Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Schumer Warns Of Filibuster | Main | Assad Seeks Face-Saving Compromise On UN Investigation »
January 09, 2006

Short Skirts Don't Mix With High Finance

Really just an excuse to show the picture, but I think a pretty good one.

As part of an experiment, researcher Peter Glick asked a woman to wear a sexy, low-cut blouse with a tight skirt, cardigan, teased hair and lots of makeup. Then he made a set of videos in which she played either a receptionist for a Chicago advertising agency or a senior manager.

The result of the Appleton, Wis., psychology professor's study?

The sexier a woman dresses and the more prominent a position she holds within a company, the more negatively she's perceived.

"If you play up your sexiness and you're in a more powerful position, you're going to get slammed for it as a woman," Glick said.

The survey querried 66 total friggin' homos who are trying to ruin everything for the rest of us.

Come on. You guys already have Paco, the cute mail-boy with the ass like Olga Korbett in her prime. You can't throw us a boner?


posted by Ace at 01:05 PM
Comments



The one on the left is fuckin' hired.

Posted by: R on January 9, 2006 01:14 PM

I think the problem the respondents had with the girl on the left may have been that she wasn't bringing anything to the table.

Posted by: Scott on January 9, 2006 01:18 PM

Duh. You put a man wearing a open collar with 3 or 4 gold chains with his hair slicked back next to a man in a Brookes Brother suit and you get the same result. Though I do contradict the study as I do not have one negative thought about the one on the left.

Posted by: roc ingersol on January 9, 2006 01:24 PM

The girls get skirts.

That's just the way it fucking is.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 9, 2006 01:25 PM

The one on the right wants me to tell her that she's hired, but I don't placate.

Posted by: Sean M. on January 9, 2006 01:32 PM

I'd hire both of them, but the one on the left is definitely getting a bigger raise.

Posted by: Robert Modean on January 9, 2006 01:38 PM

the cute mail-boy with the ass like Olga Korbett in her prime

This is disturbing on more than one level.

Posted by: JackStraw on January 9, 2006 01:39 PM

Ah, to have been the grad student who was responsible for the actual running of the experiment! The lady would have had to "model" various outfits, poses, and other behavioral patterns before the experiment began.

To control for error. And bias. Lots of potential bias there.....

After all which thong goes with which mini is a very important consideration and a male eye is best at picking that out.

In an attempt to be fair, a female grad student could run the procedural check for the male control condition.

It must be fun to work in a University Psych lab.

This&That

Posted by: This&That on January 9, 2006 01:44 PM

Ace, if I am correctly reading the last two sentences of this post, you are asking for 'homos' to give you a 'boner'.

Gay. Very gay.

Posted by: adolfo velasquez on January 9, 2006 02:04 PM

Oh this is just too funny:

But men, too, can dress too sexy for work, San Antonio executive coach Barbara Greene said. "Sometimes they'll wear a shirt with too many open buttons," she said. "They'll show cleavage."

Bwahahahahaha!

Offenses like that, committed by men or women, often go unpunished, but sometimes a little cleavage can mean losing a job.

If you're showing off MAN-BOOB CLEAVAGE you have some serious issues, and it's pretty unlikely you have a job anyway.

Posted by: TallDave on January 9, 2006 02:34 PM

Listen, this is the way it works. A secretary or assistant can be sexily attired. However, if my boss is giving me directions wearing a mini and tight top and, instead of her words, I can only concentrate on her chest, or her legs, or her ass or ... See what I mean? That's just bad for my career.

That being said, it would be perfectly OK for the one on the right to let her hair loose while keeping her grave business suit. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Posted by: jmchez on January 9, 2006 02:36 PM

Guys, I'm all over the one on the right. The whole repressed librarian look?
It's hot. Damned hot.

Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness on January 9, 2006 02:37 PM

I hate to point out the incredibly obvious, but I'm assuming everyone realizes that the one on the left and the one on the right are the same woman, in placating and non-placating outfits?

Posted by: utron on January 9, 2006 03:10 PM

C'mon utron, don't be ridiculous. The woman on the left is easy.

Sheesh, do I have to point out *everything*?

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 9, 2006 03:20 PM

Wow, look at the shoes... I mean legs, look at the legs on that chick on the left there, oh yeah baby.

Posted by: Harold Coxenballs on January 9, 2006 03:23 PM

Olga Korbut, Ace. As in the National Lampoon story "Olga Korbut Had My Baby."

Just sayin' is all.

Posted by: Christopher on January 9, 2006 03:28 PM

Is this where I'm supposed to talk about things I want her to do to my weenie now?

Posted by: Harold Coxenballs on January 9, 2006 03:28 PM

There's TWO women up there?

I see a babe on the left and ...

Well, that's all I see.

Posted by: Dogstar on January 9, 2006 03:31 PM

Is this where I'm supposed to talk about things I want her to do to my weenie now?

No, this is more the predator-prey time. So we talk about what we'd do with our weenies. Let me know if you need any more help, Pseu.

Posted by: geoff on January 9, 2006 03:43 PM

Oh, and I've been to Appleton, WI. Let's just say there's no high finance going on there.

Posted by: TallDave on January 9, 2006 03:58 PM

The librarian look dosen't work without glasses. Isn't there some middle ground between Brazilian showgirl and male Ape Management functionary from Conquest of the Planet of the Apes?

Posted by: Dave Munger on January 9, 2006 04:35 PM

"Isn't there some middle ground between Brazilian showgirl and male Ape Management functionary from Conquest of the Planet of the Apes?'

Yes, that would be called, "The Real World."

I mean, please. On her worst day ever, the woman who was considered by all to be the Ho of my company (and who eventually ran off with her married boss) wore more than the chick on the left. This Ho wasn't taken seriously in her little sundresses, and for good reason.

On the other hand, both my boss and I have been promoted in the last year, working as scientists for a conservative non-profit organization, and we've never come in looking as mannish as the woman on the right. And we never will. I wear red lipstick, dark nail polish, and you can actually see the difference between my waist and my boobs. These things are not incompatible with modest business suits.

The one on the left should be laughed at if she wears that anywhere but a bar. The one on the right should be taken immediately to a good gay male hairdresser and be shown how to buy business suits that fit.

Posted by: Kimberly on January 9, 2006 06:02 PM

I wear red lipstick, dark nail polish, and you can actually see the difference between my waist and my boobs.

*gurgle*

*must keep silent, not be annoying, stay out of jail*

Posted by: Michael on January 9, 2006 06:11 PM

Sure, but is there a middle ground between a Brazillian wax and a trim when wearing a short skirt?

I think not.

Posted by: Bart acting like Michael on January 9, 2006 06:17 PM

Short Skirts Don't Mix With High Finance

Um. High finance would be exactly what it takes to mix with the one on the left.

Posted by: rd on January 9, 2006 07:35 PM

ARE MINI SKIRTS MAKING A COMEBACK? and remember the joke? MINI MOUSE WEAR MICKEY SKIRTS?

Posted by: spurwing plover on January 9, 2006 10:00 PM

It is interesting what chameleons some women are. Those might as well be pics of two different women.

Kimberly, I've never had a gay male hairdresser who ever did a good job on my hair, or who wasn't too rough.
If they don't cut it too short, they rake your ear off with the comb and shove your head around like its a gearshift.

Posted by: lauraw on January 10, 2006 11:12 AM

Gaagh, I actually clicked on the craptastic article. I feel degraded by having to pick through this exercise in journalistic busy work. I feel like I am reading a high school newspaper.

I loved the caption for our sexy, not sexy demonstration photo. Priceless.

I also think the paragraph which states that men can also dress sexy is painfully tacked together. Yes, men can dress sexy in the office by wearing open buttons? Maybe in the 70's, Meena. If I want to impress the receptionist, I either wear my coat of many colors or a polo that shows off my gun collection, if ya know what I am saying.

Posted by: joeindc44 on January 10, 2006 11:12 AM

Second chance reaction to photo caption: Thanks for clearing that up.

Posted by: joeindc44 on January 10, 2006 11:14 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Recent Comments
Pug Mahon, Trumpy can do magic: "Whatever happened to the English thugs like Brickt ..."

Joemarine: "243 >>The original Layla the best part if the song ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "245 I saw Clapton last year. He showed up, play ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "London Thugs London Inbreds London IEDs. ..."

gKWVE: "[i]Disgraced attorney and former anti-Trump pundit ..."

mikeski: "[i]@InsiderWire #BREAKING: U.S. Border Patrol det ..."

four seasons: " Those four "British" assholes figured out they ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "I saw Clapton last year. He showed up, played a ..."

Joemarine: "209 So I just looked it up, and Michigan still has ..."

garrett: ">>The original Layla the best part if the song was ..."

Marcus T: "Commonwealth Passport from about 20 commonwealth c ..."

Joemarine: "172 Clapton has been mailing it in since 74. And h ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives