Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« She Done Put the "Log" in My Neologism | Main | Economic Growth Slows "Dramatically"... Falling All the Way Down to Clinton's Average »
July 30, 2004

Is It Over Yet?

Well, I got through that without watching so much as five minutes of it. I suppose that, as a political blogger, I was sort of obliged to cover the convention, but I have a good reason for not doing so:

I didn't want to.

What the hell could they say, after all? Figure I'll be different and provide a little counter-programming.

But, now that it's over, let me quote two key Kerry applause lines:

We wil fight a smarter war on terror. We will employ every weapon in our arsenal-- economic as well as military. Principle as well as firepower.

Wow. I figure Al Qaeda is just quivering over that threat.

Until, that is, they realize that "principle" is not in fact a weapon. It is the opposite of a weapon: it's a restraint on one's behavior. An often virtuous restraint, to be sure, but then, the forces of darkness do not tremble at the thought of their enemies behaving civilly towards them.

And that's precisely what John French Kerry promised them. Principle, and plenty of it.

Combining Edwards' and Kerry's promises: We will destroy Al Qaeda-- with principle.

Personally, I prefer killing or capturing as many of these animals as possible, and I'm not very particular as to how that might come to be. I like sausages enough to not question the manner by which the slaughterer and butcher bring them to my table.

Principle is an expensive virtue. It is often worth the costs. It is not worth the costs when we are threatened with thousands of American deaths in one day. If John Kerry fights this war with "principle," I hope he explains to the families of the next victims of terrorism why the abstract notion of principle was more important that doing everything in his power -- everything in his power -- to save their loved ones' lives.

I have a feeling the families of the dead Americans will end up preferring a war fought with more conventional weapons. And -- shivers! -- occasionally some rough handling of captured Al Qaeda mass-murderers.

Next quote:

[speaking about the Woodstock Moment:] It was a time for marching. Marching for civil rights, marching for voters' rights. For the environment, and for women. And for peace. We believed we could change the world, and guess what? We did."

Ahem. This shows the entire problem with liberalism, which remains firmly trapped in a timewarp in which it is always the Summer of Fuckin' Love.

We're in the middle of a war against the most savage animals we've ever faced -- and in terms of pure animal savagery directed towards Americans and American troops, they're far worse than the Nazis -- and this sixties throwback is talking about marching for goddamned peace.

Peace.

War is Over,
if you want it...
War is Over,
if you want it...

Everything is seen by liberal boomers through the prisms of their misspent, selfish, pampered youths, and through their one great triumph over war itself, their campaign to surrender in Vietnam.

If John French Kerry does win this election-- pass the joint. If our commander in chief is going to remain beclouded in a skunky fog of pot and juvenile naivete left hardened over forty fucking years of ignorance and stupidity like so much bong-resin spilled on the floor of your flower-spangled VW Bug, I might as well get stoned while I wait for my own anhiliation.

But when New York is bomed -- this time, bombed hard enough to shut down large sections of the city and leave me dead -- I'll at least be comforted by the notion that John Kerry confronted my killers with principle.


posted by Ace at 01:42 AM
Comments



Aiiieeee, my eyes!

Please close your italics tag, it's driving me batshit.

Posted by: Mr. Bowen on July 30, 2004 01:47 AM

I love you Ace, but your italics are broken

Posted by: Joe R. on July 30, 2004 01:51 AM

No, they've been fixed for a while. Refresh.

Posted by: ace on July 30, 2004 01:57 AM

"Where were the fuckin' ballons? What was going on there? When the music cues you drop the ballons... Where were you?!"

"Well, I was waiting... I thought..."

"You thought?! You thought? You had five goddamn thoughts tonight! When I say, drop, you drop! The speech ends, the music comes up and the ballons drop... that's just.. the.. way.. it.. is!"

"Lemme ask you, do you like your jobs? Cause I saw some lose shit out there tonight. Is Teresa Hienz Kerry good for her money? When you lay down $3.50 for a bottle of Heinz 57 do you get a bottle of toilet water? No! You get a damn fine steak sauce condiment. Well, I expect you to pay back what we pay you in performance!"

"Where's Joe Wilson?"

Posted by: Ron C on July 30, 2004 05:05 AM

We will fight a smarter war on terror. We will employ every weapon in our arsenal-- economic as well as military. Principle as well as firepower.

I DON'T GET IT. ARE WE GOING TO TAX THE TERRORISTS? THAT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE TO ME.

Posted by: Longshanks on July 30, 2004 07:44 AM

I hope some GOP operatives were on balloon duty.

Posted by: rdbrewer on July 30, 2004 07:57 AM

Amen, Ace.

Posted by: FelixUSA on July 30, 2004 08:51 AM

We are stardust
We are golden
We are caught in the devil's parlor
And we've got to get ourselves
Back to the garden

Posted by: IB Bill on July 30, 2004 09:02 AM

Who exactly was that hippie crap for, anyway? All those filthy old flower children are already on board, and while they may have had a purpose, no one wants a damn hippie making decisions for the country.

Posted by: spongeworthy on July 30, 2004 09:27 AM

My comments to my friends this morning, which I'll share here.

First, the speech was overwrought, overlong, cliched, and poorly delivered. Other than that, I felt the Senator did a fine job.

Second, I will permit myself only one observation about the policy discussed in the speech, on that least favorite subject of mine, the war.

The Senator said that the intelligence in Iraq was wrong, and that under his leadership America will only go to war if we must, and that we will only go to war on the basis of good intelligence.

Please explain how as president the Senator will be able to successfully judge the veracity of any future intelligence, when he himself misjudged the intelligence presented leading up to the war in Iraq, as represented in his vote for the war, not to mention a decade's worth of statements during the Clinton Administration supporting regime change in Iraq? Hw could he be sure he was not being fooled again by his "reformed" intelligence agencies? Given that perfect intelligence does not exist anyways, a president will require the courage to risk making what hindsight may think is the wrong call. Does this mean that we must always retaliate -- i.e., wait to be attacked-- and never preempt? Can we ever attack if provoked?

I'm just curious.

Dave
Arlington, Virginia

Posted by: Dave on July 30, 2004 09:46 AM

So I'm sitting there, watching the Kerry speech and I'm struck by the following passage:

"And now it's our time to ask: What if?

What if we find a breakthrough to cure Parkinson's, diabetes, Alzheimer's and AIDs? What if we have a president who believes in science, so we can unleash the wonders of discovery like stem cell research to treat illness and save millions of lives?

What if we do what adults should do – and make sure all our children are safe in the afternoons after school? And what if we have a leadership that's as good as the American dream – so that bigotry and hatred never again steal the hope and future of any American?"

Now, just for a lark, I decided to add the word "Imagine" in to all the spots where he says "What if".

I came up with the following:

"Imagine we believe in science,
and the wonders of discovery too,
Curing Aids and Alzheimers,
With stem cells isn't hard to do.

Imagine there's no children,
unsafe after school.
Imagine that our leaders,
eliminated hatred too.

You may say, I'm a dreamer.
But I'm not the only one.
I hope some day, you'll join us.
And John Edwards and I can live as one."

I mean, seriously, didn't that section of the speech read like a lost Lennon verse?

Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on July 30, 2004 11:04 AM

Phil, that was beautiful. I'll go puke now.

Posted by: The Black Republican on July 30, 2004 11:44 AM

LMAO: "... that was beautiful. I'll go puke now." I'm stealing that line!

Posted by: Michelle on July 30, 2004 12:27 PM

The thing that really bothered me about Frenchy's speech was how poorly it was delivered. He stammered over his first line and raced through the rest of it. On top of that, he had this fidgety nervous energy with his hands (even when they showed him from the side, he kept shuffling his feet) and was sweating like a pig the entire time. Maybe I'm being shallow here but to me he seemed like a guy that appeared to be in way over his head and lacked the confidence needed to do the job. For all the talk about W being a poor speaker, at least he speaks with conviction and a sence of purpose. In Kerry's first chance to appear Presidential to the nation, I think he totally bombed. Personally, I found his delivery and body language so distracting that it was hard to concentrate on what he was saying.

Posted by: WindyCity on July 30, 2004 12:36 PM

I agree with ya, TBR. That passage made me ill, too. I just underscored how hippy-dippy, power to the people, all we are saying is give peace a chance, the Kerry speech really was.

Hell, I half expected Yoko to walk out during the balloon drop, only to have her and John reintroduce "bagism" to a whole new generation.

Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on July 30, 2004 12:43 PM

Embassies bombed in Uzbekistan... guess it's OK to respond now. Or not.

Posted by: Chrees on July 30, 2004 12:45 PM


Convention Haiku.
Loose shit;

Wild Reeds dancing in Summer Storm

Global warming ends
When Kerry is elected;
Teresa's nucking futs


Posted by: lauraw on July 30, 2004 01:58 PM

Wait, they already had the Democratic Convention? I thought that was an assemblage of The Aquarian Tabernacle Church.

"Among our people there are some yet who speak with the Moon and dance with the Horned One in the forest. These are the Wicca, our clergy, the leaders in the Old Ways. Deep and often inscrutable, they are recognizable only by our own kind by the light in their eyes, the lilt of their voice, the love in their heart, the magic in their hands and their knowledge of themselves and of our realities."

Talking to the Moon? Dancing with the Horned One?

Are you certain that was the DNC?

Posted by: Richard on July 31, 2004 10:43 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Methos: "Okay, they've just released some of the UFO files. ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "Man, my IQ must be down like 80 points. I must hav ..."

Pug Mahon, Rock 'n' Roll Martian: "This will be my first Mother's Day since my Mom pa ..."

Have you ever thought about like, water?: "Did I keep losing 20 points for every boat? I m ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] "I Fell for the Bullshit About the Wonders of ..."

mindful webworker - but it does move!: "🛸Speaking of extraterrestrial secrets T ..."

Gotta think sales and marketing: "How about a "I Fell for the Bullshit About the ..."

JackStraw: ">>d. Buying a boat. Did I keep losing 20 points ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : " Fuck Off, You Perverts Day fixed! ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Holy carp. Seattle media is promoting Other’ ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] The crew took photos. Posted by: publius, Ra ..."

four seasons: " Howz about Fuck Off Day you perverts. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives