That's like complaining this site doesn't work on IE 1.0

Get FF 1.5, it's faster than your boyfriend.

Fuck 'em.

Even AOL highspeed users (like me) can use IE or FF(like I do).

AOL users are like the internet's palestinians. They get what they deerve.

that's "deserve" damn MS keyboard!

Any man without the tools to harness the common sense to use a worthwhile browser deserves neither Liberty or access to the world wide web.

~Thomas Jackson
(Thomas Jefferson's son-in-law's half-cousin)

I don't use an AOL browser, but the one I use is filtering out the 'S' in the word browser, from your headline.

no aol = no trolls and fewer dorks. What's not to like?

what the hell would cause that?

The que_tion wa_: can I write a whole pot without u_ing the letter '_', while not giving up readability? And the anwer i_: no!

Do us a favor, Ace: reinstate the lowly 's'.

The que_tion wa_: can I write a whole pot without u_ing the letter '_', while not giving up readability? And the anwer i_: no!

I think you gave up a fair share of heterosexuality as well.

I've found 1.5 unstable under my usual conditions (lots and lots of open tabs). Had to downgrade to 1.0.7.

I put http://ace.mu.nu into http://validator.w3.org/ and it found many problems, most of which you can ignore. But one of them is probably a real problem.

I think this is it, on line 116:
<div class="sidetitle">Support</div>
<div class="side"></a>
The </a> doesn't seem to belong to anything.

Or maybe it's the ampersand in "Q&A", which should be specified in HTML as "&amp;".

Another validation tool is here.

WebTV - invented to give AOL users a group to make fun of....

DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"

Don't use these tags if you don't really mean it.

the AOL browser is just IE in disguise anyway.

I get over 1000 errors on THIS page alone - but validating against HTML 3.2 gives only 100 errors or so on the w3 validator:
http://validator.w3.org/

Anyway, I'm running firefox on FreeBSD (unix) and the page displays fine for me.

I'm running firefox on FreeBSD (unix)

I'm on Linux. Happily Microsoft-free! :)

I'm running firefox on FreeBSD (unix)

I'm on Linux. Happily Microsoft-free! :)

I think the advice then should be to use Firefox, not M$IE, even for people stuck with using some version of Windows.

Thanks... I got rid of that a on line 116 and got rid of the ampersand, too.

I don't know what is meant by "don't use these tags if you don't mean them." Why shouldn't I? SHould I just delete that stuff?

Ace:
He's referring to the DOCTYPE declaration at the very beginning of the HTML. The declaration tells the browser, "Hey, I'm an XHTML 1.0 Transitional document," or whatever. So, if you have, say, an XHTML 1.0 Transitional DOCTYPE but your page is really still based on, say, HTML 4.01, browsers are more likely to screw up, since they're following the XHTML rules.

Now get cracking and fix all those validation errors. ;)