Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Terrorist-In-Training At The Guardian Calls Islamic Extremism Just A Bit of Excessive "Sassiness!" | Main | Margaret Cho Names Dog For "Chic" Terrorist »
July 16, 2005

Question: What's The Simplest Way To Say "Engages In Apologism"?

I keep running into this problem. I want to say that, for example, Dilpazier Aslan "aplogizes for" Muslim terrorism, but that doesn't sound right; that sounds like he's actually apologizing for the terrorism, rather than engaging in apologetics.

And so usually I resort to the clumsy "engages in apologias" or the like.

Is there a simpler way to say this? Preferably in one word? I'm stumped.

Language mavens, enlighten me.

Eh... Merriam-Webster seems to imply there's no such verb, or else they'd have mentioned it.



posted by Ace at 02:01 PM
Comments



Uh... apologist.

Posted by: Matt on July 16, 2005 02:05 PM

DEFENDS

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on July 16, 2005 02:12 PM

Let me elucidate: apologist.

Posted by: Matt on July 16, 2005 02:14 PM

Yes, I know "apologist." But that's a noun. I'm looking for a verb.

"Defends" is a close synonym, but I'm specifically asking if there's a verb-form for apologism.

Posted by: ace on July 16, 2005 02:17 PM

"...is an apologist for..."

Posted by: Larry Jones on July 16, 2005 02:17 PM

Sorry, I'm having a few Warren moments today.

Posted by: Matt on July 16, 2005 02:22 PM

I don't think there is a verb form for "apologia." I think the closest you're likely to get is "rationalizes."

Posted by: Maxie Zeus on July 16, 2005 02:42 PM

Argues apologetically
Clearly, he's defending, rationalizing, and arguing apologetically.
Asshole.

By the way-

Ol' Valerie Plame's
Undercover persona-
O'Brien's Betsy

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on July 16, 2005 02:51 PM

I'd go with "defends" or "supports", depending on the context.

Posted by: dave f on July 16, 2005 02:52 PM

rationalize, whitewash, excuse, palliate

Posted by: Phinn on July 16, 2005 03:02 PM

Justify. "The terrorism is justified because of the Muslims legitimate grievances with the West." Equivocating bastards.

Posted by: Stormy70 on July 16, 2005 03:05 PM

If you feel like corrupting the etymological root of the word apology, you can use the fabulous ancient Greek word apologeomai:"to make a defense of."

You'd have to just goof around with it though to Englishize it. It may keep the connotation intact.

She apologeomaied the terrorist attack with her assertions that America deserved to be bombed as a result of its imperialism.

I like it anyway.

Posted by: Feisty on July 16, 2005 03:12 PM

I like "AQ's bitch", but that's just me.

As in "The NYT is AQ's bitch".

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on July 16, 2005 03:19 PM

Dhimmi is another one that fits.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on July 16, 2005 03:23 PM

Appeases.

Posted by: Mark Wilson on July 16, 2005 04:01 PM

IN light of the post above this, I nominate "chomanticize" as a verb form of "engages in terrorism apologism".

Here is a sentence using the verb form of word in context:

"By naming her dog after a chic terrorist, the fat lesbian walrus comedienne has chomanticized an individual who deserves nothing but ostracism from society."

You could also accuse someone of "engaging in chomantics" should the need arise.

Damn..i really should trademark that....

Posted by: Jack M. on July 16, 2005 04:14 PM

Would this be a request for a cunning linguist?

Posted by: Gromulin on July 16, 2005 04:18 PM

I've given thought to this myself in an effort to 'brand' apologists for terror, Islamofascism, etc. I wrote about it on my blog in an article entitled "Declaring The Enemy, Part Two: Islamofans."

Posted by: Yr. Fthfl. Svnt. on July 16, 2005 04:33 PM

Then again, "Islamopimp" works as well as anything else in my book.

Posted by: Yr. Fthfl. Svnt. on July 16, 2005 04:37 PM

"justifies"

I agree -- we need to find a verb for dhimmi as well as that's really what it is.

I am casting about and not finding the word used in WWII for Jews who helped the Nazis. I know [think] there was a specific term but am having a flat-brain day.

Posted by: Claire on July 16, 2005 05:36 PM

mitigates, excuses, justifies, exonerates...

apology

Posted by: John Anderson on July 16, 2005 05:48 PM

Oh, this is one of those cool "poetic license" moments: Use a non-word everyone knows you're using deliberately, like:

Apologates.

Apologywashes.

Posted by: rdbrewer on July 16, 2005 06:01 PM

"I'm specifically asking if there's a verb-form for apologism."


Well then, I will specifically tell you the verb form for being an apologist -- apologize.

Duh.

Unfortunately, it is a seldom-used secondary meaning of the verb, so it doesn't help you much in communicating with the audience that you affectionately refer to as a bunch of morons.

While we're on the subject, apologism does not mean what you think. You probably meant to say apologetics. Don't feel bad, you'd have to be a theology buff to have heard of apologetics.

Posted by: Michael on July 16, 2005 06:02 PM

Mea-culpizes

Sorry-o-fies

Posted by: rdbrewer on July 16, 2005 06:15 PM

I like sorry-o-fies a lot. But, we need something pithier for when the Val-U-Rite vodka is fueling the post, like:

bends-over-to-offer-squeekhole-ogizes

Posted by: Michael on July 16, 2005 06:30 PM

I have several ideas:

"Sacrifices own reputation for intellectual honesty by apologizing for a manifest sleazeball"

"Breaks his back bending over to explain away the inexplicable"

"Defends the indefensible"

"Excuses the inexcusable"

"Rationalizes the irrational"

"Empathizes with evil"

"Has his head rammed so far up his own GI tract that he cannot distinguish right from wrong"

"Is so contemptuous of Muslims that he refuses to hold them to the same standard as, say, Jews"

OK, these may not be short enough.

Posted by: TigerHawk on July 16, 2005 06:35 PM

Rationalizes... justifies... excuses...

Posted by: Dave S on July 16, 2005 07:17 PM

Thank you, Michael -- I didn't know that all. v. interesting. and useful.

Starting over, howz about "excusing": To explain (a fault or an offense) in the hope of being forgiven or understood: To serve as justification for

'Course there's always the term, "the Bend-Over-and-Butter-Up Crowd"

Posted by: Claire on July 16, 2005 07:22 PM

Some other suggestions:

He

"adfiskulated"

"Galloweighed-in"

"Arafarted"

"Moore-tified"

or, simply, "lied".

Posted by: Noel on July 16, 2005 07:29 PM

how about "pimps himself out for..."

Posted by: cuddihy on July 16, 2005 07:29 PM

"Is so contemptuous of Muslims that he refuses to hold them to the same standard as, say, Jews"

Bingo!

Posted by: Claire on July 16, 2005 07:52 PM

In relation to engaging in apologetics for anything to do with the fight against Islamism, how about "dhimmicizing"?

Posted by: Squatch on July 16, 2005 07:55 PM

Apologyrates.

Mea culpagizes.

Posted by: rdbrewer on July 16, 2005 08:09 PM

rdbrewyer:

I appreciate your continuing to noodle on this, but I'm still voting for sorry-o-fies.

Posted by: Michael on July 16, 2005 09:10 PM

Of course, in order to accuse someone of sorry-o-fication you must observe the obligatory empathetic head-tilt, but the head-tilt can usually be inferred from the author's text.

Posted by: Michael on July 16, 2005 09:41 PM

Maybe "shills for"?

Posted by: David C on July 16, 2005 10:25 PM

or perhaps "flacks for"

Posted by: Stephen on July 16, 2005 10:51 PM

How about " Dilpazier Aslan "verbally participates in" Muslim terrorism"?

Or "orally justifies"
Or "excretes terrorist sh*t through his pie hole"

Posted by: dougrc on July 16, 2005 10:53 PM

"Chamberlains"

Posted by: Buckley F. Williams on July 16, 2005 11:08 PM

"Rationalizes", "justifies", or "excuses" are good.

Posted by: SWLiP on July 17, 2005 12:40 AM

Insincere-o-shitifies

Posted by: on July 17, 2005 02:23 AM

blows terrorists for lunch money

Posted by: krakatoa on July 17, 2005 02:43 AM

Kos.

"He was Kosing all over the place."

Posted by: Yr. Fthfl. Svnt. on July 17, 2005 04:06 AM

Democrats:

Dem. Demmed. Demming. Demmi. Dhimmi.

Popular dem Naom Chomsky

"Nancy Pelosi was demming for prisoners' rights in Gitmo today..."

"Kos demmed for the slaughter of US contractors in Iraq on his website..."

"Demmis Nancy Pelosi and Joseph Wilson both burst into tears on Oprah..."

Posted by: Yr. Fthfl. Svnt. on July 17, 2005 04:36 AM

exculpates?

Posted by: msl on July 17, 2005 10:34 AM

Quisling

Posted by: nobody4 on July 17, 2005 05:29 PM

I second 'justifies.'
Cuts to the heart rather nicely.

Nothing is really shorter than the clumsy 'engages in apologism,' if you want the exact same nuanced meaning, you may have to go with a longer phrase rather than shorter.

'Bends over backward trying to rationalize...'
'Trots out the old canard about Muslim grievances...'

Posted by: lauraw on July 17, 2005 08:12 PM

How about "makes sophistical arguments in support of terrorism," "propagandizes in support of terrorism," "attempts to justify terrorism," or "tells people to shut up and take their terrorism"?

Posted by: Helen Gaius Mohiam on July 17, 2005 08:20 PM

"creedle". the little fucker fairly creedles about terrorism.
ok, I just made that up. but its kinda onomatopoeic. its the sound I imagine the little craven cunt will make when his head is crushed under foot, like the cockroach he is.

Posted by: larrikin on July 17, 2005 10:21 PM

"[I]ts the sound I imagine the little craven c*nt will make...."

Actually, I think that sound would be a "queef." And I think we finally have the verbal form of "apologia": "Edward Said always used to queef for Islamic terrorism." "If you punch Robert Fisk, it just makes him queef louder." "The BBC and Reuters queef for terrorism almost as much as al-Jazeera." "Queef" will do quite well as the verbal form of "dhimmi," as well: "Andrew Sullivan used to be a voice for armed counterattack against Islamofascism, but now he just queefs." A particularly egregious editor is "editor-in-queef." (Kiefer Sutherland had better never, ever become an apologist for terrorism.) Thomas Friedman has been unexpectedly tough lately, so, like, "Where's the queef?" If someone comes up with a novel argument in favor of terrorism, he's "turned over a new queef."

Posted by: Helen Gaius Mohiam on July 18, 2005 03:50 AM

"champions".

Has the overtones of a defender and an advocate -- one who does (in this case, verbal) battle on behalf of another individual or a cause.

Thomas Friedman champions the caliphate. Milton Friedman champions school vouchers.

Posted by: Pouncer on July 18, 2005 12:30 PM

Touts Terrorism?

Mediates Murder?

Gilds Goatgropers?

Softsoaps Splodeydopes?

Posted by: Speller on July 18, 2005 12:45 PM

obsequiate?

Posted by: on July 18, 2005 09:38 PM

Toady? (neologism - Sycophize?)

from American Heritage/bartleby.com: Toadeater and the verb derived from it, toadeat, influenced the sense of the noun and verb toad and the noun toady, so that both nouns could mean “sycophant” and the verb "toady" could mean “to act like a toady to someone."

Posted by: on July 18, 2005 10:16 PM

Ooooo

'softsoaps.'
Good one, Speller.

Posted by: lauraw on July 18, 2005 10:35 PM

Ace,

Given the limitations of "English" you may need to select a verb that conveys the speaker's intent to deceive the [Western] audience while simultaneously currying favor with the [Al Queda] subject of discussion. Having established the disengenuousness of the apologist, the specific intent of apologizing for terrorism could then be relegated to context.

Then again, one of the geniuses commenting on this site may find the perfect verb, but it won't be me.

Izzy

p.s. sorry for fraying any comment threads, and who is the yellow lady?

Posted by: on July 19, 2005 12:49 AM

Gray Lady.


Yellow Journalism.


Yellow Lady.

Posted by: rdbrewer on July 19, 2005 12:59 AM

Softpeddles Suicidebombers?

Panders Porkhaters?

Hawks Headchoppers?

Markets Misogyny?

Fellates Fanatics?

Posted by: Speller on July 19, 2005 12:10 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Tom Servo: " 16 If if turns out to be true that biden's doj k ..."

NaCly Dog: "NR Pax Generally, Singapore has to be well run. ..."

Penguin Pete: "Disney's announcement that they are bringing back ..."

gKWVE: "[i]29 I have a friend who is with the K9 unit at S ..."

Delurker: "Isabel Mata: “To me, a pride flag is way mor ..."

NR Pax: "[i]Singapore Institutes Caning Punishment For Scho ..."

Smell the Glove: "@59 Ms Corrie, your protest falls flat ..."

TeeJ: " - Hmmm, that new, Canadian top official. I won ..."

Rachel Corrie, D-9: "5 It's Flapjack Friday! Posted by: Mister Scott ..."

NR Pax: "[i]55 I wonder if Paul and Sid 'know' each other ..."

Martini Farmer: "> “Singapore Institutes Caning Punishment F ..."

Huck Follywood: "NATO member. Advanced US weaponry. Armed to the te ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives