| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
MORNING RANT: The Iran Situation and Trump’s MOU – What Constitutes “Finishing the Job” After the Lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan?
Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 6/ 22 /26 Daily Tech News 22 June 2026 Sunday Overnight Open Thread - June 21, 2026 [Doof] Gun Thread: Post NoVAMoMe Discussion and Analysis Edition! Food Thread: Fish Eggs, Fish Eggs, Roly-Poly Fish Eggs! First World Problems... Another mRNA Vaccine? Really? Sunday Morning Book Thread 6-21-2026 [Sabrina Chase] Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Charles Murray On Differences In Male and Female (Group) IQ |
Main
| Camera Phone Captures Subway Flasher »
August 28, 2005
Norm Minetta Proposes Higher Fuel Efficiency Standards For Light Trucks and SUV'sAnathema to many, and I'm sure not a fan of Minetta. But... Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta proposed imaginative fuel efficiency standards for new SUVs, vans and pickups. This scheme would divide light trucks into a half-dozen categories based on size, not weight. I don't know... given the situation we're in, is it horrible for the government to coerce auto manufacturers into engineering these large vehicles to get slightly better mileage? It's not impossible, and it's not always necessary to simply lighten the vehicle up and replace life-saving steel with weaker aluminum alloys: The editorial cites a report "from President Bush's own Environmental Protection Agency" supposedly proving "America's cars and trucks are significantly less efficient, on average, than they were in the late 1980s, and that leaps in technology have been used to make vehicles more powerful but not more fuel efficient." That can be interpreted two different ways. One, we don't need additional government coercion, because manufacturers already have an economic incentive to produce higher-efficiency vehicles. Or, two, we can engineer cars to get slightly better mileage without reducing weight and safety, and if the government can act as a spur to give engineers additional motivation to do so, perhaps we should. I don't know. As I've said before, yes, I'm generally against government regulation, but there's a tragedy-of-the-commons sort of effect here that keeps increasing our dependency on oil controlled by terrorist-friendly or terrorist-sponsoring nations. What if SUV's shed about 400 pounds, bringing them closer to the 1998 average, but kept the 2005 engineering making them more fuel efficient? A two-ton road yacht is still nothing to sneeze at. And perhaps they could get 20 or 21 mpg. Not a huge increase, but not a trivial one either. Government coercion in technological matters has benefits. (I know it also has drawbacks.) But a forced emphasis on improving a technology will, almost invariably, make that technology more advanced and also cheaper, even if it is simply due to wider utilization (the more people who have it, the cheaper per-unit cost of research and development and manufacturing costs). Just sayin'. posted by Ace at 11:54 AM
CommentsHere's an idea: Let all the Hollywood big mouths and other leftys set an example by getting rid of the limos, towncars, their suvs, their private jets, and actually drive the prius they have stored in the garage? Oh, and this includes Kerry who has how many suvs? Seven? Nine? I forgot. Or is it nine houses? How about getting rid of these extra houses? And why have them so large. Kerry and his wife are only two people but they have how many mansions? What a fucking waste of energy. Posted by: on August 28, 2005 11:59 AM
All that's true, but let's face it, if only the super-rich could afford these road yachts, it wouldn't have much of an impact on fuel use. The fact is that more efficient manufacturing and increased prosperity has made them available to the middle class, and even the lower middle class. Which is, in itself, a good thing. (Something the ultrarich resent, because it's increasingly difficult for them to demonstrate their superior status with vehicle purchases.) But all those gas-guzzling highway behemoths have a nontrivial effect on fuel consumption. Posted by: ace on August 28, 2005 12:03 PM
Tell me about it. Almost everyone on my street has an suv. In fact, families have two suvs -- mom's and dad's. I still what to see the Hollywood crowd/Leftist politicians put their money where their mouth is. I want an active campaign to shame them. Confront them and catch them in lies. I do get a kick out of Streisand driving a little eco-car to her private hanger to fly off in her private jet. Arianna is another one. Lecturing us about tax cuts when she pays no taxes and fuel consumption when there are rolling blackouts and she has a $7 million dollar mansion with central air. Babs, the environmentalist, couldn't unload her old mansion because it was priced too high and took too much money to keep up ($30k amonth for water). She gives it to a state environmental agency (another bunch of crooks) and writes off the inflated price as a charitable donation. Anyway, a bit tangential to your point, so I'll stop now. Posted by: on August 28, 2005 12:33 PM
Congress has already done something about those behemoth SUVs. Congress closed the small truck loophole in the tax code that allowed people to deduct the tax on certain sized trucks (the really big ones). I think you will see that the sales of Hummers, Escalades, and Porche Cayennes will plummet as the public goes back to the good ole' family sedan. Posted by: Brass on August 28, 2005 12:53 PM
If I have to buy an 8500 lb. SUV, then that's what I'll do. Sod off, swampy. Posted by: right on August 28, 2005 03:50 PM
Yo Phinn -- you're needed over here to straighten Ace out again. Posted by: Michael on August 28, 2005 04:34 PM
Ace, you have a point. Perhaps government intervention into blogs would be good too. Get rid of all the loose shit that goes on around here. Just sayin'. Posted by: Kingslasher on August 29, 2005 08:01 AM
Ace; I'm currently driving a GMC safari conversion. (You may know it in it's Chvy Astro form). This was and remains, to my mind, the king of the Mini-vans... not really a mini. Has 5000lb towcap. A full description and pics can be found at http://www.cardomain.com/ride/713892 I'm getting the 21 you spec. But the problem here for MPG is one of weight, and available power to do the job it's designed to do. Look, the very reason Americans are buying trucks instead of cars is because of the milage restrictions placed on cars. They've gotten to the point where you need a shoehorn to get in the stupid things, and when you do, you stand no chance whatever in any kind of accident. Government regulation caused this problem... it's not a solution. You can't use the power of government to change the laws of physics. CAFE is a bad idea. Posted by: Bithead on August 29, 2005 08:42 AM
Just as I flush my 1.6 gallon toilet two or three times to rid my bathroom of loose sh*t, so shall I drive my Prius to the ends of the earth 'cause it gets such great gas mileage. As marginal costs fall, so shall the demand for that product rise, thus saith the Lord Adam Smith. Posted by: Tongueboy on August 29, 2005 09:37 AM
Ace, Single Malt Pundit does a good job explaining today why this isn't a very good idea. Posted by: Tony B on August 30, 2005 11:50 AM
Sorry forgot the address. Posted by: on August 30, 2005 11:52 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Paul Sperry
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals. The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite. Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
English racist garbage-person who's on the wrong side of history warns the corrupt Regime that the people cannot take much more of this -- and won't take much more of this
The English have rebelled before.
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
Odd 90s-Retro Susan Collins ad against the Nazi Hotchkiss "hobby farmer"
I like the throwback AOL style of the ad.
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD] Recent Comments
Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon:
"Remember, we were told that they would instantly g ..."
naturalfake: "[i]The Reluctant Lunch - a new novel by Thomas Pyn ..." Maryjane Cuthbertson-Klein from Groton, CT: "I believe very strongly that the ruling class shou ..." Tom Servo: "115 Look at what is happening in South America. Ta ..." Heroq: "Does anyone believe Iran will abide by anything it ..." TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "Anyone know how much money Iran has received since ..." Cow Demon: "So YOU'RE the guy siphoning gas out of my car!? P ..." polynikes: "I don't listen to opinions coming from people who ..." Archimedes: "[i]117 MOU or ultimate agreement doesn't matter. I ..." TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "121 I believe very strongly that the ruling class ..." DanMan: "what polynikes said...gas is close to $3 sw of Hou ..." JackStraw: ">>Does anyone believe Iran will abide by anything ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|