Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Terror-Apologism Summer Blockbusters! | Main | Syrians Spy On Phone Conversations... Even When Your Phone Is Off »
August 11, 2005

The Ace of Spades Challenge

I've wanted to write this for a while. It's not timely anymore. So this is a big waste of time.

But if Democratic politicians really believe that the Social Security system is a better "investment" than, you know, actual investments, why don't they put all their savings into the Social Security system? If the law does not permit overpayments into the system, we can change that to allow people to contribute as much as they want to the system, drawing out additional funds pro rata based on their higher contributions.

Sound good to any of them? I doubt it.

I was finally prompted to mention this by The New Editor's post that Howard Dean, dedicated foe of personal accounts, has a cool $2.5 mil invested in stocks and bonds.

Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy.

Not sure which. Honestly, I'm not. I could go either way on this one.


posted by Ace at 01:07 PM
Comments



"Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy."

You have to remember the third option. People like Dean (read: Democrats) are smarter than the commonfolk. Regular people can't be trusted to do things with their own money.

Posted by: Steve on August 11, 2005 01:26 PM

Social Security isn't an investment system.

In an investment system, you pay your money to some entity, which then uses that money to fund various profitable business activities. The benefits you get, years later, therefore represent a genuine "return" on investment -- i.e., the money you initially invested is returned to you, plus a portion of the profit derived from the use of that money.

The money you pay to SS is not used to provide capital to any business activity. It is used for immediate consumption.

Thus, the benefits one gets from SS are not a return on investment at all. The only thing that you are getting for your contributions is the right to receive, at some point in the future, contributions paid by a younger person.

Ask any liberal and they will tell you, with a straight face, since they genuinely do not see the problem with their position -- the reason that SS is "for everybody" and not just an anti-poverty program is that welfare would just wither on the vine, whereas if the middle class has a "stake," they will support it.

In other words, they KNOW that SS is a bad deal for the middle class and higher income earners, but they sell it to them as though it is good for them.

In my line of work, selling investments you know to be a bad deal for the investor will get you sued for fraud and could land you in jail.

Posted by: Phinn on August 11, 2005 01:36 PM

Good luck getting Howard Dean to buy into this, the best you'll get is ignored. They know you're right, they're just demagoguing. Though I don't think that's even a word...

Posted by: fat kid on August 11, 2005 01:42 PM

To be fair, Dean can afford to risk 2.5 million in the "horrible stock market" because...besides having a million bucks (probably in a large vault/swimming pool, like Scrooge McDuck), he will be compensated generously for his years of disservice to the American people by our overly-generous government pension system.

Posted by: brainy435 on August 11, 2005 01:45 PM

*cough*

No investment involved. . . Ponzi scheme.

*cough*

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 11, 2005 01:47 PM

Dean's just like the hypocrites at AARP. The proposed SS revision wouldn't affect even a single one of its members, yet AARP's on TV constantly with that ridiculous why-knock-down-the-house-when you-only-need-a-minor-repair ad.

And how do they propose to provide financial security for AARP members? Why, "energize your portfolio" of course.

http://aarp.scudder.com/aipt/index.jhtml

Posted by: Blacksheep on August 11, 2005 01:48 PM

No investment involved. . . Ponzi scheme.


Bingo. (you'll pardon the pun)

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 11, 2005 02:07 PM

"Either he's lying about the risks of the stock market or else he's crazy"

Probably both but if forced to pick one, I'd have to go with crazy. As a bedbug.

Posted by: BrewFan on August 11, 2005 02:13 PM

Why is this even a surprise? The Dems in Congress have been hooked right through the bag by the NEA on the issue of school vouchers, but I'll bet the number who send their children to DC's public schools is very, very low. Dean and the other Dems don't think the stock market is a bad investment; they just think regular folk are too dumb to manage their own investments.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that the man is as nutty as an Almond Joy factory.

Posted by: utron on August 11, 2005 02:39 PM

Two things for which I will never forgive the Democratic party:

1. Carping at Bush at every turn over the war on terror without presenting a plan of their own.

2. Opposing SS private accounts.

No single piece of legislation would do more long term good for our country than allowing people to invest in their own retirements.

Let's do a little math, shall we?

Take a person with a modest $30, 000 per year income and allow that person to invest the full 15% of his SS contributions into the stock market (7.5% from him, 7.5% from his employer)

Assume that this poor schmuck never gets a pay raise, but the stock market gives him an 8% return over the long haul (historic average is actually 10%).

Let's say he works from the ages of 25-65. Fair enough?

Great. Let's see what he gets at retirement:

$1,356,775.03

Just remember this the next time some liberal fucker tells you it's just to damned risky to let you look after your own retirement, 'cause what he's really saying to you is "Fuck you I got mine, but you need to stay right where you are and keep working for all my pet causes."

Posted by: The Warden on August 11, 2005 03:43 PM

Oh Howie...
Nobody understands you like I do.
It's not about the money, it's not about numbers or fairness or logic.

It's about peace. It's about equality.
Its about bombastic, ill-informed pronouncements and retarded facial expressions.

You people stop picking on my Howie.
He ain't much to look at, but he's good to me.

Posted by: lauraw on August 11, 2005 09:37 PM

Howie doesn't have to worry about retirement funds; his father was the Dean of Dean Witter.And people do not understand how totally unfair and incompetent the SS system is; if a couple both worked for the government in any capacity, the wife can only draw on her husband's funds; we owe this little gem to the sour, vindictive bumpkin from Plains. No one ever gets the earnings they put into the system - you'l only get a small percentage of your money. This system has devolved into a bribe factory for politicians.

Posted by: emmyd on August 12, 2005 07:12 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the obvious incompatibility of Islam with free societies, John Bolton is a disloyal sleaze, The SAVE Act is in the muck of Senate RINOs, the crappy quality of anti-American propaganda, and more!
Some people liked Candace Owens because she was a black woman who told hard truths about BLM and black criminality. But this was always a grift. She started out as a race hustler for a grift, then hustled race the other way to grift conservatives, and now she's back to being a race-hustler for the left again. Specifically, she is now claiming that people pointing out that she is legitimately low-IQ and can't pronounce half the words her AI-generated teleprompter script points out to her is racist and just Ben Shapiro's way of saying the n-word without quite saying it. You see, you can only say that black people are smart, and if you see a dumb one that doesn't know how to pronounce simple words while she poses as an investigatory journalist, you have to pretend she's actually smart or you're a racist. Weird, that doesn't sound very conservative, let alone "#Based," to me. To prove how much she hates racism, she then says that Ben Shapiro's Jew ancestors were masters of the slave trade.
The Oscars: A celebration of thanking. Dave Barry nails it! [CBD]
Ami Kozak: Every single Tucker Carlson episode consists of him claiming he didn't say the things he said in the last episode
Also: this is the manipulation Tucker does that i hate the most. It's so cowardly. All he does is smear people (and Jews, generally), and then claim "I have nothing against [the person or group I just smeared.]" He'll even claim "I love [x], actually." Just again and again and again. It's all a lie, of course. A year ago he smeared Jews but added how beautiful he thought Israel was, and then two weeks ago, he said Israel is ugly as dog-shit and nothing beautiful has been built there "since 1948."
Just got this email from Dracula: "I love Van Helsing, actually, he's one of my personal heroes, if I'm being honest. I will claw the heart out of his belly and bathe in his blood before the children of Babylon, but I have nothing but respect for Van Helsing, actually. Love is the answer. Except for the followers of the Christ whom I am commanded to turn into my dark army of Satan. And I totally don't worship Satan, I just think we should listen to both sides. Hugs and kisses, may Van Helsing burn in the blood-red fires of hell throughout eternity, even though I consider him a close and dear friend, Vlad called Dracul."
New CPAC Treasured Guest Speaker drops
He was hard to book, given all of his current commitments, but CPAC landed the man of the hour!
Recent Comments
clarence: "!! ..."

m: "Pixy's up! ..."

Tuna: "Morning all ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "G'mornin' everyone! ..."

m: "460 Still haven't broke down & smoked any cigs, th ..."

SciVo: "Goodnight, JQ. Sleep well. ..."

SciVo: "[i]I have no use for a tele at all. I did play one ..."

JQ: "Well, it's time for sleep-- 'Night, horde. Than ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division : " Berserker, I have Phil McKnight in a split screen ..."

Angelschein Fischereischein Kaufen: "I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This ..."

JQ: "*slides a beer down the bar to Reforger* Dude. ..."

Reforger: "Integers always have implicit leading zeros. You c ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives