Ace of Spades HQ

« IowaHawk: The Truth Is Still Out There | Main | The Return of... Dusty! »

February 24, 2005

Churchill Caught Teaching Terrorism-- On Tape

No chance of a retraction this time, as they've got the tapes and Michelle Malkin is providing the transcripts:

Question from audience: You mentioned a little bit ago, ‘Why did it take a bunch of Arabs to do what you all should have done a long time ago,’ that’s my question.
And as a white man standing here in your midst from a fairly liberal/conservative/middle of the road background—and I tell people I’m so far left I’m coming up on the rigt—and I’d like you to respond to, why shouldn’t we do something and how could we move so they don’t see us coming?

Churchill: I’m gonna repeat that, tell me if I got that right: Why shouldn’t we do something and how do you you move so they don’t see you coming.

As to the first part, not a reason in the world that I could see. I can’t find a single reason that you shouldn’t in a principled way—there may be some practical considerations, such as do you know how (laughter from audience)—you know, often these things are processes.

"Laughter from audience." Hee, hee. It's fun to discuss committing acts of terrorism against the US.

It’s not just an impulse. And certainly it’s not just an event. And the simple answer, although it probably should be more complicated, but I’m not being flip and giving the simple answer, is: You carry the weapon. That’s how they don’t see it coming.
You’re the one…They talk about ‘color blind or blind to your color.’ You said it yourself.

You don’t send the Black Liberation Army into Wall Street to conduct an action.
You don’t send the American Indian Movement into downtown Seattle to conduct an action. Who do you send? You. Your beard shaved, your hair cut close, and wearing a banker’s suit.

There’s probably a whole lot more to it, you know that. But there’s where you start.

He continues with this line of suggestion in Part II:

If you are Arab, for example, you are automatically profiled as a potential terrorist. Period. And you can be asked to leave a plane because some Nordic-looking woman two rows down tells the stewardess she’s not comfortable with you being there—her presence makes her uncomfortable—why? Because it was Arabs who flew planes into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. See.
And that fact—she’s on an airplane and there’s an Arab and somehow psychologically it makes her uncomfortable so it’s very understandable that she not be asked to leave since she’s made it clear that she’s not going to be a very big risk to the flight, but rather the individuals sitting there doing nothing have to leave.

And why by the way did it take Arabs to do what people here should have done a long time ago?

Nice, huh? I seem to remember Al Qaeda terrorism handbooks making the exact same points about how to blend in and strike without notice.

Good to see Churchill has at least one fan out there.

See Michelle Malkin for the audio for all four tapes and further transcripts.

H/t to the indispensible Little Green Footballs.

posted by Ace at 11:07 AM

Comments

Encouraging homegrown terrorism. What, pray tell, is the difference between these people and the Timothy McVeighs of the world? So far left that he's coming up on the right, indeed.

OK, NOW can we charge him with sedition?

I really don't care if he becomes a martyr in the process. Put this murder-enabler in the hole and throw away the key.

Posted by: lauraw on February 24, 2005 11:18 AM

I am a captain at a major national airline. Churchill is completely wrong when says that the discomfort that a Nordic woman might have at the sight of an Arabic man would be enough to have him removed. In spite of the overwhelming evidence that most of today's terrorists are Arabs, we do not profile on visuals, but rather behavior.

I am also a graduate of the University of Colorado. Not only is Churchill doing a fabulous job of embarassing himself (and anyone who might support him), but he's embarassing people like me, who, absent my alumni status, have absolutely nothing in common with him.

Posted by: azlibertarian on February 24, 2005 11:36 AM

Some of Churchill's statements fell out of block quotes in your entry--so that it looks as if you're saying Churchillian tripe.
Please fix before someone gets the wrong impression of you.

Posted by: m on February 24, 2005 01:47 PM

Thanks so much, M.

Posted by: ace on February 24, 2005 02:02 PM

CALLING ALL BLOGGERS: Below are all the email addresses for the Board of Regents at Ward Churchill's university the Univ. of Colorado who are considering firing him right now. Let's send 'em all an email to help 'em make up their minds!

NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS AS OF JANUARY 12, 2005
2001-20071995-2001At LargeR
Dr. Peter Steinhauer (D.D.S.)7492 Spring DriveBoulder, CO 80303 303-499-1278 (fax 303-543-2351) e-mail Peter.Steinhauer@colorado.edu
2003-2009District 2D

Ms. Cindy Carlisle411 Spruce StreetBoulder, CO 80302303-444-2606 (fax 303-444-0057) e-mail Regent.Carlisle@colorado.edu
2003-2009District 7R

Ms. Patricia Hayes12575 East Bates CircleAurora, CO 80014303-369-0054 (fax 303-740-8409)e-mail Regent.Hayes@colorado.edu
2005-2011District 1D

Mr. Michael Carrigan555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200Denver, CO 80202(303)-295-8314 (fax 303-975-5489)e-mail Carrigan@colorado.edu
1999-2005District 4R

Mr. Tom LuceroP.O. Box 921Johnstown, CO 80534 970-978-1142 (fax 970-587-0920) e-mail Tommyjclay@aol.com* Please send communications as an attachment to his email when possible
2005-2011At LargeR

Mr. Steve BosleyP.O. Box 270509 Louisville, CO 80027303-604-2313 (fax 303-604-2313)e-mail Regent.Bosley@colorado.edu
2001-20071995-2001District 5R

Mr. Jerry G. Rutledge, Chair2745 Springmede CourtColorado Springs, CO 80906-3716719-527-8868 (fax 719-632-7694) e-mail Jerryrutledge@adelphia.net

(ACE - Hope this is not too long for your site, if so delete it.)

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on February 24, 2005 02:21 PM

ACE - Hope you don't mind but I just couldn't resist repeating this:

Ward Churchill heap full'a bullshit. He ask'um Old Chief how he nam'um babies. Chief say: When I see dancing wolves and there is baby born, I name'um Dances With Wolves. When I see flying eagle and baby is born I call'um Flying Eagle. But tell me Two Dogs Fucking, why do you ask?

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on February 24, 2005 02:45 PM

Amazon.com Widgets

Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]

Top Headlines

Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.

Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove

Chris
@chriswithans

"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"

Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining

TJM wonders about world building in stories, mostly The Hunger Games

"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.

Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over

"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)

No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.

Now they've lost 84%.

Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.

Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...

The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.

Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.

(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.

Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party

STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.

Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.

Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"

Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]

Tucker Carlson is pretty sure Trump is a wizard

Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]

Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!

TJM definitively ranks the films of Billy Wilder, like Some Like It Hot