Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Schumer Warns Of Filibuster | Main | Assad Seeks Face-Saving Compromise On UN Investigation »
January 09, 2006

Short Skirts Don't Mix With High Finance

Really just an excuse to show the picture, but I think a pretty good one.

As part of an experiment, researcher Peter Glick asked a woman to wear a sexy, low-cut blouse with a tight skirt, cardigan, teased hair and lots of makeup. Then he made a set of videos in which she played either a receptionist for a Chicago advertising agency or a senior manager.

The result of the Appleton, Wis., psychology professor's study?

The sexier a woman dresses and the more prominent a position she holds within a company, the more negatively she's perceived.

"If you play up your sexiness and you're in a more powerful position, you're going to get slammed for it as a woman," Glick said.

The survey querried 66 total friggin' homos who are trying to ruin everything for the rest of us.

Come on. You guys already have Paco, the cute mail-boy with the ass like Olga Korbett in her prime. You can't throw us a boner?


posted by Ace at 01:05 PM
Comments



The one on the left is fuckin' hired.

Posted by: R on January 9, 2006 01:14 PM

I think the problem the respondents had with the girl on the left may have been that she wasn't bringing anything to the table.

Posted by: Scott on January 9, 2006 01:18 PM

Duh. You put a man wearing a open collar with 3 or 4 gold chains with his hair slicked back next to a man in a Brookes Brother suit and you get the same result. Though I do contradict the study as I do not have one negative thought about the one on the left.

Posted by: roc ingersol on January 9, 2006 01:24 PM

The girls get skirts.

That's just the way it fucking is.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 9, 2006 01:25 PM

The one on the right wants me to tell her that she's hired, but I don't placate.

Posted by: Sean M. on January 9, 2006 01:32 PM

I'd hire both of them, but the one on the left is definitely getting a bigger raise.

Posted by: Robert Modean on January 9, 2006 01:38 PM

the cute mail-boy with the ass like Olga Korbett in her prime

This is disturbing on more than one level.

Posted by: JackStraw on January 9, 2006 01:39 PM

Ah, to have been the grad student who was responsible for the actual running of the experiment! The lady would have had to "model" various outfits, poses, and other behavioral patterns before the experiment began.

To control for error. And bias. Lots of potential bias there.....

After all which thong goes with which mini is a very important consideration and a male eye is best at picking that out.

In an attempt to be fair, a female grad student could run the procedural check for the male control condition.

It must be fun to work in a University Psych lab.

This&That

Posted by: This&That on January 9, 2006 01:44 PM

Ace, if I am correctly reading the last two sentences of this post, you are asking for 'homos' to give you a 'boner'.

Gay. Very gay.

Posted by: adolfo velasquez on January 9, 2006 02:04 PM

Oh this is just too funny:

But men, too, can dress too sexy for work, San Antonio executive coach Barbara Greene said. "Sometimes they'll wear a shirt with too many open buttons," she said. "They'll show cleavage."

Bwahahahahaha!

Offenses like that, committed by men or women, often go unpunished, but sometimes a little cleavage can mean losing a job.

If you're showing off MAN-BOOB CLEAVAGE you have some serious issues, and it's pretty unlikely you have a job anyway.

Posted by: TallDave on January 9, 2006 02:34 PM

Listen, this is the way it works. A secretary or assistant can be sexily attired. However, if my boss is giving me directions wearing a mini and tight top and, instead of her words, I can only concentrate on her chest, or her legs, or her ass or ... See what I mean? That's just bad for my career.

That being said, it would be perfectly OK for the one on the right to let her hair loose while keeping her grave business suit. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Posted by: jmchez on January 9, 2006 02:36 PM

Guys, I'm all over the one on the right. The whole repressed librarian look?
It's hot. Damned hot.

Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness on January 9, 2006 02:37 PM

I hate to point out the incredibly obvious, but I'm assuming everyone realizes that the one on the left and the one on the right are the same woman, in placating and non-placating outfits?

Posted by: utron on January 9, 2006 03:10 PM

C'mon utron, don't be ridiculous. The woman on the left is easy.

Sheesh, do I have to point out *everything*?

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 9, 2006 03:20 PM

Wow, look at the shoes... I mean legs, look at the legs on that chick on the left there, oh yeah baby.

Posted by: Harold Coxenballs on January 9, 2006 03:23 PM

Olga Korbut, Ace. As in the National Lampoon story "Olga Korbut Had My Baby."

Just sayin' is all.

Posted by: Christopher on January 9, 2006 03:28 PM

Is this where I'm supposed to talk about things I want her to do to my weenie now?

Posted by: Harold Coxenballs on January 9, 2006 03:28 PM

There's TWO women up there?

I see a babe on the left and ...

Well, that's all I see.

Posted by: Dogstar on January 9, 2006 03:31 PM

Is this where I'm supposed to talk about things I want her to do to my weenie now?

No, this is more the predator-prey time. So we talk about what we'd do with our weenies. Let me know if you need any more help, Pseu.

Posted by: geoff on January 9, 2006 03:43 PM

Oh, and I've been to Appleton, WI. Let's just say there's no high finance going on there.

Posted by: TallDave on January 9, 2006 03:58 PM

The librarian look dosen't work without glasses. Isn't there some middle ground between Brazilian showgirl and male Ape Management functionary from Conquest of the Planet of the Apes?

Posted by: Dave Munger on January 9, 2006 04:35 PM

"Isn't there some middle ground between Brazilian showgirl and male Ape Management functionary from Conquest of the Planet of the Apes?'

Yes, that would be called, "The Real World."

I mean, please. On her worst day ever, the woman who was considered by all to be the Ho of my company (and who eventually ran off with her married boss) wore more than the chick on the left. This Ho wasn't taken seriously in her little sundresses, and for good reason.

On the other hand, both my boss and I have been promoted in the last year, working as scientists for a conservative non-profit organization, and we've never come in looking as mannish as the woman on the right. And we never will. I wear red lipstick, dark nail polish, and you can actually see the difference between my waist and my boobs. These things are not incompatible with modest business suits.

The one on the left should be laughed at if she wears that anywhere but a bar. The one on the right should be taken immediately to a good gay male hairdresser and be shown how to buy business suits that fit.

Posted by: Kimberly on January 9, 2006 06:02 PM

I wear red lipstick, dark nail polish, and you can actually see the difference between my waist and my boobs.

*gurgle*

*must keep silent, not be annoying, stay out of jail*

Posted by: Michael on January 9, 2006 06:11 PM

Sure, but is there a middle ground between a Brazillian wax and a trim when wearing a short skirt?

I think not.

Posted by: Bart acting like Michael on January 9, 2006 06:17 PM

Short Skirts Don't Mix With High Finance

Um. High finance would be exactly what it takes to mix with the one on the left.

Posted by: rd on January 9, 2006 07:35 PM

ARE MINI SKIRTS MAKING A COMEBACK? and remember the joke? MINI MOUSE WEAR MICKEY SKIRTS?

Posted by: spurwing plover on January 9, 2006 10:00 PM

It is interesting what chameleons some women are. Those might as well be pics of two different women.

Kimberly, I've never had a gay male hairdresser who ever did a good job on my hair, or who wasn't too rough.
If they don't cut it too short, they rake your ear off with the comb and shove your head around like its a gearshift.

Posted by: lauraw on January 10, 2006 11:12 AM

Gaagh, I actually clicked on the craptastic article. I feel degraded by having to pick through this exercise in journalistic busy work. I feel like I am reading a high school newspaper.

I loved the caption for our sexy, not sexy demonstration photo. Priceless.

I also think the paragraph which states that men can also dress sexy is painfully tacked together. Yes, men can dress sexy in the office by wearing open buttons? Maybe in the 70's, Meena. If I want to impress the receptionist, I either wear my coat of many colors or a polo that shows off my gun collection, if ya know what I am saying.

Posted by: joeindc44 on January 10, 2006 11:12 AM

Second chance reaction to photo caption: Thanks for clearing that up.

Posted by: joeindc44 on January 10, 2006 11:14 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
gKWVE: "Suck it, Spanberger Lick it, Obama ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "97 I asked a friend, who is involved with the GOP ..."

...: "We once had a 64 skull day I think. Can't remember ..."

gnats local 678: "re 86: probably thought they could get away with i ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "41 Ancient Irish vuvuzelas. youtube.com/watch?v=b ..."

18-1: "If the economy is looking good in 3 months or so, ..."

Smell the Glove: "Consider the Dems set this mess off. First the SC ..."

Sharkman: "Here is a link to the 46 page decision: https:/ ..."

GuardianB: "Someone needs to get Ace a laughing flaming skull ..."

Everyman: ""68 I think what bukkake-ed this map was not only ..."

davidt: ""The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday invalidated ..."

Dipped in skullpudding: "I haz lolboner ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives