| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
The Morning Report — 5/ 7/26
Daily News Stuff 7 May 2026 Wednesday Night ONT - May 6, 2026 [TRex] Humpday Cafe Will Fetterman Flip? Millionaire Celebrities Protest the 1% at the Billionaire-Sponsored Met Gala Left-wing Terrorist Set Fire to the Palisades to Honor the Democrats' Murderer-Hero, Luigi Mangione The FBI Raids the Home and Offices of the Virginia State Senator Pro Tempore Louise Lucas on Suspicions of Corruption Justin Baldoni Settles With Amber Heard 2.0, Claims He Paid Her Zero Dollars and Is Very "Pleased" With the Outcome Withered Aryan Hooker Me-Again Kelly: Tuq'r and I May Be Losing Our Old Audience, But We're Gaining an "International" Audience of "Young" Muslims and That's Even Better! Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Remember When the Media Was So Concerned About "Hate Radio"? |
Main
| Hate Radio: Liberals Condone "Full-Scale Civil War" »
November 12, 2004
Who's Voting on Values?Charles Krauthammer debunks the "Angry White Christian" theory of the election. Andrew Stuttaford makes a point that I think needs further exploration: Amid all the weird, wild wailing in Manhattan, amid the hot air and hysteria in Hollywood, amid all the crazy-lady shrieks of mainstream-media anguish (yes, Maureen, I'm talking about you) and the banshee howling of liberal complaint, Americans heard one overarching theme from the disappointed and distraught left — one meme, one fear, one insult that finally spoke its name. Jesusland (that's what they call it now) had won. The left likes to imagine that the right votes almost exclusively on these irrational culture-war issues. But read the words of the left. Look at what seems most hateful to them-- not the War in Iraq, hated though that is. Not Bush's stand against increasing the minimum wage. Not partial privatization of Social Security. Not the so-called "jobless recovery." No-- it's that "Jesusland" won the election. Recall that Clinton was never popular with the left until he traded DNA with an intern. Who, precisely, is voting on "values"? Who is animated chiefly by their idiosyncratic (and irrational, or at least not logically proveable) beliefs about what sort of sexual climate is best for us all? The left is voting on "values," too. In fact, sometimes it seems hard to discern what the hard left is interested in apart from the culture war. They have values they cherish and seek to evangelize to the nation through politics. Guys-- you can't whine endlessly about gay marriage and The Passion of the Christ and how uptight this bourgeois country of ours is (gee, it's practically 1952 again!) and then sit there and critique your opponents for voting on "values." You're voting on values too-- or rather for the rubbishing of them. Some people are voting for Jesus, yes. But can you really deny that many of you aren't voting on your hatred of Jesus-- and your obsessive desire to see the hated religion Christianity once and for all branded an antisocial cult? I had a funny argument one time. I think liberals make this argument constantly. A guy was saying we shouldn't have a flag-burning amendment, because "it just doesn't matter either way." There were more important issues, he asserted. Fine, I said. If it doesn't matter either way, stop opposing it, let us pass it, and then we can deal with these more important issues of which you speak. No, he said. It's unconstitutional and bad for the country. I thought it "just didn't matter either way"? I queried. It doesn't matter, he reasserted. It's a non-issue. If it's a non-issue, I patiently re-explained, then you ought to be neutral about whether we have a flag-burning amendment or not. Obviously, you have a strong opinion on it, so stop claiming that you "don't care either way." You do care-- passionately. You're using this "who cares?" claim -- a false claim, by the way-- as a way to denigrate your opponents for bothering to care, while refusing to admit that you care just as much as they do. But I don't care, he told me once again. Then let it pass, I suggested once again. No, he said firmly. It's unconstitutional and will bring this country back into the dark ages. And on. And on. And on. And on. I don't understand how the left can continue to delude itself that these issues are "irrelevant" and "not even things we should be discussing" when they are clearly, themselves, so animated by these issues. They have very firm ideas on what "values" this nation ought to embrace. They're just not willing to discuss what those values might be-- at least not publicly. Hence, the perpetual claim that these issues are beneath them and of little concern to any enlightened person. And yet they're what they vote on, cycle after cycle after cycle. posted by Ace at 01:21 PM
CommentsYou can take it a step farther and suggest that their hatred of religion is even more dangerous because they have adopted a religion of their own. They just don't recognize it as such and that's why it's more dangerous. And central to their own gospel is denigration of religion--Christianity in particular. Whether the religion is Anti-Americanism or Collectivism or Atheism or Snotty Dipshitism I haven't determined. Posted by: spongeworthy on November 12, 2004 01:39 PM
Church of the Snotty Dipshitists. I like it! Posted by: Sharp as a Marble on November 12, 2004 02:06 PM
Your Blog is precisely right. But "I don't understand how the left can continue to delude itself"??? Yet we do know how they delude themselves. They have no real absolute values of any kind, merely a set of prejudices and things they think they oppose because alcoholic lechars like Ted Kennedy say so. Or because it means they get easy sex to be a part of that group. Being a Leftie is more of a social thing, it gains one entre into social groups that even Republicans envy for their casual sex and partying. And to be a Hero of such a group - WOW! Michael Moore does what he does not out of conviction, but because it allows a disgusting, ugly, fat slob to live like a Roman Emperor! Yes, sadly we do know how they delude themselves. Satan uses the same-old, same-old over and over again. Posted by: 72VIRGINS on November 12, 2004 02:10 PM
I think it's more an issue of them hiding their true convictions, a la Kerry flip-flopping. As Ann Coulter once said, "If the American people understood what Liberals really believed, they'd boil them in oil." Posted by: Golden Boy on November 12, 2004 02:30 PM
Mmmm, deep fried Wonkette. Tasty. Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer on November 12, 2004 02:34 PM
Great point, Ace. I think the American left joins the jihadists in valuing suicide. Why else would Michael Moore have bestirred himself to argue against suicide? More on that on my blog at: http://paragraphfarmer.blogspot.com/2004/11/counsel-of-michael-moore.html Posted by: Patrick O'Hannigan on November 12, 2004 02:37 PM
Golden Boy: Yes Ann Coulter is right, as always. But believing that they have a right to mooch off of others for a living, have sex lives like Caligula, and be accountable and responsible to no one and nothing except their own selfish lust and greed is a long way from having absoloute values. Posted by: 72VIRGINS on November 12, 2004 02:51 PM
the funny part of all this to me is that, frankly, the left is obscenely stupid about who the right is. Look, this is a blog with some fairly intellectually and possibly politically active conservatives checking in all the time. And many of us spend much of our time here discussing lesbians on Survivor, speculating on Wonkette's personal life, and/or reliving our heady Dungeons and Dragons filled youths. Most of us would prefer traditional values be respected instead of denigrated. And many of us are quite religious. But the absurd notion that Bob Jones III will be crowned emperor next week persists on the left in spite of any sustainable evidence. They want an enemy. And they'll twist us into one no matter what the facts are on the ground. Posted by: See-Dubya on November 12, 2004 03:55 PM
You nailed it right here I think: They have very firm ideas on what "values" this nation ought to embrace. They're just not willing to discuss what those values might be-- at least not publicly.That, at least was the case 110% on a messageboard I eventually got kicked off of for pissing so many libs off. All anyone would *ever* say is "bush is a retard" "his plan is wrong" "bush lied" - but god forbid one applies the thumbscrews to them and ask them to come up with a better plan - you know, anything that could actually be debated. For the life of them, they simply couldn't do it. It got to the point where it was funny (to me) and I'd just bait them all day long. At that point, we'd stopped talking about motorcycles which gave the mod's enough of an excuse to say I'd upset the apple cart, and I was banned. This was all about 8 months ago, the ban was only for 5 days. The only post I've made since being banned was on 11/3 and it read something to the effect of: Elected, not selected. Bitches.Haven't gone back since. Posted by: fat kid on November 12, 2004 04:18 PM
Ace, Let me try and follow your liberal friend's logic. Passing a Constitutional amendment that says flag burning is illegal is unconstitutional. The income tax is illegal people should add that to their list of excuses--the amendment allowing an income tax is unconstitutional. If it's part of the Constitution it is constitutional. These guys are amazing. Posted by: Dale on November 12, 2004 06:07 PM
Hm. Well, that's a plan. Taperecord those two lines "If it doesn't matter then let it pass," and "Yes, you do care." and we can keep the liberals forever arguing about whether or not they care instead of having to put up with them in the next election. Posted by: Beka on November 12, 2004 10:12 PM
Talk about pinning the tail right on the Donkey's liberal leftist ass. Nice job Ace. I think that to a lot of people who chose the "Moral values" issue were saying that obviously lying about what you stand for in order to get elected shows a lack of "moral values". The split up of Iraq and the War on Terror was a flagrant attempt to dilute the importance of that issue too. To security hawks, Iraq and the WOT are one and the same, but they were likely to choose the WOT as their issue. Anti war weenies who don't think they are related were more likely to seperate Iraq and the WOT and vote against Bush based on Iraq. Totaly snow job. Posted by: Dacotti on November 13, 2004 12:06 AM
Lipovarin Review Lipovarin Info Facts about Lipovarin Posted by: lipovarin on May 19, 2005 06:07 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Democrat Congresswoman Sara Jacobs cites Me-Again Kelly, Cavernous Nostrils, Alex Jones and Tuq'r Qarlson as proof that concerns about Trump's mental health are "bipartisan"
As Bonchie from Red State says: Know the op when you see it.
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
ANOTHER LEFT WING ASSASSIN ATTEMPTS TO KILL TRUMP
If I understand this, the left-wing Democrat assassin attempted to get into the White House Correspondents Association dinner, and was stopped at the magnetometers, which detected his gun. I guess he pulled out the gun and was shot by Secret Service agents. Erika Kirk was present.
Forgotten 70s Mystery Click
You made me cry when you said good-bye 70s, not 50s Now that is a motherflipping intro
NYT Melts Down Over Texas Rangers Statue Outside... Texas Rangers' Stadium
"The Athletic posted a lengthy article about a statue outside Globe Life Field, presenting a virtue-signaling moral grievance as unbiased news coverage." [CBD]
Important Message from Recent Convert to Christianity and Yet Super-Serious Christian Tuq'r Qarlson: Actually Muslims love Jesus, it's Trump and his neocons who hate him
Tucker Carlson Network Trump's trolling tweet was ill-advised, but Tucker is just lying when he claims the Christianity-hating President of Iran was "offended" by this. He's one step away from announcing his official conversion to Islam. He literally never stops praising Islam. Well, he suddenly became Christian two years ago, there's not much stopping him from converting again. You can track Tuq'r's official conversion to Islam with this Bingo card. Recent Comments
Roy:
"A floating Petrie dish? What if it was Laura Petri ..."
rickb223 [/b][/s][/u][/i]: "Maybe that Chicago Alderman can go to Walgreens HQ ..." Nova Local: "77 62 PDT'S plan from the beginning was get rid o ..." Tom Servo: "I want the hubris of the IRGC to reject the deal, ..." San Franpsycho: "I do not want the Gaza template to be used in Iran ..." Rev. Wishbone: ">>>“We’re not here to beg Walgreens to ..." NaCly Dog: "Lady in Black Too bad he can't fall down a numb ..." Smell the Glove: "Good morning Horde thx JJ, hope all is well. Yest ..." The person who always says that : "Nothing will happen. ..." OrangeEnt: "Why anyone would willingly pay to board a floating ..." rickb223 [/b][/s][/u][/i]: "HEADLINE: Cheyenne Mountain Zoo welcomes new giraf ..." Lady in Black[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "“F— the White House,” Marx alleg ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|