Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Powerful Tsunami Footage | Main | Media Smackdown: Jim Pinkerton vs. Tucker Carlson »
January 03, 2005

Ever Wonder What Happened to Michael Moriarity?

One of my favorite actors, he played Ben Stone on Law & Order and "Not Clint Eastwood" in Pale Rider.

Then he got into some sort of public dispute with both Janet Reno and his boss, Dick Wolf, and got fired from L&O.

Now he appears to be some sort of, um, energetic conservative columnist.

At least I think he's some sort of conservative. He's so strident about everything that it's hard to see past the implied exclamation points:

It's fun to watch the worldwide socialist church - the matriarchal, anti-theological and environmental sycophants - scramble for cover in the wake of President George W. Bush's election victory. The next four years will be more than a mop-up of Al Qaeda and North Korea-backed terrorist operations. We'll corner Red Hollywood, Liberal lawyers and politicians, network anchormen and the leader of the pack - soon-to-be United Nations Secretary General William Jefferson Clinton.

Sitting in the demilitarized zone between the English-speaking Free World and a 250-year-old benighted religion called Marxianity - a French-born revolutionary nightmare composed of three traditionally 'sacred' levels: Reform, which is liberal; Orthodox, which is socialist/labor; and Fundamentalist, which is communist - hovering there are the Liberals. Yes, the Liberals are tied to the Communists as American defense is tied to the CIA. The Communists are rooted umbilically by the cord of Socialism, which is the generic definition of this entire economic and social ideology. Given the rest of the world's commitment to a one-world socialist federation under the UN and enthrallment with the New World Order, it is the United States versus the Rest of the World and, at this point in the court of world opinion, we've lost.

However, we Conservatives never assumed the messianic role of saving the entire human race. Karl Marx did that. The socialists and liberals are messianic almost by ideological commitment. Republicans are only concerned with the certainty of American freedom, prosperity and power. We will not surrender one ounce of our hard-earned preeminence as the most vibrant, productive, generous and freedom-loving people in the world. Since I don't believe there is intelligent life on any other planet, let's say that America has the best people in the universe (I'm going 'universal' because that's the meaning of my faith - Catholicism). Certainly they are the sanest people in the world. As head of Mother Earth's psychiatric hospital, President Bush is putting the criminally insane back into lockdown.

...

In the Marxists' best-of-all-possible worlds, a President John Kerry would have been in the Oval Office to welcome the new UN Secretary General Bill Clinton. Their photo ops together on the porch of the White House would be so thrilling to the Left and chilling to the Right - it would be tantamount to an absolute Marxist victory and total surrender of the American Republic to a socialist federation. Glinting in the eyes of the two presidential conquerors, joining hands in the name of a very French idea of the "People," would be the sun bouncing off the rifles of a UN Army as it paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue. Of course, that still may happen should Barack Obama (the newly elected Democratic Senator from Illinois) or Hilary Clinton win the Oval Office prize in 2008.

Mike, Mike, Mike... tone it down a little. This is spook-the-horses type ranting. You can learn a little from Pat Sajak.

Posted by MC Gusto at The Perfect World, where they're having a very spirited, if sometimes nasty, discussion about the politicization of the tsunami and what precisely America "owes" to the world.

Update: Another Moriarity column. Man, he sure seems to have a beef with Barak Obama.


posted by Ace at 02:12 AM
Comments



Wow. A little, one might say, strident. Last time I heard of this guy, he was having some problems with the drinky-drinky. I think he got arrested up in Nova Scotia back in the late 90s on a drunk and disorderly charge.

Anyway, there's more about his beef with Janet Reno if you click here.

Posted by: Sean M. on January 3, 2005 04:52 AM

Is it possible that brother Michael missed the part about Kerry losing the election? Or is he just trying to whip us up into an anti-Hilary frenzy?

As for Obama; he is a rising star in the Democrat party who happens to be intelligent, handsome, young, and, um, black. Makes him an easy target if you are in the business of whipping up either support or opposition.

Posted by: too many steves on January 3, 2005 07:07 AM

Cripes, I read the column about Barak and Hillary and the Red Chinese invasion of America's shores and found myself thinking, "Interesting, though I'd like to hear what a contemplative, restrained columnist like Ann Coulter would say on the subject."

Posted by: Alex on January 3, 2005 07:41 AM

Part me cannot believe Moriarity is being anything other than sarcastic; he's obviously parodying conservatives.

But then I remember that Jane Fonda was DEAD SERIOUS when she wrote her Vagina Day Manifesto, so maybe the guy really is conservative, and off the hook, at that.

Why O Why can't actors stick to acting?

Posted by: ccwbass on January 3, 2005 07:47 AM

You're right to be confused, Ace. And no, it's not parody, bass. He doesn't comment because he thinks he has a right to as an actor. Moriarity is a very strict, religiously conservative Catholic, so on some issues he can sound fairly liberal as he preaches peace and justice. But to us Catholics, Kerry was damn near the anti-Christ. Watching a pro-baby-killing Marxist receive Holy Communion is enough to fry our cookies real good. In addition, Moriarity seems to have overcome the Just War issue by rationalizing it the way a new majority of Catholics are: when the heathen is trying to kill you, war isn't such a bad thing. Look at him as a Catholic Ron Silver and you might begin to understand him better.

Posted by: The Black Republican on January 3, 2005 09:40 AM

Whoa. I would truly love to see Mike and Barbra Streisand duke it out in Thunderdome. "Two men enter, one man leaves..."

On a side note, I always preferred Catholic school boy Ben Stone to pragmatist Jack McCoy. There's something about a man fighting for principles that's just so dang sexy.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on January 3, 2005 09:57 AM

Yeah Mike sure spooked my horses! On the other hand, as a consevative Catholic, I can say that they don't come any more hard core reactionary than conservative Catholics. But he left out the three Gods of the French revoloution: the State, Nature, and "Reason." Funny how the Left still has the same Gods.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 10:36 AM

Oh, come on. You didn't know that Moriarty was whack? His Catholicism my ass. He's bipolar and periodically shows what it looks like without the meds.

Posted by: Cal Lanier on January 3, 2005 10:36 AM

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0605363/bio

Spouse
Suzana Cabrita (10 October 1998 - 1999) (divorced)
Anne Hamilton Martin (1978 - 1997) (divorced)
Francoise Martinet (1966 - 1978) (divorced) 1 child
Margaret (? - present)

Conservative catholic?

Posted by: zetetic on January 3, 2005 10:45 AM

Sure he's a whack. But if you read the history of the Catholic Church, it becomes clear that the church has always been very right wing. There are many very good reasons for it, primarily, the church stood as against the anarchy of the Left. And it also functioned as the voice of conscience to temper the excesses of Kings by standing for a higher moral authority. Some examples of conservative Catholics include: William F. Buckley, Pat Buchanan, Sean Hannity, George Patton, and a pair of guys who were raised Catholic took over Italy and Germany once upon a time. No shortage of right-wing whacks here.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 11:04 AM

Again, that's just goofy. There's no framework to explain Moriarty's strangeness and make it more rational. He's nutty. He goes way off the reservation periodically, then goes back on his meds and makes a few movies. Rinse and repeat.

Posted by: Cal Lanier on January 3, 2005 11:34 AM

Loved him in Q: The Winged Serpent.

Posted by: Jeff G on January 3, 2005 11:40 AM

No one is trying to explain his wackieness, but the direction of it is historically typical. Though the MSM has long ignored the right in the church (except when they were busy ridiculing it) and trumpted the left in the church, it is a false image fostered by Leftists. The Catholic Church has always been deeply conservative and remains so today.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 12:36 PM

Actually its better to say that the Catholic Church has remained consistant while the political world occilates around it. You don't exist for 2004 years by sticking your finger in the wind.
And with around a billion Catholics worldwide its pretty easy for the faithful to cover the entire political spectrum.
When I go to Europe I have alot of fun dissecting Catholics who claim to be Communists. They can't understand the disconnect.

They should make a Law & Order with Stone and Gorn. Law & Order Crossfire

Posted by: Iblis on January 3, 2005 12:46 PM

"The Catholic Church has remained consistent while the political world occilates around it," good phrase that. Even I was surprised to learn how consistently conservative the church has always been. But reading two conservative Catholic authors, Paul Johnson and H.W. Crocker opened my eyes, and made me realize how the Catholic Church has always stood and still stands as a bulwark against anarchy.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 12:58 PM

PS to Iblis: A particularly proud moment for the Catholic Church was when Pope John Paul II conspired with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher to bring down the Soviet Union and was shot for his trouble. What other religion can boast that their spiritual leader was shot by the KGB for being so effective against the Soviet Union?

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 01:11 PM

In the US, the Catholic Church was one of the primary centers of agitation for social revolution against capitalists. The Wobblies, IIRC, had their mission statement written by a priest. Communists were often rather at home in Catholic churches in the early part of the 20th century.

I'm not trying to disparage Catholicism (I reserve the self-hatred for my stupid wop dago heritage), but that history is an important component of the church's that needs to be remembered.

Posted by: Russell Wardlow on January 3, 2005 01:29 PM

Yes there has been history of infiltration of Leftists in the church in same way they metastisized into everything else. But on the whole, the direction of the church has always been clearly conservative and it still is. And the Leftist influence has been far less than the Leftist media would have us all believe.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 01:55 PM

Clinton as UN Sec-Gen? They aren't that desperate. Besides, no First Worlder will ever get the gig no matter how lefty they are.

Posted by: SGT Dan on January 3, 2005 02:47 PM

I don't want to run down an actor I admire and a fellow, um, conservative, but I heard him on the Stern show explaining his firing from L&O, and I thought he sounded a little batty then.

I don't like calling people nuts, but he's got a touch of something. I just don't think it's normal to invent words while writing essays with the enthusiasm he does. It's a little strange.

Posted by: ace on January 3, 2005 02:55 PM

We view the Church as Conservative, but the Romans viewed it as a radical organization. (To say nothing of the Sovs and Chicoms)How times change.
Libs and Lefties are always drawn to the church because of the "Peace and Love" message. Unfortunately for them, the church's idea of love isn't Sullivanesque. Its "I'm gonna take the cross for you worthless lot."

Posted by: Iblis on January 3, 2005 03:11 PM

Ace,

He is nuts. Legitimately bi-polar. He's a hell of an actor. But he's also nuts, and that's what's going on in those columns.

Posted by: Cal on January 3, 2005 04:05 PM

Cal,

Well, you may or may not be right. I lean towards "may."

I just don't like calling people I sorta like nuts.

But yeah, that column is, I hate to say it, sort of the thing that schizophrenics write. The made-up words, the grand conspiracies, the urgent, even crazed tone.

Posted by: ace on January 3, 2005 04:07 PM

I had seen his columns previously and noted that they read just like a Ben Stone closing argument from L&O. If you insert the pauses, the "sirs"...they sound pretty much like his regular delivery.


Not that that proves or disproves anyhting about his mental state; I just think it's interesting that he thinks like he talks.


Isn't it strange how many conservatives show up on Law and Order? Moriarity, Fred Dalton Thompson, and then Angie Harmon addressed the convention this summer. What other show has that many right wing actors?

72V- "the Catholic Church has always stood and still stands as a bulwark against anarchy. " Amen. I'm Protestant and I know darn well that the Catholic Church is keeping the world in order, and has been for a long time.

Posted by: SeeDubya on January 3, 2005 04:23 PM

SeeDubya: It is gratifying to hear that you and others are that objective and well informed. (PS My Jewish sister-in-law just converted to Catholicism.)

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on January 3, 2005 05:35 PM

Speaking of schizophrenia, everyone MUST read Timecube for a good laugh. It could replace the DSM description of schizophrenia.

Posted by: Smack on January 3, 2005 07:21 PM

I agree with Cal. He appears to be bi-polar and self-medicating with alcohol. I am sorry he is so ill in public.

Posted by: julie on January 3, 2005 08:33 PM

Ben's grandmother was Jewish, which explains his being confused, bi-polar, and completely whacky. Just look at Hitler.

Posted by: on January 11, 2005 04:21 AM

Hey, you leave Hitler out of this. He was just misunderstood, just like me. ~Dubya

Posted by: GW Bush on January 11, 2005 04:23 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
Village Idiot's Apprentice: "Found it!! https://instapundit.com/786507/ ..."

Count de Monet: "And leaf burning. And hunting. And fireworks Post ..."

The Mind That Alters, Alters All: "I read that Woods continues to drive because he do ..."

man: "The dude has a serious problem." Indeed. Seems ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]And leaf burning. And hunting. And fireworks P ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]if the racism is deeply hidden, how did she kno ..."

Ordinary American: "Don't forget trucks. They hate trucks. It's amazin ..."

redridinghood: "And It's TRANSGENDER INVISIBILITY DAY. ..."

Modern Women: "I could see where a comeback might be in the works ..."

man: "I could see where a comeback might be in the works ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]***** He should probably lose his drivers lice ..."

Case: "And of course only conservative WHITE MEN are raci ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives