Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Be nice to the help... | Main | Studt: Pornographj Cam Makr You Blind »
August 18, 2005

More Conservative Movies

Again from Football Fans For Truth.


posted by Ace at 03:06 PM
Comments



It's been a long time since I saw it, and maybe my memory is off, but maybe Ulee's Gold would count as a conservative film?

Posted by: SJKevin on August 18, 2005 03:39 PM

I could think of 20 more, nearly everything by Peckinpah.

More recently, Shaun of the Dead--being a hippie slacker makes you little more than a zombie, eventually you have to grow up and become an adult. Plus, the holy grail of the film is a lever-action Winchester, a very potent symbol of masculinity and the American West.

Posted by: Tom on August 18, 2005 04:08 PM

I'm gonna go with the movie George Will called the most conservative film in recent years-- Sam Raimi's A Simple Plan.

Family before money, crime never pays, and there is no such thing as an innocent lie. Plus, great performances to boot.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 18, 2005 04:27 PM

I will nominate what the liberals thought was a film about conservatives 'Falling Down' with Michael Douglas as the angry, white male.

Posted by: Dman on August 18, 2005 04:31 PM

How about Zulu? The 1970's film starred Michael Cain and I believe was set in the 1800s or early 1900s, during British colonial rule. The premise had to do with the British building a railroad, I think, through Zulu country. The Zulu attacked repeatedly and lost thousands of their fighters, and hundreds ("testing" the British flanks for weaknesses). In the end the Zulu king and his army saluted the determined courage of the Brits in song.

Posted by: ChrisG on August 18, 2005 05:00 PM

You gotta nominate Death Wish--it portrays a liberal pantywaist realizing that he can't rely on government to protect his family. Besides--when he died, the liberal media trashed Charles Bronson's legacy mostly because they could not get over the fact that he starred in a vigilante movie (or 4). If it ticks off the liberals, it's gotta be worth something...

Posted by: Kevin on August 18, 2005 05:25 PM

Heck--one reviewer even called the Death Wish films "conservative vigilante revenge fantasies".

Yeah?

Posted by: Kevin on August 18, 2005 05:28 PM

Tears of the Sun. A group of military tough guys who help Christian Africans get away from genocidal Muslim Africans. And the guys don't get them out by pussy "negotiations" or with the help of Amnesty International or any of that crap. They fight their way out. Bruce Willis (a Republican) is a particularly ruthless hard case who shows a pampered white do-gooder doctor that compassion doesn't count for shit in a war zone. Great scene where one SEAL guts a rapist out of sheer rage.

Posted by: UGAdawg on August 18, 2005 06:10 PM

Red Dawn

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 06:14 PM

The Incredibles

Gladiator

Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2

Finding Nemo - can you think of any other Disney film that has the father as a protagonist?

Posted by: Slublog on August 18, 2005 06:23 PM

I'm with Dave at GR on A Simple Plan.
BB Thornton gives an amazing performance as the simple-minded brother, with a jaw-dropping scene toward the end.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 07:21 PM

That last post was me...
After coming back from Preview it forgot who I was.

Posted by: Man of Substance on August 18, 2005 07:22 PM

Outside Providence

Posted by: SJKevin on August 18, 2005 07:31 PM

Ahhh, I'm not so sure about Finding Nemo. There was not a single good thing about humans in the movie. Man served as both villain and source of all evil/wrong in the world. Even sharks were portrayed as not being able to help themselves.

I couldn't sit through the whole thing.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 07:32 PM

Er... Finding Nemo had nothing to do with the "villainy" of humans, unless you are seriously putting forth the idea that the filmmakers were campaigning against the keeping of fish as pets. I am guessing you either have issues with small girls with braces or Australian dentists, or both.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 18, 2005 08:51 PM

This is off the top of my head and keep in mind I saw PART of the movie years ago, but if I recall correctly the dangerous places the little fishies passed through were more often than not man-made. An abandoned WWII minefield (do these even exist?), sunken ships, the harbor, the death tank (also known as the aquarium). And yes, the humans were all fish-killers. Was there a simpathetic human in the movie? No. Was there a single example of some thing humanity has done that was presented as good or helpful? No.

As I said before, from watching this movie it appears that humans are just killers and polluters. What message do children take away from this movie when they see the poor man-made struggles of our friends from the sea?

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 09:18 PM

Fast Times at Ridgemont High

By and large, the fun times are followed by actual consequences, a reasonable authority figure gets his due (Mr. Hand), and as Josh McDowell might say, True Love Waits.

Posted by: OCBill on August 19, 2005 12:13 AM

The most conservative movie I have ever seen is "Sometimes a Great Notion," also called "Never Give An Inch," which is really odd because it was directed by/stars Lefty Paul Newman and Henry Fonda plays the dad. Plot: a family of loggers go against the striking union and continue to work despite the obstacles and strong arm tactics the union puts them through. It was made in '71 and there are some pretty heart-wrenching moments because of the danger the Indie loggers have to face using substandard equipment. It's a really good movie I hadn't thought about in years, but this topic brought it immediately to mind.

This film portrays unions as Evil, family as the only thing you can rely on, and it shows how sometimes your principles are worth dying for. Am I the only one who's seen it?

Other recent conservative films:

We Were Soldiers
Team America: World Police
Saving Private Ryan

And there are a lot of conservative SF films:
Starship Troopers (it sucked but it had its ideals)
The Running Man
Rollerball (the original)
Fahrenheit 451
Seconds
A Clockwork Orange (in its own twisted way)
Equilibrium
Gattaca

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 12:15 AM

The original Rollerball still gets me all misty. James Caan was awesome as Jonathon.

Posted by: Geoff on August 19, 2005 12:22 AM

Sometimes a Great Notion has one of the most difficult death scenes ever; it's really hard to watch. But Ken Kesey and Paul Newman aren't high on the list of people who would have engrained conservative values. The conflict at the heart of Keseys' book is Eastern intellectualism vs. Western individualism, not liberal vs. conservativism. It's been a while since I've seen the movie, but I don't think the union folks are evil--they're just the dolts in the way.

Still, I agree that the film goes out of its way to avoid the usual liberal pap. As another example, the third brother is an evangelical Christian in a very positive portrayal.

It's not a perfect film, but supposedly the book was unfilmable and Newman got a lot of props for trying. Jaeckel (the evangelical brother) got an Oscar nomination, too.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 02:10 AM

Wait. Fahrenheit 451 is conservative? On what planet? Bookburning is a traditional liberal boogeyman. You can--and I certainly do--argue that liberals are well down the path of banning thought these days, particularly in higher ed. But that only evens things out.

Saving Private Ryan and Team America are largely apolitical, with next to no subtext. We Were Soldiers, yes, but it's a god awful piece of garbage on repeat viewing. There's a much better movie in that story somewhere.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 02:18 AM

Ya know maybe I'm crazy (no I'm a little tipsy) but I loved Nicholson's " you can't handle the truth!" speech at the end of A Few Good Men.

As a budding conservative it had the oppposite effect than intended. Memory may fail but I agreed with most of what he was saying - ok here it is

" Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand at post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to."

I know I was meant to be scandalized but I agreed then and now. Gosh those liberals are prescient!

Posted by: rakmjn1 on August 19, 2005 03:07 AM

Geoff, I have "Rollerball" on DVD. It's one of my favorites.

And Cal, I'm glad I'm not the only one who'd seen that movie, and while we may disagree in part, that death scene was possibly the biggest tear jerker ever.

And YES, "Fahrenheit 451" is extremely conservative, which is why Mel Gibson tinkered with remaking it for a while. (Ray Bradbury himself is a conservative.) The world in 451 is controlled by the government on both the economic and social levels, drug abuse is common, interactive television is there to provide a "family" for you and give you the illusion of importance, and any information that might spur individual thought and shake up the utopia is destroyed. That's liberalism in its pure state. People automatically connect the book burning with fascism because of the Nazis, but that wasn't the point Bradbury was attempting to get across. Everybody's equal, everybody's important, everything is perfect, and all it costs you is your individuality.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 03:40 AM

I liked Nicholsons's speech too, but that movie was made by two of the biggest, most annoying liberals in Hollywood: Rob Reiner and That Douchebag from The West Wing. Well acted and paced, but sanctimonious and gooey. The Marine Corps was made to look like a collection of martial fanatics brainwashed into violent obedience. It rarely occurs to Hollywood that there are some remarkably big brains in the military, and that tough decisions are sometimes made out of necessity, not malevolence.

Posted by: UGAdawg on August 19, 2005 09:46 AM

I've always agreed 100% with the sentiment of Nicholson's speech, which bothers me a bit since he was defending the indefensible. Don't get me wrong, hazing, properly applied, does serve a useful function in the military, but what happened in that story was simply over the line, which is why I have a problem with Col Jessup using such a noble argument to defend it.

Posted by: holdfast on August 19, 2005 10:54 AM

I liked the end of the Caine Mutiny - with the thoroug lambasting of the fuzzy-headed liberalish officers.

Posted by: Geoff on August 19, 2005 11:23 AM

"Ray Bradbury himself is a conservative"

I don't think Bradbury can be categorized as either conservative or liberal. When he speaks well of Reagan (and he does) it's with a note of surprise.

As for liberals eschewing individual thought--this always amuses me. Both liberals and conservatives think that the other subordinates the individual to the group in some way--and both are right. But there's just no way that "group think" can be automatically tagged as liberal.

I do agree that Bradbury wasn't specifically taking aim at conservatives or liberals, though. But it's not a conservative film.

Posted by: Cal on August 19, 2005 03:46 PM

Both liberals and conservatives think that the other subordinates the individual to the group in some way--and both are right. But there's just no way that "group think" can be automatically tagged as liberal.

*eye roll* Spoken like someone who doesn't even know the difference between conservatism and liberalism.

But it's not a conservative film.

Geez, Ace, do you have a new troll or something?

Cal, you obviously are wholly unfamiliar with the vast differences between liberal philosophy and conservative philosophy, hence I don't even know why you read Ace's site...except perhaps to learn the differences. Be that as it may, I'm not going to sit here and try to convince someone who can't see the obvious in something as easily discernable as a movie. You're just not worth the effort and neither is the topic.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 19, 2005 07:17 PM

LOTR portrays good values.
Galadriel tells Frodo [paraphrasing]'even the smallest person can change the course of world events.'
Gandalf tells Frodo he must rely on himself alone and his own good judgement to succeed against evil.
All the free peoples of Middle Earth must fight over and over to preserve their lands and freedoms from the Orcs, scheming wizards, and the Dark Lord himself
LOTR does not deify multiculti diversity.
Elves and Dwarves do not understand or like each other. But, they put their differences aside and work together for a higher good. From this choice to cooperate for the sake of shared values, the different races learn trust, respect, and friendship.

Posted by: on August 21, 2005 03:24 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Damn, RMBS. Here, but serving grilled London b ..."

RI Red : "5 GTs in a month. Thanks, Weasel! ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: ">>> As of Friday, I am armed with the first firear ..."

Ed L: "Hello, Weasel! ..."

Pug Mahon, Trumpy can do magic: "Grass fed is different. I like both corn finished ..."

RI Red : "Damn, RMBS. Here, but serving grilled London bro ..."

Skip: "Good evening everyone ..."

Jackson K.: "98 >>"...certain PA Dutch processed meats..." S ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Gub nood. ..."

RI Red : "Here! ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Evenin', Weasel. ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "st! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives