Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Lyric Fragment Quiz Answers | Main | A Little Afternoon Cowbell »
October 22, 2004

Andrew Sullivan Watch

Might as well slap this buffoon up before I turn in:

Here's [link omitted] an over-wrought attack on yours truly as the Judas of Bush-supporters. Please. Oh, and I'm also "Zarqawi's microphone." Actually, I'm even more important that that: "I suspect Andrew Sullivan has done more damage to the president, and more help to Kerry, than George Soros and MoveOn with all their billions." My power, it frightens me.

If someone attributed such power to me, would I link it? You betcha. But I'd be perfectly transparent about my reasons for doing so (i.e., ego stroke-- I can't believe this guy thinks I matter!)

Sullivan is posting a nobody making dopey statements primarily so he can call attention to this ninny's idea that little Andrew Sullivan is more important that George Soros' billions.

Jackass.

It's a jackass statement. And it's even more jackass for Sullivan to print it, even why saying "Moi? Important?"

A simpler explanation is that I'm a blogger who tries to call things as I see them. When facts change, I try and adjust.

The main fact that's changed is.... oh, for crying out loud, everyone knows what we're talking about here.

I never believed the Iraq liberation would be this botched; and it behooves those of us who supported it to be accountable. (God knows, the Bush administration won't take responsibility.) I've learned in life that error is not something to be afraid of. But fear of admitting error is.

And yet Sullivan then goes on to call Bush to account for Sullivan's errors. As I've pointed out before, Sullivan continues to insist he was right all along on Iraq while simultaneously claiming that it's all going wrong now-- he personally NEVER has confessed to any error as regards the war. Not that he thought the pacification would be easier, or that Iraqis would be more helpful in making their own peaceful futures, etc.

He's quite ready to confess the errors of others, especially those who oppose gay marriage (though I'm quite sure that's coincidental). But confess his own errors? Not so much.

Tell ya what, Andy-- I'll get on Bush to admit his errors the moment you confess yours.

Since you're so big on "adjusting" as facts change and such a big believer in admitting error.

Let's face it-- since you're now apparently more influential than George Soros' billions, your leadership-by-example would be most salutory for our political dialogue.

Update:

Ace, I believe that you are the single most powerful blogger in the history of blogging.

No, that's just ridiculous. Stop it.

More Powerful than Instapundit.

Now come on! This is just getting silly.

The trendsetter for the Corner.

Really? Moi? Do you really think...?

Quicker on the breaking news than Drudge.

This is just too ridiculous. I'm going to let you just make a couple of absurd compliments, and then that's it for you, buddy.

Sexier than Wonkette's faux lesbo pics.

(Batting eyes.)

Gayer than Andrew Sullivan (not that there's anything wrong with that).

Hey!

"Phat-ter" than Filet O Fish (but not fatter, since no one is). That pretty much says it all. -- Senator Philabuster, with the Comment of the Day

It doesn't QUITE say it all though! Because Jake has an interesting follow up:

Ace is more important in this election than President Bush.

No, please don't (yes yes) stop! I'm not worthy! (Am I? Tell me I am.)

Okay. Now, no more of this silly nonsense!


posted by Ace at 05:08 AM
Comments



“Zarqawi's microphone?” “Damage to the President?”

Because these don’t sound like the core complaints by conservatives I’ve been reading, Sullivan may be trying to misdirect us toward the ridiculous and patently untrue. His critics are painted as rabid crapslingers, and he looks like he’s zinged them.

Our beef with AS may be that he seemed to build readership and click count by riding the post-9/11 wave, then, after he drew readership from the Right to add to his normal base, swung left before the election season to help the liberal machine get power. I gather we generally suspect he stage-managed a premeditated, self-serving transition, and misrepresented his rationale all along the way to try to hold as much of his conservative readership as possible while not coming off as a schemer.

If that's it in a nutshell, did he do it because the Left truly knows how to reward and punish? Because he thought he could have his readership cake and eat it? WGAF. He should be embarrassed at how early we picked up on the shift and predicted his endorsement of Kerry. Bad form, Old Sport.

Posted by: Lastango on October 22, 2004 06:45 AM

Funny how we've yet to see even so much as the faintest hint of comment from Sullivan, re: the recent revelations concerning the Political Director of the Log Cabin Republicans (one Christopher Barron, to be precise) being publicly "outed" as a long time supporter and adviser of John Edwards. (information here --> http://gaypatriot.blogspot.com/)

I guess when you've been all but outed as a frothing, single-issue-propelled Kerry partisan yourself, however: that two-faced sort of treachery is just the same ol' same ol', ultimately.

Posted by: Kent on October 22, 2004 07:51 AM

Ace, I believe that you are the single most powerful blogger in the history of blogging. More Powerful than Instapundit. The trendsetter for the Corner. Quicker on the breaking news than Drudge. Sexier than Wonkette's faux lesbo pics. Gayer than Andrew Sullivan (not that there's anything wrong with that). "Phat-ter" than Filet O Fish (but not fatter, since no one is). That pretty much says it all.

Now will you bring Johnny Coldcuts back?

Posted by: senator philabuster on October 22, 2004 09:03 AM

sully is a turd

quit giving him links!

Posted by: sully = turd for brains on October 22, 2004 09:08 AM

Philabuster;

Ace is more important in this election than President Bush.

Posted by: jake on October 22, 2004 09:39 AM

Sullivan's self-obsession has become self-parody.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on October 22, 2004 10:34 AM

No one is fatter than O-Dub? Have you seen Michael Moore lately? No man is an island, but shit howdy, he's pretty close.

Posted by: zetetic on October 22, 2004 11:57 AM

...and when he moves, Ace slices like a f'n hammer. I've seen him do it.

He's also the only important one up there on the stage. He give us full value on our checks, too.

Posted by: Nathan on October 22, 2004 12:45 PM

Hey Ace,
You know, back in the day, I use to be a major metalhead. Anything George Lynch or Yngwie Malmsteen did was A-OK with me. But my ultimate motto was: "Eddie(VanHalen)is God!
Well, I've grown up a bit and have seen the error of my blasphemous ways. I have been enlightened and I now bask in the warm glow of the real true light. I can proudly raise up my power fist and shout at the top of my lungs:
"Ace is God!"

;-)

Posted by: Bohemian on October 22, 2004 02:10 PM

Now, were I Andrew Sullivan, I might have to post that, and then disclaim any pretensions of actual divinity.

Posted by: ace on October 22, 2004 03:31 PM

Ace, on what basis is there a reason to conclude that the Iraqis don't want to be free? Because the people in Fallujah are hiding Zarqawi? That's one city. Tell that to the Iraqis killed everytime a ING or IP recruiting line is attacked. The idea the Iraqis won't fight for themselves is the biggest myth of the war. Our mistake was not raising a division size force of free Iraqis in the 12 months between the "axis of evil" speech and March 2003. Wolfowitz wanted to do this but was not permitted. That's not his error - it's Powell's for blocking it and Bush's for listening to State.

Posted by: Joshua Chamberlain on October 22, 2004 03:51 PM

By the way, while the "more powerful than Soros" bit is over the top, the rest of the piece is a pretty accurate analysis of what's going on at The Daily Dish.

Posted by: Joshua Cha,berlain on October 22, 2004 03:57 PM

Ace, on what basis is there a reason to conclude that the Iraqis don't want to be free? Because the people in Fallujah are hiding Zarqawi?

I didn't intend to take a position on this. Rather, I meant that if Iraq is as much a mess as Sullivan bitches, then Sullivan has to also take responsibility for HIS miscalculations, and that would be one of them.

It's an "if... then" thing.

Posted by: ace on October 22, 2004 04:33 PM

I shudder to think what The Daily Dish would read like if it were written during WWII.

Posted by: ken on October 22, 2004 05:01 PM

Sullivan jumped the shark some time ago, and it's long past time the blogophere stopped paying attention to past glories. It's a bit shabby really, not unlike bowing to a Duke because his ancestor won some battle but then have produced 13 generations of ciphers.

Posted by: MartiniPundit on October 22, 2004 05:32 PM

"Sullivan jumped the shark some time ago..."

Yep. He's yesterday's news.

He's doing this whole elaborate dance to maintain his credibility as a "conservative", when in reality he's a single-issue voter, big-time.

Undoubtedly, now that he's spending part of the year in Provincetown he's also probably feeling tons of pressure from his social circles to get in line on Kerry.

Posted by: H.D. Miller on October 22, 2004 06:53 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
lin-duh: "Nova Local, Dumpling dump??? What is that? I make ..."

Scuba_Dude: "KABOOM!!!! ..."

blaster: "first ..."

Eromero: "Bang Bang Bang ..."

Schnorflepuppy (OT but harmless) [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "SPONGE! ..."

Emmie: "[i]Do you remember talking to Mrs. E about the lit ..."

Nova Local: "If anyone does the "dumpling dump", drain the pork ..."

lin-duh: "Making a huge pot of Bolognese sauce to portion an ..."

San Franpsycho: "Has the Food Thread had the "dinner" versus "suppe ..."

Weasel: "Has the Food Thread had the "dinner" versus "suppe ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Martini or Old Fashioned? Or...maybe a Bourbon! ..."

Rev. Wishbone: ">>>Has the Food Thread had the "dinner" versus "su ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives