Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Riot Breaks Out at London IKEA, Hospitalizing Hundreds | Main | And We Ain't Done With Eason Jordan Yet, Neither »
February 10, 2005

On the Trail of Churchill's Academic Fraud

Fraudulent Indian heritage, fraudulent military service, and now, of course, fraudulent "academic" writings.

University of Colorado officials reviewing Ward Churchill's writings and qualifications will find questions about his scholarship and accuracy dating back at least eight years.

"If he is going to get fired, it is going to be for making up data, and that's one thing you can't get away with in the academic community," said Thomas F. Brown, who holds a doctorate from Johns Hopkins and is an assistant professor of sociology at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas.

Brown is one of two professors at different universities who have published or have sought to publish detailed critiques of Churchill's work. Others have questioned his work in interviews.

Summing up his other ventures in profitable fraud:

But today, Churchill's intellectual rigor is the third area to face scrutiny in the academic and political world since his views about the Sept. 11 attacks - he called some of the victims "little Eichmanns" - became widely known. His claims of Indian heritage, which remain unconfirmed by anyone other than Churchill, as well as the shifting tales of his military service, remain the source of public debate as Churchill battles calls for his resignation or dismissal.

Churchill, who has asserted at different times that he was of one-sixteenth Creek or three-sixteenths Cherokee ancestry, now refuses to discuss anything about his past or questions about his academic qualifications.

"None of those questions are relevant to anything," Churchill said Tuesday. "This is not an issue about me. This is an issue about what I said. I'm not going to turn it into the ... National Enquirer."

But while Churchill has been unable or unwilling to produce anyone who can testify to his claims of Indian ancestry, or his accounts of facing combat in Vietnam, he has many defenders of his academic record.

And who might those defenders be?

"I've read a fair amount of his work, and a lot of it is excellent, penetrating and of high scholarly quality," said Noam Chomsky, linguistics professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an anti-war activist.

Well knock me over with an eagle-feather.

I'd say that Ward Churchill (Indian name: "Great Resume Embroiderer") is in heap-big trouble.



posted by Ace at 02:13 PM
Comments



You know who the happiest camper in the world is right now? Eason Jordan. Thanks to Churchill's complete assclownery, that dude is getting off easy.

Posted by: senator philabuster on February 10, 2005 02:16 PM

What a hoot. I made a comment on another message board that mentioned both Chomsky and Churchill (in a short list of leftist assclowns).

Posted by: lauraw on February 10, 2005 02:30 PM

Him heapum big Indian fraud.

Posted by: TallDave on February 10, 2005 02:53 PM

If CU were looking for an excuse to get rid of Churchill, they may "suddenly" find evidence of academic fraud. Getting rid of him would still be time-consuming and may not work in the end, unfortunately. I have a feeling that CU has known about Churchill's record for a long time and have decided to take no action.

Once again, "evil triumphs when good men do nothing." But then again, nothing like a little arrogance to call attention to yourself, eh, Ward? Can anyone say, "hubris?"

Posted by: Ron on February 10, 2005 03:30 PM

Means and Morris may be neo-Marxist morons, but at least they're Indians. Churchill looks like Glenn Reynolds in a wig. He's just another white dork in love with the "noble savages."

Which is worse, little Eichmanns or hopeless poseurs?

Morons like Churchill need a little Huron treatment, if you know what I mean.

Posted by: hobgoblin on February 10, 2005 03:34 PM

I think we've all heard of smallpox blankets, right? Did this clown make that shit up? Is he the source of that story? I mean, smallpox blankets are part and parcel of the America is Evil brief. It would be too freaking rich if it turned out he was behind the story and just made it up.

Any help?

Posted by: spongeworthy on February 10, 2005 03:39 PM

I always wondered about that blanket story. I mean, supposedly US soldiers handled these things in the days before widespread vaccines* and hazmat suits. So how did US soldiers avoid coming down with it? Simply being white didn't mean immunity (or what else am I doing with this smallpox vaccine scar on my arm?) Also, I was under the impression that smallpox had already been spread throughout the Americas by earlier exporers from Europe, so it wasn't as if this was a disease new to Native America by that time.

*(There was a smallpox vaccine, since at least the 18th century, but I don't know that it was all that efficient in the 1800s when this atrocity supposedly happened -- history buffs and people who have time to google out the facts are free to correct me here.)

Posted by: Andrea Harris on February 10, 2005 04:00 PM

Hey spongeworthy,

Here is a link to Deans World covering the topic.

Dean Links to an interesting article here.

They are worth reading.

Posted by: Old World Amish on February 10, 2005 04:02 PM

The smallpox blankets were real, but limited to certain tribes and times. Churchill's just expanding the story in a factually indefensible manner. Kinda like Bellesiles and the gun ownership rates in his now discredited book.

The thing was, most whites were immune from smallpox, either from limited exposure, survival, or vaccine. They could transmit the disease to Indians through many means, but there was a "blanket" program used in at least a few cases.

Posted by: hobgoblin on February 10, 2005 04:05 PM

sponge,

try here, too

Posted by: hobgoblin on February 10, 2005 04:09 PM

Let's say for a second that Churchill is Cherokee.

He's not, but let's say he is. Then his whole Marxist red-panther pose looks pretty silly, because the Cherokee Nation owned slaves before the civil war. They were one of Oklahoma's (then Indian Territory's) Five Civilized Tribes, disdained by other tribes as practically white themselves and as collaborators.

And they supported the Confederacy during the Civil War. The last confederate general to surrender was Stand Watie, a Cherokee.

Yeah, the Cherokees got a rough deal like all the Indians, but please. I believe Ace mentioned the doctrine of 'clean hands' below. If your ancestors owned slaves I think you lose a lot of those sweet sweet victim points.

Otherwise there are going to be some Daughters of the Confederacy asking for reparations.

Posted by: see-dubya on February 10, 2005 04:33 PM

I remember that 1992 Columbus day incident. That Douchebag Ward and a gang of other creeps physically prevented a bunch of elderly Italian-Americans from laying a wreath infront of a statue of Columbus at the end of their little parade. It stayed with me because one old guy said, plaintively, "this is America, isn't it?"

I hope somebody contacts that group and asks for their opinion. And i hope the name Douchebag Ward sticks.

Posted by: avenueBAlum on February 10, 2005 05:31 PM

OK, spongeworthy, just this once:

The origin of the smallpox blanket episode is that the British general Lord Amherst and/or his staff distributed blankets to the indians which had been used on smallpox victims. Francis Parkman published this story in 1851.

Got it?

Now for the fun part: your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to try to verify Parkman's account.

If you can, you will be setting your mind at rest.

Posted by: Dianna on February 10, 2005 05:51 PM

Hey everyone,

I just told Zelda this at The Urban Grind, but I wanted you to be aware of another "Looney Ward" item from the "Inside the Beltway" column (9/10/2005) in today's Washington Times. See http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/inbeltway.htm

Hint: I wonder what he would think of the Northern Plains Indians and their buffalo hunts?

Posted by: Ron on February 10, 2005 09:24 PM

In case you hadn't noticed, Ann Coulter screwed up the story, as usual. She accuses Churchill of falsifying the smallpox blanket story without making it clear that the problem was his extension of that accusation to the Mandan indians. Then she goes on to spout some bullshit about how germ theory hadn't been discovered yet. If she was held to the same standard she applied to Churchill her own ass would have been fired long ago. Germ warfare predates germ theory by centuries. You don't have to know what germs are to know that disease can be spread by contact. Using Coulter's logic, you could claim that they couldn't have used quarantines to stave the spread of the plague because they couldn't have possibly known about germs in the first place.

Posted by: Queequeg on February 17, 2005 01:09 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Tom Servo: " 16 If if turns out to be true that biden's doj k ..."

NaCly Dog: "NR Pax Generally, Singapore has to be well run. ..."

Penguin Pete: "Disney's announcement that they are bringing back ..."

gKWVE: "[i]29 I have a friend who is with the K9 unit at S ..."

Delurker: "Isabel Mata: “To me, a pride flag is way mor ..."

NR Pax: "[i]Singapore Institutes Caning Punishment For Scho ..."

Smell the Glove: "@59 Ms Corrie, your protest falls flat ..."

TeeJ: " - Hmmm, that new, Canadian top official. I won ..."

Rachel Corrie, D-9: "5 It's Flapjack Friday! Posted by: Mister Scott ..."

NR Pax: "[i]55 I wonder if Paul and Sid 'know' each other ..."

Martini Farmer: "> “Singapore Institutes Caning Punishment F ..."

Huck Follywood: "NATO member. Advanced US weaponry. Armed to the te ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives