Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Yasser Arafat "In Serious Condition" | Main | Inside Joke About Polling »
November 04, 2004

Obligatory Liberal Media Stories

First Obligatory Liberal Media Story: After a Republican Victory, Whine About How Terrible All This is For "Centrists." Don't Mention That It's Even More Terrible For Liberals, Because People Might Just Get to Thinking That Maybe the Republican Victory is Therefore a Good Thing, And We Don't Want Them Thinking That.

The Washington Post comes through: Rightward Shift May Squeeze Centrists.

Second Obligatory Liberal Media Story: After a Republican Victory, Declare That the Most Important Thing Republicans Do is Cede Power to Democrats and Immediately Implement a Liberal Agenda.

Of course? What else would you do after winning a hard-fought campaign, except immediately forfeit your victory the moment you've won? Why, isn't that precisely what Democrats do? The moment Jim Jeffords defected and gave the Democrats unelected but selected control of the Senate, the Democrats immediately offered to begin passing large swaths of the conservative agenda, right?

Riiiiight.

Only a real idiot can try to write this ridiculous obligatory article without busting up giggling so bad that he actually is forced to type the words "giggle, giggle" and "chuckle, chuckle," but fortunately, we have just such a real idiot. His name is Jonathan Alter.

Genius Jonathan figures out that Bush can appease "us" (i.e., liberals) by merely becoming a liberal.

Well, no kidding on that one, Jonathan. I'm sure he could. Did you figure that out all on your own?

On the other hand, what about the majority of the public that voted for Bush on the presumption he'd enact a center-right agenda? Won't they be disappointed?

Oh, yeah: Fuck 'em. They don't count.

Only God's Special Creatures, the precious, dear folk called liberals, need to be -- nay, demand to be -- appeased in such an extraodinary fashion.

We had an election. There is a winner. There is a loser. There is a winning agenda and a losing agenda.

This is the way it works, Jonathan. If you wanted to arrange some sort of power-sharing agreement where we agree we "both win" and we do splitsies down the middle, you should have negotiated terms before the election.

Not after you attempted to win it, and then, thereafter, planned on sticking it to the conservatives if you did.


posted by Ace at 01:15 AM
Comments



I HAD to quit reading Jonathan Alter years ago ...I was afraid the gag reflex was going to kill me.

Posted by: brandon davis on November 4, 2004 01:51 AM

http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/007946.php

Posted by: Dylan on November 4, 2004 02:08 AM

Ya think Kerry was counting on those last minute electoral votes from France?

This has been the most exciting and probably the most important election of my life time.
I have many memorable moments and observations.
And I would really like to hear what you will remember the most.
Here are a few of mine in no particular order.


1.) Rather-gate and the Pajamahadeen bloggers

2.) P–Diddy, Apparently Mr. Diddy has no teenagers of his own or he would have realized.
Young people are shonuff gonna show up for free concerts and kewl “Vote or Die” swag.
But stand in line for 4 hours to choose the next leader of the free world? BAHAHAHAHAHa , …attention span, duh !

3.) I found it fascinating that Kerry ran as “I’m NOT Bush” not realizing Bush was going to run AS Bush. . . perplexing isn’t it.

4.) Al Franken (insert any quote here or just repeat his name three times) ..see the misfortune of others IS funny.

5.) Moral Values issues on the ballot. I could concede gay marriage if my fellow Americans so choose, ..never if mandated by liberal judges.

6.) The fatherly spankin` Dick "Jedi Master" Cheney gave to the young padawan trial lawyer in the Veep debate.
If you listen closely you could even hear the echoes, “You don’t want to be vice-president.” . . . “No I don’t” . . . “You want to go home and rethink you life.” . . .“Y-e-s, I do”

7.) “You Know Where I Stand”, GWB at the RNC (I've never felt more proud to be an American)

8.) The utter filth of self loathing disgust Michael Moore felt at 5:00AM Nov 3rd after hearing Florida and Ohio being called for Bush and pounding down two dozen day old 7-Eleven jelly filled donuts. …damn I just made my self a little sick

9.) Zell Miller challenging Chris Mathews to a duel.

10.) Jibjab.com

11.) The mental picture of Carville & Begala manning the phones in a GOTV campaign for some city councilman down in Podunk Mississippi.

12.) The collective “OH SHIT !” coming out of every dank cave and terrorist haven from here to the Hindu Kush.


..can’t wait for Hillary in '08
-


Posted by: God Bless America on November 4, 2004 02:11 AM

I see what you mean about not being able to write that or read it with a straight face.

Utterly absent from Alter's mind is the possibility that Bush advanced these ideas because he believes in them. For a Beltway liberal, no one who is anointed President could really believe these heresies. I guess he thinks these articles of faith are just window dressing Bush can change to attract new customers.

And also inconceivable is the possibility that Bush doesn't care what liberals, centrists, and the rest of the world think of him:

"Bush claims not to worry about his place in history. This is disingenuous. Every president does. If he wants to secure his legacy and defy expectations, he will move quickly toward the center and stay there. This would require some shocking appointments—Joe Biden as secretary of State? Bill Clinton as Mideast negotiator? A moderate Supreme Court chief justice?—but making them would do much to calm the waters in Washington."

"Calm the Waters"? This is much like the incessant cry for "stability" in the Middle East. Stability and calm waters and detente are just not in our interest.

Posted by: See-Dubya on November 4, 2004 02:13 AM

GBA--

I'm going to remember that crack in the Tom Brokaw mask when he said, "we're going to go to commerc--oh, wait (cocks head as voice in earpiece speaks, the briefest flash of a 'well, f*ck me' look)...no we're not, because NBC is going to call Ohio for George W. Bush!"

Posted by: See Dubya on November 4, 2004 02:18 AM


Calm what waters? The republicans own the congress, the majority of the people want Bush and right/middle morals and ideals. Plus more than anything else, they don't want to give up their freedom to some liberal government that wants to take care of them "from the cradle to the grave". The reason liberals actually expect Bush to suddenly flop to Liberal views is that they think the ones who voted him in office are too stupid to realize that he did it. Appoint Biden of Clinton to any office? This is utterly laughable....what do these people do to their brains? Is their comtempt for our intelligence really that deep?

Posted by: calex59 on November 4, 2004 02:20 AM

hehe

heheheheh

I'd like to say something witty. But I can's seem to stop laughing.

Posted by: krakatoa on November 4, 2004 02:33 AM

Calex59--

Yes, it really is that deep.

What waters, indeed. More like, "If you let us go, I'll bring back the sun!"

(What's that from?)

Posted by: See Dubya on November 4, 2004 02:43 AM

damn. I know that. It's not Three Amigos, is it?

Posted by: ace on November 4, 2004 02:46 AM

Got it.

Spies Like Us, right? I know it's Chevy Chase.

Posted by: ace on November 4, 2004 02:46 AM

okay, no need to answer. I needed to know, and so I imdb'd.

I know he says that in Spies Like Us, but I can't remember the context. Maybe when they're captured by the Mujahadin?

Posted by: ace on November 4, 2004 02:48 AM

Yeah. The muj surround them and Chevy quickly and confidently says (as I remember it instead of the way IMDB had it) "Let us go, and I'll bring back the sun."

And then he says "Here's a picture of my sister. If you let us go you can have her. I hear she's quite good." That's what I'm waiting for from the left. I want that picture of their sister. (metaphorically speaking--their sisters are probably ugly.)

Posted by: See-Dubya on November 4, 2004 03:05 AM

I remember the first George Bush complaining about media bias in 1992 - "Annoy the media, reelect Bush" he used to say - and getting tackled for it. Now this time around the second George Bush makes that crack about media credibility, and wins anyway. The times they are a-changin'.

Posted by: Brian on November 4, 2004 03:48 AM

I really see this as less of a plea for Bush to move toward the center than a nod and a wink to the Dems for a new Watergate. Notice how much time he spends talking about scandals and failed second terms? I seriously think that this is where the Dems are going to go (possibly trying to imply that Bush knew about 9/11) and they've got a bitter man who--unlike Gore--is still in office to lead them.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 4, 2004 05:22 AM

Sean, Kerry tried to fry Reagan with Iran-Contra and then tried to get another shot at Bush in 1988 with his drugs & terrorism subcommittee. He couldn't make anything stick.

We've got nothing to worry about from Lurch on that score.

Posted by: See-Dubya on November 4, 2004 05:26 AM

So those who think we should appease the terrorists, now think that after losing they should be appeased as well?

Posted by: Chuck on November 4, 2004 07:00 AM

Jeebus, Jonathan, I'm already having enough trouble keeping track of which one of you is Jonathan Alter and which one is Eric Alterman. This isn't helping.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on November 4, 2004 08:02 AM

liberals can, in the immortal words or Eric Cartman, "Suck my balls"

Posted by: elcid on November 4, 2004 08:52 AM

Alter keeps stating that he "will not hold his breath" till Bush goes liberal. Please, please do hold your breath John. If you need help try plumbers putty, duct tape or the old standby, dry-cleaning bags.

Posted by: pinky on November 4, 2004 09:35 AM

As Arafat slips awaaaaay......

Seems that you have (1) the Democrats who "get" they have to change - the Centrists like Dodd, Lieberman, Nelson, Cantwell, Corzine....and (2) The Pelosi Democrats who deny and...well..who can put it better than Nancy Botoxi herself:

"It's not about soul-searching," said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat. "It may be about how we can educate the American people more clearly on the difference between Democrats and Republicans.

Pelosi goes on to say "the table is set" for 2006 and the Democrats have lost as much as they could lose, so a rebound is inevitable.

Bwahaaahaaa!

Is that after the ignorant masses are educated on the glories of gay marriage, French nuances, and not fighting the Islamoids so much as seeking to understand them, Nancy????? You are the perfect House minority leader!


Posted by: Cedarford on November 4, 2004 10:36 AM

Nancy Pelosi thinks the democrats have lost as much as they could lose? Dream on girl. There are plenty more democrats who will lose their jobs. Don't believe me, wait for the 06 mid terms. I'm pretty sure Jumpin Jim Jaffords will be on the ballot and I might just quit my day job to help retire him.

Posted by: Jim on November 4, 2004 10:54 AM

"He'll be a lot more aggressive in Iraq now," one Bush insider predicts."

I don't know who this is but I think they got it wrong. I suspect W was as agressive as he believed he should be, regardless of elections.

Posted by: Dug Rethuglican on November 4, 2004 11:03 AM

Dug: Well, with Powell out...

Posted by: someone on November 4, 2004 01:37 PM

"It's not about soul-searching," said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat. "It may be about how we can educate the American people more clearly on the difference between Democrats and Republicans.

Nancy, dear, did it ever fucking occur to you that the problem may be that the difference between Democrats and Republicans is already perfectly fucking lucid?

Posted by: Brian B on November 4, 2004 02:57 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Recent Comments
OrangeEnt: "Aetius, I think that The Music Man is the perfect ..."

Hour of the Wolf: "Did Disco Doof drop his dime before opening the ON ..."

four seasons : " I think penguins are cute. Argue with me. ..."

JackStraw : ">>So, just like Guinness, a touch of asperity in a ..."

Don Black: "something fishy about penguins ..."

Duncanthrax: "[i]I actually like penguins. Posted by: JackStraw ..."

JackStraw : ">>If we're all different, doesn't that make us the ..."

Pug Mahon, Gen X Dickweed: "While I fully admit I am not a soccer fan, I am lo ..."

... : "{{{Pipes}}} ..."

Bulg: "237 LOL ..."

Grayman27: "We can appreciate the economic benefits of hosting ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory: "Hell I miss Quizno Posted by: gKWVE Best cha ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives