Be very, very skeptical of that page. To my knowledge, not a single one of their scoops has ever panned out. Not one. They don't call it the World's Most Alarmist Website for nothing.

Unsubstantiated rumors have never stopped the lefttards. Hell, even after something is proven false or obvious by that O. Razor chap, they'll carry it with them straight off a cliff.

Veracity matters.

I don't particularly want to practice or tolerate the kind of speculative edifices found on the LLL sites.

I hold that the only destination for illegal combatants post Camp X-Ray should be an un-marked grave. They have been determined to be illegal combatants by a duly appointed tribunal as per the Geneva Conventions. The traditional sentance for being an illegal combatant is death.

If this report proves true, I'll have more arguments in support of my position above.

Da_Wiz Sends

I say load the bastards up in a C-5 Galaxy like cattle with the story that we are flying them all back to Mecca, but "accidently" let one of them sneak a suicide bomb on the plane. Once over the ocean, our pilots bail out and we blow the thing up. There will be little terrorist pieces spread all over the Atlantic.

See the beauty of that?

And waste a perfectly good C-5?

well, how many can ya fit on an aging Cessna?

well, how many can ya fit on an aging Cessna?

Enough.

It's like the old joke about lawyers at the bottom of the sea - any number is a good start.

Being naturally bloody-minded, I had a nascent thought about the C-5 scenario where we could actually deliver them to Mecca and let them go....at about 30,000 feet. Saves the plane for later and all that.

But then I thought about the mess in the Grand Mosque, and defiling the Ka'bah, and what it would mean for my Muslim friends and, of course, the people on the ground. While I wouldn't shed a tear for those who taint civilians' sanctuary by attacking from within its bounds, there are others for whom the gesture would be offensive.

There may be more appropriate sites, however. I'm thinking particularly about the three stone pillars of Jumrat three miles to the East of Mecca. During the Hajj, in a ceremony called Ramy al-jimar, small stones are cast at the pillars to symbolize rejection of Satan. Would it be so wrong to have the Raining of Jihadists, where blockheads are ejected at some altitude toward the pillars, demonstrating an actual rejection of evil?

I'm no Theologian, however, so it's just a thought.....

it's raining men, hallelujah!

It's really really dumb to make too much of this.

The real danger of letting jihadi war criminals out of Gitmo is that they could carry out attacks. Making up a story where it did happen just makes our argument look silly when it's shown to be false.

How about this for a "news flash"? None of the 520 jihadi war criminals in Gitmo were able to participate in this attack on London.

(Although, of course, if we accede to the demands to close Gitmo and let the jihadis go, some of them just might be able to make it to the next attack and make sure more people get killed.)

cathy :-)