Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Best Political Book of the Year? | Main | French Police Assist Burglar Robbing Jewelry Store »
November 13, 2004

AP Photopropaganda Alert

The AP photog snapped thousands of pics with the Marines.

Funny how Anja Niedringhaus chose this particular photo to represent the fighting in Fallujah:

Wow, Anja. That's pretty much a lefty editorial cartoon in itself. Now we just have to dress the leg in Uncle Sam striped-pants and label the dead terrorists "The Peace-Seeking World" and maybe stick in a pig labled "Ariel Sharon" somewhere in the mix.

Thanks to GregS.

And Now AFP:

Why the hell is the military letting them take these pics?

GregS again. He's a bear for photos.


posted by Ace at 04:05 PM
Comments



Two dead terrorists, whom shortly after that photograph was made, split in two, replicating (as terrorists do when you kill 'em) their invinsible Uber-Islamoid-Fascist force over the rest of Fallujah.

"Squeezing Jello" is how the progressives at Commondreams.org like to characterize it.

"Give yourselves up.....Christianity is Stupid...Communism is Good....Give yourselves up.....Give yourselves up" -Negativeland

Posted by: Vladimir on November 13, 2004 04:45 PM

CBS is going down. AP - you're next!

Posted by: Philip on November 13, 2004 04:45 PM

Along with a little pointy-toothed Bush (a la Ted Rall) covering the picture and saying, "Move alawng, nothin' tah see here!"

Which pretty much sums up most of Ted Rall's ed-toons, now that I think about it...

Posted by: Nichole Kazmin on November 13, 2004 04:50 PM

"Funny" thing is, the bodies could have been boobi-trapped and killed the soldier checking to see if they were alive. Of course that would never cross the AP's mind. Ace' headline was right; Photopropaganda.

Posted by: Ron Deaton on November 13, 2004 04:50 PM

I know people who would pay to be tied up like those guys in the second photo

Posted by: Kevin on November 13, 2004 05:41 PM

Why let the press take those photos? Could be hard to avoid when there are reporters moving with the troops, but may also resemble the way the military:

- let the press take those now-infamous photos of al Queda in orange jumpsuits arriving at Guantanamo.

- continued for months and months to make comments about possible WMD finds in Iraq until it slowly, slowly, ever so painfully dawned on them that they were being hung out to dry for even allowing the possibility that an untested substance might be WMD.

Those two examples, both completely avoidable, weren't from the same organizational source as the decision to recognize foreign observers for our recent national elections, but may flow from the same river of institutionalized stupidity.

These latest pix are probably just the start. In the Second Coming of Tet, Jenin Part Deux, every corpse and every pile of rubble will be photographed from multiple angles. We'll see them for months. All the more reason to finish clearing the Sunni Triangle before Sensitive Man starts seeing them on his TV.

It's a stretch, but I'm reminded of the decision to bivvy hundreds of troops in a single building in Beirut, and of our pre-(and continuing)-9/11 blindness. We have to get our ass kicked hard, again and again, before we even start to learn anything.

Posted by: Lastango on November 13, 2004 06:36 PM

Uh,I don't get it.
I have no problem with these photos.I believe that we are fighting the scum of humanity who arrive with an incredibly destructive agenda.
In my mind they are already dehumanized so I could not care less how they are treated.The election is over and the losers lost.These photos are proof of victory(tactical I grant but victory nonetheless).Why should we not simply accept the images merely as trophies as our predecessors always did ?
When in doubt----- what would Conan say.

Posted by: dougf on November 13, 2004 06:55 PM

I'm a Greg S. too!

It's an imposter!

Posted by: Greg on November 13, 2004 07:46 PM

Tolja.

It's just a matter of time before Falluja gets all Jenined up.

Posted by: blaster on November 13, 2004 07:51 PM

That Anja Niedringhaus is no mere tool, she's a purposeful tool.

Playing the "the sole of the foot insult" for the Arab news consumer, its like, well the Americans are running yellow capitalist dogs... er ... sorry, wrong press outfit.

Posted by: ransom on November 13, 2004 07:58 PM

I'm with doug. We didn't tape their noses so they can still breathe. What's the problem? Click away, shutterbug! I'm sure the terrorized citizens of Fallujah will be disappointed we treated them so well.

Posted by: The Black Republican on November 13, 2004 09:05 PM

Y'know, I was just sitting here watching Carnivale and drinking a Heinie when something that bothered me about those photos struck my forebrain. The corpses and clowns are in civvies. Will the AP ever mention how difficult it is to fight in a situation in which the enemy looks and dresses exactly the same as the people that you are there to protect? The same people who are killing our boys turn a corner, drop their piece and suddenly transform into innocent victims of the U.S. aggression. If the AP wishes to mantain any credibility they must present the ethos of our troops as well.

Posted by: pinky on November 13, 2004 09:53 PM

Personally, I'd like to see more of pictures like this.

Posted by: The Sanity Inspector on November 13, 2004 11:30 PM

not to mention how absurd it is that the msm showed so many pictures of abu ghraib (some of which were fakes!) but are not now showing many pictures of the serious torture that the marines have uncovered in falluja...

Posted by: lemberg on November 14, 2004 11:58 AM

Just compare todays ABCNews.com's headlines with FoxNews.com
ABC- 31 U.S. Troops Killed So Far in Fallujah
Fox- Taking Control

Maybe Mark Halperin feels the US Military is lying and has to be "balanced".

Posted by: Iblis on November 14, 2004 12:52 PM

I think the military is letting journalists take these pictures because their heads are still attached to their bodies and don't have bullet holes in them (in contrast to the treatment our fighters would receive)

Posted by: TC on November 14, 2004 08:11 PM

Nope, this guy's not checking to see if they're dead... they'd stopped bleeding some time before the photo was taken. Looks like he's taking a giant step over the bodies to go do some work past them. Yes, he wouldn't want to mess with them on the chance they'd been booby-trapped.

The photogs just keep that shutter clicking and pick/choose out of the multitude of snaps the very few that will ever see the light of day. All too often, taken out of context to seem to be something it isn't

Posted by: DaveK on November 15, 2004 03:28 AM

While these photos may be used for propaganda, they also serve to make opposing the USMC look like a very unglamorous proposition.

Who's going to sign up as a Warrior of Allah if this is the way you end up?

Posted by: GEAH on November 15, 2004 11:40 AM

Well, it's not that the Marines are "letting" them. It's against the Geneva Convention to take pictures of prisoners because they could be used
as propaganda. We used this frquently to taunt those imbedded reporters tavelling with us in Iraq last year.

"Hey! You can't take his picture! You wanna violate his civil rights or something?"

You could tell they wanted to though, and these pics demonstrate the fact that many of them did it on the sly. Some actually learned the ranking system to actually seek out the most junior (and naive) Marines in order to get their more outrageous material.

Posted by: Kadnine on November 15, 2004 03:38 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Recent Comments
Diogenes : "Best anti-drone weapons are also the cheapest: 12 ..."

Coelacanth : "Re targets - because I am childish, I lik reactive ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: "Best anti-drone weapons are also the cheapest: 12 ..."

Kindltot: "[i]Best anti-drone weapons are also the cheapest: ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, Buy ammo [/b] [/i]: "102 Blood Meridian is unfilmable. The book was snu ..."

Nato: "Same-ish here as 26. Took 2 juniors (.22 & .17) ou ..."

Captain Ned: "I think my Mattel Marauder was serial #7 ..."

Eromero: "Got a Rock Island. All steel 1911 format but in do ..."

Schnorflepuppy (OT but harmless) [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "Appreciate the forum as always, Weasel! ..."

RI Red : "Good night, Weasel. Thx. ..."

Ed L: "Thanks for hosting, Weasel! ..."

Weasel: "9:20 thank you time! Thank you! Hope to see ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives