Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« First-Hand Reportage: Cheap Lighters Can Explode | Main | How To Get Linked »
August 04, 2005

Mars To Make Closest Approach To Earth In Recorded History Last Fifteen Months

Despite a TRO stating that Mars must remain at least 33 million miles away at all times, or face a weekend in the local drunk-tank.

It will be the brightest object in the sky (well, apart from the moon, and, I guess, the Sun).

Nostradamus' Quatro XXXVII mentions this:

When the War-Star approaches
Fire, rain, great commotions, usurpations and betrayals
Paul Hackett loses in Ohio by four points
Paul Begala cries, because he's such a fuckin' homo
I mean seriously
The guy makes Peter Allen look butch.
Histler says, "That Begala guy? Stone-cold pussy."

Old? Someone says this already happened, but BlogIdaho says August 27th.

I don't know either way.

Great Commotions and Confusions: Well, I don't know. Compos says this article says the closest approach happened in 2003. But a very close approach if not the closest) will be on October 29th.

Who cares. I got a good Nostradamus joke out of it, and I'm satisfied either way.


posted by Ace at 03:30 PM
Comments



Ok, who the fuck is Histler?

Posted by: Dogstar on August 4, 2005 03:34 PM

You funnin' with me?

"Histler" is a name mentioned once or twice in Nostradamus', ahem, predictions, widely taken to be a mispelling of Hitler.

Though I'm informed it's just a river or something.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 03:36 PM

Not to sound like Odie at Garfield Ledge or whomever, but I really think this is old. Not old in the sense that it has been posted somewhere else, but old as in it actually already happened a couple of years ago.

I know there was an e-mail circulating about this a couple of months back and I'm pretty sure it was recycled.

At least that's what our local astronomer says.

Posted by: compos mentis on August 4, 2005 03:36 PM

Apparently the closest approach really was in 2003. There's an article explaining the confusion here.

Posted by: utron on August 4, 2005 03:39 PM

But that article says October 28 2005.

I'm confused.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 03:41 PM

Confusion? Or conspiracy?!
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/mars-earth-close.html

Posted by: planetmoron on August 4, 2005 03:42 PM

I'm confused.

Situation normal, then?

Posted by: Monty on August 4, 2005 03:43 PM

Ace, your command of obscure literary references is a thing of wonder.

That, plus your rich frequency of boob-related posts.

Posted by: Dogstar on August 4, 2005 03:44 PM

okay, I re-read, he says "two years ago."

Still, it'll be close.

A little... too close.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 03:45 PM

"I got a good Nostradamus joke out of it. . . "

If you say so.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 4, 2005 03:56 PM

Dave,

I don't know if you're busting my balls in a humorous way or out of peevishness.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 04:03 PM

This reminds me of when my dad went on a Nostradamus kick for a few months.

I spent many an hour (could've been a few minutes, but it seemed like hours) listening to his stories of 'Histler', 'Rosh' (sp? - which was 'Russia', you know) and all the other 'amazingly accurate' visions ol' Nosty shared.

NOOOOOOO!

Posted by: John from WuzzaDem on August 4, 2005 04:04 PM

heh... I sorta kinda know the feeling. Not with Nostradamus, but with other bits of crankery.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 04:06 PM

What's peevishness mean again?

(If you have to ask, it obviously isn't funny, but yes, it's all out of humor, mon frere).

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 4, 2005 04:09 PM

Okay. It's just you seemed a little annoyed with the open-thread idea, too.

That idea wasn't to force "the peasants" to post links in a thread. It was just to have an open thread for argument and links without having to go through me as the mighty gatekeeper.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 04:12 PM

Nostradamus' Quatro XXXVII

My dad had an Audi too. It sucked.

Posted by: Brian B on August 4, 2005 04:16 PM

Ace, I know it's challenging to properly communicate sarcasm and irony over text-- no non-verbal communication and all-- but I can assure you, everything I write here can be taken in a jocular tone unless I state it clearly otherwise.

For instance, "IN ALL SERIOUSNESS, Monty reeks of potato ham chowder."

I'm sorry if I've been coming off a little peevish lately, it was not my intent.

You've been doing a great job, you're doing a great job, and thanks for all the personal attention, and good nature in the face of my constant ribbing.

Now, if you'll excuse me, after saying all that I need to find a wet-nap and a spitcup.

Love and Kisses,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 4, 2005 04:19 PM

Now, now, ace. Dave assured you he was just busting your hump in a guy kind of way. Now quit being such a pussy and go over there and kiss Dave on the lips. You'll both feel better, and I can sell the resulting polaroids to bbeck for big money. Everyone's a winner!

Posted by: Monty on August 4, 2005 04:20 PM

Hey, Mighty Gatekeeper:

The thread below which finally died after 217 comments went from the GWOT, to what to call the GWOT, to coffee, to screwing the anchorwomen at Fox (strong opinion from Megan, natch), to lobster, to Maine scenery and politics, to the heat wave, to speculation about what kind of store lauraw owns, and other topics too numerous to mention.

I'm with Dave, who need an official open thread when we've got the Mighty Gatekeeper in charge?

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 04:22 PM

And for certain people who dislike the pleasant musk I'm proud to call my own...well, I needn't waste my time. Hmph!

Posted by: Monty on August 4, 2005 04:24 PM

You'll both feel better, and I can sell the resulting polaroids to bbeck for big money.

Only if there's tongue involved.

(And I'd like to point out that this is ANOTHER comment section in which my name is randomly dropped. 'Sup with that?)

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 4, 2005 04:32 PM

Dammit, didn't someone send bbeck the "let's all pick on bbeck today" notification?

Loose shit, people.

Posted by: Monty on August 4, 2005 04:33 PM

Uh. . . cause you're an effective punchline?

I'm just sayin'.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 4, 2005 04:35 PM

Face it, bbeck, you're the perma-life of the party, whether you like it or not.

The straw that stirs the drink. The whipped topping on the cheesecake. The shiny, spinning, chrome-plated, ridiculously expensive set of gangsta hubcaps on the $52,700 Escalade. (Less destination and dealer prep; additional charges, fees and taxes may apply, depending on your location.)

Posted by: Dogstar on August 4, 2005 04:39 PM

Dammit, didn't someone send bbeck the "let's all pick on bbeck today" notification?

Yeah, it's also known as "Thursday."

Uh. . . cause you're an effective punchline?

I sure would like to think it's because I've got one heckuva sense of humor. Yeah. Right.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 4, 2005 04:40 PM

Loose shit- that shoulda been PLUS dealer prep, etc.

Damn, I wish we could edit our posts...

Posted by: Dogstar on August 4, 2005 04:41 PM

The shiny, spinning, chrome-plated, ridiculously expensive set of gangsta hubcaps on the $52,700 Escalade.

Oh man, don't put me on an SUV.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on August 4, 2005 04:42 PM

Watch out or someday soon Sakhorov's little project will be the brightest object in the sky.


http://spacebombardment.blogspot.com/2005/08/lunar-landing-verison-of-project-orion.html

Posted by: Norden on August 4, 2005 04:46 PM

Yeah, bbeck, what Keanu Reeve's band said. Not to mention you have huge hooters and wear black thong undies. Least that's what I've heard. So guys want to cover you in whipped topping and stir your drink with their straws while you spin on a chrome thingy. Plus your just fun to pick on.

Posted by: compos mentis on August 4, 2005 04:46 PM

I sure would like to think it's because I've got one heckuva sense of humor.

Yeah, I'd like to think so too. But I think it's mostly because you're an easy target.

But hey: at least Dave doesn't accuse you of smelling like ham and potato chowder. ...mmm...chowder...

And chowder is a pretty funny sounding word when you say it a bunch of times. Chowder. Chowder. Chowder. See? And something with ham and potato would more properly be called a stew, I would think, and...

...what were we talking about again?

Posted by: Monty on August 4, 2005 04:46 PM

Geez, Dogstar, your ode to bbeck has choked me up. My eyes are getting misty. Who knew you were so romantic?

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 04:48 PM

Except, it was Hister Nostradamus referenced, not Histler. 'Cause, ya know, he typed fast, occasionally transposing characters, and every once in a while twitched the wrong hand ('s' is the ring finger on the left, 'l' is the ring finger on the right).

Hey, it's better than any other excuses I've seen for the Hister/Hitler connection...

Posted by: Anachronda on August 4, 2005 04:58 PM

I'm with Dave, who need an official open thread when we've got the Mighty Gatekeeper in charge?

Because it announces it's an open thread?

I mean, if you see a bunch of comments on an article about ID, wouldn't you assume most if not all of them are about ID?

With an open thread, you know it's, well, open.

Yes, people can post whatever they want, wherever they want. But it seems to make sense that if there's a demand for just a forum-like thread for random conversation and argument, there should be a thread specifically devoted to that.

At least it seems that way to me.

Posted by: ace on August 4, 2005 05:06 PM

I once stabbed a man with a trident. Discuss.

There. There's your open thread, bub.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 4, 2005 05:12 PM

I once stabbed a man with a trident
The displeasure he voiced was strident
Just before his death
He said with his last breath
"Who knew that Dave had this weird sexual sadistic thing with King Neptune?"

Posted by: compos mentis on August 4, 2005 05:45 PM

I once stabbed a man with a trident.

You LIAR!

Nobody can stab somebody with f'ing gum. Think we're a buncha born-yesterday dummies, or what?

"Oh yeah, and after that I busted a tic-tac in his punkass, just because I didn't like the way he was lookin' at me..."

Sure, ya did.

Posted by: Dogstar on August 4, 2005 06:19 PM

I once judged a chowder contest... and buddy, you're no chowder.

By the way, instead of Nostradumbass (hahahaha, I made a Fark-worthy joke), you should perhaps consult Snopes (although you think it has some sort of liberal bias) before posting emails your crazy old Aunt Irma forwards you.

What next, the AOL-Intel-Microsoft merger email that gives you 10 bucks (and AIDs) every time you forward it?

Posted by: ken on August 4, 2005 06:30 PM

With an open thread, you know it's, well, open.

Well, Dave made this point earlier, but it's just more fun to hijack a thread that is dying, and turn it into a conversation among friends.

Most of us respect a serious post and respond with serious comments. At least until the thread starts to wilt, at which point the regulars feel free to turn it into a chat room. It's part of the unique appeal of this blog. I'll bet most of your regulars are like me -- I scroll up and down looking for comment volume and momentum just to see where the action is and have some fun.

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 07:11 PM

I'll bet most of your regulars are like me -- I scroll up and down looking for comment volume and momentum just to see where the action is and have some fun.

Christ, nice to know I'm not the only loser doing it.

Posted by: TheDude on August 4, 2005 07:14 PM

Ace of Spades HQ:

The foul-mouthed Cheers of the rightwing blogosphere.

Posted by: TheDude on August 4, 2005 07:17 PM

Christ, nice to know I'm not the only loser doing it.

Nope, you're not. And we're not losers. Human beings are fundamentally pack animals, and we're just exploiting an electronic opportunity to pick lice out of each others' fur.

This is a good place to do that, because this blog is really targeted at a niche audience. The niche audience is "people who think Ace is funny, insightful, and affecting in an odd sort of way." The niche audience is fairly large, but does not threaten to become too big.

By "too big," I mean that I enjoy reading posts at LGF or Scrappleface, but I almost never comment there. Two hours after they post, there is a stampede of 200 commenters. They just don't offer the sense of family that you get here, where all the regulars can talk about bbeck's tits, or Cedarford's racism, or compos mentis' explosive shitting, and we all have a shared history that creates a sense of community.

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 07:34 PM

Can I be the weird uncle that nobody wants to talk about?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 4, 2005 07:43 PM

I know it's hard to talk about, but what ARE we going to do about Uncle Dave?

Shhh, here he comes...

Posted by: Lipstick on August 4, 2005 07:51 PM

CHARGE, Rough Riders!

Everything's bully! Just bully!

Why did they clean my face up last on Mt. Rushmore?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 4, 2005 08:54 PM

Well, the lichens in your nose looked like boogers and were kind of disgusting, that's why.

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 08:59 PM

Now, now, ace. Dave assured you he was just busting your hump in a guy kind of way. Now quit being such a pussy and go over there and kiss Dave on the lips. You'll both feel better, and I can sell the resulting polaroids to bbeck for big money. Everyone's a winner!

And kissing another guy on the lips isn't as terrible as you think it might be.

Don't ask.

Posted by: Slublog on August 4, 2005 09:02 PM

Whoa, there's one for the next flame thread....

Posted by: Lipstick on August 4, 2005 09:33 PM

Well, the lichens in your nose looked like boogers and were kind of disgusting, that's why

that'd be Woolly Bully!

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 4, 2005 09:34 PM

Oh, did I say "kissing" another guy?

Heh heh. Silly me

I meant punching the crap out of.

Sorry for the confusion.

Posted by: Slublog on August 4, 2005 09:41 PM

Mea Culpa.
I finally get an Ace Link and I blow it.

Pretty good photo though.

Posted by: Retired Geezer on August 5, 2005 01:18 AM

"...this blog is really targeted at a niche audience. .....'people who think Ace is funny, insightful, and affecting in an odd sort of way.'"

Michael. You are such a poofter, that when people see you talking in public, they say 'God DAMN what a major f**king poofter!'

(shaking head in disbelief)
Wow. Just....wow.

Sorry, was that offensive?
Take some deep breaths, Mike.

Posted by: lauraw on August 5, 2005 09:55 AM

That came out meaner than it was supposed to.
Deal.

Posted by: lauraw on August 5, 2005 10:03 AM

lauraw:

I'm genuinely confused. It seems kinda obvious to me that this blog has a unique personality, Ace is not going to be everyone's cup of tea, but the fact that he appeals to us gives us something in common. AOSHQ is not a bland mass market site like Instapundit, for example. That's what I like about it, and I assume you do to.

Now, exactly what about that pisses you off?

Posted by: Michael on August 5, 2005 02:16 PM

Oh, I agree with what you said
But I just can't get enough of the gay-baiting with you.

Posted by: lauraw on August 5, 2005 03:45 PM

OK . I don't mind being called a poofter, I just wasn't expecting a flame out of nowhere on this thread, so I was concerned.

Posted by: Michael on August 5, 2005 03:59 PM

Please, all out of the blue flaming should be directed at bbeck. She just loves the attention.

Posted by: TheDude on August 5, 2005 04:03 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Low-T High-Calorie Potato Brian Stelter: "Matthew Dowd is no longer an MSNBC political analyst, according to a network source."
Matt Dowd, former Disney Groomer Corporation Political Director and John McCain advisor (of course), is the one who blamed Charlie Kirk's shooting on the real assassin, Charlie Kirk, claiming that Charlie's "hateful words lead to hateful actions."
Trump speaks about the "heinous assassination" of Charlie Kirk, notes the left relentlessly demonized him until they radicalized an assassin to kill him
"For years, the radical left has compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to NAZlS... this type of language is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the terrorism we're seeing in our country today.
And it must stop RIGHT NOW!"
Argentinian PM Javier Millei: "The left is always, at all times and places, a violent phenomenon full of hatred."
I disregard their hate. It's the violence that we object to. And we will begin objecting to it with force.
Update: Kash Patel says the person of interest has been interrogated and then released. Wrong guy, I guess.
But as the hours pass without a real suspect, and with the FBI apparently interrogating uninvolved people, I begin to fear the assassin has escaped. I mean, they don't seem to be following a breadcrumb trail, they seem genuinely baffled.
Karol Sheinin: I can confirm the person of interest questioned by the FBI is Zachariah Ahmed Qureshi.
If this is the guy -- apparently he also interned at Heritage.
Update: Source says he's been released? Wrong guy?
Fat-F*ck Pritzker blames Trump's rhetoric for the ramp up of political violence! May he rot in hell! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland.org joins us to discuss the blockbuster polls they have released over the last week. Americans 19-39 seem to be embracing socialism, overt redistributionist policies, destruction of our rights, and international control of our country! But there is hope on the horizon!
Broward County Officials Accused of Adding Over 100,000 Ineligible Voters to the Rolls It is too soon to know how it happened, but...Republicans are watching! And that is how it is done. [CBD]
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump from firing Federal Reserve Gov Lisa Cook With absolutely nonsensical reasoning, but you already knew that. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 2A ban for trannies? Venezuela attack is Congress dropping the ball, RFK Jr...Maniac or disrupter? Heartland.org poll is a sad commentary on American education, and more!
James Varney: Reflecting on Hurricane Katrina twenty years later, and the partisan uses Democrats found for it
There was fear aplenty. But the truth is, a lot of the panic Americans saw on television was performative. The throngs of people along Convention Center Boulevard sat patiently in the broiling weather, five or six deep in folding chairs on the sidewalk, waiting for something, someone, to arrive. Then, a television crew or photographer would show up, and people would pour into the street, falling on their knees, screaming and gesticulating to the camera. It was an awful situation, obviously, but when the camera wasn't on them, it was remarkable how patient and orderly everyone was.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: the most repetitive but catchy earworm of the eighties?
Sometimes, I find you doubt my love for you but I don't mind
Why should I mind? Why should I mind?

It's hard to quote the song while avoiding quoting from the endlessly-repeated chorus.
Wait, my mistake, his other hit from 1985 was the most repetitive new wave hit of the 80s.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I'm gonna get high, man, I'm gonna get loose/
Need me a triple shot of that juice
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 600,000 Chinese spies given visas? Scotland relies on 14-year-old girls for their defense, tariffs work! mortgage fraud is the new thing, and more!
I guess yesterday's Starship test flight was cancelled. They're counting down to another launch, NOW. Lift-off!
The "hip" gray corporate slop era of Cracker Barrel is put on hold (supposedly):
Bret Baier
@BretBaier

Cracker Barrel is going back to the old logo. Company statement: "We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our "Old Timer" will remain. At Cracker Barrel, it's always been - and always will be - about serving up delicious food, warm welcomes, and the kind of country hospitality that feels like family. As a proud American institution, our 70,000 hardworking employees look forward to welcoming you to our table soon."
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Recent Comments
Speller: " -"I think it's time now for a series of articles ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]What this person fails to mention is that the " ..."

Oldcat: "Socialism is Communism is Socialism ..."

[/i][/b]SpeakingOf: "283 That Luigi character, is he on death row yet ? ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " I lost all respect* for that xkcd guy when he pu ..."

Captain Fantastic: "Reports: Kids Wearing Coats and Ties to School Tod ..."

J.J. Sefton: "21 I think the Marxists want a civil war Posted b ..."

rickb223: "281 As far as tracing links go, if you go six hops ..."

Buzz Adrenaline: "There were cops there. Had there not been, he migh ..."

El Mariachi - Attorney at Law: "Watch carefully that Charlie Kirk Memorial video. ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]I'm three degrees of separation from Osama bin ..."

CommonTater: "It proves, to themselves, that they were right all ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives