Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Can I Vote In France? | Main | NYT Clears Rove Without Quite Admitting It »
July 14, 2005

How To Trick A Liberal

Ask:

Would you agree that the current state of support for terrorism in the world is due to George Bush's policies and his invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan?

After they answer "Yes" -- which of course they will -- read them this:

Support for Osama bin Laden and suicide bombings have fallen sharply in much of the Muslim world, according to a multicountry poll released on Thursday. The survey by the Pew Research Center examined public opinion in six predominantly Muslim nations: Morocco, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Jordan and Lebanon. It also examined views in nine North American and European countries as well as in India and China. In all, more than 17,000 people were questioned either by telephone of face-to-face.

"There's declining support for terrorism in the Muslim countries and support for Osama bin Laden is declining. There's also less support for suicide bombings," said Pew Center director Andrew Kohut.

"This is good news, but still there are substantial numbers who support bin Laden in some of these countries," he told a news conference.

In Morocco, 26 percent of the public now say they have a lot or some confidence in bin Laden, down from 49 percent in a similar poll two years ago.

In Lebanon, where both Muslims and Christians took part in the survey, only 2 percent expressed some confidence in the Saudi-born al Qaeda leader, down from 14 percent in 2003.

In Turkey, bin Laden's support has fallen to 7 percent from 15 percent in the past two years. In Indonesia, it has dropped to 35 percent from 58 percent.

...

A similar picture emerged when respondents were asked whether suicide bombings were justifiable. In Morocco, 13 percent said they often or sometimes could be justified, down from 40 percent in 2004.

In Indonesia, 15 percent expressed that view, down from 27 percent in the summer of 2002. Support for suicide bombings also fell in Pakistan and dropped dramatically in Lebanon.

And then watch them splutter.

Bush's fault? Fair enough, sir.

Add insult to injury by mentioning this quote from a world-renown expert on gaining or losing support from masses of people:

When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse. -- Osama bin Ladin

PS: It spoils the fun a bit, but in the interests of accuracy, it should be noted that support for sucide bombings increased in Jordan (and only Jordan among the surveyed nations), rising from 43 to 57%.

And in both Jordan and Pakistan support for bin Ladin increased:

However, in Jordan, confidence in bin Laden, who took responsibility for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and many other attacks, rose to 60 percent from 55 percent. In Pakistan, it went to 51 percent from 45 percent.

That's margin-of-error type stuff, though.

Liberal baiting aside... have Muslims finally begun recoiling from the horrors that many have been supporting? One can only hope.



posted by Ace at 08:03 PM
Comments



Kinda makes ya wonder just how WRONG!!! Fatty-Patty Buchanan (remembering the classic SNL skit) can be.

Posted by: fretless on July 14, 2005 09:18 PM

they gots phones in those caves now? along with the DSL...

Posted by: W.E.Todd on July 14, 2005 09:24 PM

So.... only a tiny percentage of Muslims are terrorists... but a whole helluva lot of them are terrorist supporters...

I wish our leaders would address the results of polls like this instead of blathering on about the Religion of Peace.

Posted by: IreneFingIrene on July 14, 2005 11:25 PM

Re: Jordan

Don't these people watch Survivor? You run off in the woods by yourself like that, and you're just begging to be nuked voted off next.

The liberals at work are all on vacation today, so I'll have to wait until Monday to try this.

Posted by: harkyman on July 15, 2005 07:18 AM

You stupid right-wing pricks, don't you know the neocons and corproations control the media???? of corse they will say this now, cause bushco holds a gun to their head. you McCarthyites make me sick!!!

Posted by: on July 15, 2005 09:32 AM

True, although I had to pistol whip Pinch Sulzberger yesterday to get them to put the word "terrorist" back on the approved word list.

Posted by: Joseph McCarthy on July 15, 2005 09:45 AM

Is it just me, or is everybody incredibly funny today?

Posted by: lauraw on July 15, 2005 09:48 AM

You stupid right-wing pricks, don't you know the neocons and corproations control the media???? of corse they will say this now, cause bushco holds a gun to their head. you McCarthyites make me sick!!!

Dude, one word:

Haldol.

Posted by: Slublog on July 15, 2005 09:55 AM

How to trick a liberal? I always found a shiny metal object works best.

Posted by: Dman on July 15, 2005 11:10 AM

Another little poll result, which I just saw over at NRO (apparently it isn't even on the web elsewhere): a post-bombing poll of British views on the war in Iraq shows no change in opinion. A narrow majority sez, "We'll stay til the job is done."

Posted by: utron on July 15, 2005 11:36 AM

"You stupid right-wing pricks, don't you know the neocons and corproations control the media???? of corse they will say this now, cause bushco holds a gun to their head. you McCarthyites make me sick!!!"

I love it when demon-rats act like it is the Republicans who control the media -- it really makes me laugh (and laugh hard that is).

Is it just me or is it true that the demon-rats RUN their lives off of baseless conspiracies and Republicans use REAL statistics.

I don't know...

What I do know is that John McCain is already beating Hillary by 19 points in the polls and he is as conservative on social issues as Bill Frist is.

The era of demonrats is over - get ready for a conservative packed court. (:

Posted by: David on July 16, 2005 02:17 PM

Only a fool would underestimate Hillary Clinton's chances of winning in '08. McCain is not a conservative, David! He has a drug abusing wife and we have worked hard in 'oo to bring to light the fact that he has a "mixed" family and he suffers from mental issues. McCain is in favor of baby killing and he voiced his support for Kerry during the 'o4 elections. Stop assuming that President Bush will do what is right when it comes appointing a proper conservative on the Supreme Court. Chance are we will end up having a Hispanic that open up our borders to our enemies. Stop assuming the war is over, David. Keep fighting or get out of the way and join the Liberals!!

Posted by: Ben on July 17, 2005 11:48 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Recent Comments
Angzarr the Cromulent: "Just curious--what were the heinous crimes committ ..."

LinusVanPelt: "J6 was worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 combined!! ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Hey, to be fair, antifa is doing what they are pai ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]The Times editorial board points out that 12 pe ..."

Maj. Healey [/i]: "We need to revisit sentencing guidelines nationwid ..."

Leupold: "Was the most "violent" act that was committed by a ..."

LizLem: ">>> Posted by: Honey Bucket Inc. I always thoug ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Illegal alien gang members? They are our "neigh ..."

18-1: "It is interesting that protesting in the People's ..."

It's me donna: "Absolved of any punishment? Most of them sat in pr ..."

The Whine Guy: "Honestly I think Trump is going to win this one. ..."

illiniwek: "Oil price may be global, but gas at the pump is ov ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives