Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Terror-Apologism Summer Blockbusters! | Main | Syrians Spy On Phone Conversations... Even When Your Phone Is Off »
August 11, 2005

The Ace of Spades Challenge

I've wanted to write this for a while. It's not timely anymore. So this is a big waste of time.

But if Democratic politicians really believe that the Social Security system is a better "investment" than, you know, actual investments, why don't they put all their savings into the Social Security system? If the law does not permit overpayments into the system, we can change that to allow people to contribute as much as they want to the system, drawing out additional funds pro rata based on their higher contributions.

Sound good to any of them? I doubt it.

I was finally prompted to mention this by The New Editor's post that Howard Dean, dedicated foe of personal accounts, has a cool $2.5 mil invested in stocks and bonds.

Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy.

Not sure which. Honestly, I'm not. I could go either way on this one.


posted by Ace at 01:07 PM
Comments



"Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy."

You have to remember the third option. People like Dean (read: Democrats) are smarter than the commonfolk. Regular people can't be trusted to do things with their own money.

Posted by: Steve on August 11, 2005 01:26 PM

Social Security isn't an investment system.

In an investment system, you pay your money to some entity, which then uses that money to fund various profitable business activities. The benefits you get, years later, therefore represent a genuine "return" on investment -- i.e., the money you initially invested is returned to you, plus a portion of the profit derived from the use of that money.

The money you pay to SS is not used to provide capital to any business activity. It is used for immediate consumption.

Thus, the benefits one gets from SS are not a return on investment at all. The only thing that you are getting for your contributions is the right to receive, at some point in the future, contributions paid by a younger person.

Ask any liberal and they will tell you, with a straight face, since they genuinely do not see the problem with their position -- the reason that SS is "for everybody" and not just an anti-poverty program is that welfare would just wither on the vine, whereas if the middle class has a "stake," they will support it.

In other words, they KNOW that SS is a bad deal for the middle class and higher income earners, but they sell it to them as though it is good for them.

In my line of work, selling investments you know to be a bad deal for the investor will get you sued for fraud and could land you in jail.

Posted by: Phinn on August 11, 2005 01:36 PM

Good luck getting Howard Dean to buy into this, the best you'll get is ignored. They know you're right, they're just demagoguing. Though I don't think that's even a word...

Posted by: fat kid on August 11, 2005 01:42 PM

To be fair, Dean can afford to risk 2.5 million in the "horrible stock market" because...besides having a million bucks (probably in a large vault/swimming pool, like Scrooge McDuck), he will be compensated generously for his years of disservice to the American people by our overly-generous government pension system.

Posted by: brainy435 on August 11, 2005 01:45 PM

*cough*

No investment involved. . . Ponzi scheme.

*cough*

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 11, 2005 01:47 PM

Dean's just like the hypocrites at AARP. The proposed SS revision wouldn't affect even a single one of its members, yet AARP's on TV constantly with that ridiculous why-knock-down-the-house-when you-only-need-a-minor-repair ad.

And how do they propose to provide financial security for AARP members? Why, "energize your portfolio" of course.

http://aarp.scudder.com/aipt/index.jhtml

Posted by: Blacksheep on August 11, 2005 01:48 PM

No investment involved. . . Ponzi scheme.


Bingo. (you'll pardon the pun)

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 11, 2005 02:07 PM

"Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy"

Probably both but if forced to pick one, I'd have to go with crazy. As a bedbug.

Posted by: BrewFan on August 11, 2005 02:13 PM

Why is this even a surprise? The Dems in Congress have been hooked right through the bag by the NEA on the issue of school vouchers, but I'll bet the number who send their children to DC's public schools is very, very low. Dean and the other Dems don't think the stock market is a bad investment; they just think regular folk are too dumb to manage their own investments.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that the man is as nutty as an Almond Joy factory.

Posted by: utron on August 11, 2005 02:39 PM

Two things for which I will never forgive the Democratic party:

1. Carping at Bush at every turn over the war on terror without presenting a plan of their own.

2. Opposing SS private accounts.

No single piece of legislation would do more long term good for our country than allowing people to invest in their own retirements.

Let's do a little math, shall we?

Take a person with a modest $30, 000 per year income and allow that person to invest the full 15% of his SS contributions into the stock market (7.5% from him, 7.5% from his employer)

Assume that this poor schmuck never gets a pay raise, but the stock market gives him an 8% return over the long haul (historic average is actually 10%).

Let's say he works from the ages of 25-65. Fair enough?

Great. Let's see what he gets at retirement:

$1,356,775.03

Just remember this the next time some liberal fucker tells you it's just to damned risky to let you look after your own retirement, 'cause what he's really saying to you is "Fuck you I got mine, but you need to stay right where you are and keep working for all my pet causes."

Posted by: The Warden on August 11, 2005 03:43 PM

Oh Howie...
Nobody understands you like I do.
It's not about the money, it's not about numbers or fairness or logic.

It's about peace. It's about equality.
Its about bombastic, ill-informed pronouncements and retarded facial expressions.

You people stop picking on my Howie.
He ain't much to look at, but he's good to me.

Posted by: lauraw on August 11, 2005 09:37 PM

Howie doesn't have to worry about retirement funds; his father was the Dean of Dean Witter.And people do not understand how totally unfair and incompetent the SS system is; if a couple both worked for the government in any capacity, the wife can only draw on her husband's funds; we owe this little gem to the sour, vindictive bumpkin from Plains. No one ever gets the earnings they put into the system - you'l only get a small percentage of your money. This system has devolved into a bribe factory for politicians.

Posted by: emmyd on August 12, 2005 07:12 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence
She's a lady through and through
She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle
She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
I got something done yesterday and am exhausted.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Illegals registered and voted in NJ! Leftist violence is baked into the Democrat cake, Iran's capabilities are being degraded, Londonistan? And...come on SC...no senate dynasties!
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have destroyed damaged [CBD] over 147 Russian warships and shadow fleet oil tankers in the Black Sea over the past ten days.
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.
[CBD]
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT STRIKES DOWN NJ "ASSAULT WEAPONS" BAN/MAGAZINE BAN! Let's see if it reverts to the previous 15 round limit or I can actually run my weapons as God intended! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Trump Slaps Mullin down; he wants the auto stops to continue, we need employment enforcement at our big corporations, The gerontocracy in the Senate, the Iranian junta is true to form, but Trump responds forcefully, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Northern Lights Division
Our topic today is music
That's right, like
'Cause my brother and I are now experts in the field, eh
Yeah, right, 'cause we're a band now

Uh, yeah, so
Except for him, I'm a band
Aw, how can you do that?
You're making me look bad
You're such a Hosehead
CNBC ranks Tennessee as dead last in its “Worst States to Live” analysis. The specific reason is that cross-dressing men in TN are denied access to children and women’s private spaces. Texas finished 49th. The “worst” states were all red states. [Buck]
Senator Lindsey Graham (R - SC) has died after a "brief and sudden illness." [Buck]
Recent Comments
tubal: "183 Clark should have supported Cunningham but ins ..."

tubal: "175 We watched a bit of a WNBA game and it was lik ..."

JackStraw : ">>So like a welfare queen, the owners and players ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "180 This will be Rubio's historical greatest weakn ..."

polynikes: "Clark should have supported Cunningham but instead ..."

whig: "Caitlin Clark showed that if you let them women ca ..."

Common Tater: "Chinooks have impressive sling-load capacity. ..."

ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "And it's just reality now. No GOP presidential hop ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Instead they push Angel Reese who just got traded ..."

NaCly Dog: "nckate *Snort*. He has a way with words. ..."

JackStraw : ">>Sophie Cunningham has done the impossible by mak ..."

Delurker: "175 My husband said for lesbians they sure have t ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives