Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« R2, Do You Is Fucking? | Main | On "Peak Oil" »
August 22, 2005

Pardon The Downtime

Not lazy, as usual, but the whole system has been glitchy today. I wasn't able to get the posting window up for two hours.

Which brings me to a Frequently Asked Question-- Have I been banned?

The answer is almost always no. Sometimes there are glitches in the software that prevent people from posting. The site is frequently attacked by trackback and comment spam, and this slows things down, and sometimes causes some features to go offline as Pixy Misa tries to thwart the attack.

I've only banned two or three people, always for good reason (multiple libel after multiple warnings, etc.). I just don't ban too many people. Unless you've said something flagrantly objectionable, racist, or libelous, I haven't banned you. Your inablity to comment is a temporary thing caused by software problems, not my banning you.

And, btw, I've always announced bannings, I think. At least in the comments after the offensive comment. I wouldn't just ban someone without saying why.


posted by Ace at 03:51 PM
Comments



Have Pixy Misa look into this program.

It works beautifully and stops a few hundred spam trackbacks and comments a day on my site.

Posted by: Slublog on August 22, 2005 03:54 PM

So, if I called you a fucking talentless hack butt-pirate Dago who steals all his material from his commenters, would that get me banned?

Just curious.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

P.S. I have no idea if you're Italian, but given how much of a little whiny bitchy you are, I figured you for a greasy wop, with you wifebeater and slicked-back hair.

Then again, you could be a bloody drunken Mick, too. You see where I'm going with this? Do you?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 22, 2005 04:08 PM

Geez, Dave. Comments like that, people are going to figure you're a beer-swilling, 'shrinkage' plagued Kraut with nothing but vitriol for those of other races and plans for world domination.

Either that, or you're one of those pasty-faced Limeys with the boring food and the funny accents.

Posted by: Slublog on August 22, 2005 04:13 PM

Hey, I take umbrage at that remark. For the record, I'm a highly-intelligent, militarily-competent Polish-American.

*NOBODY* ever makes fun of the Poles.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 22, 2005 04:16 PM

Hi. I’m Sherman Dinwiddie Higgenbotham, Monkey Lincoln’s attorney. My client, Monkey Lincoln, informs me he has had little success in posting today, and thinks he might have been unjustly banned.

Actually, what he said to me was, "Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, ooh ooh ooh AAAAH AAAAH AAAAH!!!” Then he began throwing feces at me. But the gist of it was, he feels he’s being unjustly singled out for lots of “FORBIDDEN” and “INTERNAL SERVER ERROR” messages.

You must cease and desist in your efforts to silence my client, Monkey Lincoln.

We patiently await your response.

Thank you,

Sherman Dinwiddie Higganbotham

Posted by: Sherman Dinwiddie Higganbotham on August 22, 2005 04:23 PM

Which brings me to a Frequently Asked Question-- Have I been banned?

Isn't that a bit narcisstic of the person asking the question?

Anyway, it's akin to the dreaded question, "Are you mad at me?" No! Now, shut the fuck up!

Posted by: on August 22, 2005 04:43 PM

"...I figured you for a greasy wop, with you wifebeater and slicked-back hair."

Dave - when discussing Italians, especially of the NYC/NJ/Philly variety, guinea-tee is the preferred usage ;-)

Posted by: steve_in_hb on August 22, 2005 05:01 PM

So, if I called you a fucking talentless hack butt-pirate Dago who steals all his material from...

Ummm, I resemble that remark!

Posted by: Tony on August 22, 2005 05:02 PM

I would very much appreciate more precision in your banning decisions. How are we to know how to get banned? I've always wanted to be banned from some site, but others always get there first.

Posted by: john on August 22, 2005 05:49 PM

So, if I called you a fucking talentless hack butt-pirate Dago who steals all his material from...


No, Dave, that comment can't get you banned for libel. Legally, libelous statements, no matter how offensive, must be false.

(And you cleverly protected yourself from liability if Ace is not Italian.)

Now, Ace, if were to call Dave a sychophantic Polack nancy boy bachelor who can't get a girlfriend because the chicks are turned of by that shitty crown molding in his bathroom before they even get sick of his personality -- would that get me banned?

Posted by: Michael on August 22, 2005 06:17 PM

No, Ace, you can't ban Michael. If he can't spend time here, Mrs. Michael will have no time to boink the pool boy!

Posted by: Lipstick on August 22, 2005 06:30 PM

who can't get a girlfriend because the chicks are turned of by that shitty crown molding in his bathroom

I think I might actually ban Michael, just because of how fucking lame that put-down was.

Wow. Making fun of the crown molding in his bathroom.

As Indiana Jones would say, "Now you're getting nasty."

What are you, some kind of homo or somethin'?

Posted by: ace on August 22, 2005 06:47 PM

john,

If you want to get banned this is the place for you. All you have to do is leave a comment along the lines of "Bill, I think you should apologize..." and ZAP!, you're outta there!

Lipstick,

lol!

Posted by: BrewFan on August 22, 2005 06:54 PM

ace, wasn't Dave doing the carpentry?

If so, attacking a man's woodworking skills is simply beyond the pale. I am heartsick at such gob-smacking vile-ness.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 22, 2005 07:26 PM

ace, wasn't Dave doing the carpentry?

Yes, he was. And he was whining about his difficulties using a miter box, hence my flame truly was gob-smackingly vile and not lame.

Posted by: Michael on August 22, 2005 07:36 PM

In fact, my money says Dave at Garfield Ridge is curled up in a fetal position on his newly tiled bathroom floor, sobbing uncontrollably.

Posted by: Michael on August 22, 2005 07:39 PM

Brewfan:

I waited a couple of weeks for Bill to calm down and then I actually sent him a polite email in which I requested readmission on condition that I never try to be funny on his site again. Never heard from him.

Posted by: Michael on August 22, 2005 07:43 PM

Holy shit, Michael, you got banned there too? I thought I had ban-inducing skills. Obviously not.

Posted by: Dogstar on August 22, 2005 08:08 PM

If I haven't been banned, than why can't I comment here any more?

Posted by: John from WuzzaDem on August 22, 2005 08:46 PM

Is it just because I can't spell then?

(Thought I'd save Michael the trouble)

Posted by: John from WuzzaDem on August 22, 2005 08:48 PM

"Never heard from him"

There is no doubt in my mind you're better off as a result.

Posted by: BrewFan on August 22, 2005 08:55 PM

You ever get bored enough that you go to Ace's sitemeter, look at the world map, and keep hitting refresh to see where his hits are coming from. Like, in the last minute he's gotten pinged from (roughly) San Diego, Boston, and Silicon Valley.

Posted by: Michael on August 22, 2005 09:26 PM

Michael, that's pretty frickin' bored.

Posted by: Slublog on August 22, 2005 09:51 PM

ROFL Sherman!

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 22, 2005 09:54 PM

Slublog - thanks, but SpamLookup only works for MT 3.1 (and later) and we're stuck on MT 2.6 for the moment. I'm working on various ways of solving the problem, up to and including tactical nuclear strikes on the spammers.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on August 23, 2005 04:46 AM

Nice blog.I like this.
Paul
http://www.sify.com

Posted by: paul on August 23, 2005 05:07 AM

BrewFan: And for goodness sakes, don't even think about asking him to "wake up"....he reportedly banned his alarm clock one morning.

Posted by: Old Coot on August 23, 2005 10:57 AM

Slublog - thanks, but SpamLookup only works for MT 3.1 (and later) and we're stuck on MT 2.6 for the moment. I'm working on various ways of solving the problem, up to and including tactical nuclear strikes on the spammers.

That's too bad. Tactical nukes are a completely workable option, as well.

Posted by: Slublog on August 23, 2005 11:00 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
Recent Comments
[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "The link to your favorite Cafe story doesn't go wh ..."

Anon Y. Mous: ">>>Programmers designed the worst-possible volume ..."

Aliassmithsmith: "The 30.06 bullet recovered from the beloved Chsyl ..."

Paolo: "[i]Save some ladies for the rest of us. Posted by ..."

eleven: "Are there any big blonde beavers? ..."

Anon Y. Mous: ">>>Town builds statue to commemorate day that citi ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "dogs! ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "nood! ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "216 How come nobody ever looks for aliens in the o ..."

eleven: "BTW...I can almost guarantee you the China laser t ..."

Primus : "More big brown beavers are always welcome! ..."

Oldcat: "The Lincoln Assassins were all hung from the same ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives