Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« The Ace Effect: Lileks Disses Willis Without Either Linking Him Or Naming Him | Main | Oh, Boo-Hoo-Hoo, the Bears, the Bears... »
March 17, 2005

Judge Rules Against Transferring Yemeni Terrorists to a Foreign Country

The Urban Grind (scan down to first post of March 17th) has the dope, which I haven't seen anywhere else today:

Lawyers for the Yemenis are worried the government will try to move them from the Guantanamo Bay facility to another country in order to “warehouse them in a prison, provide them with no legal process and, in effect, avoid the American court process altogether,” Marc Falkoff, an attorney for the detainees, said Sunday.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer’s ruling Saturday on an emergency petition blocks any attempt to move the Yemenis until a hearing is held on their lawyers’ request for at least 30 days notice if their clients are to be transferred.

She adds:

Now call me unsophisticated, but why should people wishing to destroy us and our way of life be defended within a system they are trying to destroy?

I think we need to have a debate on the limits of "civilization," and the still-robust need for the civilized to occasionally act in reasonably savage manner -- against those who are themselves made monsters by their own choices.

Via Instapundit comes this related thought by The Volokh Conspiracy, regarding the Iranian government's savage-yet-appropriate execution of one of the most vile serial killers ever known:

I like civilization, but some forms of savagery deserve to be met not just with cold, bloodless justice but with the deliberate infliction of pain, with cruel vengeance rather than with supposed humaneness or squeamishness. I think it slights the burning injustice of the murders, and the pain of the families, to react in any other way.

And that's precisely why I support torturing those who are either caught red-handed committing terrorism or are well-known, indisputable leaders of the movement. If inflicting pain on these bastards can lead to one tip that catches another terrorist or even an entire cell -- thus sparing the lives of at least three or four innocent people, and perhaps several dozen (perhaps a thousand!) -- I say that's worth a few broken fingers.

And, to be quite honest, even if the torture doesn't produce useful information -- it's still rough justice. Those who step outside the most basic rules of humanity have no cause to complain when humanity decides to suspend its basic rules as regards them.


posted by Ace at 05:14 PM
Comments



I say ef 'em.

Posted by: fat kid on March 17, 2005 05:29 PM

Our judicial overlords at work.

Posted by: someone on March 17, 2005 05:35 PM

Hear! Hear!

Posted by: kobekko on March 17, 2005 11:09 PM

"I think we need to have a debate on the limits of "civilization," and the still-robust need for the civilized to occasionally act in reasonably savage manner"

Will you listen to yourself? "the still-robust need" to act savagely? We should act in a manner that every civilized people agrees is inhuman? And how, exactly, does one act in a reasonably savage manner? That, it seems to me, is an oxymoron of the highest order.

It slights the injustice of murders to not deliberately inflict pain "with cruel vengance rather than a supposed humaneness"? Even if it doesn't produce useful information (and all evidence by experts suggests that it does not) it's still justice? Not the sort of justice I have any interest in, thank you very much.

You are correct in this, however, "[t]hose who step outside the most basic rules of humanity have no cause to complain when humanity decides to suspend its basic rules as regards them." That's why I am complaining...not on their behalf but upon behalf of whatever humanity may remain within you, within our society as a whole.

The idea of sanctuary, a place where murderers could go for protection from hate induced vengeance until (s)he could receive due process of law, is one that goes back several thousand years before Christ. Would you really set back society 4,000 years?

Posted by: Craig R. Harmon on March 18, 2005 01:05 PM

Good post Ace. And thanks for the plug. You've got some great Terri Schiavo posts as well.

Posted by: Zelda on March 20, 2005 09:37 PM
Posted by: on June 6, 2005 07:50 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD commiserate about the NYC primaries and whether the contagion will spread, J.D. Vance is becoming a cypher, Texas Antifa gets a wake-up call, and more!
Trump will present the trophy for the World Cup, and lunatic cultists will not be happy
pRiDe Month's shameful record so far
Department of Energy Announces American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans
$17.5B is a good start. Now add two zeroes to that number! [CBD]
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
Recent Comments
Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Rockford Files remake coming btw Posted by: st ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "everyone else will watch New York decline and "lea ..."

(D)emocrat Election Officials: "[i]As long as your permanent residence is 6 feet u ..."

It's me donna: " I'm OK with this. As long as your permanent resi ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]I summon next thread simply by clicking 'post' ..."

SMH at God's mercy: "Rockford Files remake coming btw Posted by: steev ..."

Cheri: "Darializa...Diarrhea is more appropriate. The n ..."

Ex Rex Reeder: "The next social contagion? The Coof was one. The t ..."

Don Black: "I summon next thread simply by clicking 'post' ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] Don't ever apologize for loving 80s music, re ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Don't ever apologize for loving 80s music, rega ..."

Howdy: "[i]IT WILL WORK. That's the problem with our naive ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives