Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« The Life-Cycle of Blogging | Main | I Love the Smell of a Retraction In the Morning »
June 21, 2005

Durbin Edges Even Closer To a True Apology

First he was sorry that he was "misunderstood." Now he takes another step closer to confessing actual error on his own part:

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dick Durbin (search) went to the Senate floor late Tuesday to offer his apologies to anyone who may have been offended by his comparison of treatment of detainees at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to Nazis, Soviet gulags and Cambodia's Pol Pot.

"More than most people, a senator lives by his words ... occasionally words fail us, occasionally we will fail words," Durbin, D-Ill., said.

"I am sorry if anything I said caused any offense or pain to those who have such bitter memories of the Holocaust, the greatest moral tragedy of our time. Nothing, nothing should ever be said to demean or diminish that moral tragedy.

"I am also sorry if anything I said cast a negative light on our fine men and women in the military ... I never ever intended any disrespect for them. Some may believe that my remarks crossed the line to them I extend my heartfelt apology," Durbin said, choking on his words.

Durbin said in the course of his remarks on June 14, he raised "legitimate concerns" about U.S. policy toward prisoners and whether their treatment makes America safer.

Still not anything close to a retraction, or an apology for saying such things. He's confessing only to a poor choice of words which may have caused offense to some people. Not for the basic thrust of his screed.

A genuine apology would disavow the Nazi-Khmer Rouge-Soviet comparisons. A genuine apology would distinguish between those hellish regimes and our own. A genuine apology would actually confess true error, not just in clumsy phraseology (an error of happenstance). A genuine apology would confess that his words were intentionally grandstanding and slanderous, and that these words were deliberately chosen for effect, not blundered into by some sloppy draftsmanship.

Straight-talker John McCain was right there, however, to deem his semi-apology close enough for government work and thereby gain even more media-love:

"I don't want anything in my public career to detract from my love for this country, my respect for those who serve it and this great Senate. I offer my apologies to those who were offended," he said.

Immediately after his remarks, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he thought Durbin made a "heartfelt statement" and he was satisfied with the apology.

"He did the right thing, the courageous thing and I think we can put the situation behind us," McCain said.

Thanks for letting us know, John. I found the apology insufficient and face-saving and very calculatedly blame-avoiding, but hey, if you say everything's jake, I guess that settles the issue.

Senator John McCain

The "maverick," "independent-thinking" Republican whose New York Times-friendly comments are always knee-jerkedly predictable.

Because real "independent-thinkers" always have perfectly-predictable thoughts.

Thanks for the heads-up to brak.


posted by Ace at 06:56 PM
Comments



Damn it, Ace-- I'm proud of you.

I was about to post on this, and you beat me to it. Thanks, you saved me from writing the same thing.

Now I can go back to ripping Wiggles CDs.

Much obliged,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on June 21, 2005 07:12 PM

Wow, John McCain, a true American icon. What a goob...

I am repeating myself from another post, but I must say it again, I guess it's ok to trash all over the military as long as you have a tear-filled apology afterward. Lame. Ultra lame.

Good post, Ace.

Posted by: US Soldier on June 21, 2005 07:15 PM

Jesus. Courage is what our guys in the military got. Not some twit senator backpedaling on his asshat comments.

Posted by: on June 21, 2005 07:24 PM

Arrgh, this sort of thing just burns my ass. The whole "I'm sorry if you're such a wimpy loser whiney twit that you were offended" crap.

You're sorry or you're not. Period.

And John McCain, hey, it just occured to me that his last name is appropriate..

Posted by: Lipstick on June 21, 2005 07:35 PM

That guys' even more of a weasely douche bag IMO now.

What's with all our pussy ass senators these days? I've never in my life seen so many grown men cry. It makes me sick to see a fucking Senator cry over some crafted remark that backfired on his ass.

Politicians can suck my balls.

Posted by: fat kid on June 21, 2005 07:36 PM

Fat KidIt makes me sick to see a fucking Senator cry over some crafted remark that backfired on his ass.

Yeah, this is the type of behavior you would expect out of some gern like Al Franken, but a Senator... no shame. What a bunch of pansies.

Posted by: on June 21, 2005 07:42 PM

That last one was me....

Posted by: US Soldier on June 21, 2005 07:43 PM

Apology? What apology? What the jerk did was denigrate every American alive in the world, and he's "sorry if he offended anyone"? He only got one thing right in his whole side-step: He's sorry.

That I can take to the bank, because he's just as sorry as the wuss who ran for pres and lost, just as sorry as the lady-killer from MA, and certainly just as sorry as the dirtbag "apologist" from AZ.

Posted by: Carlos on June 21, 2005 08:27 PM

The Republicans in Arizona have to insist that McCain run as a Dem. We need our Senators to have balls; obviously he doesn't.

Posted by: Len-KC on June 21, 2005 08:59 PM

Because real "independent-thinkers" always have perfectly-predictable thoughts

The same way real non-conformists always wear black and listen to the same bands.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega on June 21, 2005 09:02 PM

...Durbin said, choking on his words.

Now THAT I believe.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on June 21, 2005 09:27 PM

Sorry, Dick. Still not accepting your apology.

But, for what it's worth, you forgot to apologize for giving moral support and aid to the terrorists who plot to murder us.

Apologize for that...so I can reject that one too.

Look, people...we know where this guy's mindset is. Apology or no apology, tigers don't change their stripes (even Tony the Tiger), the make PR calculations.

Shame on my native Illinois. Shame.

Posted by: USMC_Vet on June 21, 2005 09:39 PM

You know, I could accept his apology, if he would apologize for what he actually did wrong.

Instead of apologizing for making an assnine moonbat comment comparing Gitmo to a gulag, he apologizes for offending people. Of course he's sorry he offended people. People vote. Therefore, upset people = bad. Appease the people =good.

What a douche.

Posted by: US Soldier on June 21, 2005 10:20 PM

Excitable Andy must be disappointed that his new hero made even such a half-assed apology.

Good. Fuck him.

Posted by: Sean M. on June 21, 2005 11:26 PM

Yeah, but Lott had to apologize and resign. So should Dickless Durbin.

Posted by: Iblis on June 21, 2005 11:30 PM

mcCAIN just makes himself more irrelevant by the day and deed. Won't be long before Republicans are saying "John who". His hatred for President Bush is equal to that of the donks and he just can't wait everyday to side with them.

Posted by: catnip on June 22, 2005 12:24 AM

The news says Richard Daley had something to do with Durbin's about face. I hope Daley kicked Durbin's ass in private. His son, Patrick Daley, enlisted post 9/11. And though he is a republican, blood is blood!

Posted by: on June 22, 2005 12:45 AM

Reason 857 to hate John McCain: He's cosponsoring a bill to make DHEA a controlled substance, undistinguished from anabolic steroids. I don't see how he could even have taken it into his head to do such a thing unless it were at the behest of people who finance his campaigns and have special access to the buttons and switches of his moral indignation. I'm tempted to write that bloated, diseased martinet and let him know vitamin D is a steroid, too. "Please, you must make fortified milk a controlled substance before Our Children are destroyed by drug pushers!"

Posted by: Ornithopter on June 22, 2005 08:15 AM

This was nothing compared to what Trent Lott said a few years ago, yet he practically gets a free-pass from the MSM and a half-ass apology is called "courgaeous." Utterly predictable.

Posted by: brak on June 22, 2005 09:27 AM

Who wrote this apology? The f**king runaway bride!

Posted by: Dman on June 22, 2005 10:03 AM

No, Durbin did not do the right thing and anyone can see it. But these words can all be brought up again and shoved in his own and his party's face, including his weak attempt at covering his own ass. This shit won't flush in much of this country. And as long as he refuses to admit it was outrageous, this is actually good news!

Posted by: 72 optimists! on June 22, 2005 10:37 AM

And, surprise! Sully's obviously feeling the heat of criticism, because he's printed not one but TWO self-congratulatory emails in which people agree with him.

In responding to one email, he says this:

I'm reminded of Mayor Daley's amazing quote: "I think it's a disgrace to say that any man or woman in the military act like that." Some questions: Is Daley denying the incident Durbin described? And what does he mean by "like that"? We know for a fact that some U.S. interrogators have tortured some detainees to death. We know it because the military has conceded it. Is it now "a disgrace" to report that? Is it "a disgrace" to lament that? And how exactly is torturing innocent people to death via presidential memo utterly different than the behavior in many vile regimes?
Um, when exactly was someone 'tortured to death" at Gitmo? I mean, more people have died in Ted Kennedy's car for crying out loud.

It seems to me Sullivan has stepped over a line. He's suggesting the president approves of torturing people to death.

What a hysterical little crapweasel.

Posted by: Slublog on June 22, 2005 10:44 AM

Durbin and McCain. These pricks deserve each other.

Phony crocodile tears on the Senate floor and a backwards apology -- that only applies if you were "offended" -- if you agree with the cocksucker, well then everything is hunky-dory

Next time I kick someone in the nuts for no reason I'll just profess to be "sorry" if they were "hurt"

that's the lesson I learned from this.

Posted by: bostonirish on June 22, 2005 11:23 AM

It finally seems that at least some AZ Republicans are tired of McCain:

http://www.gopwing.com/modules.php?sid=910

Saw that at RWN

Posted by: brak on June 22, 2005 11:36 AM

We know for a fact that some U.S. interrogators have tortured some detainees to death.

No, we don't. But I have seen things on the net that say so, and I dearly hope they're true. But the fact that Liberals don't care that as a direct result of this kind of accusation, and that the resolve of our enemy is stiffened, our image among the terrorists and the allies we need to help us is tarnished, and that this will make the war much harder, much more bloody, much more expensive and much longer than it had to be is one reason I hate them so much. They just don't care what happens to our boys and our country and deserve to be horsewhipped on the steps of the capital.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on June 22, 2005 11:50 AM

Hey, what more do you want? King McCain stamped his approval.

Dang shame the King of the Dwarfs, couldn't have managed to give the nod to stop his good buddies on Abu Ghraib and Gitmo. Instead he shook his Important Head and turned loose his hounds, Hagel and Graham. Shame King Hero Celeb chose not to stop the "torture" by his good buddies and MSM. But hey, that's just American soldiers being trashed in his effort to hit Bush. Reminds one of his view on those pesky Swifties. Who were those people? Why didn't they shut up when King Celeb Hero told them ? Didn't they know he was the ONE?

Now we should all just move along with Turbin Durbin. King Double Speak of the Ruling 7.... ordained.

Posted by: watcher on June 22, 2005 11:56 AM

There are only two reasons to make this sort of "Sorry if you're offended" non-apology. One is if you're tactfully refusing to back down from your remarks. The other is if you're a craven politician who finally realized this might come back to bite you in the a$$ with the voters. It's possible Durbin was non-apologizing for both reasons simultaneously.

If the guy had an ounce of class, he'd apologize for these reasons, in this order: 1) Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war; 2) Slandering our men and women in uniform; 3) Embarrassing the Democratic Party. (Okay, that last one was just comic relief. He might offer an apology to Richard Daley, though.)

Posted by: utron on June 22, 2005 12:07 PM

I have bad news for McCain: All those moonbats who say they would vote for you if you ran because they think wrongly that it makes them look less moonbatty -- are lying! And you sure as hell not going to get the nonmoonbatty vote.

Posted by: on June 22, 2005 12:16 PM

utron

"Sorry if you're offended" non-apology.

Isn't that galling? I'm sorry if you're offended but I'm not going to admit I'm wrong on the substance because that would involve a real mistake on my part, instead of hyper-sensitivity on your part.

But this will still come back to haunt him and his party, i.e., if conservatives can manage not trip over their own dicks in public long enought for this to be used by them against Liberals, a very big "if."

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on June 22, 2005 12:18 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "SO...Starmer is getting his ass kicked. Nice. ..."

...: "Posted by: nurse ratched at May 07, 2026 09:38 PM ..."

mikeski: "[i]ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar Pos ..."

...: "Fetterman should change his name to Will Fetterman ..."

The rest of Tennessee: "[i]167 The left has killed itself through mal-educ ..."

runner: "ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar ..."

runner: "Labour is having a very very very bad night! ..."

clarence: "GIB = Guy in Back or in this case Goober in Back. ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: " The left has killed itself through mal-education ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I don't allow my kids on social media. I guess the ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: " May I please ask for prayers for Zoe. Her gran ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I just heard a cool saying on an old episode of Wa ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives