Given the events of the last week, I just find this stupid and unimportant.

I disagree. There are only so many things that can be written about Katrina, and most of us have cover the bulk of the possibilities.

There is other news, and it shouldn't be embargoed just because there is a huge story.

Yes like Bagdad jane cancelling her bus tour, I am so bumbed, all these rotten eggs and now what do I do.

I didn't mean that telling the story was stupid, I meant that the desire of these people to push same sex marriage into society was stupid considering what we are going through.

I would NEVER question your telling of a story ACE!!!

;-)

Leno argues that Proposition 22...only bans California from recognizing same-sex marriages from out of state...

I wonder if that's what the people thought they were voting on in 2000.

What a dick.

DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

RWS,

Well, it wasn't me who posted it, it was LauraW.

I guess I need to have some sort of way to more clearly note who's writing what. It always says it at the endline, but people don't seem to notice that.

Well, I would never question LauraW's decision to post a story either!!!!!

Resistance is futile! You will be assimilated!

This should surprise no one. Anything they can't get done with the approval of the voters, they ram down our throats anyway.

Democracy in action.

What is it going to take to get the LLMSM focused back on the Rove/Plame story?

I mean, I can't get enough of that.

Forget Rove/Plame. Don't you miss CINDY???

Well, kinda, but remember she was right up the road from me so I got all that super-keen local coverage you guys missed out on.

According to a news story I heard this morning, Governor Arnold says this should be decided by the courts, i.e. not the people and not the legislature.

Yes like Bagdad jane cancelling her bus tour...

Damn. I was hoping to spend some quality time "in the oil" with some hot moonbat babes.

What the hell is it here in California that keeps electing people to state offices who hold the will of the electorate in open contempt. Or feel only a small subset of the voters are actually qualifed to hold an opinion? Why do Californians keep accepting this treatment? Do the rich ultraliberals have that much power to control elections. Given the outrageously gerrymandered districts here, I suppose they do.

Leno tried to totally screw up our 3 Strikes Law, he blocks any get tough on sex offender bills, including stay aways from schools and parks for pedos. For some reason, they refuse to pass a law against necrophilia in this state. The last outrage involved county morgue workers caught on tape having sex with the body of a 6 year old girl. Again, they tried to enact a law but Leno blocked it. Can you imagine losing your child and on top of it finding out the body was desecrated and it goes unpunished?

As to why these asshats keep getting elected, it's because of gerrymandering. My district has no historical or geological relationship. It looks like a piece of spaghetti as do several of the other districts.

The last outrage involved county morgue workers caught on tape having sex with the body of a 6 year old girl.

*gag* *choke*

This is too grotesque for even me to make a snarky quip about, and I'm willing to make heartless snide remarks about almost anything.

What the hell is it here in California that keeps electing people to state offices who hold the will of the electorate in open contempt.

You'd have to ask Hugh Hewitt. He's the one that told California conservatives that Arnold would govern like a conservative.

What the hell is it here in California that keeps electing people to state offices who hold the will of the electorate in open contempt. Well, you've got to remember this is California we're talking about here. After all, how bad is it to have the opinions of 20 million most of whom are nut cases over turned by the legislature who are totally nuts. Now in most state this would be a travesty, but in California who cares? Nuts is nuts.

Two thirds of those nuts voted to define marriage as that between a man and woman. Arnie just announced he would veto the bill. Don Meyers foiled again!

Can you imagine losing your child and on top of it finding out the body was desecrated and it goes unpunished?

Friend, I promise you it wouldn't go unpunished.

"Friend, I promise you it wouldn't go unpunished."

My thoughts exactly. I'd bring to life that Grisham novel A Time to Kill.

Arnold vetoed the bill, as he should. The same Dem assembly just passed a bill allowing drivers licenses for illegal aliens, which he'll veto also. The only thing the Dem assembly is going to accomplish is raising Arnold's poll numbers, HA!

They've also been throwing hissy fits over Arnold's support for a ballot measure that requires tough tracking of sexual offenders (another sure winner with the voters). Carole Migden, the assemblydyke from SF, actually said that such issues were too complicated for voters & should be handled by the assembly. Typical liberal elitism!

Predictably, Sully is off his meds, railing that the "intent" of Prop 22 was to ban out-of-state marriages. What a stupid idiot.

In California, the legislature (mostly Democratic) has a history of overturning public votes, especially on guns, taxes and smoking. Then they wonder why we threw out so many with term limits.

Now-now, they have a right to do this after al it is their state. The rest of us just live here. /s

Leave it to the legislature of california to vote for gay marrage but drag their big fat feet when it comes to a economy and budget