Your link isn't working. Take off the quote.

Ace-- O/T, but check out this story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7037620/site/newsweek/

I don't know what's sadder: Putin's mirror-imaging, or the fact that Bush *could* have fired Dan Rather and gotten away with it.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Is there a way to see the entire article without paying? BugMeNot no help.

I am shocked - SHOCKED.

Next they'll tell us Pamela Anderson's boobs are fake.

I think the correct term is "anti-American." We wish it was un-American to be anti-American, but it turns out to be all to commonly American.

Ah Screw semantics! Let's start racking up heads!

BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From the British magazine Spectator, circa May 2004, via Instapundit:

The other day, while taking a break by the Al-Hamra Hotel pool, fringed with the usual cast of tattooed defence contractors, I was accosted by an American magazine journalist of serious accomplishment and impeccable liberal credentials.

She had been disturbed by my argument that Iraqis were better off than they had been under Saddam and I was now — there was no choice about this — going to have to justify my bizarre and dangerous views. I’ll spare you most of the details because you know the script — no WMD, no ‘imminent threat’ (though the point was to deal with Saddam before such a threat could emerge), a diversion from the hunt for bin Laden, enraging the Arab world. Etcetera.

But then she came to the point. Not only had she ‘known’ the Iraq war would fail but she considered it essential that it did so because this would ensure that the ‘evil’ George W. Bush would no longer be running her country. Her editors back on the East Coast were giggling, she said, over what a disaster Iraq had turned out to be. ‘Lots of us talk about how awful it would be if this worked out.’ Startled by her candour, I asked whether thousands more dead Iraqis would be a good thing.

She nodded and mumbled something about Bush needing to go. By this logic, I ventured, another September 11 on, say, September 11 would be perfect for pushing up John Kerry’s poll numbers. ‘Well, that’s different — that would be Americans,’ she said, haltingly. ‘I guess I’m a bit of an isolationist.’ That’s one way of putting it.

The moral degeneracy of these sentiments didn’t really hit me until later when I dined at the home of Abu Salah, a father of six who took over as the Daily Telegraph’s chief driver in Baghdad when his predecessor was killed a year ago.

The MSM are fundamentally immature and not serious. This discussion highlights their inability to distinguish between issues of global import and local politics. For further examples from lower down in the media food chain see http://pbswatch.blogspot.com/2005/02/i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i.html

"The MSM are fundamentally immature and not serious." True, but it's far worse than that. Being Liberals, they are all cowards and so fundementally dishonest that they are totally unbalanced. Very simply, they believe what they want to believe no matter how absurd or what the facts are. These universal Liberal personality traits express themselves through a profound lack of good judgement, they are incapable of seperating major facts from minor facts and major issues from minor issues. And typically, the jounalist was speaking from the local Hotel at which she probably spent most of her time in the bar talking shit instead of in the field.

YO ACE - Let's bang the drum against Ward Churchill, Freeper reports a group of teachers just signed a letter of support for him. I hate to admit it, but it's only Monday and already I'm fed up with the Liberal toxic waste that comes out of their demented minds. LET'S DO SOMETHING!

"Conservatives are sometimes criticized, fairly I think, for wanting things to go right."

Who? When? I can't think of a single example of what you're talking about.

Joshua,

Go back and read the post. There was no period after 'right'. Why are you taking that phrase out of context? Are you a troll?