Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Who's "Mainstream"?: Department Head at Columbia U. Questions Existance of Al Qaeda, OBL's Involvement in 9-11 | Main | CNN: Collecting All the Dickheads In One Place »
November 22, 2004

A Contrarian View of the NBA Brawl

Yes, it was bad behavior. Yes, an athlete really ought never go into the stands and throwing punches.

But.

He was provoked. He had something thrown at him, right? Why aren't we focusing more on that part of the bad behavior?

Do I think Artest should be suspended? Absolutely. For life? No. He behaved badly, he lost control, he started punching out the NBA's customers, which isn't very good for business. He should be punished.

But I don't think I agree with this can-you-top-my-level-of-outrage contest.

He behaved badly. But people occasionally get into bar fights after a big provocation, and we generally don't strip away their livelihood. If you commit an assault on someone -- and throwing something at someone is an assault -- I'm sorry, but you're pretty much asking for it, and you can't complain much at what happens next.

I don't think the year's suspension without pay will stick; I think it will be negotiated down to something a lot less harsh. I hope it's not negotiated down to a slap on the wrist; he should be punished, as I've said.

But I think most men (and a few women!) would feel sorely provoked by having something thrown at them while they're just trying to do their job. And if you lash out -- well, you behaved unprofessionally and badly. But I can't say that you'd be behaving like an animal or a thug or otherwise inexplicably and unaccountably.

It's understandable behavior. Understandable does not mean "excusable" -- though many on the left seem to think it means just that -- but I think it does tend to mitigate the crime.

You throw something at this guy while I'm blogging, and you see what happens next.

Let's just say you'll be hearing the words "Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!" in the ensuing combat rounds.

Okay, I Changed My Mind Update: Suspend this dick for life, just based on these quotes:

Meanwhile, Artest is promoting his record label, Truwarier, and said that with his other career endeavors he was trying to make his life more positive.

"Having a record company and putting out my own CD. There's clothes and shoes. There's also an upcoming book deal that I'm trying to do," he said.

"I'm trying to be positive. I'm a big fan of the Nobel Peace Prize."

Well... obviously.


posted by Ace at 05:20 PM
Comments



If I attacked a customer while an agent of the company I work for, for any reason, I would be summarily fired. Period!

No pay cut, no suspension, just a personal escort to the door, and no golden parachute!

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 05:31 PM

If he took a swing at you for no reason and you swung back, you'd be fired, automatically?

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 05:34 PM

I believe in about as broad a concept of self-defense as there is. Self-defense is like a religion for me. The right of self-defense is the cornerstone of civilization. And I'm not at all convinced that it shouldn't be OK to use lethal force to prevent commission of a felony (one of the old-school felonies, at least, like robbery, etc.).

But this was not self-defense. It was anger. It was revenge. Throwing a beer on someone is an assault, yes, but it is not felony assault, and it does not justify the use of force. The player decided to use violence to protect his status and reputation, not to protect his life or safety.

As for what the NBA does, I couldn't care less. Become respectable? Sure. Pretend to become respectable? That's probably more likely. Embrace their shittiness? Go for it. Start a whole new sport of thug-ball (where players are awarded points not only for putting a ball in the right place, but for coming up with clever insults of their opponents and/or their mothers while doing so!)? Knock yourself out.

-- George

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 05:38 PM

At my company, I'd be fired for fighting a customer, even if he threw the first punch. Knowing that, I'd make sure I landed the last 20 punches before I went out the door.

BTW, I'm having a hard time believing Artest knew who threw the beer at him. He was laying flat on his back looking up when it landed. It looked like he jumped up, found the smallest white guy in the stands and started throwing his slappy, sloppy punches. His victim looked like Jarrod from the Subway commercials.

Isn't there any NBA player that punches like a man?

Michael Dennis

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:04 PM

Whoa. There are customers, and there are criminals. The beer throwing dude was a criminal. Employees shouldn't have to show the same deference to criminals that they do to customers.

Otherwise you get situations like this, at Long John Silvers a while ago: http://www.wnbc.com/news/3784002/detail.html

This isn't so much a defense of Artest as an indictment of silly no-resist policies.

Michael D--I think that guy Jackson got in one really good knock in the stands.

--See Dubya

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:14 PM

I'm with Ace on this one.

Professional athletes are one asshole away from a career ending injury. Hell, remember when the referee threw the penalty flag into the Cleveland Browns offensive lineman's face (Courtney Brown?) and nearly blinded him in one eye (as it was he sat out almost 2 full seasons recovering)? That was a freak accident that nearly cost Brown his career. The opportunity for a permanent injury escalates directly when people are intending to do harm.

Very few workplaces require that as a condition of work, you expose yourself to 15,000 lunatics every other night. Does this justify going into the stands? Not on its face. But it also should mitigate the gut reaction of "if I got in a fist fight at Pier 1 I would be canned".

Granted being splashed by a beer isn't a big deal. But suppose it had been AA-batteries? Or golf balls? Or any other object that could be brought in and, when hurled from the 15th row, could do some career ending damage?

I agree with Charles Barkley on this one: If a fan crosses the line, the player has a right to protect his livelihood. Especially in a situation where it is clear that the league, the teams, the officials, the security staffs, and the law enforcement personnel at the event are incapable of keeping things under control, or are simply overwhelmed by events.

Should Artest (and the others) be convicted of criminal assault/battery? Not if I'm on the jury.

Should they be held responsible under civil law? Maybe. Some of them put a pretty good beat down on truly innocent people, and they ought to be compensated for the injuries they incurred. But that one fan who went onto the court? Hell, for all Artest and O'Neill knew, that dude could have been carrying a knife, and he came out of the stands towards them. Think that's far fetched? Ask Monica Seles.

In a situation as chaotic as we saw at the Palace the other evening, I don't blame players for protecting themselves. Just because you buy a ticket doesn't mean you have purchased the right to physically abuse the folks on the court/field. Boo them, get in their heads, fine, that's acceptable. PLacing those guys/gals in harms way is not.

/soapbox

-Senator Phil A. Buster

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:19 PM

Uh Ace? He ran into the stands and started beating the wrong effing guy! And then was punching other fans!

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:20 PM

He also laid down on the scorer's table to taunt the fans, not to cool down as some are saying now. He was basically looking for an excuse to lash out. If I taunt a dog into biting me and he does, then I go and beat him, whose fault is it?

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:39 PM

Artest has only been suspended 6 times in the last two years and refused anger clases.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:40 PM

Artest has gotten a bum rap with his 'repeat offender' tag. He's no Rasheed Wallace.

Anyway, I think Detroit management and their fans are at quite substantially culpable here. And going forward, what incentives do clubs have to protect opposing players? In this case, Detroit eviscerated their EC main competition by letting their fans run wild.

European soccer tournaments have the right idea for this sort of crap: take away home games. I suggest the Pistons should have to play their first round 'home' playoff games at a neutral venue.

someone

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:50 PM

I disagree. Call it a "Thug League" or change the name to ThugBall, but don't call it professional. It seems to me that the players started it on the court when the shooter got fouled. Mayhem ensues. A fan shows his disgust at all the showboat crap and dumps a beer on a guy just aching to be the center of attention. Don't tell me that laying on the scorer's table wasn't an act of taunting and provocation. He wanted someone to "make" him grow up and fly right. Puh-leeeze.

If I wanna see thugs playing roundball, I can visit some of Clinton's midnight basketball leagues for free. The fans in the arena were paying the players to play professionally.


Jackie Robinson is crying a river. He was hit by trash, taunted, and called every vile name in the book, but he by-gawd loved the game of baseball and was a professional in every way.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:07 PM

I have seen the same thing reported that he ran up into the crown and hit the wrong guy. If thats true and given that this is just the latest in a long string of moronic things done by Artest the NBA should boot his butt out for good because it is obvious that this guy isnt going to learn. Ever. Also he should be charged and spend some time in jail.
That being said every one of those fans that they can track down who did something should be carted off to jail also. The NBA should fine the hell out of Detroit for a serious lack of security ,maybe ban beer sales (at the very least they should be banned for a while), and perhaps force them to erect a barrier between the fans and the court.
The NBA should make it clear you never go up into the stands no matter what. Not only for the safety of the fans but also for the safety of the players. His going up into the stands caused a few tossed beers to turn into a riot that saw tossed chairs and fans coming down onto the floor and put at risk the players and staff that we’re not involved in the thing to begin with. And really, Artest is lucky. In a lot of sports crowds he wouldn’t have made it back out of the stands in one piece.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:13 PM

LIGHTNING BOLT! Best dorky video clip EVER! Thanks Ace! That made my day.

George D

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:30 PM

Sorry Ace-- I see where you're coming from, but it doesn't apply here.

Artest went after the wrong guy. Which completely invalidates the self-defense argument.

And Artest deseves everything he got because of that.

However, I think Steven Jackson should've been suspended the rest of the season, same as Artest. He went into the stands, not to break up the fight, but to start swinging himself-- at anyone and everyone in his way. At least Artest had an excuse-- a lame one, but an understandable one.

Bottom line: whatever your opinion about the fight, the NBA, the rules, and the suspension, the important point isn't what happened to the players, or what happened to the fighting fans. It's what happened to every innocent fan caught in the middle of that fight. Those people did not ask for that, nor did they deserve to be in the fight by virtue of their actions (or, in this case, their inaction).

That all said. . . man, that was pretty effin cool to watch, eh? ;-)

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

P.S. Don't get me wrong-- I believe 100% in the right to self-defense. When Artest and others got approached by the fans *on the court*, they were completely in their rights to clock 'em. However, the whole ugly mess should never have gotten to that point, period.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:55 PM

The penalty will NOT be reduced. The aftermath is strictly David Stern vs. Ron Artest. Guess who's going to win?

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 08:13 PM

I was just speaking to a friend who, it turns out, reads my blog (although I'm supposed to be f'n' anonymous; thanks, Ron!) and he was making that exact point-- Artest had no idea who threw the beer, and in fact went after a guy HOLDING A BEER, which would probably be the one guy you know for sure didn't throw a beer, being that, you know, he's still holding his and all.

It's a good point.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 08:18 PM

I think the fact that they're only talking about "battery" charges about fans is the GIANT EFFING ELEPHANT in the middle of the room that nobody wants to pay attention to. Regardless if you get hit with a soda, you have no right to jump into a stand and punch somebody in the face. Maybe, and maybe it's me here folks, but you shouldn't have been provoking/instigating the situation by going and laying down on a table, arms behind your head, with a smug "f*ck you" look on your face, when, you know, IT'S AN AWAY GAME! That guy is just plain retarded - as far as his rights? Look at the game he plays - look how many times THAT a$$hole has been booted/fined for his temper. Whatzit like 5?!? He's no angel. Isn't this also the same guy who wanted time off to promote a rap album....oh wait, that's half the league.

All I'm sayin, is if anyone gets sued, I wanna be readin the names of the basketball players on the list.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 08:18 PM

Damn - that was my rant

-Fat kid

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 08:19 PM

Ace,

Um, no.

If a fan throws any object, from a cup of ice to a brick at a player, on the court, in transition to/from the locker-room, or outside of the stadium, it is assault. The appropriate, professional, and responsible thing for the player to do is point out that fan and have the fan arrested.

End.of.Story.

If the fan is on the field of play and then assaults a player, then and only then does the player have the right (and responsibility) to physically defend himself against the threat of injury.

The field of play and its boundries are sancrosanct, and neither shall the fan cross into it or the player cross out of it.

End.of.Story.II.

This was David Stern's message and he is correct. Yes, the fans, security, coaches, players, all are in-some-part responsible for the melee at the Palace at Auburn Hills.

But Ron Artest and his teammates must and will be made examples of for the sake of the game.

And lastly, the fact that Mr. Artest has had a history of explosive and out-of-control behavior only makes more certain the league's (Mr. Stern's) judgement against him.

MTT

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:11 PM

Ace,

Er, sacrosanct.

Spellcheck.is.my.friend.

MTT

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:13 PM

Isn't there any NBA player that punches like a man?

Michael Dennis

Yeah, "Tree Washington". Hit Rudy Tomjanovich with one punch, fractured all the bones on one side of his face, detatched his retina. Should he come back and give lessons to 6'10 Ghetto thugs like Artest on how to really punch??

As for blame, yeah, you have the thugs and their whole lowball lifestyle poisoning the NBA - but lets not forget the fans....Who are now taught that a sporting event is all about taunting, busting balls, dissing, cursing a player's mother, throwing stuff at them in an attempt to "throw them off their game" or just get attention cast on the fan with the most belligerant mouth.

In Pro football, players have knocked some fans cold when they went on the field in the middle of a game, and the "hit" is replayed and the player is patted on the back. Baseball arrests hecklers and anyone throwing stuff. Soccer hooligans have paid for their riots by being banned from travel to other countries, and banned from all soccer league stadiums.

The NBA has tolerated the trash-mouths and beverage throwers - they have to crack down on the fans as well as the players.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:29 PM

What about the guy Artest is seen punching towards the end of the tape (or the amount that is normally seen)? This is on the court after Artest is pulled out of the stands. Artest gets some beer thrown on him from behind and to the left. He see a guy to his right and starts taking a couple of swings at him. The guy said he did nothing and said nothing before Artest hit him.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 11:14 PM

I went to a basketball game the other night and a hip-hop awards show broke out.

Posted by: on November 22, 2004 11:23 PM

Sorry, Ace, but I think you're wrong on this one. Retaliating is not self-defense, and even less so when you have to go out of your way and go INTO THE STANDS.

Artest deserves to have his ass handed to him on a platter, and if he never played again, I wouldn't care. Then again, it's not like I care about the NBA in general.

- NickS.

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 12:22 AM

Hmm ... two links to the D&D video in one day ... must mean something ...

Think we figured it out:

http://pullonsupermanscape.typepad.com/pull_on_supermans_cape/2004/11/ace_lifts_his_k.html

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 01:12 AM

Moveabletype botching our link:

First part:

http://pullonsupermanscape.typepad.com/pull_on_supermans_cape/

Rest of it:

2004/11/ace_lifts_his_k.html

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 01:13 AM

I may be wrong. Like I said, it does seem that Artest didn't even go after the actual assailant, which de-mitigates the mitigation. You can't just start punching random people because someone you can't identify threw a beer on you.

Still-- a year's suspension is a pretty harsh sentence. It's no slap on the wrist. That's at least a couple of million dollars he's losing, and from the only five or six years he'll be capable of earning that kind of jack.

Let me remind everyone that Ray Lewis kinda-sorta was involved in a murder. Not a murder at a sporting event, yeah, but how much does that matter?

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 03:09 AM

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 08:30 AM

THIS WAS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!! Artest acted out of a desire for revenge. It was just an escalation of violence.

First, Artest attacked the wrong guy. He wasn't simply mistaken. Even if he was, his mistake was not reasonable. He just didn't care.

Second, there is absolutely no reason to honestly believe that "for all Artest and O'Neill knew, that dude could have been carrying a knife, and he came out of the stands towards them." If they sincerely believed this, they would not have charged into the stands, fists flying. It defies common sense. They did the exact opposite of what someone does when he genuinely fears for his safety. They did exactly what someone does when he wants to punish someone for insulting his status or reputation.

It was really just a stupid fist-fight, but events like this helps to form public opinion about basic social mores. Teenagers learn from this sort of thing. The popular attitude toward violence and self-defense is shaped by situations like this.

Prosecute the beer-thrower, too. Misdemeanor assault, or whatever it is. Also, the arena and/or sports team would be irresponsible if it did not ban that guy from future games.

As a side note, Artest's suspension is not "punishment." Punishment is what the State does. The League and its players are just parties to a contract. The League is not in a position of authority. It may have the right to enforce its rights under the contract, but that's it.

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 10:55 AM

I'm not so sure all these fans who claim to have done nothing actually did nothing. The fan Artest went after says Artest asked him if he threw the beer and he begged off. Well, guess what? The guy who is accused of flinging the beer says he didn't throw it, but they have it on video. Same guy?

And another guy says he was doing nothing when he got whacked. But someone sucker-puches O'Neill and then gets whacked. And that's on film too. Same guy?

So don't put too much faith in these guys telling you they didn't do anything. There's a reason they're the ones being questioned about it and most likely it's because they were involved.

There has to be some limit. That ass Robin Ficker used to scream horrible things at Patrick Ewing from about 5 feet away throughout the entire game and no one did a damn thing about it. You don't think that leads to this?

Posted by: on November 23, 2004 11:32 AM

They should kick the Detroit franchise out of the league permanently over this incident, and suspend the Indiana franchise for at least a year. I guess I'm in the minority, thinking the primary fault for this is with Detroit, and suggesting such a severe penalty... but I don't see how else to insure that it never happens again. What they've done is a slap on the wrist at best.

The fans should either be better-behaved, or they should not be permitted to sit so close to the floor. The Detroit franchises knew well in advance how poorly-behaved their fans were.

After a city loses a team because the fans are too boorish to have even the most remote sense of sportsmanship, maybe it'll revive some of the social pressure to act like decent human beings, even at a sporting event.

Posted by: thoughtomator on November 28, 2004 05:10 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Forgotten 70s Mystery Click
You made me cry
when you said good-bye

70s, not 50s
Now that is a motherflipping intro
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD wonder about the Chaos that Trump is creating in the minds of the Iranian junta, Virginia redistricting is pure power grab, Ilhan Omar is many things ...and stupid too! Amazon censoring conservative thought again, and the UK...put a fork in it!
NYT Melts Down Over Texas Rangers Statue Outside... Texas Rangers' Stadium
"The Athletic posted a lengthy article about a statue outside Globe Life Field, presenting a virtue-signaling moral grievance as unbiased news coverage." [CBD]
Important Message from Recent Convert to Christianity and Yet Super-Serious Christian Tuq'r Qarlson: Actually Muslims love Jesus, it's Trump and his neocons who hate him
Tucker Carlson Network
@TCNetwork

The people in charge [Jews, of course -- ace] don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.

Islam reveres Him as a major prophet and messenger of the Lord, believes He performed miracles, and states that He will return to Earth to defeat the Antichrist. That's why Donald Trump's painting depicting himself as the Son of God offended the president of Iran. It was an attack on his religion as well as Christianity.

Trump's trolling tweet was ill-advised, but Tucker is just lying when he claims the Christianity-hating President of Iran was "offended" by this.
He's one step away from announcing his official conversion to Islam. He literally never stops praising Islam. Well, he suddenly became Christian two years ago, there's not much stopping him from converting again.
You can track Tuq'r's official conversion to Islam with this Bingo card.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk Orban losing, but is it the end of Hungary? The Irish start a brawl, but is it enough, Pope Leo wades into politics, Trump calls Iran's bluff and blockades Hormuz, Artemis II! Swallwell is scum, and more!
People say that the bearded man in the video of Fartwell molesting a hooker looks like Democrat Arizona Senator Rueben Gallego, said to be Swalwell's "best friend" and known to take vacations with him.
@KFILE 21m

Politico is reporting that multiple people have abruptly resigned from Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign: "Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell's top liaison to organized labor groups."

So the campaign is collapsing due to the truth of the sexual harassment allegations.
That hissing sound you hear is the air going out of the Swalwell campaign. UPDATE: No it wasn't, it was just Swalwell one-cheek-sneaking out a fart on camera
Eric Swalwell more like Eric Farewell amirite
thanks to weft-cut loop.
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
Recent Comments
Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "5th! ..."

mindful webworker - the wait is over: "“We never live; we are always in the expecta ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "1 ..."

COMountainMarie : "Yay! ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "229 223 So whom does God root for in the Super Bow ..."

...: "So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? Po ..."

four seasons: " Bulg, I believe God doesn't root for anyone ..."

mikeski: "[i]So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? P ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Those ships would be good for repatriating Somalia ..."

Bulg: "223 So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? ..."

And?: "What if you wasted the gifts you were given becaus ..."

mikeski: "[i]I just don’t think that God cares about t ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives