Interesting.

The dipshit misspelled "proportional" and "racism" too.

I know, but at least they were ballpark.

Holy crow.

like legitimite to stupid!

What sucks is that they claim they are "patriotic" by openly siding with the terrorists simply because a Republican has the sack to fight them.

The dipshit misspelled "proportional" and "racism" too.

Hell, I started my sordid career path as a reporter. Most of them can't spell at all.

wow, the AP -- shockers! Never saw it comin'...

Yes, he/she does have the right to his/her opinion, and can express that opinion all he/she wants. I can yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater, too. Problem is, you are looking at his/her right, not his/her responsibility. If he/she is an American, he/she has a responsibility attached to that citizenship.

Sorry, Ace, but if I were on the jury, I'd hang him/her for sedition.

If that person is not a citizen of this great country, then send him/her back...after spending a good long time thinking about it courtesy of the racist taxpayers he/she hates so much.

Sure glad the terrorists are so wrapped up in their "religion of peace". And so are the mush-brains. Can't say I recall too many neocons serious about nuking a city or two to get rid of those peace-lovers. I do recall, though, a peace-lover trying to figure out how to set one off in our country. Go figure.

Nice catch. Amazing.

(1) Huh. I thought he was quoting Galloway from the debate (didn't listen to that one).

(2) Boy, won't you feel stupid if he turns out to be a jihadi who's later involved in something...

Worse, what does it say that the "enlightened ones" at the AP aren't aware IP addys can be traced back?

Yes, he/she does have the right to his/her opinion...

Indeed.

A right to "financial success for vile scum" doesn't exist in the constitution though.

I would have no problem with such opinions voiced by people residing in cardboard boxes under bridges rather than cushy digs enabled by phat AP salaries.

Boy, won't you feel stupid if he turns out to be a jihadi who's later involved in something...

Yeah, but where do I draw the line?

Are 50% of the people posting on this site shadowy drifters strangling hitchikers and whores along the interstates?

Almost certainly. But which 50%? See, I don't know. So what do I do?

Are 50% of the people posting on this site shadowy drifters strangling hitchikers and whores along the interstates?

Damn you, I said I was "tapering off" to only weekends...

And the other 50% are busy setting dumpter fires. It's a well rounded bunch.

Are 50% of the people posting on this site shadowy drifters strangling hitchikers and whores along the interstates?

It's that other 50% over there.
Trust me.

Yilkes, Ace. Loose Shit.

You could always say it was the NY Times, and Frank Rich emailed it you.

that should read as "to you"

Never mind. Goodnight.

I saw the "Um, Yeah" troll creeping around 4 Right Wing Whackos. But that was over a year ago.

I remember Um Yeah. Haven't seen it for some time. It used to spew at the Rottweiler HQ and other places.

Are 50% of the people posting on this site shadowy drifters strangling hitchikers and whores along the interstates?

Damn! It was one freaking hobo! Will you just let it go? It's not like he had anything to live for.

I think I remember an Um Yeah post a few days ago here at AoS. Seemed extra crazy, so it might have been a parody. Even had the proper mistakes in grammar and spelling.