Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« On the Trail of the Forger | Main | Why Did a Democrat Activist Seem to Know About the "Documents" Before Virtually Anyone Else? »
September 15, 2004

As Predicted: CBS News Executes Plan B

Dan Rather says:

"The truth of these documents lies in the signatures and in the content, not just the typeface and the font-style. Let me emphasize once again, these are not exact sciences. Not like DNA or fingerprints."

He is not-very-skillfully attempting to downplay the actual documents, in favor of a discussion of "their contents." In other words-- the documents may be forged, but they were forged to tell "the truth."

As many correspondents here have noted: This was also claimed by many in the liberal media in response to Fahrenheit 9-11. Sure, the film may be technically dishonest and misleading in parts; but that dishonesty is in service of a "higher truth."

Apparently CBS News will now expressly be pursuing "the higher truth" and de-emphasizing trivial "facts" and "verifiable evidence."

I have to say again: I did not seriously believe anyone would dare make such an argument a couple of days ago when I rhetorically postulated that this would be the next step.

But a week ago, I didn't believe a lot things I now understand to be the case.

As I've said, the epitaph of this story will be Everything was much worse than it seemed, even if you thought it was all pretty shoddy to begin with.


posted by Ace at 03:31 PM
Comments



Hannity just said the CBS press release has been *once* *again* rescheduled, this time for 5 pm ET.

Posted by: Tongue Boy on September 15, 2004 03:42 PM

It's kind of like what I told the judge that one time: "The truth of these $20 bills, Your Honor, lies in the denomination, not in the purple ink or the portrait of John Wilkes Booth on the front."

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on September 15, 2004 03:44 PM

As the poet asked, "how can we separate the dancer from the dance?"

How can we possibly evaluate the truth value of the content independent of the fact that they were created by a non-author, much later, with a biased view?

By the way, is this the new standard that CBS will be using when the shoe is on the other foot? When CBS is investigating?

Posted by: John S on September 15, 2004 03:48 PM

CBS: These documents are fake, but it doesn't matter, the stuff about Bush is true anyway.

Public: How do you know it's true?

CBS: These documents say so.

Public: But they're forgeries.

CBS: Maybe they are forgeries, but it doesn't matter, the stuff about Bush is true anyway.

Rinse. Repeat.

Posted by: hobgoblin on September 15, 2004 03:55 PM

Faithfully PARAPHRASED from the commie liberal afternoon radio show in my area:

'Its not really conclusive yet that these were forged...but if its true, CBS is committing the same sin that Bush did before going to war...listening to the evidence that he liked and disregarding the rest...'

The commentatore went on to mention that Killian's secretary is saying the content is true, though the memos were forged.

THEY NEVER STOP. WITH THE BULLSHIT.

Posted by: lauraw on September 15, 2004 04:02 PM

I'm beginning to think that Rather's daughter and Ben Barnes (identified as a key document authenticator) are the principal links to the source, and her political career in the leftward wing of the DemonRatic Party is directly on the line and this forged smear is the price of her admission.

In any case, they will both be subject to the most exquisitely detailed microscopic inspections by bloggers and others at every future possibility.

Posted by: recon on September 15, 2004 04:04 PM

Check out Lucianne. Your prediction confirmed.

Posted by: A on September 15, 2004 04:15 PM

If CBS manages to broaden this into a referendum on their entire story... they are still sunk. Did they happen to mention that (besides their key documents being faked) one of their key witnesses has jumped ship, and the other two are _major_ Kerry supporters with scandal ridden pasts. Its beyond hypocricy that CBS is investigating the political affiliations of opposing document examiners when they never bothered to mention that Ben Barnes is a Kerry campaign vice-chair. That is beyond bias, that is blatant willful manipulation of the political process. CBS is opening an even bigger can of worms. Look for the rats to start jumping ship, every peice of evidence they can produce is tainted badly. They will eventually be left with their unnamed sources and their phony documents and claiming that is enough. No chance.

Posted by: Mark Buehner on September 15, 2004 04:18 PM

I'm Ok Your Ok.

Do you remember that book on Transactional Analysis; The Parent, the Adult and the Child?

How about CBS, the Blogosphere and the Democrats:

Parent: Focus on a few documents in a story with bigger questions is irrelevant; I decide what's important and you better listen to me.

Adult: Speaking from the perspective of "journalism" isn't it the responsibility of a "Reporter" to ensure what is put forth as "News" is factually correct; We think truth is relevant.

Child: It's not fair, everytime we want to "do something" those pajama wearing neocons piss on our parade; You won't let us have our parade and it's not fair!?.

What's going on here is quite obvious.
Just a thought ~

Posted by: PatrickDavid on September 15, 2004 04:19 PM

I just peaked at Lucianne's site. You have got be shitting me. If CBS honestly believes that this will fly with anyone actually a member of Michael Moore's fan club, then the CBS logo needs to replace Oliver Willis's image on the Kool-Aid.

Posted by: physics geek on September 15, 2004 04:21 PM

Hey, didn't the LAPD and DA try the same thing with OJ? Since they really, really believed he was guilty, it was perfectly appropriate for the detectives to plant blood evidence to support that truth. Oh, wait a minute. That kind of backfired on them too, didn't it?

Posted by: Dacotti on September 15, 2004 04:54 PM

Not an exact science? Who else does he think he's kidding? Especially in older typewriters, the mechanical quirks of usage, metal fatigue, nicks and surface scratches on a font, have served to help convict more than one ne'er-do-well.

Whoever is offering the $10,000 for someone who can reproduce the memo on an old typewriter should feel fairly safe. I hope CBS gives an old Olympia typewriter to Dan as a going away present.

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! on September 15, 2004 05:05 PM

This has to be at least Plan F.

Posted by: Al on September 15, 2004 05:26 PM

8/15/04

Mr. Rather,

Catch up please. The story has long since moved past the phase where one proves the documents fraudulent. They are fakes, and LAST WEEK this was proved (by people wearing pajamas) in cyberspace, planet blogosphere. Events are now unfolding at the virtual speed of the pajama-hadeen typing with computer keyboards not fossilized “journalists” pecking at vintage typewriters. Time in cyber-reality unfolds in seconds to minutes, not days to weeks. The story is now about how fakes got on the air as part of a "news story" in development for five years? Would you care to answer this question? I thought not. Then I guess President Bush is not obligated to answer your “questions.” Queries based on faulty data are faulty.

The president of CBS, Andrew Heyward, no longer even tries to contend that the documents are authentic. He describes them as “accurate” (sic). By this he means that they may be fakes, but the information is (in the opinion of CBS) accurate, so it doesn't matter if Lt. Colonel Killian wrote them or not. Instead, what matters to CBS is that they believe if he had actually written documents about these issues (which genuine documents they do not have), the content would have been consistent with the content of the documents that they do have (which were written by anonymous). Additionally, the contents of these supposed documents (for which CBS has been desperately and clumsily searching for many years) would be identical to the opinions of Mr. Rather, Mr. Heyward, and CBS, perfectly fitting the gaping hole of credibility in their five-year-old story. BUT, as CBS does not have those increasingly hypothetical authentic documents, the "accurate" papers they do have DO NOT FIT the yawning chasm of veracity needed to perfect their otherwise incomplete scoop (actually the old “news” upon which they have been fixated for half a decade). There are still people looking for El Derodo, Shangri-La, and the Lost Dutchman’s Mine, so Mr. Rather, Mr. Heyward, and CBS are in like company following their “accurate” maps/documents and chasing a futile fantasy.

Lt. Colonel Killian, an authentic American hero, is not available to defend his honor, or set the record straight. He is deceased, which is incredulously advantageous for CBS. The documents were written recently in MS Word, and not in 1972 and 1973. While they contain many clumsy mistakes and inaccuracies, there are allusions in the documents to real facts as established by real documents. MY SAINTED GRANNY, this is historical fiction. CBS is writing a “tell all” historical novel and not a “news” story. Is this the basis of a mid-autumn historical docu-drama? You bet your sweet pajamas, but thankfully, CBS “News” is not the sole author of the script. Authentic Journalists, weblogers, real participants in the actual events of 1972 and 1973, and scandalized authorities/experts are rewriting the clumsy plot scripted by CBS. The real story is developing and circulating all around us, much to the bewilderment and distress of Mr. Rather and his staff. There is nothing they can do to close Pandora’s Box. Box? What Box? They are not clever enough to trick the Genie back into the bottle. Ignore those Genies behind the curtain.

Mr. Rather and Mr. Heyward, using fiction as the basis for questions about Mr. Bush’s Texas National Guard record is like blaming ones spouse for doing something wrong in a dream. Any American voter who would fall for this contemptible fraud had already decided to vote for Mr. Kerry in the first place. This story is a coffin being built by CBS to bury its long dead and rotting credibility. The longer it stays at the center of the stage for this sad burlesque show, and the longer CBS continues to defend a story based on fictions, the longer the pajama-clad weblogers, and REAL journalist will continue to drive nails into it.

Lonnie Kendall
Registered Democrat

“Caveat, this message was created in MS Word, and proud of it.”

Posted by: Lonnie Kendall on September 15, 2004 11:21 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Recent Comments
Blonde Morticia: " That's Mrs Porker to you Posted by: Hatari some ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i] I can tell you've put some serious thought int ..."

Missing Persons: "4 By the way, do they have any place where they ca ..."

fourseasons: " Influencers, What a stupid word. They say ..."

Ben Had: "The only thing I am influenced by are recipes ..."

Skip: "Can't see whiy not dump.it out in space, whats a f ..."

Rev. Wishbone: ">>>Here, try these chips fried in olestra... Po ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Can they see Judge Crater? ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Hadrian, how are you and HM and the dogs? Pos ..."

Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd: "He is definitely a guy with thoughts. Posted by ..."

Cow Demon: "As a matter of fact, I am. Posted by: Krebs v Car ..."

Blonde Morticia: " Can you imagine the 4-year long hectoring I woul ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives