Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Actor Tom Sizemore Fails Drug Test Using... Fake Penis; Then Goes on Coke-Fueled Whore-Slapping Spree | Main | A Clarification & A Disclosure »
February 11, 2005

Eason Jordan: Reporters "Deliberately Targeted" by Bloggers

D A V O S, SWITZERLAND -- Eason Jordan, a Chief News Executive at CNN, raised eyebrows and hackles during a panel discussion in which he suggested that bloggers "deliberately target" members of the mainstream media.

"I know of at least twelve journalists who have been targeted by bloggers," Mr. Eason is reported to have claimed. "And I know several journalists who say they've been tortured. They've had all sorts of mean things said about them, and let me tell you, that isn't anyone's idea of fun."

Asked precisely which journalists have been "targeted" by bloggers, Mr. Jordan seemed to backpedal, explaining, "I'm not saying this is necessarily part of blogger policy, coming down from the high command of Instapundit and Powerline and Hugh Hewitt. But there are definitely some bloggers -- individual bloggers, to be sure -- who are targeting journalists."

If Mr. Jordan thought that would end the matter, he soon found himself to be mistaken. Further acts of "torture" at the hands of bloggers quickly ensued, with entire pages dedicated to criticizing Mr. Jordan's remarks.

"It was inhuman," said a high-ranking CNN producer. "It makes Abu Ghraib look like the Bear Jamboree at Disneyland."

Contacted for comment, CNN issued a terse response: "Mr. Jordan was simply attempting to draw a distinction between those journalists deliberately and intentionally targeted by bloggers, and those journalists who were merely embarassed and exposed as fools merely as part of the 'collateral damage' of correcting their myriad errors and fabrications. He certainly did not intended to claim that any bloggers are just making sport of journalists, nor that bloggers believe that journalists are generally incompetent, arrogant daddy-hired-me's, nor even that they would be easily replaced by a cadre of coked-up chimps equipped with Blackberries and fedoras."

Reaction from the blogosphere has been unrelenting-- and unstinting. "Of course we're 'targeting' them, for crying out loud," commented anonymous blogger Ace of Spades. "I mean-- duh. They're, you know, a bunch of half-smart dickheads who cruised through private-but-not-elite colleges earning cushy communication degrees and got their jobs on family connections alone. And now think they're masters of the universe. To borrow a chestnut they're fond of-- they were born on third base, but they think they hit a triple."

Eason Jordan resigned from CNN tonight, saying he hoped to avoid further "tarnishing" CNN's reputation by his presence there.

He says he plans to spend "more time with his family." He also says he's considering co-authoring a book with former NYT Editor-in-Chief Howell Raines and departing CBS News achorman Dan Rather. The book is tentatively titled, Bloggers: Why Do They Hate Us?, and will explore the "root causes" of the blogosphere's disatisfaction with, and rage against, the Western media.

"Hopefully, our book will be a sensitive exploration of the differences that separate bloggers and the legtimate professional media," Mr. Jordan said. "We intend to explore these issues with the characteristic objectivity we're famous for. Our take is that bloggers don't like us because they're all stupid and jealous right-wing mouth-breathers and troglodytic wack-a-doos, but that's just a working premise at this point. We're open to other theories, like that they're simply all mid-functional retards."

Helen Thomas could not be reached for comment, as Friday night is "Canasta 'n Chain-Smokin' Night."


posted by Ace at 11:33 PM
Comments



Only 12? I thought we'd targeted them all.

On a related note Obersturmfuehrer, we have begun perparing the target list of moonbat bloggers as well. The Deathcard brigade is already in position awaiting your command.

Posted by: Iblis on February 12, 2005 12:15 AM

I don't give written commands.

I think you know what the higher-ups expect of you.

Posted by: ace on February 12, 2005 12:17 AM

Hey, Scappleface, Onion? Hear that knocking? That's Ace at the door and he's busting in with Dave @ Garfield Ridge riding point.
And if I were Anderson Cooper with his boyish good looks and bleached blond mane, I'd be stepping lightly.

Posted by: Ron C on February 12, 2005 12:31 AM

I sorta get the feeling anderson cooper already is stepping lightly.

I keed, I keed.

But honestly-- his eyes do sparkle.

Posted by: not ace on February 12, 2005 02:08 AM

Over at Slashdot (where the aggressively ignorant and pugnaciously stupid predominate) you can read all about how "Open Source Reporting" has kept the White House Press Corp™ free of the rightwing taint that Gannon brought with him. How pathetic.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega on February 12, 2005 02:08 AM

"(T)hey were born on third base, but they think they scored a triple."

Not only are they eternally stupid about reporting, but they don't even realize they don't score on a triple.

I mean, at least the rules of baseball are written down and straightforward. At least they could get that much right.

Posted by: on February 12, 2005 03:16 AM

Damn, I meant to correct that hours ago.

You got me, son.

I guess I'm the next to go down-- but I'll go down fightin', just like two-fisted Jeff Gannon.

Posted by: ace on February 12, 2005 03:21 AM

A sweet day. But come on, this means war: MSM efforts to tear down the blogosphere are going to be all-out from here on out.

Of course, if they do the great job they did in tearing down Bush's military service...

Posted by: someone on February 12, 2005 03:23 AM

Yeah, but they'll never dismiss us again, will they?

I smell their fear. It stinks like... victory.

Posted by: ace on February 12, 2005 03:29 AM

"I think you know what the higher-ups expect of you."

Heh heh!

Posted by: Iblis on February 12, 2005 11:00 AM

Might I suggest that David Gergen be the next? His smarmy defense of Jordan shows that he does not get it - "This is too high a price to pay for someone who has given so much of himself over 20 years. And he's brought down over a single mistake because people beat up on him in the blogosphere? They went after him because he is a symbol of a network seen as too liberal by some. They saw blood in the water."

Sorry David, it's not just this fuckup, but also his utterly shameful embrace of Saddam and his employer's embrace of evil around the world.

Posted by: lito on February 12, 2005 12:11 PM

*He says he plans to spend "more time with his family." *
or maybe he plans to spend more time with
Daniel Pearl's family

Posted by: on February 14, 2005 12:17 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
Recent Comments
whig: "YES, here is why... when you get busted for did ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " A man can become a woman. Make it make sens ..."

sniffybigtoe: " Obama's library looks like a Nazi anti-aircraft ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Nood. Virginia reaction stream. ..."

garrett: ">>RAGBRAI, the annual bike ride across Iowa, goes ..."

Seems Legit: "Never, ever, ever underestimate the degree of ment ..."

John McCain: "This is a good opportunity for me to reach across ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "The Chicago way Posted by: Steve_in_SoCal at May ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Only Jan 6 grannies go to jail for "inciting" viol ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Fat, Dumb, and Happy[/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "I've seen photos of her. That lawyer needs glasses ..."

mikeski's Cereal Box Replies: "[i]I am enough. Posted by: fd's Cereal Box Affirm ..."

Steve_in_SoCal: "I seeem to recall there are also massive issues wi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives