| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
lol
THE MORNING RANT: School Board and Down Ballot Races Are the Most Important Races You Can Vote in this Cycle Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 5/ 8/26 Daily Tech News 8 May 2026 Thursday Overnight Open Thread - May 7, 2026 [Doof] Thursday Cafe US Assets Counter-Attack Iranian Fast Boats Quick Hits Tennessee Passes New Gerrymandered Map Which Will, Hopefully, Eliminate the Last Democrat-Held Congressional Seat Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Downing Street Memos May Not Be Quite Authentic And Other Things That Don't Matter |
Main
| Am I Crazy, Or Is It Impossible to Capture a Terrorist Using "Art"? »
June 20, 2005
New York Times: No Jews Is Good NewsAn ex-CIA agent made some arguably anti-Semitic (well, let us say, "anti-Zionist") remarks at John Conyers' barking moonbat hearings on Iraq, but the New York Times whitewashes his statements and won't report them to its liberal, and fairly Jewish, well-cocooned readership.
All the news that we think you can handle without drawing "improper" inferences. We are the gate-keepers of your minds. It's a service we provide to you, gratis. Thanks to the Hotline's Blogometer. Ask the "Public Editor!": Tom Maguire suggests you ask the public editor why the New York Times deliberately embargoed the most newsworthy part of this story. posted by Ace at 01:41 PM
CommentsPBS Newshour had Ray "There's Got to be a Morning After" McGovern on for a long spot as well, like he was some normal analyst. He did manage to embarrass himself a bit, however, by constantly making vocal noises while the "counterpoint" guy (another ex CIAer but from the Heritage Institute) talked. McGovern is a spook version of Noam Chomsky. Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on June 20, 2005 02:12 PM
It always comes back to the Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooos! Posted by: TallDave on June 20, 2005 02:15 PM
To pre-empt Cedarford: Ace, you Tel Aviv puppet. Can't a man hand out pamphlets exposing the World Zionist Conspiracy without being labeled an Anti-Semite? /Cedarford off Posted by: Knemon on June 20, 2005 02:28 PM
I have no doubt that Israel has different interests than we do, and of course they're interested in enlisting us to their cause. As every country is. I guess there's a way to say this without being an anti-Semite. But I do think an awful lot of this is motivated by anti-Semitism. Colin Quinn (maybe next week, he says!) had an non-anti-Semitic hypothetical-- what if we could end this war just by giving up Israel, letting the Arabs push them into the sea? That's hard-hearted and self-interested and I don't object to the question automatically. Sometimes you have to fuck someone over. But I really am tired of hearing how terrible the Israelis/Zionists/Jews in general are, and how they're using us. Grow up. Everyone uses everyone. Posted by: ace on June 20, 2005 02:44 PM
"Everyone uses everyone." Tell me about it... After a weekend with Miss Conservative T-shirt, I feel more sapped and limp than a worn out, raggedy, beat-up washcloth. Posted by: BobDolesCock on June 20, 2005 02:53 PM
Knemon - I believe I can speak for myself and many, many Americans just fine. I pointed out the Democratic event was noteworthy in another thread because it signals America is now easing off being the last country in the world, including Israel, where it has been politically forbidden to criticize Israel. Now, the Democrats at the meeting were from the far liberal wing of their Party, but 10% of Democrats in Congress were represented at the meeting, nevertheless. And willing to break the "no criticism of Israel" taboo. Or the past reluctance to subject it's dedicated lobbyists, neocon promoters, and Zionist moneymen to scrutiny. (Only Israel-backers are shielded by law from having to register as foreign lobbyists) The consequences to the Democrats are low. Liberal Jews care more about gay marriage, progresive causes, the ACLU, and never forgetting past Republican wars against the Communist Party to ever vote Republican. Despite Bush's total devotion to what Israel wants as a good believing Christian Zionist should - Jews still voted for Kerry with 3 out of every 4 votes - and big Jewish donors still funded 50% of the DNC's coffers and roughly the same with the 527s....Even in Israel, half the population is not Zionist, but are liberals similar to Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer. And this was followed a few days later by the announcement that all American military technology transferred to Israel is now under American supervision and vetting to prevent our untrustworthy "Special Friend" from sneaking around and surrepticiously transferring that technology to make a buck. Israel had a long history of that, starting with the Soviet Union and after several significant violations with China, including selling our F-16 avionics & electronics, the Patriot Missile system radar and targeting package - Israel was told it was to submit to supervision or lose access. We have already cut them out of Joint Strike Fighter development due to past backstabbing, reserving partnership for more trustworthy nations like Turkey, the UK, Netherlands, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Spain, Poland. Posted by: Cedarford on June 20, 2005 03:09 PM
Everyone uses us for different reasons, though. The Saudis use us to keep their misogynistic, theocratic regime in Mercedes. The europeans use us to keep their welfare states in place while we spend our resources to keep them safe. Posted by: Drago on June 20, 2005 03:14 PM
Giving up on Israel will not make the islamofacsists stop. It's only one obstacle in their way to us. Posted by: on June 20, 2005 03:21 PM
Cedarford: I think I made that point more succinctly above. Posted by: TallDave on June 20, 2005 03:32 PM
You know, if I were the suspicious sort, the entire incident would look like it was set up to allow Howard Dean to look centrist and reasonable by giving him something other than Republicans to deplore. But that would require the intention subversion of the Democratic Party's moral authority. You're right, that's just crazy. Posted by: Pompous on June 20, 2005 04:00 PM
Sorry, Cedarford, I'm not interested in reading your nonsense. Explain this to me, though: how is "criticizing Israel" (the thing you claim you're doing, and it's so BRAVE and HEROIC to do so, what with the supercovert Mossad death squads on the lookout for you and all) and handing out "Jews stayed away" pamphlets the same thing? Don't you see that it's because people like you view Jews as some alien species, and a Jewish American as very much Jew first, Zionist second, maybe American fifth, that Israel acts the way it does? Do you think the Jews stayed away from the WTC? Yes or no, asshole. Posted by: Knemon on June 20, 2005 04:20 PM
No Tall Dave, it's about America being free to scrutinize and them to criticize nations that the American public thinks are harming America's national interests through too much clout and palm-greasing of America's elected officials & businessmen. Given the volume of criticism about Saudi Arabia, France, China, Germany, Russia, screwed up Muslim nations the American public is free to engage in...... It's clearly not "all about the Jooooooz" as you claim. It is about regaining the freedom to finally permit average Americans to criticize any nation or it's backers working against the interest of the American public without fear of speech codes or being smeared as an "anti-Chinese racist"; "Islamophobic", "Francophobe", or "anti-Semite". Just as America slowly but surely has surmounted the speech codes once blocking any criticism of inner city black culture, feminism - as we are feeling freer to publically note the deficiencies of the "Religion of Peace", we are now joining the rest of the world's democracies in allowing criicism of Israel or Zionism to be made part of the debate. It's about what is best for America... Posted by: Cedarford on June 20, 2005 04:32 PM
Sorry, Cedarford, I'm not interested in reading your nonsense. Hey, that's MY line! But you left out calling him a wanker. Later, Posted by: bbeck on June 20, 2005 04:50 PM
Why does Herr Cedarford always claim that no one is allowed to criticize Israel in America, and then follow up by criticizing Israel. And of course completely ignores how the (jooo-owned) media runs a story about the poor Jordanians (whoops they call themselves Palestinans now) are being fenced out, shot at, raped & butchered by those evil Israelis. Or does he not view that as criticism? Posted by: HowardDevore on June 20, 2005 06:06 PM
If you wish to contribute to the cause of France, or Australia or Canada for that matter - and give money to the registered lobby of the country you like, three things apply: 1. Your name appears on a list of contributors to another foreign country that the American public can scrutinize. 2. You cannot claim your contribution as "tax-exempt". Heck, even domestic lobbies working for a direct domestic political vs. charitable cause cannot claim tax-emptions. 3. If you yourself meet with politicians, you are required to tell them that you are a registered foreign lobbyist - and the reason you want the preferential trade subclause is ....Wow! Because the foreign country your lobby is supporting wants it. Except for Jewish-Americans and Israel. Chip in to Israel's lobby, and a "special exception for special friends" applies. All the money you give is tax-exempt by a clever loophole inserted by American Zionists. There is no list of contributors made publicly available for scrutiny under law. And if you work for a Zionist Lobby, you don't have to say that you are working for Israel, as opposed to other nations where you are legally bound to declare you are an agent of a foreign power. I, unlike Knemon, bbeck, Spewfan, and Jack M - know which nation has my full loyalties. Chew on that, Knemon. To me, folks like you are mild traitors and true assholes if you put another country's interests over America. You seek to use the 30 year old strategy of stifling, intimidating, and marginalizing critics of Israeli policies. That tactic once worked in other nations, but ultimately failed....because you can't get people in a country to believe that all those with valid criticisms of influence, Zionism are all bigots or conspiracy nuts. Now you are down to your last country where criticism of Israel or Zionism has been verboten, and the cracks in the wall you and your sort have placed between the American people and the true facts are widening. America is where France or Canada or the UK was 20 years ago....kow-towing to the World's Greatest Victim Group....but questioning their unequivocable support as more and more Zionist transgressions and lies emerged. Posted by: Cedarford on June 20, 2005 06:11 PM
Oh, gee, Devore, I forgot all about you and your dubious loyalties! Sorry! Posted by: Cedarford on June 20, 2005 06:13 PM
Ah, what would a day at Ace's place be without Cedarbigot's non-stop Jew-bashing? Sometimes I actually think Cedarjew is going to make it all the way to the end of the day without refexively spewing the type of racial and religious hatred that'd get you imprisoned in Europe, and then ... boom! ... there he goes again. Regular as a guard's watch in a concentration camp. He just can't seem to stop himself. I guess that as long as the Cedarliars are out pimping their non-stop Jew-baiting crapola, all remains well in Elders-of-Zionville. Posted by: 12" Saturday Night on June 20, 2005 06:29 PM
Aw the guy who has to tie his arm down to keep it from doing a sieg heil says I have dubious loyalites. How sweet. Posted by: HowardDevore on June 20, 2005 06:34 PM
Howard, unfortunately, Cedarford's nation and government to which HE holds allegiance no longer exists. If it did, maybe we could take it to war and beat it...again. Oh well, we must all just enjoy the regular beatings he gets here instead. Later, Posted by: bbeck on June 20, 2005 06:40 PM
Okay, Cedarford. Let's throw Israel to the wolves. Let the you-know-whoslims push them "into the sea." Then what? War's over? Kumbayah? Everyone goes home happy, the jihad is over, peace and love reign and rainbows sprout from the ayatollahs' assholes? Posted by: Knemon on June 20, 2005 07:19 PM
Knemon, naturally then Cedarford would find a reason that the diaspora had to be destroyed...but only because of what those evil Jews do, not out of antisemitism! Noel at Hog On Ice posted these superb tidbits; "And what is anti-Zionist? It is the denial to the Jewish people of a fundamental right that we justly claim for the people of Africa and freely accord all other nations of the Globe. It is discrimination against Jews, my friend, because they are Jews. In short, it is antisemitism." "The antisemite rejoices at any opportunity to vent his malice. The times have made it unpopular, in the West, to proclaim openly a hatred of the Jews. This being the case, the antisemite must constantly seek new forms and forums for his poison. How he must revel in the new masquerade! He does not hate the Jews, he is just 'anti-Zionist'!" "My friend, I do not accuse you of deliberate antisemitism. I know you feel, as I do, a deep love of truth and justice and a revulsion for racism, prejudice, and discrimination. But I know you have been misled--as others have been--into thinking you can be 'anti-Zionist' and yet remain true to these heartfelt principles that you and I share." "Let my words echo in the depths of your soul: When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews--make no mistake about it."--Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., 1967 Posted by: lauraw on June 20, 2005 09:32 PM
Hah, Lauraw! I figured you of all people would know that lying comes as easy to a Zionist as breathing. The whole King thing is a Jewish fabrication. And hardly surprising given the arrogance of the Zionists.
But the old hoary lies weren't enough so a rather stupid but well-heeled and well connected Rabbi ran the "anti-Zionism=anti-Semitism MLK scam in the late 90's in conjunction with a Jewish-owned publisher. The whole speech was readily picked up by MLK scholars as phony as a 3-dollar bill from the style and content of the message, as well as that Jews who were associated with King and the Communist Party would have relished getting that speech out earlier. CAMERA, a Jewish dominated organization, caught wind of the speech fabrication issue being discussed in the MLK scholar community and decided to out the dumb Rabbi and his confederates before a non-Jewish owned media outlet here or in Europe outed him, or before the fabrication was exposed in a published academic paper. The King family originally thought the "discovered" paper equating anti-Zionism to anti-Semitism was true, and then were plenty pissed and wanted "damage money" - which since the Rabbi came from one of the more illustrious and wealthy of the Top NYC Jewish families - was readily paid - rumors of several million bucks were needed to propitate the angry Kings. All that would have been hushed as just another clumsy Zionist lie - except that lots of people were angry that Zionists were manipulating the memory of their beloved MLK for their own ends and because the whole hoax got out on the Internet and fervent Zionists spread it thinking it was true. In the black community, this fabricated speech of MLK is cited as yet another reason for mistrust of Democrat Party Jews.. Posted by: Cedarford on June 20, 2005 11:50 PM
You should dig a little deeper Cedarturd. From CAMERA's website CAMERA ALERT: Letter by Martin Luther King a Hoax
Posted by: Master of None on June 21, 2005 01:01 AM
Master of None - Ah, fake but true...like the CBS National Guard memos. So the fake speech concocted by Zionists reflects what they think King would have said if he had written the fabricated document, just like Killian would have written the Guard memos if he could have found the time or would have said they were "basically true" if he had lived. This Zionist defense of yours is as bad as CBS's after getting caught in a lie. And since Zionists are pathological liars, I wouldn't be surprised if some are still posting the MLK fake knowing it is fake. And we all know that Zionists, once caught red-handed in a lie, attempt to reconstruct the lie into something else they claim is "basically true". We will never know what King would have said if he had lived. He was beholden to Jews for the money they gave him, and said kind words about Jews now and then...but he also got in real trouble with the FBI because the Jews closest to him in the 50s and early 60's turned out to be Communists. And King approved of the late 60s purge of the Jews trying to control the NAACP and the SLC. There is also the matter of King, in the last years of his life, becoming a strong opponent of both the Vietnam War and strong advocate for the rights of indigenous 3rd World peoples over their oppressors. While again, we will never know, some of Kings closest associates have said he would have opposed the Zionist's colonization drive into Gaza and the West Bank that happened after he died.. And the off-handed remarks at Harvard to a question posed by someone in the audience were not recorded, but stated as what a Jewish associate of King's at the appearance remembered what he said. Not that a Zionist would ever lie, of course! Posted by: Cedarford on June 21, 2005 01:28 AM
Seriously, Cedarford, what's the deal with you and Israel? The history of the world is full of people's who invaded someone else's land, beat the crap out of them and settled down. The losers either died out, moved away or made peace and assimilated. What the Jews did after WWII only makes sense- if a tribe of people is spread out all over several continents, and just narrowly survived being marked for destruction, why not find someplace to concentrate and consolidate? As for the rest of the world hating America because we support Israel, so what? The rest of the world is going to hate us anyway. Any country with more than 10% Muslim population will hate us no matter what. We are the infidels. We broadcast images of scantily-clad women, acting boldly like prostitutes, into their TV sets, movie theatres, computers, etc. We publish blasphemous books and newspapers. Plus, like I said before, there's the unspoken reason for hating us- we are the world's most successful nation. We enjoy a more rewarding lifestyle than anyone else. It is only natural to be jealous of our success. The US is full of special interest groups who are constantly pulling and tugging at the government's pursestrings to increase their little shares of the pie. If the Jews are an organized special interest group who make it their job to keep several billion dollars a year flowing to Israel, who is that any different than the farm subsidy lobby, who is ten times as successful? Or the environmentalists, who have driven the cost of gasoline up because they have torpedoed all attempts to increase domsetic refining capacity? Or the defense contractors, who spill more loose change every day on the sidewalk than what we send to Israel in a year? Just seems like you're overly focused on a very minor part of what's happening today. Posted by: Dogstar on June 21, 2005 09:17 AM
" On March 25, 1968, less than two weeks before his tragic death, he spoke out with clarity and directness stating, “peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.” From Congressman John Lewis's House website Posted by: Master of None on June 21, 2005 09:50 AM
I'm sorry for repeating a post I found somewhere else without verifying it; that was irresponsible. Whether MLK actually agreed in substance with the false quotes attributed to him is no excuse. I have noticed that thing posts more when we entertain him. When we had that little blackout going on, he was far less frequent of a troll. I'm gonna resume ignoring him. Anybody with me? Its not like being proven wrong time and time again teaches him anything. He's just here for the bashing, lets not give it to him. Posted by: lauraw on June 21, 2005 10:06 AM
"We will never know what King would have said if he had lived. He was beholden to Jews for the money they gave him, and said kind words about Jews now and then" WOW. Every day it gets worse. You are beyond parody. Posted by: on June 21, 2005 10:33 AM
"Just seems like you're overly focused on a very minor part of what's happening today." There's a clinical term for this, I think :) (ococococococococococococococo...) Posted by: BrewFan on June 21, 2005 10:55 AM
Dogstar writes: What the Jews did after WWII only makes sense .............why not find someplace to concentrate and consolidate? Except that after WWII, because of the Nazi lebensraum policy and the Japs colonizing effort, the Geneva Conventions were amended to prohibit colonization. Israel signed that in 1949 as a condition of joining the UN...then violated it when it started it's Settlements Policy in the 70's..claiming it wasn't "really" colonizing so much as "joining with the Arabs for mutual benefit & peace". As for the rest of the world hating America because we support Israel, so what? The rest of the world is going to hate us anyway. America once had many friends and allies. They are a good thing. Others paid for most of the WWII costs and Gulf War costs. Think about the joy of going it alone as your kids pay off the 200 billion and growing bill the US is footing almost solely and taking 95% of non-Iraqi casualties.....as a small part of what our blind support of Israel reaps for the US. Allies really matter, especially when we are engaged in a global war on radical Islam where the Islamoids organize and work their plots mostly outside the USA. And we need allies as China rises.. Any country with more than 10% Muslim population will hate us no matter what. No, as recently as 35 years ago Americans were well-liked and well regarded in most Muslim countries and it was safe for Americans to live and work there. Like I said before, there's the unspoken reason for hating us- we are the world's most successful nation. We enjoy a more rewarding lifestyle than anyone else. It is only natural to be jealous of our success. That is just arrogant American jingoism speaking. Japan, Singapore, Thailand, China, Canada, and most European countries rather like their own nation and think it is successful and have no wish to shape it as a clone of America. The gap in productivity, standard of living, predominance of cultural exports was even higher in the 50's and 60's - but we weren't hated overseas, then..Our policies, not who we are, formed the basis of why others dislike us. The US is full of special interest groups who are constantly pulling and tugging at the government's pursestrings to increase their little shares of the pie. If the Jews are an organized special interest group who make it their job to keep several billion dollars a year flowing to Israel, who is that any different than the farm subsidy lobby, who is ten times as successful? Well, yes! One group is trying to affect domestic policy for a group of Americans, the other is an agent for a foreign power devoted to advancing it's wealth and interests - sometimes to the detriment of America's interests and economic well-being. Posted by: Cedarford on June 21, 2005 12:12 PM
Your probably right lauraw, its just that cedardouche's philosphy is EVIL. Still it's not like anyone on this site agrees with the turd. Whenever someones who doesn't know any better starts agreeing with a "reasonable" cedarnazi point, you regulars start telling them not to go there. Argh such a dilemna. Ignore the screaming naked 3 year old in the middle of theliving room, or tell him to shut up, at which point he starts pooping on the coffee table. Posted by: HowardDevore on June 21, 2005 03:43 PM
Actually, you have a bigger problem, Howard. As the American public becomes educated in all the Zionist lies and myths told to past generations of Americans, blind support of Israel as a beacon of democracy will lessen as they realize the racist nature of Zionism and how they were lied to for so many years by Zionists. The MLK fabrication that Lauraw wittingly or unwittingly put out as "proof" that anti-Zionism=anti-Semitism might have actually worked for decades as a tool of deception not too long ago. Jewish-controlled media would have just run it as true and ignored all "letters to the editor" saying it was fake. Now, you have easy fact-checking and easy proof when a Lauraw attempts to disseminate pro-Zionist fakery. I don't hold much warmth in my heart for Muslims in the USA, but as Emmanuel Cellar and Co 1965 Immigration Reform Act opened our Borders and let millions of Muslims in - The Muzzies are doing a bang-up job purging Zionist lies and myths from school textbooks and forcing a "balanced" ME perspective be tought in school and universities. Also, as they continue increasing their power, wealth and numbers - they become a countervailing political force in America against the old "carte blanche" whatever Israel wants, faction in Congress. Just like as happened in Canada and France. Posted by: Cedarford on June 21, 2005 04:49 PM
"The Muzzies are doing a bang-up job purging Zionist lies and myths from school textbooks" Oh yes, lets hear it for the Muslims and the great truths found in their TEXTBOOKS You've complete lost it if you're counting on Muslims to find any kind of truth, especially about Jews. Posted by: Master of None on June 21, 2005 05:05 PM
So to Cedarfuck doesn't like muslims, but as long as they're PURGING jews he'll let them stay!!!! Posted by: HowardDevore on June 21, 2005 05:29 PM
Howard--- That's not surprising. The Nazis had a similar relationship with Muslims too. It's the old enemy of my enemy is my friend deal. Posted by: Master of None on June 21, 2005 05:33 PM
Hey, don't blame me! Jews like Emmanual Cellar were the main organizers and prime movers of the mass immigration policy enacted to prevent "another St Louis" and to make Emma Lazarus's poem the basis of American immigration policy. Don't like millions of Muslims pouring into the USA? Take it up with the ACLU and other pro-immigration Jewish fronts that helped open the doors of America to millions of Islamists and are busily keeping them open. And the ONLY 2 good things about the Muslims here is that they are balancing the counterproductive "tilt" in America's foreign policy favoring only one nation - and they are also a test case to see if radical Islamists are capable of assimilation and reformation of their violent anti-infidel tendencies. Posted by: Cedarford on June 21, 2005 07:07 PM
Poor Seedy, doing all that typing. Here Seedy, save those precious fingers and use cut-and-paste. Same garbage, same amount of bandwidth wasted, much less work on your part. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on June 21, 2005 07:24 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Democrat Congresswoman Sara Jacobs cites Me-Again Kelly, Cavernous Nostrils, Alex Jones and Tuq'r Qarlson as proof that concerns about Trump's mental health are "bipartisan"
As Bonchie from Red State says: Know the op when you see it.
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain Recent Comments
gKWVE:
"Suck it, Spanberger
Lick it, Obama ..."
TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "97 I asked a friend, who is involved with the GOP ..." ...: "We once had a 64 skull day I think. Can't remember ..." gnats local 678: "re 86: probably thought they could get away with i ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "41 Ancient Irish vuvuzelas. youtube.com/watch?v=b ..." 18-1: "If the economy is looking good in 3 months or so, ..." Smell the Glove: "Consider the Dems set this mess off. First the SC ..." Sharkman: "Here is a link to the 46 page decision: https:/ ..." GuardianB: "Someone needs to get Ace a laughing flaming skull ..." Everyman: ""68 I think what bukkake-ed this map was not only ..." davidt: ""The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday invalidated ..." Dipped in skullpudding: "I haz lolboner ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|