Ace. On point. Unfortunately I (along with the rest of America) have a memory span like that of a goldfish (approximately 7 seconds), so alas, I'd forgotten that the NYT broke the Plame story.

*hangs head low in shame*

In case we'd forgotten which side the NYT is on... It ain't the good guys'.

Boxer knew damn well that they're not agents. If she had any real evidence, she would have provided it like a giant smoking gun. She wouldn't have been able to contain the ability to question the CIA, Pentagon, White House, etc.
Just when I think I can't be more disillusioned by the Times, they print something like this.

Trying to make sense of a democrat is analogous to a dog chasing it's tail; the twain shall never meet.

It’s unbelievable the credence Boxer gives “Gandhi.” He's a well-known and obnoxious troll, whom she makes out to be incarnation of his namesake.

I hope bloggers can cast enough light on this that ITM is allowed to reply in the NYT. It’s only fair.

It blows my mind that there are Americans who actually want democracy to fail in Iraq -- but the people at the Times clearly do. Every time I think that I will never be shocked again, the Times proves me wrong. Today they've got a piece chastizing the Coptic Christians of Jersey City for not liking it when Muslims crashed the funeral of a family they almost certainly killed.