Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Italy Arrests Madrid Bombing Mastermind | Main | Credit Glitch »
June 08, 2004

Good News From Iraq

The liberal media says that Reagan's death will help Bush by driving Iraq off the front page.

That shows their bias. They just can't comprehend that there's actually good news concerning Iraq that Bush would like to see publicized.

Doesn't matter much, though. Whether Reagan died or not, the media wouldn't cover the good news.

France and Germany will support compromise resolution on Iraq which does not contain the absurd provision that the Iraqi government should have a veto over US troops. The resolution is expected to pass unanimously.

This is pretty big. This legitimizes the Iraqi government. When the pricks of Europe want to bash Iraq, they'll no longer be bashing America, but the Iraqis themselves. That should force a change in their behavior.

The new Iraqi Prime Minister (how nice those three words sound together) disbanded all of illegal political militas. Al Sadr "rejects" the order to disband, but that just shows how marginalized he is; all the other militias agreed to disband.

This is big again. America doesn't relish the role of always playing the heavy in Iraqi internal security matters. It's important for Iraqis to understand that they just can't blame America for their ills. There is a problem in Iraq, and that problem has to be solved by Iraqis, with assistance from Americans. This move seems to signal a responsible politics emerging in Iraq.

And, for those who wanted a show of gratitude from the Iraqis, the Iraqi Prime Minister provided such a show, as did the Foreign Minister when addressing the UN.

Not that there's any chance you'll hear about that anywhere except the extremist rightwing media.



posted by Ace at 04:17 PM
Comments



The new prime minister has also linked Al Qaeda and Saddam, however, so he is obviously an American tool.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on June 8, 2004 04:24 PM

Kronos

Of course he's a tool of the Right Wing Hate Machine, I mean who would thank America for deposing Saddam and then turning over control of the country to Iraqis? America is to be condemned for their Imperialist aims and their bloodlust for oil. Damn the Billions spent to help Iraqis and the soldiers lost to free them from tyranny, cant he see that it is all just a plot cooked up in Texas so Halliburton can increase their profits? What an idiot.

Posted by: Big E on June 8, 2004 05:40 PM

Ace, you left out that the Iraqis have assumed full control of the oil ministry.

Some war for oil, huh? You'd think we weren't a bunch of racist, imperialist, colonialist and mercantilists.

Posted by: Dianna on June 8, 2004 05:45 PM

Im afraid of speaking too soon but is it possible we may have turned the corner in Iraq?
5 years from now, will the liberals be discussing how "we" won the war as they do in regards to the Cold War?

Posted by: Golden Boy on June 8, 2004 06:05 PM

Golden Boy,

Perhaps you've been reading something I have not, but I've never seen any liberal state that "we" won the Cold War. The collapse of the Soviet Union was dumb luck, a mere fortuity, or else a bad thing (repressive American capitalist pig-dogs ruining a blissful communist utopia for no reason other than spite and greed). Given their failure to acknowledge that the Cold War was actually won, and didn't just die of old age, I think that no, liberals are not at all likely to be discussing how "we" won the War on Terror while they are still liberals.

Posted by: Aaron on June 8, 2004 07:25 PM

Aaron,

I see your point but I guess it depends on the liberal in question and what day it is. Bill Clinton once explained to the Washington Post regarding the Cold War, "We had an intellectually coherent thing. The American people knew what the rules were." I guess the rules included draft dodging and leading protests against one of the key campaigns of the Cold War.
Reagan himself addressed this in his final speech at the 1992 Republican Convention: "I heard those speakers at that other convention saying 'we won the Cold War'-- and I couldn't help wondering, just who exactly do they mean by 'we'?"

Posted by: Golden Boy on June 8, 2004 08:20 PM

I agree with Aaron.

It was clear to everyone at the that that Jihadism was an archaic holdover from the Middle Ages, inevitably to be driven from the world stage by modernity. Experts all agreed that the Middle East was slowly reforming itself and democracy would have soon flourished with rights for women, free speech, and the embracing of religious diversity, secularism, and even the separation of church and state.

In fact, the War on Terror only prolonged reactionary radicalism's existence by inflaming the Arab steet. Not to mention all the innocent people who died, the domestic costs, and the cultural chauvinism it demonstrated.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on June 9, 2004 06:35 AM

Here at work and was listening to the Reagan Funeral on the radio. Had to change the channel.

They were playing 'Hail to the Chief,' then the 21 gun salute. 'Hail to the Chief' got to me but then when I heard 'Amazing Grace,' I just had to change it.

Sigh. Sometimes its hard to be a woman.

Posted by: lauraw on June 9, 2004 12:59 PM

You think that's bad? Try bursting into tears at work when you're a man! The best you can hope for is to make up something about being hit in the crotch by a rogue computer peripheral. :-)

Posted by: Smack on June 10, 2004 12:25 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
m: "3 It's not so much that I forgot to push the butto ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "BOING! I'm contributing a musical interlude rel ..."

Pixy Misa: "It's not so much that I forgot to push the button, ..."

JQ: "Told sis that I wasn't about to take an experiment ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone ..."

m: "w00t ..."

m: "Pixy's up! ..."

Skip: "I am sure Pixy will be up any minute, but I am no ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "*pushes bottle o' Woodford toward Bers* Help y' ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "LMAO, Bers! Yeah, the 'vid was a scourge on ALL ..."

JQ: "*pushes bottle o' Woodford toward Bers* Help y' ..."

JQ: "LMAO, Bers! Yeah, the 'vid was a scourge on ALL ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives