Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« You Guys All Know Andrea Harris Is, Like, Twice As Mean As Me, Right? | Main | Stupid is as stupid does. »
August 17, 2005

Can you be a refugee from a country you were never in?

This just in from the Anti-Semitic dhimmis at the AP.

You might need a calendar for this one.

Ramzi Qabalawi, 55, a refugee in Lebanon since the 1948 founding of Israel, called the Gaza withdrawal "a great victory" for the Palestinians.


posted by Tanker at 05:16 PM
Comments



Whoa, buddy. . . pal-- math?!?

You're gonna have to spell this one out for me.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 17, 2005 05:55 PM

Suppose this guy turns 56 tomorrow. That means he was born in 1949. Also consider his mother could have been carrying him in her womb for nine months. The first of those being December 1948. She could have possibly been walking on land now in Israel. Technically, he could be a refugee. Maybe more like a refwombgee, er somethin'.

Posted by: compos mentis on August 17, 2005 05:56 PM

Don't confuse a guy with facts when he's on a roll...

Maybe this dude is the palestinian version of Howard Dean?

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 06:05 PM

Well, genius, then how can anybody be a "victim of the Holocaust" if they are less than 60 years old?

Perhaps being born in a Displaced Persons Refugee Camp in 1949 Austria to destitute Slav, Jewish, or Roma parents does indeed qualify you as a refugee and as a victim.

Posted by: Cedarford on August 17, 2005 07:20 PM

Well, genius, then how can anybody be a "victim of the Holocaust" if they are less than 60 years old?

Dude, exactly when was the last time you heard ANYONE under the age of 65 claim to be a victim of the Holocaust???

Posted by: Dogstar on August 17, 2005 07:27 PM

Check out any of thousands of "Holocaust Reparations" lawsuits filed on the basis of the Present Victims that are descendents of the "direct victims".

Must work, Dogstar, as the shysters are Hoovering in tens of billions a year for the descendents of dead clients.

But the Zionists have avoided having one shekel being pried from their grasp to repay any victim, direct or indirect, of the Great 1948 Land Grab and Cleansing.

Zionist Motto: "Not one shekel of OUR money for goyim unless there is a better deal within for us!!

An odd tangent of America's Goyim motto "of millions for defense, billions for others in need, not one penny for tribute".

Posted by: Cedarford on August 17, 2005 08:55 PM

OMG! I can smell it here too!

Posted by: BrewFan on August 17, 2005 08:59 PM

As I understand it, the UN has declared the descendents of Pali refugees to also be refugees. It is the only group with this designator.

Posted by: rabidfox on August 18, 2005 01:05 AM

Rabidfox is correct. The UNRWA's decision to declare descendents of Palestinian Arab refugees as refugees themselves, give them unique status in the history of refugees.

Please note that between 1948 and 1967 (Israel's War of Independence at its founding and the Six-Day War), around 800,000 Jews were forced out of the surrounding Arab lands that they had lived in for centuries. In many cases, all their assets were stolen as well. They arrived in Israel penniless and landless. But you don't see them living in refugee camps. They've managed to move on and build new lives for themselves.

Posted by: anna on August 18, 2005 07:09 AM

Good news, for what its worth.

Posted by: lauraw on August 18, 2005 11:00 AM

lauraw

The good news is worth a lot. I saw Seymour Hirsch last night on Jon Stewart (during the commericals) who said that Abdullah was a clueless and no friend of ours. It must be nice to have a job where you can be so very wrong so much of the time and it never matters.

And Cedarford,

But the Zionists have avoided having one shekel being pried from their grasp to repay any victim, direct or indirect, of the Great 1948 Land Grab and Cleansing.

Over the years, the Palestinians have been offered (by different countries) repatriation, lands in many differernt countries and lots of money, and they haven't taken it. I don't know that anyone would make such offers today given their history, but in the past different countries have done so. But they prefer instead to blow thmselves up to get their 72 vaginas. What a savage religion Islam truly is!

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on August 18, 2005 02:48 PM

I think Cedarford doesn't really exist as a human being. I think Cedarford is really a caricature of Archie Bunker*

*My posthumous apologies to the wonderful Caroll O'Connor for referring to his acting role and Cedarford in the same sentence ... but I think he'd understand ...

Posted by: psflanagan on August 18, 2005 05:26 PM

Even if Cedarford had a point (besides the one on his head), there are a few points that he should be aware of;

1) Israel did not start the 1948 war - it was started by the neighboring Arab countries. Maybe all those poor displaced Palis should look to the Arab states for compensation.

2) In the period between 1948 and and 1956, aprox 700,000 Sephardic Jews were kicked out of / ran like hell from various Arab countries (Yemen and Iraq being, I believe, the principals). This is about the same number as Palis displaced from pre-1967 Israel. How about we allow the Israelis to pass their claims for confiscated property on to the Palis and they can collect?

3) Those Arabs who chose to stay is Israel are full citizens, with the right to vote (a right which most Arabs living in Arab countries do not enjoy). Are they generally less prosperous than the average Israeli - yup, but there must be a reason that many of the Bedouin from Gaza are trying to get INTO Israel right now.

4) The companies againt which reparations were sought are typically banks and insurance companies which decided "hey, our clients are dead and their bankbooks / insurance policies destroyed. I guess we just get to keep all their stuff, and screw their heirs."

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 06:23 PM

anna - Please note that between 1948 and 1967 (Israel's War of Independence at its founding and the Six-Day War), around 800,000 Jews were forced out of the surrounding Arab lands that they had lived in for centuries.

A nice Zionist lie. Some were forced out, most made voluntary Aliya (journey to the Zionist Homeland). Many were reluctant to leave. In Egypt and Iraq, Zionist agents were actually caught bombing Jews in those communities to whip up fear and get them to emigrate. Zionist agencies called the caught agents "overzealous".

As for the ones that were cleansed, would you make the argument that Jews cleansed by Yemenis and Moroccans negates any obligation for Zionists to give reparations to Palestinians. Where the Germans and Austrians wrong to give reparations to Jews when German ethnics were cleansed the end of WWII by Soviets, Poles, Czechs, and Hungarians?

Holdfast - Israel did not start the 1948 war - it was started by the neighboring Arab countries. Maybe all those poor displaced Palis should look to the Arab states for compensation.

Another fine Zionist lie. Civil War broke out throughout Palestine when the Partition Plan was rejected. The Jewish militias and terror squads were ready, and cleansed the Muslim and Christian Palestinians out. When the neighboring Arab countries came in - it was a month later and was only fighting to retake lands the Zionists weren't given in Partition, but were seized for the cleansed non-Jews.

In the end, 453 Palestinian villages were destroyed and paved over. Zionists villages suffering a similar fate? Zero.


Posted by: Cedarford on August 18, 2005 08:40 PM

Cedarford - you're completely full of sh*t. You try to use isolated inceidents to completely reverse the overall picture.

I bet you're just mad that a bunch of skinny, refugee yids were able to beat, among others, the British officered and trained Arab Legion

Posted by: holdfast on August 19, 2005 11:36 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
Case: "Tiring old clowns of the left. Didn't like them th ..."

JQ: "There couldn't have been 200 people at the local p ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: " read a post by a Japanese guy on Twixxer and he b ..."

[/i][/i][/i][/s][/s][/s][/b][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor: "[i]Nobody saw it coming. Apparently our big brains ..."

This is reality.: "Without regime change, this war will have been poi ..."

Kindltot: "My mistake, most of the Egyptian Tucanos were sold ..."

Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea: "The entire premise is one of the stupidest things ..."

Martini Farmer: "> Drones are really changing the tactics of war. ..."

[/i][/i][/i][/s][/s][/s][/b][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor: "[i]I wouldn't be at all surprised if Meta has exte ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "The left has big plans for "after Trump". Packing ..."

Cow Demon: "I do not know what is done with unsold magazines. ..."

Kindltot: "[i]"Skyraider II" Based on the Ag AirTractor used ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives