Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Be nice to the help... | Main | Studt: Pornographj Cam Makr You Blind »
August 18, 2005

More Conservative Movies

Again from Football Fans For Truth.


posted by Ace at 03:06 PM
Comments



It's been a long time since I saw it, and maybe my memory is off, but maybe Ulee's Gold would count as a conservative film?

Posted by: SJKevin on August 18, 2005 03:39 PM

I could think of 20 more, nearly everything by Peckinpah.

More recently, Shaun of the Dead--being a hippie slacker makes you little more than a zombie, eventually you have to grow up and become an adult. Plus, the holy grail of the film is a lever-action Winchester, a very potent symbol of masculinity and the American West.

Posted by: Tom on August 18, 2005 04:08 PM

I'm gonna go with the movie George Will called the most conservative film in recent years-- Sam Raimi's A Simple Plan.

Family before money, crime never pays, and there is no such thing as an innocent lie. Plus, great performances to boot.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 18, 2005 04:27 PM

I will nominate what the liberals thought was a film about conservatives 'Falling Down' with Michael Douglas as the angry, white male.

Posted by: Dman on August 18, 2005 04:31 PM

How about Zulu? The 1970's film starred Michael Cain and I believe was set in the 1800s or early 1900s, during British colonial rule. The premise had to do with the British building a railroad, I think, through Zulu country. The Zulu attacked repeatedly and lost thousands of their fighters, and hundreds ("testing" the British flanks for weaknesses). In the end the Zulu king and his army saluted the determined courage of the Brits in song.

Posted by: ChrisG on August 18, 2005 05:00 PM

You gotta nominate Death Wish--it portrays a liberal pantywaist realizing that he can't rely on government to protect his family. Besides--when he died, the liberal media trashed Charles Bronson's legacy mostly because they could not get over the fact that he starred in a vigilante movie (or 4). If it ticks off the liberals, it's gotta be worth something...

Posted by: Kevin on August 18, 2005 05:25 PM

Heck--one reviewer even called the Death Wish films "conservative vigilante revenge fantasies".

Yeah?

Posted by: Kevin on August 18, 2005 05:28 PM

Tears of the Sun. A group of military tough guys who help Christian Africans get away from genocidal Muslim Africans. And the guys don't get them out by pussy "negotiations" or with the help of Amnesty International or any of that crap. They fight their way out. Bruce Willis (a Republican) is a particularly ruthless hard case who shows a pampered white do-gooder doctor that compassion doesn't count for shit in a war zone. Great scene where one SEAL guts a rapist out of sheer rage.

Posted by: UGAdawg on August 18, 2005 06:10 PM

Red Dawn

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 06:14 PM

The Incredibles

Gladiator

Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2

Finding Nemo - can you think of any other Disney film that has the father as a protagonist?

Posted by: Slublog on August 18, 2005 06:23 PM

I'm with Dave at GR on A Simple Plan.
BB Thornton gives an amazing performance as the simple-minded brother, with a jaw-dropping scene toward the end.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 07:21 PM

That last post was me...
After coming back from Preview it forgot who I was.

Posted by: Man of Substance on August 18, 2005 07:22 PM

Outside Providence

Posted by: SJKevin on August 18, 2005 07:31 PM

Ahhh, I'm not so sure about Finding Nemo. There was not a single good thing about humans in the movie. Man served as both villain and source of all evil/wrong in the world. Even sharks were portrayed as not being able to help themselves.

I couldn't sit through the whole thing.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 07:32 PM

Er... Finding Nemo had nothing to do with the "villainy" of humans, unless you are seriously putting forth the idea that the filmmakers were campaigning against the keeping of fish as pets. I am guessing you either have issues with small girls with braces or Australian dentists, or both.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 18, 2005 08:51 PM

This is off the top of my head and keep in mind I saw PART of the movie years ago, but if I recall correctly the dangerous places the little fishies passed through were more often than not man-made. An abandoned WWII minefield (do these even exist?), sunken ships, the harbor, the death tank (also known as the aquarium). And yes, the humans were all fish-killers. Was there a simpathetic human in the movie? No. Was there a single example of some thing humanity has done that was presented as good or helpful? No.

As I said before, from watching this movie it appears that humans are just killers and polluters. What message do children take away from this movie when they see the poor man-made struggles of our friends from the sea?

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 09:18 PM

Fast Times at Ridgemont High

By and large, the fun times are followed by actual consequences, a reasonable authority figure gets his due (Mr. Hand), and as Josh McDowell might say, True Love Waits.

Posted by: OCBill on August 19, 2005 12:13 AM

The most conservative movie I have ever seen is "Sometimes a Great Notion," also called "Never Give An Inch," which is really odd because it was directed by/stars Lefty Paul Newman and Henry Fonda plays the dad. Plot: a family of loggers go against the striking union and continue to work despite the obstacles and strong arm tactics the union puts them through. It was made in '71 and there are some pretty heart-wrenching moments because of the danger the Indie loggers have to face using substandard equipment. It's a really good movie I hadn't thought about in years, but this topic brought it immediately to mind.

This film portrays unions as Evil, family as the only thing you can rely on, and it shows how sometimes your principles are worth dying for. Am I the only one who's seen it?

Other recent conservative films:

We Were Soldiers
Team America: World Police
Saving Private Ryan

And there are a lot of conservative SF films:
Starship Troopers (it sucked but it had its ideals)
The Running Man
Rollerball (the original)
Fahrenheit 451
Seconds
A Clockwork Orange (in its own twisted way)
Equilibrium
Gattaca

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 12:15 AM

The original Rollerball still gets me all misty. James Caan was awesome as Jonathon.

Posted by: Geoff on August 19, 2005 12:22 AM

Sometimes a Great Notion has one of the most difficult death scenes ever; it's really hard to watch. But Ken Kesey and Paul Newman aren't high on the list of people who would have engrained conservative values. The conflict at the heart of Keseys' book is Eastern intellectualism vs. Western individualism, not liberal vs. conservativism. It's been a while since I've seen the movie, but I don't think the union folks are evil--they're just the dolts in the way.

Still, I agree that the film goes out of its way to avoid the usual liberal pap. As another example, the third brother is an evangelical Christian in a very positive portrayal.

It's not a perfect film, but supposedly the book was unfilmable and Newman got a lot of props for trying. Jaeckel (the evangelical brother) got an Oscar nomination, too.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 02:10 AM

Wait. Fahrenheit 451 is conservative? On what planet? Bookburning is a traditional liberal boogeyman. You can--and I certainly do--argue that liberals are well down the path of banning thought these days, particularly in higher ed. But that only evens things out.

Saving Private Ryan and Team America are largely apolitical, with next to no subtext. We Were Soldiers, yes, but it's a god awful piece of garbage on repeat viewing. There's a much better movie in that story somewhere.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 02:18 AM

Ya know maybe I'm crazy (no I'm a little tipsy) but I loved Nicholson's " you can't handle the truth!" speech at the end of A Few Good Men.

As a budding conservative it had the oppposite effect than intended. Memory may fail but I agreed with most of what he was saying - ok here it is

" Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand at post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to."

I know I was meant to be scandalized but I agreed then and now. Gosh those liberals are prescient!

Posted by: rakmjn1 on August 19, 2005 03:07 AM

Geoff, I have "Rollerball" on DVD. It's one of my favorites.

And Cal, I'm glad I'm not the only one who'd seen that movie, and while we may disagree in part, that death scene was possibly the biggest tear jerker ever.

And YES, "Fahrenheit 451" is extremely conservative, which is why Mel Gibson tinkered with remaking it for a while. (Ray Bradbury himself is a conservative.) The world in 451 is controlled by the government on both the economic and social levels, drug abuse is common, interactive television is there to provide a "family" for you and give you the illusion of importance, and any information that might spur individual thought and shake up the utopia is destroyed. That's liberalism in its pure state. People automatically connect the book burning with fascism because of the Nazis, but that wasn't the point Bradbury was attempting to get across. Everybody's equal, everybody's important, everything is perfect, and all it costs you is your individuality.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 03:40 AM

I liked Nicholsons's speech too, but that movie was made by two of the biggest, most annoying liberals in Hollywood: Rob Reiner and That Douchebag from The West Wing. Well acted and paced, but sanctimonious and gooey. The Marine Corps was made to look like a collection of martial fanatics brainwashed into violent obedience. It rarely occurs to Hollywood that there are some remarkably big brains in the military, and that tough decisions are sometimes made out of necessity, not malevolence.

Posted by: UGAdawg on August 19, 2005 09:46 AM

I've always agreed 100% with the sentiment of Nicholson's speech, which bothers me a bit since he was defending the indefensible. Don't get me wrong, hazing, properly applied, does serve a useful function in the military, but what happened in that story was simply over the line, which is why I have a problem with Col Jessup using such a noble argument to defend it.

Posted by: holdfast on August 19, 2005 10:54 AM

I liked the end of the Caine Mutiny - with the thoroug lambasting of the fuzzy-headed liberalish officers.

Posted by: Geoff on August 19, 2005 11:23 AM

"Ray Bradbury himself is a conservative"

I don't think Bradbury can be categorized as either conservative or liberal. When he speaks well of Reagan (and he does) it's with a note of surprise.

As for liberals eschewing individual thought--this always amuses me. Both liberals and conservatives think that the other subordinates the individual to the group in some way--and both are right. But there's just no way that "group think" can be automatically tagged as liberal.

I do agree that Bradbury wasn't specifically taking aim at conservatives or liberals, though. But it's not a conservative film.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 03:46 PM

Both liberals and conservatives think that the other subordinates the individual to the group in some way--and both are right. But there's just no way that "group think" can be automatically tagged as liberal.

*eye roll* Spoken like someone who doesn't even know the difference between conservatism and liberalism.

But it's not a conservative film.

Geez, Ace, do you have a new troll or something?

Cal, you obviously are wholly unfamiliar with the vast differences between liberal philosophy and conservative philosophy, hence I don't even know why you read Ace's site...except perhaps to learn the differences. Be that as it may, I'm not going to sit here and try to convince someone who can't see the obvious in something as easily discernable as a movie. You're just not worth the effort and neither is the topic.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 07:17 PM

LOTR portrays good values.
Galadriel tells Frodo [paraphrasing]'even the smallest person can change the course of world events.'
Gandalf tells Frodo he must rely on himself alone and his own good judgement to succeed against evil.
All the free peoples of Middle Earth must fight over and over to preserve their lands and freedoms from the Orcs, scheming wizards, and the Dark Lord himself
LOTR does not deify multiculti diversity.
Elves and Dwarves do not understand or like each other. But, they put their differences aside and work together for a higher good. From this choice to cooperate for the sake of shared values, the different races learn trust, respect, and friendship.

Posted by: on August 21, 2005 03:24 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
gKWVE: "Suck it, Spanberger Lick it, Obama ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "97 I asked a friend, who is involved with the GOP ..."

...: "We once had a 64 skull day I think. Can't remember ..."

gnats local 678: "re 86: probably thought they could get away with i ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "41 Ancient Irish vuvuzelas. youtube.com/watch?v=b ..."

18-1: "If the economy is looking good in 3 months or so, ..."

Smell the Glove: "Consider the Dems set this mess off. First the SC ..."

Sharkman: "Here is a link to the 46 page decision: https:/ ..."

GuardianB: "Someone needs to get Ace a laughing flaming skull ..."

Everyman: ""68 I think what bukkake-ed this map was not only ..."

davidt: ""The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday invalidated ..."

Dipped in skullpudding: "I haz lolboner ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives