Ace of Spades HQ

« Top Ten Most-Used Words in the Media | Main | Ministry of Dubious Factoids »

May 27, 2004

Michael Moore Interviewed Nick Berg for "Fahrenheit 9-11"

Interview Believed to Have Taken Place Before, During, or After Abu Ghraib Abuses

In the left-wing Salon magazine; requires you view a stupid ad.

But the hell with giving Salon traffic and ad revenue. Here's a fair-use excerpt of all the important stuff:

May 27, 2004 | Filmmaker Michael Moore filmed an interview with American Nicholas Berg in the course of producing his documentary film "Fahrenheit 9/11" before Berg left for Iraq, where he was taken hostage and killed, Moore confirmed to Salon in a statement Thursday. The 20 minutes of footage does not appear in the final version of "Fahrenheit 911," according to the statement.

Word of the footage reached Salon through a source unaffiliated with Moore or his film "Fahrenheit 9/11"...

In a statement released to Salon, Moore said, "We have an interview with Nick Berg. It was approximately 20 minutes long. We are not releasing it to the media. It is not in the film. We are dealing privately with the family." Moore's camp declined to comment further on any aspect of the interview. Because the footage is not in the film, a spokeswoman for Miramax Films, the production company behind "Fahrenheit 9/11," said the company had no comment.

Ahem.

First of all: subpoena the interview. This is a murder investigation, after all.

Second of all: I don't know what this means. Just because he was interviewed by the left-wing traitor Moore doesn't mean he was one himself; Moore interviews conservatives, too, in order to edit them into jackasses.

But the CIA theory would seem to be out the window.

Speculation: Sorry, Ilyka, I know you find this speculation about a murdered man distasteful, but I think we're moving past the point at which taste governs the inquiry.

I'd like to know who contacted who, here. My suspicion is that Berg contacted Moore, because I'm not sure anyone even heard of Berg before his death. If Moore managed to track him down because he learned of the FBI inquiry, he's a somewhat better Internet Detective than I gave him credit for.

If, on the other hand, Berg contacted Moore, I'd like to know for what purpose. The story has been that Berg was a big-time supporter of the War in Iraq. If it turns out he wasn't, well then, what we have here is a lie, and while some lies are innocent, most are not.

Nick Kronos makes the important point, which I overlooked, that the article doesn't say it's an interview with Michael Moore; it could just be an "interview" with his dad, which the dad then sent to Moore.

Who knows.

It does get curiouser and curiouser.

posted by Ace at 04:10 PM

Comments

Berg's father is highly active in the peace movement so that could be a link.

Also, haven't read the Salon story, but the AP piece I read just says interview. So it's not certain this is a Moore interview.

It could be that Berg's father has some tape of his son, Moore has seen Berg's criticism of Bush, and Moore is going, "Hey, I can use this guy!"

So he contacts the father and asks, "Whatya got?"

"Well, there's this video."

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on May 27, 2004 04:42 PM

Sounds like a Michael Moore publicity stunt to me.

Posted by: on May 27, 2004 06:46 PM

I'll second that.

Notice Moore's wording: "We have an interview with Nick Berg." If it was an interview Moore had conducted himself he would've said exactly that. And it wouldn't have taken him this long to bring it to light.

If we've learned anything about Michael Moore it's that he words his statements very deliberately -- to avoid people calling him a bald faced liar. You can punch holes in his logic all day long, but he's not going to get caught on the particular wording of something like this.

What happened to Berg is horrible, and this is just another example of the sick-headed opportunist Michael Moore is.

I bet it's a publicity stunt. A shameful one at that. Moore probably didn't give two shits about Nick Berg until he saw a way to exploit the tragedy in order to discredit Bush.

Posted by: The Right Wing Conspirator on May 27, 2004 08:15 PM

Can this get any more bizarre? First, we find out that a terrorist had used his computer while he was in college. Next, we find out that his dad is a member of a Stalinist "peace" group. Now we find out he may have been interviewed by Michael Moore? I'm certainly not claiming the kid was up to no good, but what is the joint probability of all 3 events independently happening?

Posted by: Mark on May 27, 2004 09:23 PM

I know you find this speculation about a murdered man distasteful

Is your name Paul? Does this post contain the word "exclusive?" Do you make bold assertions like "this guy was dirty" and then backpedal desperately from them? Do you often leave comments at other blogs calling the author a "fucking coward" or "hypocritical moron" while filling in an email address like a@b.com--without apparent irony? No?

Then I have no quarrel with what you write about this. If anything, I'd say 80% of your work on this blog is consistently better written, better researched, and more professional than most of what I see in my local paper.

Posted by: ilyka on May 28, 2004 04:28 PM

Watching the video, i have no doubt it was real, but i ask everyone to listen to the video. At the VERY END you here in plain English a man ask "AND HOW WILL THIS HAPPEN?" It is so clear and occures after the last arab chants, there is a pause and then you hear a man in a English speaking voice speak.
Why was Berg over their? Looking for work? All I hear about is how abundant work is over their. HE was a wack, and his father is a wack, but i cant help but be mad, since no one cried foul about this as much as they do these frat prank pics of Iraqs. Come on, for some reason the media feels compelled to stick up for the side that cant possibly win. Why was Moore able to walk around so freely in Iraq, how can anyone miss that lard? They should have gutted his fat butt and fed a nation

Posted by: BEAU on May 28, 2004 07:01 PM

To watch the video will make you sick but lets look back at the facts. #1 Nick lets a terrorist use his email account(without knowing he did it)and is questioned by the FBI. #2 Nick gets stopped by Iraqi police because of an Israeli stamp in his passport(Israeli Mossad says he visited the West Bank and Gaza when there). This is where Hamas & Fata has its headquarters.#3 Then he gets his head chopped of in Iraq by terrorists. Yes another brush with terrorists. #4 Moore has a clip of him that was shot for his ANTI-BUSH, ANTI-U.S.MILITARY movie. Come on guys. Don't you think that a couple of brushes with known terrorists by the same cat in just a few years is way out there. Then a visit to the West Bank and Gaza. There refugee camps are not where a person goes on vacation. Come on. His guy was up to something no good.

Posted by: Thor on May 28, 2004 09:40 PM

Oh no! Hamas' de facto press agent at the UN complains that she can't use her credit cards or rent a card now that she's been sanctioned as a terrorist operative
Why does this keep happening to members of the "political organization" (per Tucker Carlson) of Hamas?!?!

Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?

Sydney Sweeney has passed from celebrity to Meme Legend

Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:

I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.

TJM Returns with a discussion of Auteur Theory.

Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...

Update on Scott Adams:

Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau

"Trump" goes trick-or-treating

Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy

Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.

ICYMI: Australian journalist actually presses Kamala Harris when she repeatedly dodges questions about Biden's mental fitness
Kamala admits she didn't have the stamina to run for president, while continuing to insist he had the mental capacity to serve as president. He was too frail to run but perfectly strong enough to govern. Yeah sure whatever lying whore.

On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.

Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.

Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting

According to Grok, Latrine John-Pissoir has never failed to mention she is "black" (or "queer") during her book interviews
She may not know what the hell her book is about, but she definitely knows that "every day I wake up black and queer." Join the club, sister!

Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.

Hackers take over University of Penn website, calling the school a "dogshit elitist institution full of woke retards" and threatening to release its admissions files to prove illegal racial discrimination
No lies detected so far

Live Now: Dana Loesch is interrogating Heritage President Kevin Roberts on his insistence that the gay Nazi Nick Fuentes is an absolutely essential "conservative" voice whose ideas we must take seriously and who we must absolutely not exclude based on his Naziism

TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.

Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.