Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Cheese & Cracker's Amazing Rise | Main | And Speaking of Margaret Cho: Best of Ace, #7 »
January 01, 2005

I Don't Care What Ann Althouse Says: Margaret Cho Is Not-Funny

NRO was nice enough to link one of my several anti-Cho pieces here. Kind of bookend links-- they linked me right in the beginning of my blog, and then the day after my first blogoversary. And never in between.

Ann Althouse, also linked by Goldberg, insists, just like that dopey Slate reviewer, that Margaret Cho is funny not because of her written act but because of her funny faces and funny voices.

To each her own, I guess. Maria Bamford does lots of funny faces and funny voices, but she actually has a well-written act in addition to the funny faces and voices.

I don't know why Cho is to be praised for only being able to do "funny faces" and "funny voices" without having any kind of written act to speak of.

As I've said a thousand times before: I'm sorry, but I think Althouse just appreciates the socio-political content of her unfunny act, and finds it kind of validating. But validation isn't really comedy.


posted by Ace at 04:40 PM
Comments



I confess to laughing at one of Cho's bits where she impersonates her immigrant mother, but then, you know how Allah likes the racist humor. Try screening that old "ancient Chinese secret" Calgon commercial for me and watch the puddle of urine form at my feet.

By the way, Ace, kudos on changing your banner back to the old style. The font you were using a few days ago was just a little too "Magic: The Gathering," if you know what I mean.

Posted by: Allah on January 1, 2005 06:02 PM

Cho has reached the stage in her career where she thinks she does not have to prepare for a comedy performance. She thinks that anything that pops into her head on stage is funny. Most of the time the headpops are not funny-just stupid.

Been to a Seinfeld performance lately? He works just as hard today as he ever did and he is just as funny.

Posted by: Jake on January 1, 2005 06:02 PM

Margaret Cho is not funny.

You know who's funny?

Willie Tyler and Lester. Now, THAT'S funny.

Unlike Margaret Cho, who is not funny.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 1, 2005 06:53 PM

Margaret Cho is terrible. To compare her massively over-the-top Asian stereotype thing to Uncle Leo is comedic heresy.

As much as I love your ripping Margaret Cho, I think there are better targets out there. Margaret Cho is a nothing. She's worse than nothing, she's in the negatives. Bill Maher has a show on HBO, 90% of which is him telling a semi-joke which gets polite applause and a chuckle or two from the massively liberal audience. People call Bill Hicks a genius. Now he's undoubtedly funnier than Maher, but a lot of his stuff is the same kind of liberal applause line garbage. That is not a genius.

Posted by: chris on January 1, 2005 11:09 PM

People drool all over Bill Hicks because he died young. If he were still alive today he'd be Managing a Hardee's.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on January 1, 2005 11:52 PM

I don't know why I capitalized "managing."

Posted by: Andrea Harris on January 1, 2005 11:53 PM

At last! Someone else who appreciates Maria Bamford. I've been disappointed that career hasn't gone farther. She is one of those act that I'll stop and watch a while when channel surfing, even if it's a bit I've seen dozens of times.

Maybe she's a psychopath that nobody wants to hire but she's just seems terribly talented to me.

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on January 2, 2005 05:28 AM

I think there is some romanticism attached to dying young, Andrea, but Bill Hicks was funny. To tell you the truth, I don't recall hearing any of the overtly leftist stuff that I read about these days.

Posted by: CraigC on January 2, 2005 06:07 PM

I keep meaning to say something about Bill Hicks.

I agree with Andrea. I watched an old special of his on HBO, and it was nothing but warmed-over angry-man Carlin leftist crap.

Now, that stuff can be funny, I guess, to the right audience. But Hicks' crap just seemed like more of "the alleged comedy of validation." The jokes were banal and obvious, the attitude was borrowed from his betters, and the whole act was just flat.

He is adored because he 1) was left wing and 2) died young.

I think people imagine he would, with seasoning, have become a superstar. Judging from his tired, stale warmed-over yippie-bullshit act, I'm going to have to say "Not likely."

Posted by: ace on January 2, 2005 06:39 PM

I used to say Bill Hicks was nothing more than a talentless hack with stupid immature political beliefs whose career was nothing more than validation applause from fellow liberals, but the truth is, he has been funny a couple of times. All in all though, he really is terrible.

Posted by: chris on January 3, 2005 12:42 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
Recent Comments
OrangeEnt: "I need that $150 for better things. Plus, with a d ..."

Quarter Twenty : "And I thought I was fancy with a two axis Pareto c ..."

Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "Her podcasts Antiracist Parenting Podcast and Deco ..."

Thomas Bender: "So CRAID can have various different meanings, it's ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i] Sense-free. No real-world referents whatsoever ..."

Quarter Twenty : "*WTF was that bullshit? Posted by: rickb223 at Ap ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "Whenever I hear about RAID in tech-speak, I think ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "Time for post walk shower. BBIAB ..."

OrangeEnt: "Sense-free. No real-world referents whatsoever. P ..."

Thomas Bender: "@99 >>Thomas Bender thanks for that, but I'll w ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]. . . Informed by the liberatory education she ..."

Quarter Twenty : "A word to the wise: if you're dealing with someone ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives