Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "Nerdcore:" Finally, Rap Music That Speaks To Me | Main | Nuking Mecca? »
July 27, 2005

California Bans Smoking In Prison

Not as a form of punishment; just to make all those prisoners healthier.

Guards are banned from smoking too:

The California Department of Corrections (search) has banned cigarette smoking indoors and outdoors for both inmates and employees. The Department of Corrections hopes this move will cut health care costs by hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

"It just helps reduce the risk of secondhand smoking, helps reduce the risk of tobacco illness not just for employees, but for inmates as well," said Lt. Ken Lewis (search), spokesman for the California State Prison, Los Angeles County.

Gee, if they can't control drugs and weapons in prison, won't it be hard to stop smoking?

But the ban may not get rid of all tobacco products in California prisons. A black market for chewing tobacco has already emerged. Tins that normally cost $11 can run as much as $200 on the cellblock.

Oh.

No doubt, smoking is bad for your and a nasty, stinky habit.

But this Fascism of Health and Niceness is getting out of hand.

Thanks to NickS.


posted by Ace at 01:00 PM
Comments



We now know that ace will make sure never to be arrested in California.

Posted by: max on July 27, 2005 01:07 PM

Hope they triple staff those prisons during the transition, 'cause there are going to be a lot of irritable fuckers in one tight space.

Posted by: TheDude on July 27, 2005 01:08 PM

A tin of chewing tobacco cost $11 a can in CA?! Whoa

Posted by: brak on July 27, 2005 01:17 PM

$11!! Those commies! I'll bet there's a nice, healthy black market in dip outside of prisons, too. In fact, since it's "only" $4.45 in PA...

Posted by: John on July 27, 2005 01:25 PM

Yeah, the cost of living is getting so high in California that even the inmates are feeling the pinch...
Poor guys have to pay $200 per can...

WTF??!!

How do these scumbags have $200 to throw around in the first place???!!!

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on July 27, 2005 01:37 PM

from selling drugs

Posted by: Dave in Prison on July 27, 2005 01:42 PM

They shouldn't let the inmates smoke. Prison life should be uncomrtable, and smoking is a luxruy. Plus, when the negative health effects set in, who pays for their care? The taxpayer

Posted by: brak on July 27, 2005 01:53 PM

I'm a huge smokers' rights advocate but I'll agree with brak here. Smoking is a luxury and prisons aren't anywhere near as harsh as they should be, at least not in the right way. Everyone in prison should suffer equally.

Far more offensive was the MSNBC Connected segment today in which some NJ dipshits were trying to make a case for stopping law-abiding citizens smoking in their own fucking cars. Wannabe fascists make me sick.

Posted by: Megan on July 27, 2005 02:14 PM

By that logic, brak, we should feed them nothing but vegetarian diets and enforce mandatory fitness programs, and that's just the beginning. Newsflash for you, but prison life already *is* uncomfortable. Being a nanny state warden needn't be part of the package.

Furthermore, I'd wager that the money spent on additional medical costs are offset by the reduction in years of providing 24/7 room & board. If smoking actually resulted in a net savings, then perhaps we need to let them smoke as much as they want to.

Posted by: NickS on July 27, 2005 02:16 PM

Maybe if the health care costs were less than the room and board, I'd change my mind. But I'm not sure about that.

Smoking is a luxury though. I don't think there should be cable TV in prison either.

Posted by: brak on July 27, 2005 02:22 PM

No smoking for prisoners, but let the guards smoke just to piss the prisoners off.

Posted by: John from WuzzaDem on July 27, 2005 02:33 PM

I smoked for more years than I'd care to mention and I think smoking should be banned in the prison system, if for no other reason that to save the taxpayers from footing the bill for sick inmates. We're already paying tens of millions for the cost of sick smokers now, if we can reduce that we (and they) will all be far better off.

I bought into all the same arguments to protect smoking before. But when I see through smoke free eyes how terrible the effects of smoking really are, I believe firmly that cigarettes should be illegal because they are, and have always been, an unsafe product. Someday they will be illegal and we'll all be better off without them.

Posted by: 72 3-legged dogs on July 27, 2005 02:39 PM

I don't have a problem with this, if the people who actually work with the prisoners don't. Especially since we're paying for their treatment. (As for feeding them vegetarian diets for their health, that sounds like a fine idea to me.)

I do think that we should try to make some aspects of prison bearable. I'm in favor of access to good books and movies and whatnot, because I want them to be in a sane state of mind when they're released. Most of all, I think that the amount of violence and rape in prisons is intolerable. It disturbs me for humanitarian reasons, and it worries me when I think about people being released after years in such an environment.

If it sounds like I'm being soft on crime, let me counter that by saying that I think prison sentences for violent crimes are typically way too short.

Posted by: SJKevin on July 27, 2005 02:42 PM

72 cigarettes:

I'm an ex-smoker, too. Cigarettes are a plague on humanity.

I still don't really think that outlawing them for adults is the right answer, although I wish it were.

The most important thing is to prevent minors from getting them, since most people start smoking when they're in their teens. When I was young, the lobby of the diner right next to my high school had a cigarette machine we all used. This is the kind of thing which needs to be prevented.

People talk about the dangers of cigarettes mainly in terms of a shortened lifespan. But to be honest, that doesn't bother me much. What bothers me most is the years of needless agony prior to the early death. Many non-smokers live long lives feeling good much of the time, then they get sick and die, never having spent a huge amount of time hospitalized. But smokers often spend years in bed, in pain, suffering asphyxiation, before they die young. For me, it's not about the early death, it's about all the pain that precedes it.

Posted by: SJKevin on July 27, 2005 02:53 PM

Unless TV and movies have lied to me (and they never, ever do that), cigarettes are sorta the currency in prisons, right? The lubrication, if you will, ensuring the system works as well as it does.

If you yank 'em all out, won't they need to find another basic unit of exchange? Where do they go from there? Bricks? Severed testicles? Bibles?

Seriously. It's a head-scratcher.

Posted by: Knemon on July 27, 2005 02:53 PM

Prison smoking? It's like getting your salad tossed by an ashtray.

Posted by: spongeworthy on July 27, 2005 03:01 PM

Spongey's right. Lips that touch cigarettes will never touch my squeakhole.

Posted by: Pretty Prison Baby on July 27, 2005 03:04 PM

SJKevin

Yeah, its only been three years for me and I've heard you're not out of the woods for 7-10 years!!! In Tom Wolfe's Look Homeward Angel there is a scence in which his brother dies of smoking and it is horrific. As to making cigarettes illegal, they are an unsafe product and always have been. If the government didn't make so much money on them they'd have been illegal 2o years ago. But eventually, they will be and we'll all be better off.

BTW - From the vantage point of a non-smoker when I see old movies now the thing that strikes me most about smokers is how often they smoke. They smoke one every fifteen minutes or so, all day every day! Going without a cigarette for half and hour to an hour used to seem a long time. Talk about addiciting!

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 27, 2005 03:10 PM

Fortunately, this nanny state imposition took place AFTER Clint Eastwood filmed "The Dead Pool", which has one of the best EVER Dirty Harry scenes.

If you don't know what I'm talking about, go rent it.

"Oh, you see that greaseball down there? He says that smoking causes cancer and that anyone who smokes as much as you do is one *dumb* son of a bitch."

rotfl.

Posted by: NickS on July 27, 2005 03:17 PM

Ban smoking in prisons, just give them heroin.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on July 27, 2005 06:41 PM

Aw jeez digitalbrownshirt, you beat me.
I was going to suggest an opium tube in every cell. Just for the lifers.
Make them nice and pliable and nonviolent.

Posted by: lauraw on July 27, 2005 07:15 PM

How about curarie or ricin?

Posted by: 72 Twinkies on July 27, 2005 07:20 PM

There is one important thing to remember about the ill effects of smoking. The majority of deaths come not from lung cancer but rather heart failure. A smoker is more likely to have a fatal DRT heart attack and never spend a prolonged period in a cancer ward nor collect Social Security benefits.

The Los Angeles Times recently ran an article bemoaning the number of senior citizens behind bars with severe medical expenses. If we let those people have as many cigarettes as they like, for their sole use and not as trade goods, we could save a fortune by letting them off themselves.
http://www.latimes.com/features/health/consumer/la-tm-oldcons26jun26,1,5821557.story

Posted by: epobirs on July 27, 2005 08:22 PM

Yeah. let's force 'em to live nice loooooooooong lives so they can rip us off longer. Sheesh.

buncha old ladies in pantaloons.

Posted by: W.E.Todd on July 27, 2005 10:00 PM

No smoking in prison?

Gee, the next thing you know, they are gonna ban butt-sex in prison too...


Oh...

Posted by: cheshirecat on July 28, 2005 10:03 AM

cool site

Posted by: ebony on July 28, 2005 06:44 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: the most repetitive but catchy earworm of the eighties?
Sometimes, I find you doubt my love for you but I don't mind
Why should I mind? Why should I mind?

It's hard to quote the song while avoiding quoting from the endlessly-repeated chorus.
Wait, my mistake, his other hit from 1985 was the most repetitive new wave hit of the 80s.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I'm gonna get high, man, I'm gonna get loose/
Need me a triple shot of that juice
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 600,000 Chinese spies given visas? Scotland relies on 14-year-old girls for their defense, tariffs work! mortgage fraud is the new thing, and more!
I guess yesterday's Starship test flight was cancelled. They're counting down to another launch, NOW. Lift-off!
The "hip" gray corporate slop era of Cracker Barrel is put on hold (supposedly):
Bret Baier
@BretBaier

Cracker Barrel is going back to the old logo. Company statement: "We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our "Old Timer" will remain. At Cracker Barrel, it's always been - and always will be - about serving up delicious food, warm welcomes, and the kind of country hospitality that feels like family. As a proud American institution, our 70,000 hardworking employees look forward to welcoming you to our table soon."
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Lost Seventies Mystery Click: The Darkest Song Ever Recorded?
I think Professor of Rock (on YouTube) claimed this song was so upsetting that people used to pull over to the side of the road when it came on the radio. It's about a fatal plane crash, but obviously it suggests a fatal car crash too, which could wig out a driver.
It's like one of those nasty 70s anti-war body horror movies. Not for the squeamish. I'm not even going to post the lyrics because they're upsetting too.
Compilation of Naked Gun intros
That theme gets me charged.
Compilation of all Police Squad! openings. They're all the same except for the last few seconds where they reveal the Special Guest Star and the title(s).
Recent Comments
NaCly Dog: "Good morning! Let's smile & be happy & strike ..."

r hennigantx: " JJS ..."

NR Pax: "Hi, everyone! ..."

r hennigantx: "Thirsty Thursday ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : "JJ ..."

Brunnhilde: "Hadrian, I will miss your frequent comments whe ..."

I used to have a different nic[/s][/b][/i][/u]: "[i]Come to find out most of those arms are US Taxp ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " You want to read something that's nothing short ..."

RMA: "Six years ago, conservatives were making fun of th ..."

Unknown Drip Under Pressure: "[i] “If the Israelis lay down their armsR ..."

rickb223: "One suite, remote, device type thing, is Ford pass ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Side effects to Cryfylnz may include but are not ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives