Link is not working for me.

*cough*deletethequotemarksattheendofthehyperlink*cough*

Ever read "Women on Top" by Nancy Friday? It's not just monkeys. Doggies, too.

Still no go on someone trying to teach me calculus

C'mon, get real-- monkey sex turns *me* on.

Uhhh. . . I didn't just write that, did I?

Shit.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

P.S. Allah, I know Ace is your bud and all, but you better have sent him the monkey sex story because my blog is down. If I somehow lost out on being INTERNET's primary monkey-sex resource, I'm going to feel quite unloved.

How could anyone learn calculus with that technique? I watched the whole video and only vaguely recall that there might have been some letters mentioned...maybe an x?

Ever read "Women on Top" by Nancy Friday? It's not just monkeys. Doggies, too.

May I inquire why you would read any Nancy Friday?

Thanks, Pompous. I copied the link by right-clicking to its Properties, deleted the offending quotemark, and it worked.

This may help someone else until Ace gets around to fixing the friggin' thing.

May I inquire why you would read any Nancy Friday?

You're asking me why I'd want to read 600 pages of women's sexual fantasies?

Is this a trick question?

I don't know of any women he like guys with hair on their backs.

Women on Top is hysterical and yes there is monkey sex in it, I read it years ago and I am still emotionally traumatized by the monkey part. I think the whole scenario, if memory serves me was "observed" by scientists in an effort to collect "sperm." The woman who submitted that one probably has a blog that makes lots of money.

There is also dogs and some really odd shit. Men in Love is the one she wrote about men's sexual fantasies, I think that is the title.

I am not sure if there is a section on football and macaroni & cheese or creative fondling of the remote control, but there should be.

Men in Love is the one she wrote about men's sexual fantasies, I think that is the title.

Yep, that was the name of it and it was crap.

I read Women on Top years ago. Some weird, wild, wacky stuff in there, all right. But why the hell would I want to read a book filled with nothing but men's sexual fantasies? I don't need to read it, Dottie--I lived it.

The fantasizing part, I mean.

This makes me think of that old movie Morgan with gasp, Vanessa Redgrave. Her crazy husband dresses in a Gorilla costume, kidnaps her, and impregnates her.

Gay sex, monkey sex....

Makes me long for the good old days of discussion about a true heterosexual ladies man: Chris Klein.

Oh, and video of girls in bikinis teaching you calculus. Not quite safe for work, as it discusses "differentiating x."

And that filth is from John.
Obviously this is educational. Don't be dissing great math teachers.

I think the abstract notion of sex is more arousing to women by default, because the actuality of a naked dude climbing up on top of you and grunting like he's taking a dump just can't be that much of a thrill. Been thinking about that since RWS brought up a hot movie scene of a kiss, windblown drapes, then a fadeout.

I suppose the evolutioinist wackos will be claiming this proves our connection with apes what a bunch of malarkey