Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« I My Co-Bloggers | Main | Hanson Vs. Huffington at 9PM ET »
September 14, 2005

Liveblogging Hitch v. Galloway, Plus Live Thread

It's actually beginning quite late... starting about now. Click.

It's organized by Stop the War, and they moderator is some flunky in George Galloway's Support Genocidal Tyrants Committee, so our boy Hitch is in the lions' den.

Well, maybe not lions' den. Saber-toothed peace-pussies' dean, I guess.


Damn... this might interfere with the INXS elimination show.

Sporadic live-blogging below, maybe, after I get myself some smokes and a beer.

"Those Leaflets You Were Handing Out Outside Like An Idiot" Update: Michael Totten has the text of the leaflets Hitch was distributing.

Thanks to AllahPundit.

Correction: Groundskeeper Willie said that Hitch was handing the leaflets out, but it was actually some conservative supporters, including Judith Weiss of the blog Kesher Talks.


Timekeeper will be Elizabeth Wrigley-Field. That's actually her real name. Her parents were named "Wrigley" and "Field."

Hitchens seems to have a fair number of fans in the audience, unless leftists are just being respectful, which I doubt.

Asks for a moment of silence for those murdered by the people George Galloway champions. He didn't say that, exactly, but that's the implication. Nice.

Runs through consequences of anti-war movement, had they been heeded. Slobo, Kuwait destroyed, Taliban in control of Afghanistan and still hosting Al Qaeda. Notes, pointedly, that if he had that sort of political history, he would have a little more humility about demanding answers from those who finally said enough is enough.

Notes four reasons to invade a country, says Iraq satisfied all four. Gets quite a hand after concluding this oral paragraph.

Hitch takes delight in fact that Saddam Hussein will soon be in the dock, although he says that some here (Galloway) do not.

On to Kurdistan, one of his biggest causes, of course. Smell of the chemical burns on women, mass graves rotting. Nevertheless, they forge ahead with democratization.

Another consequence: Qaddafi disarmed. Revealed that provenance of his weaponry and research was the AQ Khan (of Pakistan) nuclear network.

Notes that when Qaddafi disarmed, he went to Bush and Blair, not Kofi Annan.

Quoting Sentimental Education, says Kofi Annan so corrupt he would have gladly have paid for the pleasure of selling himself.

Lists Arab/Muslim leaders saying that this (the fall of Iraq) was the "falling of the Wall," meaning the beginning of democratization in the Arab/Muslim world.

Calls GG a "guttersnipe" for failing to testify at UN (?). Gets hooted, jeered, and shouted down. Scolds lefties: "If you only knew how you sounded when you do that, Comrades..."

Jesus, now he's laying into the wood. Says GG is always looking for next Fascist Fatherland, Soviet Union let him down, so now he goes to Syria. Discusses his business partnership with worst butchers in the world. Says GG is "far beneath your contempt."

Wow. Game on.

Okay, Galloway doesn't seem to have showed up. In his place, apparently, Hitch will be debating Groundskeeper Willie.

Groundskeeper Willie (hereafter, GKW) notes that Hitchens "bravely" stood with Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine, which hijacked many airplanes and such. Basically tying Hitch to his former (?) support of terrorists. Ah, well. Hitch can't get over his love affair with Palestinian terrorists; not news.

Praises Hitch for opposing 1991 Iraq war and embarassing Charleton Heston by asking him to name 4 countries Iraq borders.

Notes that when Hitch opposed 1991 war, you could still smell the chemical burns in Kurdistan.

Big laugh-line (?): "What you are witnessing is the first metamorphasis of a butterfly into a slug." What a slug leaves behind is a trail of slime.

Incidentally, GKW, slugs don't transform into butterflies. Slugs transform into bigger slugs. They're entirely different fucking species, nitwit.

Calls Hitch's works "Goebellian."

Invokes Cindy Sheehan. What a shock.

Says his biggest hero is Charles James Fox, barred from Parliament for supporting American Revolution and French Revolution. Makes joke that one day revolutionary America would be ruled by "religious fundamentalists," like Pat Robertson.

Another shock: Such a country might not be able to pick up its dead bodies after greatest disaster (Katrina, shock) due to its incompetence and malevolence.

But Fox would have said, come what may, "I have no right to occupy them."

Compares Islamist terrorist to Irish rebels in 20's and 30's. Called a bunch of "priest-ridden, bog-trotting, Gaelic obscurantists." What the fuck this could mean I don't know, but I now have a new insult for my Irish friends.

Says Hitch wants a moment of silence for the 145 killed today, but won't mention the "100,000 massacred by Americans in Fallujah," citing the ludicrous Lancet "study."

Wishes Hitch would pick up a gun and fight. I hope Hitch suggests that he fight for HIS buddies.

He does in fact sound like fucking Hitler, by way of Groundkeeper Willie, of course. Dave was dead-on about that. His whole cadence is Hitleresque. As are his obscene distortions and praise of vicious, genocidal fascism.

Blah blah, Britain and America biggest two rogue states in the world today.

Hitch back up!

Begins apologetically... calls debate "battle of the titans." Does he read me, damnit?

Says he probably wouldn't have been invited had he NOT opposed 1991 invasion.

Says Groundskeeper Willie poses as a pacifist, but in fact supports bin Ladin, Syria, Baathist terrorists.

Notes some of the "pacifist" operations conducted by Groundskeeper Willie's buddy. Says they're not "anti-Imperialist," as they expressly seek a restoration of a lost empire, the Caliphate. Calls GKW repugnant.

Among people killed by these "heroic operations," some of them run out of Syria by GKW's new pal, was Casey Sheehan.

Is it not disgusting to curry favor with Assad, who killed Casey Sheehan, and then come to America and prey upon the emotions of her mother?

Damn, phone call. Briefly, noted that lefties there fancied themselves revolutionaries, plainly evident by the "zoo noises" they make, and mentioned something about them masturbating. Wish I'd not missed that.

Okay, now Galloway again. Makes an issue of Hitchens' branding of the idiotic Lancet "100,000 killed" number as a "crazed fabrication," to which Hitch says "Politicized fabrication." "You said CRAZED," GKW says.

"Both," Hitchens says dryly.

Vile. Justifies terrorism by invoking Battle of Algiers. When asked why they used baby-carriages filled with bombs to kill people in public squares, the Algerian terrorists said "When the french give us some of their helicopters, we'll give them some of our baby carriages."

Makes absurd point that only a leftist would think clever that many American weapons systems are named after Indians or their weapons, the same people we exterminated as we settled this country.

Terrorists are only in Iraq because of America. Al Qaeda only began because of Afghanistan.

Says Hitchens' policy has created "10,000 new bin Ladins." "Sorry about that," Hitchens snarks. "Didn't mean to do it."

I think a better line woudl have been: "10,000 and ONE, George."

Oddly, seems to want an end to propping up dictators... and yet supports Assad & Co.

Hitch up. More snark. Galloway, in an impassioned bit of lefty/Jihadist rhetoric, ended round 2 by saying he wants to appeal "to your head."

"Oh, that was intended to appeal to my cerebellum, was it?" Chris wants to know.

Goes back to GKW's statement that those buildings "just didn't come out of the blue sky" -- there was a provocation. Notes "you picked the wrong city to say that in, and perhaps the wrong month." More zoo noises from the masturbaters.

Seems strange to say the Bush Administration supports Assad, given you just came from his podium. Especially as Bush helped achieve partial regaining of Lebanese independence.

Odd to say of these "al qaeda chaps" that they wouldn't hurt us if only we wouldn't be "so mean to them."

"It's all your fault because you made them mean" is masochism, but it is offered by sadists.

Accuses Galloway of personally meeting with Tariq Aziz to discuss oil-for-food vouchers payoffs.

GKW says it's a complete lie, like the other lies on the leaflets you were handing out "like an idiot."

No one ever discussed oil allocations with me.

"Do you want me to discuss the dictatorships YOU'RE supporting?"

Hitch: "Yes, go ahead."

GKW stumped a bit, but then says Hitch supports Saudi Arabia.

Says that "Real democracy" in Lebanon would result in leader of hezbollah being president, but he can't be, so it's not real democracy.

I'm going to say something that's kinda nasty: The world will not be a lesser place with this man's absence. Read between the lines.


Q: How do you respond to COlin Powell's statement that his UN testimony was a stain on his record?

Hitchens: I don't give a damn. I don't care about what the man says. Never did. He's been the most overrated public figure in America and now he wants to be the most overrated figure in the world.

Q: Did Saddam commit any crimes?

GKW: Yes, but only because he was best friends with Donald Rumsfeld.

Uses word "Goebellian" once again.

I think Hitch might ultimately fucking hit him. I do.

Galloway claims he was "denounced" for demonstrating against Saddam when Saddam had a profitable relationship with Britian.

Hitch responds that he knows the woman in charge of the relevant demonstrating group, and she has no memory of Galloway being there. But take him at his word (nah!) -- then that means that it's all the more disgusting that he met with Tariq Aziz with full knowledge of the Baathists' crimes.

And then, once again, he goes on to saying that Hitchens opposed the 1991 war.

GKW says that sometimes you have to choose between evil and worse evil, and that's what Hitch did in 1991. Says that there's "no difference" between us, except that somewhere along the road to Damascus ("Watch it," hitch snarks) you lost your way.

Says it may have been the lucrative Vanity Fair contracts that caused his 'crazed shifts' of opinion, or the whiskey.

Hitch: So I changed my mind. I guess we have to say you've been 100% consistent in your support of unmentionable thugs and dictators.

Okay, now GKW is just going into leftist cant. Halliburton, Bechtel. Do you think they'll ever leave?

Laughs at calling Al Qaeda in Iraq "foreign fighters." Which part of Iraq is General Myers from? (Funny line, though idiotic.)

Cites Juan Cole. Whoo-hoo!!! Juan Cole has a fan!!!

Hitch: I should like to thank Galloway for expressing what I suspected but feared, to wit, a full expression of support for terrorists in Iraq. (Which is precisely what he did in his last Hitleresque jag.)

Notes that most people in Iraq want democracy, or else they could simply win their "resistance" by VOTING. Says it's very eloquent of Mr. Galloway to suggest that Iraqis' freedom will only be secured when his friends, the terrorists, succeed in stopping all of these elections.

Okay, I think I'm done for now... the idiot questioner is asking about Katrina.

Lots of nonsense... Hitchens scolds the jeerers again, reminding these dipshits they're on "telly." An audible "fuck you" sounds out from the hooting baboons.

Tells those making "zoo noises" that he's on CSPAN and their efforts to drown him out will not work. "They can make me out just fine; all they hear is your baying. Or, should I say, it will take more than that to shut me up, tough-guys."

Ooooh. Frank Fuckin' Rizzo and shit, Chris!

This debate has jumped the shark as Dave said. I'm done.

Wait: One more. Both agree debate has run out of steam. But Galloways says Hitch is right, he's no pacifist, and neither is Hitchens, so perhaps they should end without any further belligerence (suggesting that it might come to blows if they continue).

"Oh don't worry about that," Hitchens coos, threateningly.

Nice.

posted by Ace at 07:32 PM
Comments



I was fortunate enough to record some of the chatter a half hour before the thing really started, and it is rather funny.

Posted by: ArrMatey on September 14, 2005 07:44 PM

I'm hoping for a Hell In A Cell match. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 07:44 PM

Don't forget, Hanson v. Huffington starts at 9pm EDT.

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 07:44 PM

Any bets on whether ol' Hanson will whip out some Catullus on Arianna's ass?

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 07:45 PM

The curse of a relatively ancient PC and a lowly dial-up connection: I can't get the audio link to work.

Any other impressions of the debate so far? Is the audio file likely to be made available online afterwards? There are better PC's at school!

Posted by: Jill on September 14, 2005 07:52 PM

Question is "Justify the war in Iraq." Hitch is talking first. Doing just fine listing the indisputables.

Well, indisputable here on *Earth*, that is.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 07:54 PM

Sound is great. Hitch is good so far and has fans.

Try 'other Jill if you have RealPlayer. The first link didn't work for me either.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 07:54 PM

I think GG is up in about 2 minutes. Nice shot at Chirac and Schroder

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 07:56 PM

That was great.

Posted by: Iblis on September 14, 2005 07:56 PM

So far, I've been able to resist spontaneous vomiting, but that's only because Hitch came on and began. After George gets on, I'm likely to be revolted again.

"Guttersnipe" - good choice of words.

Posted by: Patton on September 14, 2005 07:57 PM

I thought the time keepers parents' last names were "Wrigley" and Stadium."

Posted by: Jeff Gordon on September 14, 2005 07:58 PM

Hitch has many fans in the audience.

As for the unfans: "If you knew how you looked and sounded when you do that, comrades."

Heh heh.

Posted by: S. Weasel on September 14, 2005 07:59 PM

Am I mistaken, or did Hitchens just call Galloway "Gaddafi?"

This is awesome. And I agree, Patton, "guttersnipe" is superb.

Posted by: Nathan on September 14, 2005 07:59 PM

Hammering Galloway and his backers in the crowd. Went right at him. I like him that much more. Very direct.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 07:59 PM

Can't get the audio to load, and anyway, I'm at work and it'd be too distracting anyway.

Will there be archives for later listening?

Posted by: Alex on September 14, 2005 07:59 PM

Damn, Hitch is going right after Galloway.

Sweet.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 07:59 PM

Anyway, I wonder anyway how many redundant "anyways" I can put in one sentence, anyway.

Loose shit.

Posted by: Alex on September 14, 2005 08:00 PM

Greenskeeper Willie?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:01 PM

No, Fat Bastard?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:01 PM

Did Hitch bring some KY? Cause that's got to hurt.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:02 PM

Wow-- Galloway is attacking Charlton Heston.

WTF?!?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:03 PM

GG is using Hitch's own past words and twisting them to try to undermine him. Hitch is going to take that and bury him with it. It's a cheap trick any skille ddenater knows how to put down.

GG just took a shot at Heston. F'in scumbag.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 08:04 PM

Ahhh, Leftists are always the same.

Hypocrisy is always a crime greater than murder.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:04 PM

"The queen. The vatican. The Getty's. The Rothschilds. AND Colonel Sanders before he went heads up! Oh, I hated the Colonel with his wee BEADY eyes! and that smug look on his face, 'Oh! You're gonna buy my chicken, OHHH!"

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:04 PM

Galloway is putting THE emphasis in very STRANGE places and pausing ODDLY. Is he always like this?

Posted by: S. Weasel on September 14, 2005 08:05 PM

Spherical, yet quite pointy in parts.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:05 PM

Does GG make points or just pour out insults. I've yet to hear a shred of principle good or bad.

Posted by: Nathan on September 14, 2005 08:06 PM

Slug bug!!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:06 PM

Sheehan? Great.

WHen GG said she gave the life of her son Hitch murmured "no she didn't". Good point.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 08:07 PM

Oh, Mother Sheehan!!!! Hail Sheehan, full of grace......

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:07 PM

Jill, hit the "other" button if the windows one doesn't work. That's what worked for me.

Posted by: Lipstick on September 14, 2005 08:07 PM

Wait a sec-- Galloway, *a supporter of Saddam*, is equating his line of argument to The Founders.

??

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:08 PM

Why is this asshole in our country giving speeches?

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 08:09 PM

George Bush = Fundamentalist Muslims

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:09 PM

Wow. I'm almost waiting for Galloway to demand the Sudentenland.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:10 PM

OK, so I get that he thinks occupying the country is wrong, but I've yet to hear him say why overthrowing Saddam was wrong.

"Cheap demagoguery?" Rich...

Posted by: Nathan on September 14, 2005 08:11 PM

Oh shit. If I was there and I'm serious, I'd punch him in the face.

Zarqawi=resisting foreign occupation

???????

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:11 PM

I wonder what Michael Collins would think of being compared to Zarqawi?

Posted by: Embittered Redleg on September 14, 2005 08:12 PM

If there is such a thing as treason left in the West, Galloway is guilty of it.

I'm sorry, the man is in bed with our vilest enemies. The only question is whether he pitches, or catches.

Okay, one more question: how long would Zarqawi entertain Galloway's brogue before he sliced his head off? Over/under is 5 minutes, tops.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:12 PM

Well, whether the world may be a dangerous place is up for debate, but methinks Galloway is a wealthier man because of it.

He's definitely the REAL war profiteer.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:14 PM

You're right Dave. That's why I wonder why he is here. Would the Brits really be offended if we told him to go pound sand? I doubt it.

He just said I'm not sentient. I think I'll punch him too.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 08:14 PM

Oh shit. If I was there and I'm serious, I'd punch him in the face.

I've never punched anybody in my life, and I just had the same thought. What a screaming asshole.

Posted by: S. Weasel on September 14, 2005 08:15 PM

Dave, here's an indication of what the answer might be. (Sorry to use my own post, just quicker that way.)

Posted by: Nathan on September 14, 2005 08:15 PM

Gobsmackingly vile.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:15 PM

Don't be naive Dave, the Devil can always use a man willing to do his bidding. Zarqawi could/does use Galloway even today.

Posted by: The Apologist on September 14, 2005 08:16 PM

'Squalid trick' in reference to GKW.

GKW just agreed he is backing the terrorists. Unapologetically. Hitch is mostly ignoring the insults so far. Give it time.

Posted by: Silk on September 14, 2005 08:19 PM

Wow. I'm almost waiting for Galloway to demand the Sudentenland.

hehehe, Dave you're right, just picture a Hitler stash on him!

Posted by: Lipstick on September 14, 2005 08:19 PM

Did Hitch just use the word "brigandy"?

Man, I want to drink Scotch with this guy like you wouldn't believe.

Not in a gay way, or anything. Like a Viking.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:19 PM

DAMN! SHEEHAN SMACK DOWN LIKE YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE!

That's gonna leave a mark.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:21 PM

"Praising the murderers of Casey Sheehen"

Well played.

Posted by: Embittered Redleg on September 14, 2005 08:21 PM

Long underground twilight struggle against Dick Cheney. . . masturbating. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:24 PM

"While you're masturbating in that manner..." "Twilight struggle against Dick Cheney..." The man is a genius.

Posted by: Nathan on September 14, 2005 08:24 PM

Galloway meets Zarqawi

Beat you Allah!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on September 14, 2005 08:25 PM

Jeebers, the stream from Democracy now sucks.

Galloway can't really seem to formulate an argument - he's depending on the crowd to just yell "amen" once in awhile.

Posted by: Slublog on September 14, 2005 08:25 PM

"Both."

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:25 PM

Again, with the hypocrisy!

Better consistent and wrong than change your mind and be right.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:27 PM

Is Galloway really arguing, or just throwing red meat to the crowd?

I'm thinking the latter.

Posted by: Slublog on September 14, 2005 08:29 PM

Logical fallacy: Hitchens being wrong in the past doesn't make Galloway correct today.

BTW, no Al Qaeda in Iraq before the invasion?

That's right, Zarqawi was summering at the Galloway house, IIRC.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:29 PM

"Sorry about that."

Beautiful.

Posted by: Slublog on September 14, 2005 08:30 PM

The best thing about this debate? Galloway is on the record, in a public forum, in a place that any American listening would hear him for the loon that he is.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:31 PM

Wait, Galloway is arguing "drain the swamp" means SUPPORTING terrorists?

Ace, this guy must be one of those "differently handed" people you mentioned earlier.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:33 PM

Is this on TV or Radio anywhere?

Posted by: lauraw on September 14, 2005 08:33 PM

Holy crap, it's like watching a SEAL-trained Marine Ranger Sniper play paintball with Mickey Mouse's younger retarded brother, Pussy Mouse.

Posted by: rho on September 14, 2005 08:33 PM

HEAD! MOVE! NOW!

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:34 PM

Laura,

http://kpftx.org/

Down on the right side, click 'other'

Posted by: Rusty on September 14, 2005 08:35 PM

"You picked the wrong city to say that in. . . "

Obvious.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:36 PM

I think the debate will be rebroadcast on CSPAN over the weekend.

Posted by: Laddy on September 14, 2005 08:37 PM

Grrr..
'Too congested'

Can't get through. I'm going to try NPR.

Posted by: lauraw on September 14, 2005 08:37 PM

"This is sinister piffle."

That's a good slogan for a t-shirt.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:38 PM

"Abusers of indiscriminate explosions."

Best. Description. Of Al Qaeda. Ever.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:38 PM

S&M??

I think I might go gay for Hitchens. 'Bad' gay.

Posted by: Rusty on September 14, 2005 08:40 PM

Galloway is saying Hitch supports Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait?

Huh? Is he talking about Hitchens, or Hitch, lovable rogue played by Will Smith?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:42 PM

So, Saddam is a criminal?? But it's the US's fault. And now that the US opposes Saddam, well, let's support Saddam.

Posted by: Rusty on September 14, 2005 08:52 PM

Just FYI,

"According to the Lebanese constitution, the prime minister must be Sunni, while the president must be Christian, and the parliament speaker must be Shiite."

Religious discrimination, that.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:52 PM

Anybody remember how much longer this is supposed to last? I have to make a phone call. And take a pee. Not necessarily in that order.

Posted by: S. Weasel on September 14, 2005 08:52 PM
I'm going to say something that's kinda nasty: The world will not be a lesser place with this man's absence. Read between the lines.

Oh, don't be such a pussy. If the west was truly serious about a war on terrorism, Britain would have hanged this turd for treason ages ago. We all know it. Except for James Wolcott, of course, who considers Galloway a "hero."

Posted by: Allah on September 14, 2005 08:52 PM

Comments are back. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:53 PM

Am I the only one who doesn't feel right about rooting for Hitchens?
Okay, sure, Hitch is an effective supporter for the invasion of Iraq, but he is a loony leftist on every other issue.

I liked his ass-whooping he did on Michael Mooreon, but calling all people of religious faith "foolish" is pretty shitty. And I have to wonder why Hitch's moral rationale for the war matches my own, (of course, his is coherent), but you get my point.

The guy, Hitch, is...vile. Galloway is vile and sub-human and should be tar and feathered in Harvard Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts with Noam Chomsky. But is Hitchens worthy of our support?

Hitchens vs. Galloway in a debate. Well, I see two a-holes in an argument. One regular, but very witty, clever a-hole; and another enormous anal aperature trying to shit on each other.

Did anyone understand that visual? See, I told you I wasn't coherent.

Anyways, go Hitch! I guess.

Posted by: Bart on September 14, 2005 08:54 PM

I think the lesson for all of us here is: never debate Chuck Heston.

Nothing good can come from that.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:55 PM

The other debate's started early. But it's just Zsa Zsa now, so why bother?

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 08:55 PM

Aren't these 'fighting words'??

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.

Posted by: Rusty Shacklefod on September 14, 2005 08:55 PM

LUCRATIVE CONTRACTS? This man has some nerve.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 08:56 PM

Choosing b/t America and Iraq in 1991 is choosing between evil and more evil?

The America that acted in accordance with the international law Galloway is sucking off right now?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:57 PM

Bart, sometimes you have to choose between evil and more evil.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 08:57 PM

I love this: The reason Hitch 'betrayed the cause' is for corporte greed.

It's always about the corporations........

Posted by: Rsuty on September 14, 2005 08:58 PM

"The liberation struggle."

Yup, head-hacking is quite liberating. Clears the mind.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:58 PM

Anyone know if the Hanson-vs-Zsa Zsa debate will be saved on that site, for later listening?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 08:59 PM

Galloway thinks we *want* to stay in Iraq?

Man, I gotta sell this guy a bridge, stat. I can get me some of that Oil-for-Food money. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:01 PM

Halliburton!

Everyone take a shot.

Posted by: Embittered Redleg on September 14, 2005 09:01 PM

Agribusiness? Patented seeds?

Whoa...that's a new one, I'll grant you.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:03 PM

Galloway thinks we *want* to stay in Iraq?

I should hope so. We've kept bases in every other country we've fought wars in, unless we've been asked to leave. I thought having bases in the Middle East was a big part of the point of the exercise. It isn't?

Posted by: S. Weasel on September 14, 2005 09:03 PM

I'm out. I have a thing for Hungarian chicks....getting beat up....and I'm a big fan of the Offspring...."kick em when they're down"

Posted by: Rusty on September 14, 2005 09:03 PM

No, no George-- the Iraqi resistance are agrarian reformers.

Duh, we all know that.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:03 PM

Bart, I understand your reluctance to root for Hitch. I share it. He's been on the wrong side of liberty too often in the past.

But consider how long it takes to unlearn Marxist cant and I think you'll be more forgiving. Hitch has been wandering the backwoods of International Socialism for decades. He's beginning to see the light. Give him time. Someday, when he gets over his own brilliance, he may even have the humility to acknowledge possible divinity outside his own ego.

In other words, allies are people who fight alongside you, not people who's philosophy you endorse.

Posted by: The Apologist on September 14, 2005 09:04 PM

Juan Cole gets dragged into this...maybe he'll blame it all on Steven Vincent and his widow.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:05 PM

I ain't gonna lie to you, I'm still pissed off that George invoked Chuck Fox.

The gall of that "man."

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:05 PM

I'm listening to the Hitch-Galloway debate on Windows Media Player, and the VDH-Zsa Zsa debate on Real Player.

It's the greatest mash-up ever.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:08 PM

Hey, what country is Zarqawi from?

A: Iraq?
B: Jordan?

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:08 PM

Wait, it was my understanding there would be no math.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:09 PM

BTW, I'm listening through www.live365.com and it comes through clearly, no glitch.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:11 PM

'shame on the people who call [zarqawi's terrorists] a liberation movement'

Posted by: David Ross on September 14, 2005 09:12 PM

Whoa--I'm hearing some flutter and missing some words here. Did it just (6:13) cut out for you guys?

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:14 PM

Galloway is such a cheap shot artist. "What about barbara bush!" Beam me the fuck out of here, Scotty...

Posted by: David Ross on September 14, 2005 09:15 PM

....and you end up an apologist for Saddam, Lord Hoo Haw.


Yeah, attack Barbara Bush loud and clear. That will play real well here.

Posted by: See-Dubya on September 14, 2005 09:16 PM

What the hell is this? GKW and Anne vs. Hitchens?

Why are they talking about Katrina? Fucking hurricanes.

Posted by: rho on September 14, 2005 09:16 PM

Why the eff are two Brits are debating about Katrina?

This debate has jumped the shark.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:17 PM


This debate has jumped the shark.


Ted McGinley brought in as as moderator...

Posted by: Embittered Redleg on September 14, 2005 09:19 PM

Hey, I'm waiting for the Class 4 hurricane to hit the British Isles.

Then we'll see how George Galloway reacts.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:20 PM

Uh oh, classical smackdown.

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 09:20 PM

Wrong thread.

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 09:20 PM

Hitchens seems to spend an inordinate amount of time shushing the peanut gallery.

Posted by: Alex_fs on September 14, 2005 09:21 PM

George Galloway is attacking Barbara Bush.

What does he do for an encore? Drown puppies?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:22 PM

Almost done. Chris is being asked, as he has changed his views, 'is the media friendlier to you?'

Chris: after some hemming and hawing, he says 'it's a bit of a waste of a question'. Galloway [accurately] calls it a waste of an answer.

Both agree the debate has run out of steam

Posted by: David Ross on September 14, 2005 09:23 PM

A courtier of sadists.

Nice putdown.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:25 PM

Galloway is claiming to side with the "mainstream", against the far right wing neo-cons.

Posted by: David Ross on September 14, 2005 09:26 PM

Thanks for the coverage of this event. Just curious -- Is this "Elizabeth Wrigley-Field" a CUB reporter? LOL

Posted by: Ron on September 14, 2005 09:30 PM

"The number of people who hate us has been increased."

No thanks to you, George.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on September 14, 2005 09:32 PM

The commentators compare Hitch's supporters to "Yankee fans." How DARE they?

Posted by: Embittered Redleg on September 14, 2005 09:36 PM

Summary:

Hitchens lists reasons and logic for why supporting the Iraq war is not stupid.

Galloway reads talking points from MoveOn.org (Halliburton!).

The only part I regret is how Hitch failed to thrown GKW's comment about "the Iraqi people choosing their government", as if the Iraqis had a chance to choose anything under Saddam. Had Galloway gotten his way, the Iraqis would be choosing between cake or death ("but we're all out of cake").

Posted by: rho on September 14, 2005 09:42 PM

Loose shit, Ace, it's 'Kesher Talk'. And you should update the URL.

I'm quite disappointed they chose to demagogue perhaps the only sane thing he's ever said though. (Pro-tubist.)

Posted by: someone on September 14, 2005 10:25 PM

i am F'N pulling my hair out looking for a re-stream or something, anyone got anything???

Posted by: trey on September 14, 2005 10:39 PM

9/11 was a ligitimite and porportional response to rascism!

Posted by: Um Yeah on September 14, 2005 10:45 PM

I was there and the lefties in the audience were scary. It was like an extended version of the two minute hate from 1984. It will be interesting to see how this comes across on TV but Hitch wisely played to the cameras while Galloway played to his amen corner in the peanut gallery. The first time Galloway mentioned 'neocons" I turned to my husband and said, "When's he going to blame the Joooos?" and got dirty looks from the skanks in the row ahead of me. But sure enough, within five minutes he hit those points and they applauded.

Posted by: vivi on September 14, 2005 11:20 PM

[shrug] Galloway is the UK's version of Cynthia McKinney. No one of consequence takes him seriously. Surprised Hitchens felt a need to "debate" him - its not like Galloway is known for intellectual honesty or anything.

Posted by: Fen on September 14, 2005 11:31 PM

There are stream archives available at the site from which you could hear it live. Just wait 'til I'm done downloading them, before you start please...

Posted by: Anachronda on September 15, 2005 12:12 AM

Ok, I grabbed 'em all. Knock yerselves out.

Anyone know where there's an archive of the VDH/Huffington debate?

Posted by: Anachronda on September 15, 2005 12:19 AM

Looks like it's going to be on CSPAN2's BookTV this weekend.

Posted by: Anachronda on September 15, 2005 12:33 AM

Fen: what a load of crap; so many Brits who should've known better were crowing about how Galloway really showed up the Senate committee, blah blah.

Even -- no, especially -- among the Tories. They despise him, but hate us more.

Posted by: someone on September 15, 2005 12:40 AM

"Makes absurd point that only a leftist would think clever that many American weapons systems are named after Indians or their weapons, the same people we exterminated as we settled this country. "

I always thought the point of those name borrowings was respect: these were our most formidable foes, who fought us for the longest and hardest fight of our national life? I mean, the Athapascan peoples & assorted nations were badASS.

Maybe that's just me.

Posted by: Knemon on September 15, 2005 01:07 AM

The debat starts about 36 minutes into the "b" file.

Posted by: Anachronda on September 15, 2005 01:07 AM

OK, looks like they wound back to the beginning of the debate for the "c" file, so you don't need the "a" and "b" files.

It also sounds like they will be playing it on the Democracy Now! program tomorrow, which is available on LinkTV (although while I'm at work, so I'll have to wait for BookTV on the weekend if I want to see the video).

Posted by: Anachronda on September 15, 2005 01:33 AM

I was there and I agree with vivi: the lefties were scary. I can't believe I'm in New York dumping on the Israelis and praising the head-choppers are applause lines.

I lustily booed when Galloway suggested that we had 9-11 coming because of our policies, blah, blah, blah...

Hitchens pointed out this was the wrong city to say that in.

Posted by: caspera on September 15, 2005 01:44 AM

what a load of crap; so many Brits who should've known better were crowing about how Galloway really showed up the Senate committee,


Note my disqualifier: No one of consequence...

Posted by: Fen on September 15, 2005 02:25 AM

"Groundskeeper Willie said that Hitch was handing the leaflets out, but it was actually some conservative supporters, including Judith Weiss of the blog Kesher Talks."

No, Hitch was too. Me and Mary and Hitch and David and some unidentified Hitch minions.

Posted by: Yehudit on September 16, 2005 03:26 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD commiserate about the NYC primaries and whether the contagion will spread, J.D. Vance is becoming a cypher, Texas Antifa gets a wake-up call, and more!
Trump will present the trophy for the World Cup, and lunatic cultists will not be happy
pRiDe Month's shameful record so far
Department of Energy Announces American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans
$17.5B is a good start. Now add two zeroes to that number! [CBD]
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Recent Comments
gKWVE: "So, at what point in this accelerationist scenario ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "We will never know what the people of CA think or ..."

Community Notes: "229> Shilling for the worst possible tax • ..."

Axeman: "I've never heard this explanation. Were Marx and E ..."

Lizzy: "James Talerico says Christianity is the most viole ..."

Aetius451AD work phone : "Hmmm, ace live blogging Citizen Vigilante! Have ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory: "But these downwardly mobile whites? How far down d ..."

Axeman: "How did Peaceful Islam, starting from Arabia, end ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "274 Blacks will just stay home and stop engaging ..."

Blonde Morticia: " Blacks will just stay home and stop engaging wit ..."

Reforger: "259 Some y’all already started drinking, did ..."

elon musk, noted boring co. founder: "266 [i]Boring is good.[/i] indeed. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives