Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« OBL is KIA | Main | Sheesh! The Sex is Least Embarassing Part of Paris Hilton's New Videotapes »
October 17, 2004

CNNGallup Shock: Bush Back Up by 8

At Drudge.


Zogby and Newsweek weren't just noise. Bush's weak first debate performance cost him, but not as much as it first seemed. I'm a little surprised -- I thought Bush was toast, to be honest with you -- but the public does seem to have sort of settled on him for re-election (if just by a little bit).

I did not see this one coming.

Coming Soon! Andrew Sullivan explains how the "internals" all look amazing for Kerry! Eagles up, South Park Republicans!


posted by Ace at 01:46 PM
Comments



'I did not see this one coming '----Ace

The nice thing about the internet is that you can be 'petty' and it almost never seems out of place.

I saw this one coming.

Kerry is UN-ELECTABLE except in the various 'asylums'scattered around the nation.I don't know if this poll is accurate but you can SEE the desperation in the Dems campaign.Kerry 'won' the debates,but I saw a great piece on the BBC(REALLY!!),wherein they showed a focus group after the last debate.When asked who'won'virtually everyone picked J*K,but when asked who they were voting for,the OVERWHELMING majority went firmly for Bush.Kerry got 3.5 votes(1 lady said that she would vote for Kerry only 'if I had to'.
The reason advanced by the pollster --- " They know that Bush is not as articulate,BUT they believe that 'he believes',and that is good enough for them.
Exactly.

Posted by: dougf on October 17, 2004 02:07 PM

After the 1st debate, when Kerry was up by one or two points, the media here in Europe went into a frenzy. For more then a week they parroted the news...i wonder if they will say something about this?

Posted by: madne0 on October 17, 2004 02:12 PM

Don't get nervous when Rasmussen and Zogby get closer on Monday and Tuesday. That's just noise from the weekend effect where Dems poll higher on Fridays and Saturdays. But expect to see the press highlight the "mo" toward Kerry from this easily identifiable pattern.

I'm just saying...

Posted by: Birkel on October 17, 2004 02:51 PM

It is encouraging news but I hope no one gets lazy and decides in any state that their vote doesnt matter any more...it matters now more than ever. Let's not get complacent about this news!!!

Posted by: Paul on October 17, 2004 02:53 PM

You are killing me! There's still 2 weeks left. Anything can happen. A wild attack on an American city that Kerry actually handles well ('we tried it the president's way, and we're still having attacks, let's try it my way'), something worse than we've been seeing in Iraq, or a market crash. Or, Kerry can find something dirty on Bush and release it 2 days before the election. Or, the 527s can be more effective that we can imagine in getting out the vote. Be happy about the poll numbers but pleeeeeeeeeease stop saying how Bush is such a lock.

Posted by: Karol on October 17, 2004 02:53 PM

Dead people, illegal immigrants and people with multiple aliases don't show up in polls. If you want Bush to win I suggest you sign up for the 72 hour program and volunteer as a poll watcher or voter caller on Nov. 2nd. Take days off if you have to. The dems are going to cheat big this year.

Posted by: Paul B. on October 17, 2004 03:09 PM

"Stay on Target!"

Posted by: Iblis on October 17, 2004 03:44 PM

Iblis: just what I was going to say.

I wonder if Ace was the other guy in the theater killing himself laughing during "Team America"'s cantina scene.

Posted by: someone on October 17, 2004 04:09 PM

That's the problem with following the media's lead and scoring a debate like a boxing match. It's not.

In 2000, Gore was widely perceived to have "won" the debates but the memorable parts about his antics and "lockboxes" ultimately cost him. So what was memorable about the debates?

- "Global test"
- "Mary Cheney"
- "marrying up"

The media can claim Kerry won the debates all they want. The conventional wisdom before the debates was that Bush needed to get through them without a major gaffe: he did, and Kerry didn't.

For once, it looks like the conventional wisdom might have been wise after all.

Posted by: Jim B on October 17, 2004 04:21 PM

Zogby is already claiming that Kerry has cut Bush's lead from 4 to 2. CNN isn't even touting their poll on their own web site. I personally like the realclearpolitics.com approach. Take all them polls done in a certain time frame and average them. I would suspect that it would give you a less biased view with a smaller margin of error. They show Bush +3.8.

Posted by: Steve L. on October 17, 2004 04:34 PM

I was thinking more of, "Don't get cocky, kid!" Must be my inner Solo coming through. :-)

And remember what followed soon after that: "That's the only explanation for the ease of our escape."

Is this blog bugged?

Posted by: The Black Republican on October 17, 2004 04:37 PM

Instapundit links to a new Stephen Denbeste article about the polls where he overlays color bars to show the overall trends, which clearly show both candidates creeping up, but Bush more sharply than Kerry and the trends are very consistent over the past several months. From his engineering background, he states that there are two possible reasons for the "noise", or the large ups and downs: Bad sampling equipment (impossible with a poll) or Fraud. Want to guess which it is? And the big reason the Dems are crapping their pants right now? They are loosing. And they are loosing more and more as we get closer to the elections.

Posted by: Dacotti on October 17, 2004 04:55 PM

Kerry's internals? I suspect Kerry's "internals" got flushed down the john after that poll came out.

Posted by: Dan on October 17, 2004 05:04 PM

Jim B, Re: memorable moments.

Got wood?

(anyone selling that on t-shirts yet?)

Posted by: SomeJoe on October 17, 2004 05:39 PM

Ace-

Guess the debates really *were* a wash after all ;-).

Hey pal, bully on you for the great poll coverage, you're my first stop. Okay, my second stop, after Drudge. But you're kicking ass.

BTW, did you know that Pierre Salinger was killed by a missile?

http://garfieldridge.blogspot.com/2004/10/was-pierre-salinger-killed-by-surface.html

Cheers,
Dave

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 17, 2004 05:48 PM

As much as we want to believe that Bush has turned the corner, we can't lose sight of Ohio. Does Rove have a viable plan to capture the Buckeye state? And Florida's not out of the woods either. Let us pray. Or better still, let Rove & Co. prey.

Posted by: wdennis on October 17, 2004 05:50 PM

Newsweek polls are always noise and should always been ignored.

Gallup, Zogby, Rasmussen, Ipsos-Reid, Mason-Dixon, and one or two others--these are legit. Newsweek's one of those outfits that gives polling a bad name.

Posted by: Dean Esmay on October 17, 2004 07:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
New video shows ICE agent being rammed and dragged while clinging to the car's hood; communist filth continue claiming he wasn't hit at all
Venezuelans who fled Maduro's tyranny just discovered that they can send him mail in prison and that the US will deliver it to him
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Venezuela...nation-building or our interests? Minnesota insurrection heats up, be careful what you wish for Democrats, dive bars, and more!
More bad news for Nicholas Maduro as old blackface photos resurface
Ay yi yi, the week this guy is having!
Cynics will say this is AI
Did Everpeak and Hilton lie? Nick Sorter thinks they did, and has video evidence! [CBD]
New Yorkers are shocked after footage goes viral of NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani's Tenant Director stating that white people will be HEAVILY impacted after they transition property "as an individual good to a collective good" [CBD]
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
Ch-ch-ch-ch-chaka khan, chaka khan
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The Somali grift might be the biggest financial scandal in American history, will the Mullahs finally fall? CFPB gets a lifeline from a corrupt judge, Brigitte Bardot...RIP, and more!
Lurker extraordinaire announces impending surgery: Victor Davis Hanson: 'Not Yet and Not Today'
Best wishes for a speedy recovery! [CBD]
Trump Says 'We Have the Makings' of a Peace Deal in Ukraine It sounds nice, but please take Winston Wolf's advice. [CBD]
This isn't Christmas Eve fare, and I thought about waiting until the 26th to post it, but supposedly an amateur detective has solved the Zodiac killer mystery. And the horrific Black Dahlia killing. He says it's the same person! I always thought of them as very far apart in time but I think Black Dahlia was mid-fifties (nope, 1947) mid and the Zodiac murders began in 1968 so it's possible it's the same killer.

The killer, if it's the same man, would have been in his 20s when he killed the Black Dahlia and his 40s when he did the Zodiac murders. Possible.

A little caveat: I saw someone snark on Reddit, "The Zodiac case gets solved more often than Wordle." There are a ton of coincidences here, supposedly, like a Zodiac cipher being solved by the name "Elizabeth." Elizabeth Short was the name of the so-called Black Dahlia.

If you don't know about the Black Dahlia, don't look it up. Just accept that it's grisly on the level of Jack the Ripper.

Yes, the named suspect resembles the police sketch of Zodiac.

Here's a podcast with the amateur sleuth who claims he cracked the Zodiac.
Daily Mail article.
Link to get around the LA Times' paywall for their article.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The great Trump fleet? The economy is solid, Somalia's corrosive effect on America, Merry Christmas, and more!
Recent Comments
Aetius451AD work phone: "ONT is nood. ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "rd ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "1 ..."

Doof: "[i]Anyone have any good Doof jokes? Posted by: We ..."

mindful webworker - Barbara Eden says yes, master - woo: "PROJECT MOONBASE - with Dr. Bellows before Admiral ..."

Weasel: "Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at January 11, 2026 09 ..."

Weasel: "Anyone have any good Doof jokes? ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "Did a little web reading and youtube viewing on co ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "An Anvil on reparkerizing a 1911: https://youtu ..."

Weasel: "I'll drop your name so it is handled by their best ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: "It had been a Aussie cop gun and I would say it ch ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Mark Novak is the channel name now. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives