Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« They Don't Ask For Much... Just For Your Children | Main | Zogby: Bush By One »
October 04, 2004

Your Daily Warporn Fix: Air Force Researching Anti-Matter Weapons

Ohhh-oh-oh...

The U.S. Air Force is quietly spending millions of dollars investigating ways to use a radical power source -- antimatter, the eerie "mirror" of ordinary matter -- in future weapons.

...

In a sense, matter and antimatter are the yin and yang of reality: Every type of subatomic particle has its antimatter counterpart. But when matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate each other in an immense burst of energy.

"annihilate my protons"...

More cataclysmic possible uses include a new generation of super weapons...

cataclysmic superweapons, very hot, very hot...

-- either pure antimatter bombs or antimatter-triggered nuclear weapons; the former wouldn't emit radioactive fallout....

Following an initial inquiry from The Chronicle this summer, the Air Force forbade its employees from publicly discussing the antimatter research program. Still, details on the program appear in numerous Air Force documents distributed over the Internet prior to the ban.

These include an outline of a March 2004 speech by an Air Force official who, in effect, spilled the beans about the Air Force's high hopes for antimatter weapons. On March 24, Kenneth Edwards, director of the "revolutionary munitions" team at the Munitions Directorate at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida was keynote speaker at the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) conference in Arlington, Va.

mmmm.... revolutionary munitions...

In that talk, Edwards discussed the potential uses of a type of antimatter called positrons.

Positrons, also known as the nymphomaniacal, polymorphously perverse she-males of the subatomic "scene."

General Edwards sounds like he's very naughty, and naughty generals require spankings.

...

In 1929, Dirac suggested that the building blocks of atoms -- electrons (negatively charged particles) and protons (positively charged particles) -- have antimatter counterparts: antielectrons and antiprotons. One fundamental difference between matter and antimatter is that their subatomic building blocks carry opposite electric charges. Thus, while an ordinary electron is negatively charged, an antielectron is positively charged (hence the term positrons, which means "positive electrons"); and while an ordinary proton is positively charged, an antiproton is negative.

yes yes yes y-esss....

The real excitement, though, is this: If electrons or protons collide with their antimatter counterparts, they annihilate each other. In so doing, they unleash more energy than any other known energy source, even thermonuclear bombs....

Allright, I'm done. Anyone want to order Chinese?

General Tso's? General Tso's? Who's up for some General Tso's chicken?

Not Hot at All Update:

In the meantime, the Air Force has been investigating the possibility of making use of a powerful positron-generating accelerator under development at Washington State University in Pullman, Wash. One goal: to see if positrons generated by the accelerator can be stored for long periods inside a new type of "antimatter trap" proposed by scientists, including Washington State physicist Kelvin Lynn, head of the school's Center for Materials Research.

...

Besides, Lynn is enthusiastic about antimatter because he believes it could propel futuristic space rockets.

"I think," he said, "we need to get off this planet, because I'm afraid we're going to destroy it."

Hysterical whining isn't very sexy at all. I can just see this guy in his ponytail, strumming his doucheboy folk guitar, trying to pick up chicks by crooning about blowing up the world with positrons in his self-penned "Big Yellow Anti-Matter-Producing Supercollider."

That sorta worked in college. Thankfully, it stops working (mostly) for anyone over age 25, which is one of the few assurances that there is justice in the world.

Mirror Matter Update: Ripper suggests that I check out Mirror Matter, which is explained in this BBC piece.

This website is more breathless, but I can't help linking it, because it suggests that "Mirror Matter" might explain one of my private obsessions, the Tunguska Fireball.


posted by Ace at 11:20 AM
Comments



You want fun future weapons? Look up Mirror Matter, the stuff may exist, if it does mirror bombs might be able to pentrate right through solid matter.

Posted by: Ripper on October 4, 2004 11:23 AM

It doesn't work if the 'target' is over 25. It still works if the 'user' of such pick-up lines is under 35.

Word!

Posted by: Birkel on October 4, 2004 11:53 AM

Dr. Noonian Soong unavailable for comment.

Posted by: dillene on October 4, 2004 11:58 AM

OK, so here is the only problem... (Warning some physics geekitude ahead...possible minor math...)

A positron has the same mass as an electron. Now, how often to you here about a pound of electrons...you don't, because their really too small to be useful*. The real reason to create positrons is so that they can be paired with anti-protons to make anti-hydrogen. Now you can have a pound of hydrogen, so you could have a pound of anti-hydrogen. Unfortunately, anti-hydrogen is not effected by magentic fields (it is electrically neutral...) so storing it, without letting it touch any real matter, is very very very very difficult. So maybe you keep the anti-hydrogen very cold, like 3degrees kelvin and maybe it has some superconductity properties there and you could get it to magnetically levitate. So you got a anti-hydrogen bomb. Now you got to store it, on ships, in planes, being handled by high school graduates...and it has to be kept cold, and relativly still...

Yes, I think we have a long way to go to anti-matter weapons...


* Use E=mc^2, look up the mass of an electron, multiply times 2 (one is the electron, one is the positron) multiply by the speed of light (3x10^8 m/s) and that will give you a number that is kg*m/s which is also known as a Joule. Joules per second is a Watt... now figure out how much mass of electrons and positrons it would take to run a 100W light bulb... Then try the whole thing over using the mass of a proton times two in E=mc^2...

Mmmmmmmmm..... anti-hydrogen

Posted by: Angus on October 4, 2004 12:39 PM

PICTURES, DAMMIT! I'm a guy! I need visual stimulation, even when we're talking about Warpron. None of this female-orineted verbal warotica Tom-Clancy-meets-Harlequin BS! Show me pictures of stuff being vaporized!

Posted by: Brian B on October 4, 2004 12:40 PM

Right now, usable quantities of antimatter are as "out there" as a usable anti-gravity system. But the power/mass ratio is awesome. All mass is converted into energy in a matter-anti matter interaction. Less than a gram of matter was actually converted into energy in the Hiroshima bomb. A 10 megaton bomb converts less than a pound of it's matter into energy. But "if" it could be produced in an enormously energy intensive process, AND safely stored in anything bigger than nanonanonano gram quantities, well, yeah it would be something.

Another so far sci-fi concept is the isotopic bomb. Physicists have noted for decades that some rare radioisotopes can be made to decay far faster than their random decay half life number - with the application of electrical stimuli. A particular hafnium isotope most promising.

The Russians were interested in it. But the technological hurtles are staggering. The quantum mechanics math of understanding the process of stimuli of an isotope into decay, the loss of reactor effeciency to make it, the difficulty in separating out one of 8 or so metastable isotopes of hafnium that has this characteristic are beyond us. But theoretically, you could make 1-2 ounces of that special hafnium isotope release the energy of 10-30 tons of TNT if we knew how to do it, with far less radioactive contamination -. But a still a firecracker compared to a real nuke.

There is also the matter of economics. If you have an enemy that you absolutely have to take out because they have already used a nuke or potent biowar strike against us, our thermonuclear arsenal is relatively cheap to create and maintain as a deterrent. A 500KT weapon makes a heck of a bunker buster - and in extremis...you probably wouldn't give two hoots about innocent little Islami babies and cuddly little goats being blasted and irradiated in the process of ensuring that group or country never uses a WMD again.

Posted by: Cedarford on October 4, 2004 12:56 PM

Why would the energy of annhiliation have anything to do with anti-gravity?

Posted by: ace on October 4, 2004 01:01 PM

"Why would the energy of annhiliation have anything to do with anti-gravity?"

Beats me, I'm still enjoying my cigarette...

Posted by: Sharp as a Marble on October 4, 2004 01:14 PM

ACE - just an analogy. Usable quantities of anti-matter are as remote from reality as a useable anti-gravity system, based on current scientific knowledge, existing technology, and practical energy limitations.

The current process of creating anti-matter involves vast amounts of energy to get a few atoms produced.

Sort of like the old trap some people fall in that note that water is hydrogen and oxygen, therefore a source of perpetual energy. Missing the obvious that far more useful energy must be used to get water to separate into it's constituent elements than can be created from using that hydrogen for energy uses.

Posted by: Cedarford on October 4, 2004 01:46 PM

We don't need any more weapons with mass killing capability. We need portable weapons with tight patterns.

I am of the belief that Tesla was behind that Siberian thing. I believe we are still using his inventions to blow stuff up only in secret.

Posted by: spongeworthy on October 4, 2004 02:07 PM

For those who can't wait a few centuries for anti-matter weapons, have a look at the Airborne Laser, prototype already being tested.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/abl.htm

Posted by: SkyEye on October 4, 2004 03:07 PM

I am of the belief that Tesla was behind that Siberian thing.

I heard that the Kerry campaign has Tesla in cryogenic stasis, and that he will be reanimated to serve as the Secretary of Energy.

Zombie Hippocrates is keeping Tesla in the state physiological suspension for Kerry. Zombie Hippocrates will be Secretary of Wellness under Kerry.

Posted by: Rocketeer on October 4, 2004 03:21 PM

(In the words of Miss Piggy),
Why would they put Kelvin Lynn in an "antimatter trap"? I think your mental masturbation has progressed beyond worldly use. Why oh why would anyone put such a nice man in such a terrible trap?
You've choked my chikken once too often sonny boy. Now, Kerry is a negatronic and Bush is a positronic. If you put these nice young men in that trap thingy what happens to them? Isn't this part of the vast right wing conspiracy? Well, speak up! Is it?

Posted by: on October 4, 2004 03:22 PM

Cedarford is the resident expert on everything. Just ask him.

Posted by: on October 4, 2004 03:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Yacht or Nyacht?
With a combined score of 49.5 on Yacht or Nyacht, I'd say this one is a "Nyacht." No Hoe Snow snap. Not bouncy. Pretty dreary. No smooth groove. You won't be able to snort cocaine out of the cleavage of a "Naval Mabel" or "Poopdeck Patty." Or even if you do, it will be half-hearted at best.
From Instapundit, a Free Beacon Fact Check:
Joe Biden, nominal president of the United States, sat down with the ladies of The View for an interview on Wednesday. "It's like having one of the Beatles at the table," co-host Sarah Haines said as the audience roared and her colleagues cackled.
Haines wasn't entirely wrong, according to a Washington Free Beacon fact check. Biden doesn't have much in common with the Beatles, but they're both half-dead, half-octogenarian relics who haven't accomplished anything of substance since the 1970s. We rate Haines's claim "mostly true."

I guess that's true if you're talking about the Beatles. But individual members of the Beatles did some decent stuff in the 80s.
Kyrsten Sinema
@kyrstensinema

To state the supremely obvious, eliminating the filibuster to codify Roe v Wade also enables a future Congress to ban all abortion nationwide.

What an absolutely terrible, shortsighted idea.
Classics of Yacht Rock Mystery Click
Oh but it's all right
Once you get past the pain
You'll learn to find your love again
So keep your heart open

This is a fantastic (casual) driving song, when you're actually driving a little below the speed limit because you don't really have anywhere to be.
Going forward, if we have any arguments about what is or what is not Yacht Rock, we can just consult the Yacht or Nyacht? website, which has ranked hundreds of songs according to their Yacht Quotient (YQ). I can see this website stopping arguments, fistfights, and formal duels.
In solidarity with the MSM, Rich Lowry and National Review vilified the Covington Kids as racist agitators back in 2019. Now, it’s Rich Lowry being canceled for an accidental slip of the tongue that sounded like a forbidden word. There’s a lesson here for the Polite Right, but they won’t learn it. [Buck]
Forgotten 70s Mystery Click: Pop Princess Edition
'Cause it gets me nowhere to tell you no/ And it gets me nowhere to make you go
From the same album
Are Lebanese citizens making up songs praising the #pager bombs?
The Lost Classics of Yacht Rock
You know you can't fool me
I've been loving you too long
It started so easy
You want to carry on

I'm not sure this is even Yacht Rock. This might just be very soft rock. I can't see myself sniffing cocaine from a Boat Hoe's cleavage to this song, which is the primary criterion of Yacht Rock.
But I think this song more crosses from the shallows of soft rock to the cresting majesty of Yacht Rock. This is definitely bouncy enough for Hoe Snow. Very smooth, a little folky, a little jazzy. It's got that Hoe Snow snap.
From Andycanuck: Hezballah members reporting for work today, a little bit skittish about entering the code on an electronic keypad lock
I don't know if this is real. It's certainly accurate -- no one in Hezballah is happy to be handling any kind of electronic device today.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
CBD and Sefton are joined by Jim Lakely of The Heartland Institute! The evil of the Democrats, Donald Trump's psyche after the assassination attempts, exploding pagers...and more!
FAA fines SpaceX $633K for acting without its permission "These fines therefore are simply because FAA management has hurt feelings because SpaceX wouldn't wait for it to twiddle its thumbs for a few more weeks. The fines also suggest that FAA management is either being pressured to hinder SpaceX's commercial operations by higher ups in the White House, or that management itself is trying to exert more power over the company, for apparently very petty reasons." [CBD]
1) Individuals, on camera and audio, stating what they saw is "unconfirmed" with "no specific reports"

2) anonymous bomb threats with no arrests or suspects is "Republicans threatening Haitians."

Well fuck them, I called the hospital and they said there's no confirmed reports of specific individual Republicans making any bomb threats.

Posted by: People's Hippo Voice at
Rep. James Comer writes letter to criminal Christopher Wray, seeking information about Tim Walz's many, many suspicious trips to China
The FBI investigated whether Trump was a Russian agent based upon... nothing. Think they're investigating Walz, or nah?
Sopranos vs. Star Trek
Thanks to "NYT c*cksuckers"
Recent Comments
FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: San Franpsycho at September 28, 2024 05 ..."

San Franpsycho: "Fen, our son in law is from Sydney, and we are her ..."

JQ: "Nasrallah, may all your virgins be Rachael Levine ..."

I miss Rush: ""He has assumed room temperature." ~ Rush Limbaug ..."

kallisto: "We use WP at work to send out newsletters. The s ..."

Ben Had: "Nasrallah, may all your virgins be Rachael Levine ..."

AltonJackson: " g'mornin', 'rons ..."

FenelonSpoke: ""Persevere." A reflection on Job 19:23-27 tinyu ..."

Just Wondering : "Birdbath status? ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: San Franpsycho at September 28, 2024 04 ..."

JQ: "Last toddy of the night, here... ..."

m: "Starting up on the Earl Grey, with cinnamon. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives
Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com