Here's a crucial difference in what Ms. Knox says in the ABC interview you link above:
__

Killian's former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, told ABC News she believes the documents are fake, but that they do reflect some of what her former boss thought of then-Lt. George W. Bush.

"He did have complaints about Bush. Bush missed his physical and went off to Alabama with none of the paperwork, I remember Killian talking about that," Knox said. "But it wasn't in memo file."
__

And what she says to Drudge:

__
"I typed memos that had this information in them, but I did not type these memos."
__

So: did she ever type this stuff, or did it just exist as conversations between her and Killian? Was it "in memo file" or not? Inquiring minds want to know!

(Brightly) I want to know!

Uh, dude, your clock says TWELVE not ELEVEN.

Thanks. Getting ahead of myself.

Either that, or Karl Rove was somehow behind the incorrect date-stamp.

Cherchez le femme?

Sorry- not to hog the thread, but I want to make clear why this is important. I think it has implications for the suspect pool. For one thing If Ms. Knox NEVER typed this stuff, how could Bill Burkett later see these memos in the trash can?

Her statements are confusing and inconsistent (and therefore suspicious), but I think she says she didn't type THESE memos. I think she hints that she typed similar memos.

This may just be a cheap shot, but personally, I'd rather have seen you say your prediction is based on unimpeachable sources, and unless someone shows you definitive proof, you don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill about them.

poker me up