| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
The Morning Report — 5/ 14/26
Daily Tech News 14 May 2026 Wednesday Night ONT - May 13, 2026 [TRex] Golden Cafe Massive Report Details the Apocalyptic Evil of the October 7 Massacre -- as the NYT Hides That Reporting to Push Absurd Hamas Propaganda About Israel Training Dogs to Rape Palestinian Terrorist Prisoners Murkowski, Collins, and Paul Defect to the Democrats, As Usual, to Demand Trump Surrender to Iran Hollywood: Shit or Garbage? CIA Whistleblower: Fauci Ordered the Cover-Up About the America-Funded Wuhan Lab's Creation of the Covid Virus Schmoll: Credibly-Accused Sexual Deviant Thomas Massie Trails His Trump-Backed Primary Opponent Appeals Court Rules That Trump Doesn't Have to Pay Lunatic Fantasist E. Jean Carroll for the "Defamation" of Continuing to Deny This Vicious Fruitloop's Sex Fantasy About Him Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Who's "Mainstream"?: Department Head at Columbia U. Questions Existance of Al Qaeda, OBL's Involvement in 9-11 |
Main
| CNN: Collecting All the Dickheads In One Place »
November 22, 2004
A Contrarian View of the NBA BrawlYes, it was bad behavior. Yes, an athlete really ought never go into the stands and throwing punches. But. He was provoked. He had something thrown at him, right? Why aren't we focusing more on that part of the bad behavior? Do I think Artest should be suspended? Absolutely. For life? No. He behaved badly, he lost control, he started punching out the NBA's customers, which isn't very good for business. He should be punished. But I don't think I agree with this can-you-top-my-level-of-outrage contest. He behaved badly. But people occasionally get into bar fights after a big provocation, and we generally don't strip away their livelihood. If you commit an assault on someone -- and throwing something at someone is an assault -- I'm sorry, but you're pretty much asking for it, and you can't complain much at what happens next. I don't think the year's suspension without pay will stick; I think it will be negotiated down to something a lot less harsh. I hope it's not negotiated down to a slap on the wrist; he should be punished, as I've said. But I think most men (and a few women!) would feel sorely provoked by having something thrown at them while they're just trying to do their job. And if you lash out -- well, you behaved unprofessionally and badly. But I can't say that you'd be behaving like an animal or a thug or otherwise inexplicably and unaccountably. It's understandable behavior. Understandable does not mean "excusable" -- though many on the left seem to think it means just that -- but I think it does tend to mitigate the crime. You throw something at this guy while I'm blogging, and you see what happens next. Let's just say you'll be hearing the words "Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!" in the ensuing combat rounds. Okay, I Changed My Mind Update: Suspend this dick for life, just based on these quotes: Meanwhile, Artest is promoting his record label, Truwarier, and said that with his other career endeavors he was trying to make his life more positive. Well... obviously. posted by Ace at 05:20 PM
CommentsIf I attacked a customer while an agent of the company I work for, for any reason, I would be summarily fired. Period! No pay cut, no suspension, just a personal escort to the door, and no golden parachute! If he took a swing at you for no reason and you swung back, you'd be fired, automatically? I believe in about as broad a concept of self-defense as there is. Self-defense is like a religion for me. The right of self-defense is the cornerstone of civilization. And I'm not at all convinced that it shouldn't be OK to use lethal force to prevent commission of a felony (one of the old-school felonies, at least, like robbery, etc.). But this was not self-defense. It was anger. It was revenge. Throwing a beer on someone is an assault, yes, but it is not felony assault, and it does not justify the use of force. The player decided to use violence to protect his status and reputation, not to protect his life or safety. As for what the NBA does, I couldn't care less. Become respectable? Sure. Pretend to become respectable? That's probably more likely. Embrace their shittiness? Go for it. Start a whole new sport of thug-ball (where players are awarded points not only for putting a ball in the right place, but for coming up with clever insults of their opponents and/or their mothers while doing so!)? Knock yourself out. -- George At my company, I'd be fired for fighting a customer, even if he threw the first punch. Knowing that, I'd make sure I landed the last 20 punches before I went out the door. BTW, I'm having a hard time believing Artest knew who threw the beer at him. He was laying flat on his back looking up when it landed. It looked like he jumped up, found the smallest white guy in the stands and started throwing his slappy, sloppy punches. His victim looked like Jarrod from the Subway commercials. Isn't there any NBA player that punches like a man? Michael Dennis Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:04 PM
Whoa. There are customers, and there are criminals. The beer throwing dude was a criminal. Employees shouldn't have to show the same deference to criminals that they do to customers. Otherwise you get situations like this, at Long John Silvers a while ago: http://www.wnbc.com/news/3784002/detail.html This isn't so much a defense of Artest as an indictment of silly no-resist policies. Michael D--I think that guy Jackson got in one really good knock in the stands. --See Dubya Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:14 PM
I'm with Ace on this one. Professional athletes are one asshole away from a career ending injury. Hell, remember when the referee threw the penalty flag into the Cleveland Browns offensive lineman's face (Courtney Brown?) and nearly blinded him in one eye (as it was he sat out almost 2 full seasons recovering)? That was a freak accident that nearly cost Brown his career. The opportunity for a permanent injury escalates directly when people are intending to do harm. Very few workplaces require that as a condition of work, you expose yourself to 15,000 lunatics every other night. Does this justify going into the stands? Not on its face. But it also should mitigate the gut reaction of "if I got in a fist fight at Pier 1 I would be canned". Granted being splashed by a beer isn't a big deal. But suppose it had been AA-batteries? Or golf balls? Or any other object that could be brought in and, when hurled from the 15th row, could do some career ending damage? I agree with Charles Barkley on this one: If a fan crosses the line, the player has a right to protect his livelihood. Especially in a situation where it is clear that the league, the teams, the officials, the security staffs, and the law enforcement personnel at the event are incapable of keeping things under control, or are simply overwhelmed by events. Should Artest (and the others) be convicted of criminal assault/battery? Not if I'm on the jury. Should they be held responsible under civil law? Maybe. Some of them put a pretty good beat down on truly innocent people, and they ought to be compensated for the injuries they incurred. But that one fan who went onto the court? Hell, for all Artest and O'Neill knew, that dude could have been carrying a knife, and he came out of the stands towards them. Think that's far fetched? Ask Monica Seles. In a situation as chaotic as we saw at the Palace the other evening, I don't blame players for protecting themselves. Just because you buy a ticket doesn't mean you have purchased the right to physically abuse the folks on the court/field. Boo them, get in their heads, fine, that's acceptable. PLacing those guys/gals in harms way is not. /soapbox -Senator Phil A. Buster Uh Ace? He ran into the stands and started beating the wrong effing guy! And then was punching other fans! He also laid down on the scorer's table to taunt the fans, not to cool down as some are saying now. He was basically looking for an excuse to lash out. If I taunt a dog into biting me and he does, then I go and beat him, whose fault is it? Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:39 PM
Artest has only been suspended 6 times in the last two years and refused anger clases. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:40 PM
Artest has gotten a bum rap with his 'repeat offender' tag. He's no Rasheed Wallace. Anyway, I think Detroit management and their fans are at quite substantially culpable here. And going forward, what incentives do clubs have to protect opposing players? In this case, Detroit eviscerated their EC main competition by letting their fans run wild. European soccer tournaments have the right idea for this sort of crap: take away home games. I suggest the Pistons should have to play their first round 'home' playoff games at a neutral venue. someone Posted by: on November 22, 2004 06:50 PM
I disagree. Call it a "Thug League" or change the name to ThugBall, but don't call it professional. It seems to me that the players started it on the court when the shooter got fouled. Mayhem ensues. A fan shows his disgust at all the showboat crap and dumps a beer on a guy just aching to be the center of attention. Don't tell me that laying on the scorer's table wasn't an act of taunting and provocation. He wanted someone to "make" him grow up and fly right. Puh-leeeze. If I wanna see thugs playing roundball, I can visit some of Clinton's midnight basketball leagues for free. The fans in the arena were paying the players to play professionally.
Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:07 PM
I have seen the same thing reported that he ran up into the crown and hit the wrong guy. If thats true and given that this is just the latest in a long string of moronic things done by Artest the NBA should boot his butt out for good because it is obvious that this guy isnt going to learn. Ever. Also he should be charged and spend some time in jail. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:13 PM
LIGHTNING BOLT! Best dorky video clip EVER! Thanks Ace! That made my day. George D Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:30 PM
Sorry Ace-- I see where you're coming from, but it doesn't apply here. Artest went after the wrong guy. Which completely invalidates the self-defense argument. And Artest deseves everything he got because of that. However, I think Steven Jackson should've been suspended the rest of the season, same as Artest. He went into the stands, not to break up the fight, but to start swinging himself-- at anyone and everyone in his way. At least Artest had an excuse-- a lame one, but an understandable one. Bottom line: whatever your opinion about the fight, the NBA, the rules, and the suspension, the important point isn't what happened to the players, or what happened to the fighting fans. It's what happened to every innocent fan caught in the middle of that fight. Those people did not ask for that, nor did they deserve to be in the fight by virtue of their actions (or, in this case, their inaction). That all said. . . man, that was pretty effin cool to watch, eh? ;-) Cheers, P.S. Don't get me wrong-- I believe 100% in the right to self-defense. When Artest and others got approached by the fans *on the court*, they were completely in their rights to clock 'em. However, the whole ugly mess should never have gotten to that point, period. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 07:55 PM
The penalty will NOT be reduced. The aftermath is strictly David Stern vs. Ron Artest. Guess who's going to win? Posted by: on November 22, 2004 08:13 PM
I was just speaking to a friend who, it turns out, reads my blog (although I'm supposed to be f'n' anonymous; thanks, Ron!) and he was making that exact point-- Artest had no idea who threw the beer, and in fact went after a guy HOLDING A BEER, which would probably be the one guy you know for sure didn't throw a beer, being that, you know, he's still holding his and all. It's a good point. I think the fact that they're only talking about "battery" charges about fans is the GIANT EFFING ELEPHANT in the middle of the room that nobody wants to pay attention to. Regardless if you get hit with a soda, you have no right to jump into a stand and punch somebody in the face. Maybe, and maybe it's me here folks, but you shouldn't have been provoking/instigating the situation by going and laying down on a table, arms behind your head, with a smug "f*ck you" look on your face, when, you know, IT'S AN AWAY GAME! That guy is just plain retarded - as far as his rights? Look at the game he plays - look how many times THAT a$$hole has been booted/fined for his temper. Whatzit like 5?!? He's no angel. Isn't this also the same guy who wanted time off to promote a rap album....oh wait, that's half the league. All I'm sayin, is if anyone gets sued, I wanna be readin the names of the basketball players on the list. Damn - that was my rant -Fat kid Ace, Um, no. If a fan throws any object, from a cup of ice to a brick at a player, on the court, in transition to/from the locker-room, or outside of the stadium, it is assault. The appropriate, professional, and responsible thing for the player to do is point out that fan and have the fan arrested. End.of.Story. If the fan is on the field of play and then assaults a player, then and only then does the player have the right (and responsibility) to physically defend himself against the threat of injury. The field of play and its boundries are sancrosanct, and neither shall the fan cross into it or the player cross out of it. End.of.Story.II. This was David Stern's message and he is correct. Yes, the fans, security, coaches, players, all are in-some-part responsible for the melee at the Palace at Auburn Hills. But Ron Artest and his teammates must and will be made examples of for the sake of the game. And lastly, the fact that Mr. Artest has had a history of explosive and out-of-control behavior only makes more certain the league's (Mr. Stern's) judgement against him. MTT Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:11 PM
Ace, Er, sacrosanct. Spellcheck.is.my.friend. MTT Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:13 PM
Isn't there any NBA player that punches like a man? Michael Dennis Yeah, "Tree Washington". Hit Rudy Tomjanovich with one punch, fractured all the bones on one side of his face, detatched his retina. Should he come back and give lessons to 6'10 Ghetto thugs like Artest on how to really punch?? As for blame, yeah, you have the thugs and their whole lowball lifestyle poisoning the NBA - but lets not forget the fans....Who are now taught that a sporting event is all about taunting, busting balls, dissing, cursing a player's mother, throwing stuff at them in an attempt to "throw them off their game" or just get attention cast on the fan with the most belligerant mouth. In Pro football, players have knocked some fans cold when they went on the field in the middle of a game, and the "hit" is replayed and the player is patted on the back. Baseball arrests hecklers and anyone throwing stuff. Soccer hooligans have paid for their riots by being banned from travel to other countries, and banned from all soccer league stadiums. The NBA has tolerated the trash-mouths and beverage throwers - they have to crack down on the fans as well as the players. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 09:29 PM
What about the guy Artest is seen punching towards the end of the tape (or the amount that is normally seen)? This is on the court after Artest is pulled out of the stands. Artest gets some beer thrown on him from behind and to the left. He see a guy to his right and starts taking a couple of swings at him. The guy said he did nothing and said nothing before Artest hit him. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 11:14 PM
I went to a basketball game the other night and a hip-hop awards show broke out. Posted by: on November 22, 2004 11:23 PM
Sorry, Ace, but I think you're wrong on this one. Retaliating is not self-defense, and even less so when you have to go out of your way and go INTO THE STANDS. Artest deserves to have his ass handed to him on a platter, and if he never played again, I wouldn't care. Then again, it's not like I care about the NBA in general. - NickS. Posted by: on November 23, 2004 12:22 AM
Hmm ... two links to the D&D video in one day ... must mean something ... Think we figured it out: http://pullonsupermanscape.typepad.com/pull_on_supermans_cape/2004/11/ace_lifts_his_k.html Posted by: on November 23, 2004 01:12 AM
Moveabletype botching our link: First part: http://pullonsupermanscape.typepad.com/pull_on_supermans_cape/ Rest of it: 2004/11/ace_lifts_his_k.html Posted by: on November 23, 2004 01:13 AM
I may be wrong. Like I said, it does seem that Artest didn't even go after the actual assailant, which de-mitigates the mitigation. You can't just start punching random people because someone you can't identify threw a beer on you. Still-- a year's suspension is a pretty harsh sentence. It's no slap on the wrist. That's at least a couple of million dollars he's losing, and from the only five or six years he'll be capable of earning that kind of jack. Let me remind everyone that Ray Lewis kinda-sorta was involved in a murder. Not a murder at a sporting event, yeah, but how much does that matter? Posted by: on November 23, 2004 08:30 AM
THIS WAS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!! Artest acted out of a desire for revenge. It was just an escalation of violence. First, Artest attacked the wrong guy. He wasn't simply mistaken. Even if he was, his mistake was not reasonable. He just didn't care. Second, there is absolutely no reason to honestly believe that "for all Artest and O'Neill knew, that dude could have been carrying a knife, and he came out of the stands towards them." If they sincerely believed this, they would not have charged into the stands, fists flying. It defies common sense. They did the exact opposite of what someone does when he genuinely fears for his safety. They did exactly what someone does when he wants to punish someone for insulting his status or reputation. It was really just a stupid fist-fight, but events like this helps to form public opinion about basic social mores. Teenagers learn from this sort of thing. The popular attitude toward violence and self-defense is shaped by situations like this. Prosecute the beer-thrower, too. Misdemeanor assault, or whatever it is. Also, the arena and/or sports team would be irresponsible if it did not ban that guy from future games. As a side note, Artest's suspension is not "punishment." Punishment is what the State does. The League and its players are just parties to a contract. The League is not in a position of authority. It may have the right to enforce its rights under the contract, but that's it. I'm not so sure all these fans who claim to have done nothing actually did nothing. The fan Artest went after says Artest asked him if he threw the beer and he begged off. Well, guess what? The guy who is accused of flinging the beer says he didn't throw it, but they have it on video. Same guy? And another guy says he was doing nothing when he got whacked. But someone sucker-puches O'Neill and then gets whacked. And that's on film too. Same guy? So don't put too much faith in these guys telling you they didn't do anything. There's a reason they're the ones being questioned about it and most likely it's because they were involved. There has to be some limit. That ass Robin Ficker used to scream horrible things at Patrick Ewing from about 5 feet away throughout the entire game and no one did a damn thing about it. You don't think that leads to this? Posted by: on November 23, 2004 11:32 AM
They should kick the Detroit franchise out of the league permanently over this incident, and suspend the Indiana franchise for at least a year. I guess I'm in the minority, thinking the primary fault for this is with Detroit, and suggesting such a severe penalty... but I don't see how else to insure that it never happens again. What they've done is a slap on the wrist at best. The fans should either be better-behaved, or they should not be permitted to sit so close to the floor. The Detroit franchises knew well in advance how poorly-behaved their fans were. After a city loses a team because the fans are too boorish to have even the most remote sense of sportsmanship, maybe it'll revive some of the social pressure to act like decent human beings, even at a sporting event. Posted by: thoughtomator on November 28, 2004 05:10 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD] Recent Comments
Sponge - F*ck Cancer:
"[i]you were right but the goalie was a kid called ..."
Wi Tu Lo: "Speaking of inscrutable Asians, is Wo Fat still ac ..." Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "Shake up the administration?? what are you talking ..." Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] I will vote for Roy and Paxton in the runoffs ..." Zombie Jimmy Buffett: "Havana daydreamin' Boy, he's just dreamin' his li ..." Tom Servo: "The UAE has a decent Air Force , since it is US tr ..." runner: "It seems it's a dumping ground for weirdos and fre ..." Black Orchid (j+aD2): "[I]Was at a Hooters watching game one of the Stars ..." Smell the Glove: "Girlfriend in a Coma is a song by The Smiths ..." Gref : "98 This is a tough one. Roy said Trump committed ..." Will Robinson : "'Back in the day, hood rats would sell their stamp ..." runner: "That whole office is not necessary, they don't do ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|