Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« But I wanted to go to Tashii Station to pick up some power converters | Main | Here's How It Should Work »
October 06, 2004

Debate Round-Up

From what I can see from Allah, Who Is All-Wise, it looks to me like Cheney won.


posted by Ace at 02:57 AM
Comments



Ace--

Not according to Andrew Sullivan.

http://garfieldridge.blogspot.com/2004/10/andrew-sullivan-boy-was-i-ever-wrong.html

Cheers,
Dave
Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 6, 2004 03:12 AM

You know, that one was so goofy, even I had to just link it and laugh at it and I'm probably second to Ace in Sullivan bashing.

Ace will probably surprise me but seriously, how do you make it anymore comical than by just making the whole post a list of his quotes tonight?

"Bush supporters were particularly emphatic that Cheney won big. That makes sense to me psychologically - and it may help explain why so many conservatives viewed it as a huge Cheney win. They need to believe that right now, to keep their spirits up after last Thursday."

Projection is so fun to watch, heh.

Posted by: Elric on October 6, 2004 03:43 AM

I concurr, Cheney rocked...hard....

I'm only wondering how the 'never met you before' snippet will play out given that he has 'met' Edwards before.

Of course, it's a little bit awkward to refute the argument by suggesting that you met once.....three and a half years ago at a prayer breakfast.

Posted by: DelphiGuy on October 6, 2004 04:02 AM

I can hardly wait for Ace's take on Roadkill Sully's debate coverage!

(By the by, where does one get a decent view of roadkill whilst bicycling around DC or the balmy beaches of P-Town? Perhaps the hammock is closer to the highway than any of us knew.)

Posted by: Sean M. on October 6, 2004 06:37 AM

The absolute best part of Sully's "argument" was this telling admission:

I watched the debate again with a crowd of college students, at Ursinus College in Pennsylvania. Maybe their flummoxed response to Cheney and obvious rapport with Edwards influenced my take.

I'm not one to make cheap cracks about how Sully, surrounded by a gaggle of college students, might have his view of the debate colored by his desire to agree with that big bear of a redshirt freshman who alternates his Cheney-as-roadkill jokes with sly glances in Sully's direction. No, I would never suggest such a thing.

Posted by: Josh on October 6, 2004 07:46 AM

I don't need any 'pundit' to tell me what to think; I live behind my own eyes.

Cheney took a smirking, giggling ambulance-chaser to the woodshed and opened up a big ol' can of whoop-ass on him. Edwards fumbled, hammered his tired old left-wing lies, and made several "mistakes," all the while giggling and winking at the moderator ("Ah know y'all will forgive me 'cos Ah'm CUTE.")

Not all that cute, Johnny.

Note Edwards' rapid blink rate. Consider the fact that psychologists tell us that rapid blink rate is one of the signs of lying. Draw your own conclusions.

Posted by: Sailor Kenshin on October 6, 2004 09:20 AM

I had to turn it off after 20 minutes, I got so sick of hearing John-Boys inane prattle. But Cheney most certainly spanked him like a little bitch, at least during the parts I did manage to sit through. I have to say I wish we could see Cheney debate these douche bags more often. His soft-spoken cut to the bone style is so effective against that damn giggling school girl liberal crap. I actually felt bad for edwards , he looked like a dumb redneck in a middle school spelling B. All that crap where he was giggling at the moderator and exclaiming "AW SHUCKS I DUN BROKE DEM RULES AGIN DINT I?" it was just horrific to watch. Truly a sad moment for southerners everywhere.

Posted by: Marty on October 6, 2004 09:28 AM

Two things. Closing arguments. Edwards was like one of those guys on late night TV talking about "If you've been hurt on the job...mesothelioma...blah.blah.blah."...what do you call 'em...oh yeah. FUCKING TRIAL LAWYERS.

Very fake. Very toothy. But OOOOHHHH that hair.

She's a lady. WOOAAH..WOOOAH..WOOAHH She's a laday.

Sorry. And the other. John-John has the most feminine hands I've EVER scene on a man. I wouldn't do him or anything. Just sayin'.

OK maybe I'd do him. But I'd definitely have to drive.

Posted by: sentinel on October 6, 2004 09:33 AM

It would seem to me that based on everyones take on Edwards, we can agree on one thing: As huge an asswhooping as Cheney Delivered, it might not have been so bad if Edwards hadn't been so... himself.

Posted by: Brian B on October 6, 2004 11:01 AM

Ace, you gotta check this out. While doing a round-up of liberal bloggers, I saw that Atrios is calling Cheney a liar because of the "your hometown newspaper" line. I did some reseaerch that debunks that steaming pile.

Posted by: Sobek on October 6, 2004 12:09 PM

It's the last two paragraphs, btw.

Posted by: Sobek on October 6, 2004 12:09 PM

Ace,

Andrew Sullivan is unbearable today. Please, please institute the appropriate smackdown only worthy of a blogger of your abilities. I can't believe that people are letting him get away with more projection and baseless ad hominem attacks. I'd send him a letter, but he won't read it because a) there is no money in it to help with his "increasing bandwidth" and b) I'm not heaping praise on him for being a Republican that sympathizes with his "independent" views that go against the "hubris" and "pigheadedness" of the Republican attack machine.

Posted by: doug on October 6, 2004 12:25 PM

All that was left for Cheney to do at the end of the debate was to pull out one of his pant pockets and make Edwards hold it as they walked off the stage....Cheney owned Edwards last night.

If you can't stand up to Howard Dean, how will you stand up to Bin Laden...

I've been Senate President for 3.5 years and this is the first time we've met...

Consistent isn't a word I would use to describe Kerry...

Last night's debate was like watching Ward Clever debate a 20 year old pot smoking college kid with a Che t-shirt on the importance of personal responsibility.

Posted by: WindyCity on October 6, 2004 12:43 PM

I especially admired the way Cheney handled Edward's attempt to bait him with comments about Cheney's lesbian daughter, Cheney politely thanked him for the kind(?) comments about his family and didn't dignify the cheap-shot tactic with a response. Now that's class.

Posted by: Jane on October 6, 2004 01:23 PM

I emailed Sullivan about using a johnkerry.com link. Seriously I gotta ask, does anyone here actually check the head campaign sites or DNC/RNC? Why does he? Heh.

Beyond that, Sullivan is just a waste of time at this point. Although I have it on high authority that Sullivan will soon be receiving emails from "Terry McAulliffe" chastising him for not somehow fitting in "war for oil", "Chimpster", and "bigotracistsexisthomophobefascisthatemongerimperalist" into his fellating of Edwards. Any minute now to steal a phrase :)

Posted by: Elric on October 6, 2004 01:24 PM

It was nice to see the Bush Administration was able to come up with someone able to debate, point out major flaws in Kerry-Edwards, and ably defend Bush's policies.

Posted by: Cedarford on October 6, 2004 02:03 PM

Teresa Heinz-Kerry:

First John, now Edwards
When do I debate Laura?
Now fetch me my drink

Posted by: Johnny Catbird on October 6, 2004 03:47 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
Archimedes: "[i]Unrelated: Megyn Kelly has defended Candace Owe ..."

Neighbor Lawrence: "[i]What would you do with one trilly dollars?[/i] ..."

Dr. T: "I mean, I think we all knew that Owens was a few f ..."

Robert, the Love Walrus: "Have we seen this about the 1/5/21 pipe bomber? ..."

the way I see it: "I remember working on a road construction crew whe ..."

Jackson: "If a Liberal Judge ordered Trump to find money for ..."

Robert, the Love Walrus: "Afternoon. ..."

clarence: "What if....... ---- If you think I'm going to cl ..."

JM in Illinois : "How it works; Anonymous judges complain about SCO ..."

banana Dream: "I'm not the biggest musk fan, but all he ever does ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]Oddbob: "Nood trillionaires. ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]Oddbob: "Hah! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives