Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Where Does Bush Get All His Wonderful Toys? | Main | Victory in Oz »
October 08, 2004

The Second Debate

I've only watched the foreign policy section of the debate so far, but Bush is definitely far stronger, crisper, clearer, and more passionate this go-round.

I think Kerry is still doing reasonably well, but he's not coming across nearly as well as he did the first time. He reminds me of that Far Side cartoon where all the dog hears is "Blah, blah, blah, Ginger, blah, blah, blah Ginger." The only thing I hear him saying on terrorism is "blah, blah, blah, France, allies, blah, blah, France, allies." I don't think Bush attacked him hard enough here -- I'd like him to ask John Forbes Kerry precisely how many foreign troops joined us in the first Gulf War and actually engaged in fighting ; I'd like him to give us a number of how many foreign troops he'd attract now; I'd like him to explain why, if he cites Bush's father's efforts as the paradigmatic Grand Coaltion, he voted against that war anyway.

That said, Bush is actually responsive to most of Kerry's attacks this time; last time Bush seemed determined to say "hard work" no matter what Kerry's charge. He's on the defensive most of the time, but despite that disadvantageous stance, he's battling back all right.

I'm trying to put my partisan bias aside here. But thusfar, I'm frustrated that Bush hasn't laid this guy out cold, but I still have to give it to him on points. No knockouts, but Kerry's face has gotten scuffed up pretty good.

Other Opinions: Allah's sampling indicates wide disagreement. But hey-- at least disagreeing between a draw or slight Kerry win or Bush win on points is better than well-nigh universal agreement that Bush lost.


posted by Ace at 10:31 PM
Comments



Just checked the MSNBC poll, kerry is winning 74-26 with 20,000 votes, and the debate has JUST finished.

Oddly enough, when I went to their site directly after the VP debate, and oddly enough, Edwards was winning that vote by about 74-26....

Posted by: DelphiGuy on October 8, 2004 10:40 PM

Gaffe O' the evening "WTC was when? Er, uh, 1993"?

Posted by: Roundguy on October 8, 2004 10:41 PM

"I'd like him to ask John Forbes Kerry precisely how many foreign troops joined us in the first Gulf War and actually engaged in fighting"

I've been looking for that statistic, myself. I was in the 1st Gulf War and I remember seeing nothing but American and British troops right up until we liberated Kuwait. I spent 30 days in Kuwait City after the liberation and that's when I saw troops of every flavor all over the place(usually standing in front of me in the line to use the phones.)

Posted by: Golden Boy on October 8, 2004 10:41 PM

I thought Bush won when he asked America who needs
some wood.

Posted by: anonymous on October 8, 2004 11:32 PM

I own a timber company?

That's news to me.

Need some wood?

Posted by: W on October 8, 2004 11:35 PM

I knew you'd say that, Chimpy McBushyburton.

Posted by: a democrat on October 8, 2004 11:38 PM

I know what John Kerry was writing on his note pad...."Oh, Shit!"

Posted by: Brent Sutton on October 8, 2004 11:41 PM

According the website that Cheney meant to send people to in the Vice-Presidential Debate, Factcheck.org, under the current administration's definition of "small-business owner" Bush is indeed the "owner" of a timber company.

Posted by: Batman on October 8, 2004 11:44 PM

Holy tax fraud, Batman. Another tax loophole is exactly
what I needed. Thanks.

Posted by: Republican Robbin' on October 8, 2004 11:55 PM

Can we now start calling Kerry the "Baldrick Candidate"? His every answer seemed to include the phrase "I have a cunning plan."

Posted by: H.D. Miller on October 9, 2004 12:02 AM

I think Bush is saving the "knockout" punch for the final debate. Anything he he would have done up to now would just have given Kerry a chance to regroup and fight back the next time. But, with a knockout in the last debate, Kerry will no longer have a chance to counteract it on stage with the President, on live TV in front of 50 million voters.

I'm looking for Bush to eat Kerry for lunch during the last debate.

Everybody wants Bush to win now, and they're wrong. Bush knows that peaking too early is a great plan for failure. On the other hand, 25 days to go and I'm biting my nails.

Posted by: Remy Logan on October 9, 2004 12:11 AM

But, I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But. I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But. I have a plan...

Posted by: Gary Lewis on October 9, 2004 12:13 AM

No... the gaffe of the evening was on the abortion question... by Kerry... "Judicial Intervention"

Posted by: Gary Lewis on October 9, 2004 12:15 AM

Kerry:...And looking around here, at this group here, I suspect there are only three people here who are going to be affected: the president, me, and, Charlie, I'm sorry, you too.

So basically, the audience is a bunch of losers whoe doesn't ever have to worry about making $200K

Posted by: Rock on October 9, 2004 12:27 AM

Rock-

Yep. Kerry earned his elitist stripes with great aplomb tonight.

"All you guys look too poor to associate with me, but I've got a plan to be your President."

Guess that was focus group tested.

Posted by: Birkel on October 9, 2004 01:06 AM

Best Kerry debate performance analysis ever is by Gary Lewis:

"But, I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But. I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But, I have a plan...
--click--
But. I have a plan..."

As I live-blogged the debate thie exact series of statement from John Kerry seemed to exit from his mouth when he spoke.

Posted by: Chad Evans on October 9, 2004 01:19 AM

I felt sick to my stomach after the first debate. Bush was embarassing, though I agreed with him on substance. Bush won this most recent debate, and I can finally hold my head up high again. :)

Posted by: VI on October 9, 2004 01:40 AM

In the beginning of the debate, Bush appeared to be genuinely angry. He was obviously annoyed by Kerry and his galling hypocrisy. But his anger came out the wrong way; it seemed as though he was lashing out at the audience.

Then Bush started to relax, and that's when he assumed command of the debate. Kerry was reduced to repeating over and over again that "I have a plan". Bush, meanwhile, cracked jokes, exuded warmth, and managed to hammer Kerry on several points without looking nasty.

Bush's performance may not represent a decisive victory, but his impressive showing will re-energize Bush supporters, who were in despair over his dismal performance last week, and help to recover lost ground.

[Industrial Waste]

Posted by: Penn on October 9, 2004 02:26 AM

Whatever the facts, America definitely needs some
wood. If you know what I mean.

Posted by: anonymous on October 9, 2004 03:13 AM

Watching the debate I was struck by the fact that Bush looked like a real person. Kerry looked like he could star as himself in 'Team America World Police'.

Posted by: Greg on October 9, 2004 08:03 AM

Here's what I think: Only a spell of uncharacteristic modesty is keeping ol' Andrew Sullivan from nominating himself for one of his "Sontag Awards."

Posted by: Short Shock on October 9, 2004 08:29 AM

I liked it when Kerry said that promoting abortions in 3rd world countries would help with the AIDS crises ... how does that work?

Posted by: Carin on October 9, 2004 09:02 AM

" That's why I think it's important. That's why I think it's important for the United States, for instance, not to have this rigid ideological restriction on helping families around the world to be able to make a smart decision about family planning. You'll help prevent AIDS. You'll help prevent unwanted children, unwanted pregnancies. You'll actually do a better job, I think, of passing on the moral responsibility that is expressed in your question and I truly respect it."

Posted by: Carin on October 9, 2004 09:10 AM

Mr. and Mrs. Kerry paid 12% of their income in taxes last year. The Bush's paid 28%. If Kerry was serious about the rich paying their fair share, surely he and the rich Mrs. could have instructed their accountant to pay a larger share?

Mr. Kerry was definitely deterioriating in front of the camera. At the end he was reduced to holding on to his wife for reassurance.

Posted by: Lovely on October 9, 2004 11:08 AM

This says it all...

debate summary photo

Posted by: Gary Lewis on October 9, 2004 11:47 AM

People saw Bush as a man passionate about his job, passionate about America, and passionate especially about this war and how we fight it. This is exemplified when Bush forcefully rebutted Kerry after he yet again demeaned and belittled the contributions of our allies, something Charlie apparently didn't want Bush to do. This was good diplomacy by proxy, really.

They saw in Kerry an elitist, pandering fence-sitter who couldn't lead his sandwich out of a paperbag without summarizing his options and focus grouping them.

Certainly a win for Bush, not a KO, but this is only the second round.

By the way, did anyone notice the woman's face, the one who asked the abortion question, after Kerry finished? She looked incredibly depressed.

Posted by: Alan on October 9, 2004 12:15 PM

Rock 12:27AM Tax cuts for the richest 1% is a loser. It failed to work in creating jobs via that old joke - the "trickledown" fantasy. It exists because the fatcats at the Club for Growth bought the Repubs to whore for it. Just like the Dems are paid whores of the rich trial lawyers blocking tort reform.

Both sides use "class envy!" charges to protect the loot gains of either wealthy biz owners or trial lawyers.

Kerry, fortunately for Republicans, is a rich elitist who is not the best person to say that rich people paying far less of a total tax rate - that combo of local, state, payroll and Federal income taxes - 11% in Kerry's case vs. the 30-35% total tax paid out by the middle class - is a screwing in progress in need of reform so the wealthy pay total tax rates closer to the middle classes burden. As Warren Buffet keeps reminding us - his secretary pays far more of each dollar she earns to the government than he does.

Kerry has many character flaws and negatives. The idea of him being in charge of national security and rubberstamping Teddy's 4 Supreme Court selectees not the least of them.

But Republicans best recognize trickledown has failed to create jobs, failed toget Jews and their enormous political cash gifts to switch sides, and if you are seen as stiffing 99% of the citizenry to borrow Chinese money to gift the 1% with huge "tax cuts" - you risk the Presidency unless you change a failed policy - or risk another 1994 Congressional debacle generated by one party sticking with failed policies.


Posted by: Cedarford on October 9, 2004 04:03 PM

These ultimate racing pocket bikes are today's fastest growing products in the motor sport vehicle industry, aside from electrics scooters and gas scooters.

Posted by: pocket bike on October 28, 2004 05:26 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Sydney Sweeney unleashes the silver orbs
Thanks to @PatriarchTree
Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.
-- G.K. Chesterton
[CBD]
Recent Comments
Boss Moss: "Partly Cloudy Daniels. ..."

gp: "244 Ha! ..."

Pug Mahon, I Have Become Comfortably Lame: "Colorado is dead, period. From what I read. Poste ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "Are the illegals going to get Healthcare? Poste ..."

Don't blame the alligators: "Whoa! Get a load of the new Stormy Daniels: htt ..."

Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "They play the long game. They've been creating ind ..."

Maj. Healey: "Typical feeble GOP theater. Not surprised they wil ..."

She Hobbit: "REAKING: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene yelled at Hou ..."

Axeman: "I am disappointed that the filibuster is still the ..."

IrishEi : "Before anyone gets any more depressed Sen. John Ke ..."

Chairman LMAO: "231 News for the depressed: Woke Portland Polit ..."

I used to have a different nic[/s][/b][/i][/u]: "There's a reason that people don't turn out to vot ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives