Ace of Spades HQ

« If You Don't Vote, The Democrats Will Steal This Election | Main | Yawwwn... The Only Blogs the Media Acknoweldges Are Left-Leaning »

December 06, 2004

Ninnies Squeal Like Pigs As British Hottie Pleasures Boar

How do I tease this delicately? On a British reality TV show, former David Beckham concubine Rebecca Loos was asked to, errr, manually stimulate a boar in order to, ummm, extract his genetic material for breeding.

Now, of course, this sort of thing happens on farms all the time. (And it's not always motivated by economics or husbandry, either.)

Thank Goodness we have people keeping a sharp eye on this:

The RSPCA condemned the scenes as "morbid and sordid".
But in its ruling today, Ofcom said the stunt was not degrading or harmful to the pig involved.

I'm perpetually amused by left-leaning prudes who obviously object to salacious material, but they are committed to the (false) notion that they are completely sexually open-minded. And thus they always cast their objections to pornography and its french-kissing-cousins as some kind of concern for the "victim" of "exploitation."

Mickey Kaus even tried that tact in order to criticize the Janet Jackson boobie-flash-- "Gee willickers, the S&M pantomime was degrading to women!" -- even as he continued to claim he thought it was otherwise no big deal to show that sort of thing to children.

The stunt may indeed have been borderline pornographic and distasteful, but it was certainly not harmful to the pig. Matter of fact, he hasn't stopped talking about it for a week. You can't say three words to him without him somehow working it in that he got that "killer hand-job" from Rebecca Loos.

He just keeps asking you if you think she's going to call. It breaks my heart to have to tell him "I think she's moved on."

Thanks to Robert McClelland.

"Chinese...? I was thinking Indian myself. Manual sex always gives me a yen for chicken tikamasala."

More here, if you really need it.

Thanks to Nick Kronos, who I'm told has a blog his own damn self.

posted by Ace at 01:16 PM

Comments

Pics that would make any Democratic candidate posing for Rolling Stone jealous

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on December 6, 2004 01:22 PM

"I'm perpetually amused by left-leaning prudes who obviously object to salacious material, but they are committed to the (false) notion that they are completely sexually open-minded."

I've been wondering/thinking about this myself for quite awhile, and I'm starting to come to the conclusion that, why the left likes to portray us right-wingers as a bunch of prudes, I think it might be the other way around. This occurred to me recently when I kept getting emails from people at the University where I work advertising a guest speaker in the field of "minority sexuality".

Now, not being an expert in "minority sexuality" I have no idea what that means, but I found myself wondering why it is that academic types constantly feel the need intellectualize sex. We have sex ed classes well into college and grad school here. One would think that if you didn't know that stuff by the time you made it to college, then you probably shouldn't be in college. But then I realized, that maybe, part of the reason that they continue to intellectualize about sex in sterile, academic environments is because they are too prudish to talk about it like normal people do.

The epitome of this is a Michael Moore-loving leftist woman I know who is a 30+ year old virgin that teaches sex ed classes.

Anyway, this is all just a theory, but something I've been pondering lately.

Posted by: Jason on December 6, 2004 01:44 PM

Yeah, that occurs to me on occasion as well.

I keep meaning to write a big essay along similar lines, but I keep getting distracted by pig-whack-off stories.

Posted by: ace on December 6, 2004 01:56 PM

"Thanks to Robert McClelland?"

THAT Robert McClelland? The Canadian troll scourge of sites like Damian Penny's and Jeff Jarvis'?

I alway KNEW he was just a right-wing plot.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 6, 2004 02:25 PM

I don't think it's prudishness that motivates this intellectualization of sex that you're talking about. I think it's motivated by a desire to strip sex of all meaning, or at least, of any non-sanctioned meaning.

When I say this, I'm talking about the black-hearted, humanity-loathing Gramsciites who make up the Left's intellectual inner core. Your average garden variety leftist dipshit advances these people's hideous agenda because they've tricked him into thinking it's common sense, and that it's "right" (though they've also got him thinking that there is no right and wrong, but that's a whole nother essay.)