Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« UN-Seen | Main | Those Exit Polls: Continued Showing Weighted Kerry Lead By 7:33 PM EST »
January 04, 2005

Lasering Pilots: Anti-Laser Contact Lenses For Flight Crew?

This site is a bit left-leaning for my tastes, but he seems to keep abreast of interesting military developments.

This article notes the work the Chinese and North Koreans are doing on blinding-laser technology (we've pretty much scrapped such efforts, due to a Clinton ban).

And here is an article on anti-laser contact lenses:

The contact lens sits on the eye, the entire cornea and pupil are covered, so there is no chance of a reflection, or high angle incident beam, sneaking behind the LEP [Laser Eye Protection]. Therefore, coupled with the appropriate laser protection technology, contact lenses provide a perfectly sized defense against eye injury, eliminating direct and off-axis retinal hazards from today’s most dangerous military lasers that operate in the far red and near infrared spectrum (670 nm – 1200 nm).

posted by Ace at 02:21 PM
Comments



Thanks for the link Ace.

Trolling around his site, I. . . I don't know what to say.

His articles on the Pentagon cuts are so completely wrong-headed, I think I just found a subject for my next posting.

Nifty links, yeah; but his original analysis? To paraphrase one of the greats, "His conclusions are all wrong. . . Halsey acted stupidly."

Thanks,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 4, 2005 05:23 PM

In the good old days, bomber and fighter pilots had eyepatches to put on if hostilities broke out between the US and USSR, so if a nuke blast happened in their vision they'd have one eye left. Someone find the box with all the eyepatches and we're straight.

Then again, I agree with Gerard at American Digest: lasers are about targeting, not blinding.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey on January 4, 2005 05:46 PM


Wouldn't it make more sense to coat the plane's windows in the protective material these contacts have?

Posted by: jack on January 4, 2005 06:21 PM

In a word, no. Coating the windows sounds pretty smart, until you realize that, at the speeds the airplanes are moving, contact with rain will make that coating vanish faster than a box of Krispy Kreme donuts in front of Micheal "He's THAT fucking fat!" Moore.

Posted by: Mr. Bowen on January 4, 2005 10:17 PM

Making the material part of the cockpit windows (layered within the glass) is a pretty nifty idea, but I imagine AL contact lenses would be several metric fuckloads cheaper.

Posted by: Mr. Bowen on January 4, 2005 10:19 PM

Ummm.....wouldn't it be easier to coat the inside?

Posted by: cthulhu on January 4, 2005 11:34 PM

Wouldn't it be several metric fuckloads cheaper to make the contact lenses? Don't make me repeat myself, you won't like me if I have to repeat myself.

Posted by: Mr. Bowen on January 5, 2005 02:18 AM

I think we might be past that point....

Crew of three in a commercial airliner, possibly prescription lenses for a year vs. a one-time application of interior window film -- I had someone quote me about $100 for tinting the windows on my wagon, and I don't think a cockpit is any bigger. Plus, no dry-eye problems for expensive pilots pulling 18-hour days.

While I can't speak for any metric fuckloads, it does look like the Imperial fuckloads might favor a laser-proof film on the inside of the cockpit windows.

Posted by: cthulhu on January 5, 2005 03:03 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: "I am going to mock Thune forevermore. Maybe tomorr ..."

Martini Farmer: "> >Can the US function without Congress? ------- ..."

NaCly Dog: "Berserker-Dragonheads Division It has already s ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "190 the Senate is nothing but pampered pusillanimo ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Yes, I know this had to be done and "death to Amer ..."

mindful webworker was there then: "Sitting in my '68 Mustang, waiting on the busy Str ..."

Happy!: "Dear Leader is the name for the murderous leader o ..."

NaCly Dog: "Berserker-Dragonheads Division Including 7,000 ..."

ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: " But compared to any other war or expeditionary f ..."

JQ: "There's going to be one of those sad little protes ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "But compared to any other war or expeditionary for ..."

ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: "191 the Senate is nothing but pampered pusillanimo ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives