Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« The Dam Breaks: Washington Post Deems Documents Likely Forgeries | Main | Dan Rather: Expert Shop-A-Holic! »
September 14, 2004

The SwiftVets Said Kerry Wrote the After Action Reports...

And guess what?

He did.

Kerry was awarded the Silver Star for shooting a fleeing VC teenager in the back.

This was not a war-crime. A fleeing soldier is not a surrendering soldier; a soldier who flees is just executing a sound military strategy, and he'll be back to kill you at some other point.

So John Kerry had every right, if not the duty, to shoot the kid in the back.

I'm not suggesting he did anything wrong.

I am, however, suggesting he didn't do anything particularly noteworthy or heroic; a lot of soldiers have, in the line of duty, had to shoot fleeing or unaware enemy soldiers, and they should be commended for doing a duty that they might find distasteful on a human level.

But we don't usually award them the Silver Stars for plugging a kid in the back while not being in any danger themselves. There's a big difference between "acting above and beyond the call of duty" and "just doing what the hell you were supposed to do," after all.

The SwiftVets said that Kerry was in no danger at the time of the shooting; there were no other VC in sight. The liberal media Spirit Squad said, "But he was awarded a Silver Star! Surely there must have been danger!"

The SwiftVets said, "No, not particularly. He wrote the After Action Report, and turned a pedestrian shooting of a fleeing teenager into fraudulent heroic glory."

The liberal media said, "But you have no proof he wrote the After Action Report."

Well, guess what, now we do have the proof. And, who knows, before long perhaps we'll have the other After Action Reports as well.

I expect we'll be hearing that apology from Chris Matthews any day now.

Any. Day. Now.

From Drudge.

Facts About Kerry's Actual Vietnam Record: Visiting Hugh Hewitt's great blog I was tipped to a new blog, and a good post summarizing Kerry's real record.

The writer asks: Did Kerry serve honorably?

I think he did serve honorably. Honorably, but not eagerly, and furthermore with a somewhat indecent haste to stop serving honorably the moment he could cadge his third fakey Purple Heart; and competently and occasionally courageously, but certainly not heroically. He is indeed a "war hero" in the sense that we term almost all veterans of foreign wars "war heroes" just for doing the man's job that is defending our country; but not in the stricter sense of "war hero," the sense he and his supporters actual want us to take "war hero" to mean.

Bob Kerrey was a war hero. If you read about what he did, you're actually taken aback by the grit and guts of his deeds.

John Kerry was a guy who attempted to get a deferrment to go to grad school in Paris (natch) and then, faced with the option of being drafted into the very-dangerous infantry, "volunteered" for what he believed would be non-combat service. And then, after serving only four months of a one year tour, he contrived three bogus Purple Hearts, asskissed his way back home, and began calling his fellow veterans murderers, butchers, and rapists.

He served honorably but not heroically in Vietnam. After returning to the United States, he served monstrously.

Checking My Work Update: A correspondent asks, "Where does it say in the report that it was written by John Kerry?"

Actually, to my eyes, it doesn't. There may be some military sort of code indicating it was composed by the OINC (which would be Kerry), but I know nothing of that.

I guess, with all of the SHOW YOUR WORK demands of the blogosphere I should have been more cautious about that.

Nevertheless, Itznewstome saw the TV report which disclosed the AAF, and he says the reporter's commentary attributed the AAF to John Kerry.

That's not actual first-hand evidence; that's just relying on a reporter's say-so (something we should be pretty cautious about doing). But it does seem that the reporter on the story, at least, determined it was written by John Kerry, though I can't say how or why he determined that.

I'll keep my eye on this. If it turns out the attribution to Kerry is shaky at all, I'll retract and correct and apologize. Unlike Dan Rather, I won't demand "definitive" evidence that I spoke too quickly.


posted by Ace at 02:46 AM
Comments



I'd throw that medal away too.

Posted by: See-dubya on September 14, 2004 02:56 AM

Fraudulent awards is nothing new in the armed forces. The egos of the world that stake their soul on being recognized will push and push until they get their 15 minutes. I know it happens now and am sure it happened then.

I, for one, am not holding my breath.....

Posted by: Todd Baker on September 14, 2004 03:06 AM

Those documents are obvious fakes. The military was only using Times New Roman at that time.

Posted by: Milty on September 14, 2004 03:42 AM

Ace:
Kudos on striking the right tone in this. Service in Vietnam good, calling fellow soldiers rapists and murderers bad.

Posted by: Brett on September 14, 2004 08:37 AM

Can someone point out it where it is indicated that Kerry authored this document? I'm dense...

Posted by: robert on September 14, 2004 09:59 AM

I had the same question as Robert. Also, if Kerry wrote the submitted AAR, how does that report support the contention that Kerry jiggered up the report to get a medal? I'm unclear in what way this AAR furthers the theme that Kerry falsified his way to his medals.

Posted by: Dave Pasquino on September 14, 2004 11:28 AM

as am I, an after action report is not the same thing as a citation for award. Any leader writes a AAR as a learning tool, outlining what they did in the mission or training, and how it could have been done better. Did kerry write his own award citation?

Posted by: james on September 14, 2004 01:50 PM

I forget where I've seen the codes that defined who was whom for these reports, but on the fifth line of that document it says:

"FM CTE ONE NINE FOUR PT FIVE PT FOUR PT FOUR"

That is the "from" line.

Posted by: Deb on September 14, 2004 02:51 PM

Rats, Deb beat me! I also noticed the sender designator code was 1-94, indicating the sender was CO, PT 94.

Hope that resolves your question on Kerry writing the action reports, Ace!

As for Dave Pasquino and James question on how this all correlates into medals, the AARs were the official record of the engagement with the enemy, that all awards of valor were derived from. That is just another reason why the core moral values taught to every officer earning a commission is that an "officer will neither lie, cheat, nor steal". High trust and latitude is placed on the integrity of officers and NCOs in the US military, and punishment is harsh for those falling short. It has to be that way, because our military just cannot function without absolute confidence on the word of an officer and gentleman(gal) in weighty matters.

We know Kerry lied in other AARs written, like his sampan incident when he claimed they took out 5 VC, when the truth was they greased a kid and her mother. In this one, he oddly enough told the truth as the Swifties claimed it was. That he shot a wounded VC in the back as he was crawling on the ground, after initially taking some fire, but was part of a heavy force of 70 or so soldiers cleaning out 5-7 VC irregulars. That shouldn't have merited a Silver Star, but Kerry somehow got the award finagled, and then puffed up the incident to where he supposedly courageously turned his boat into heavy fire against a vastly numerical force. Kerry's coup de grace amounted to 1 of the 4 enemy KIA, and only 2 VC survivors were spotted fleeing into the treeline from the 6 dozen well armed men engaging them.

Now, as a former soldier, I note there is absolutely nothing wrong with killing a wounded enemy attempting to escape. That is standard operating procedure under rules of engagement. Kerry did his duty that day. But he wrote the AAR in a way that made his role the centerpiece of the report, harvested a Silver Star for something that he displayed minimal, if any valor, in the face of danger, in doing. Then had some Senatorial "juice" applied to rewrite, and modify the original citation until he was a nautical version of Audie Murphy.

Posted by: cedarford on September 14, 2004 06:36 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Forgotten 70s Mystery Click
You made me cry
when you said good-bye

70s, not 50s
Now that is a motherflipping intro
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD wonder about the Chaos that Trump is creating in the minds of the Iranian junta, Virginia redistricting is pure power grab, Ilhan Omar is many things ...and stupid too! Amazon censoring conservative thought again, and the UK...put a fork in it!
NYT Melts Down Over Texas Rangers Statue Outside... Texas Rangers' Stadium
"The Athletic posted a lengthy article about a statue outside Globe Life Field, presenting a virtue-signaling moral grievance as unbiased news coverage." [CBD]
Important Message from Recent Convert to Christianity and Yet Super-Serious Christian Tuq'r Qarlson: Actually Muslims love Jesus, it's Trump and his neocons who hate him
Tucker Carlson Network
@TCNetwork

The people in charge [Jews, of course -- ace] don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.

Islam reveres Him as a major prophet and messenger of the Lord, believes He performed miracles, and states that He will return to Earth to defeat the Antichrist. That's why Donald Trump's painting depicting himself as the Son of God offended the president of Iran. It was an attack on his religion as well as Christianity.

Trump's trolling tweet was ill-advised, but Tucker is just lying when he claims the Christianity-hating President of Iran was "offended" by this.
He's one step away from announcing his official conversion to Islam. He literally never stops praising Islam. Well, he suddenly became Christian two years ago, there's not much stopping him from converting again.
You can track Tuq'r's official conversion to Islam with this Bingo card.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk Orban losing, but is it the end of Hungary? The Irish start a brawl, but is it enough, Pope Leo wades into politics, Trump calls Iran's bluff and blockades Hormuz, Artemis II! Swallwell is scum, and more!
People say that the bearded man in the video of Fartwell molesting a hooker looks like Democrat Arizona Senator Rueben Gallego, said to be Swalwell's "best friend" and known to take vacations with him.
@KFILE 21m

Politico is reporting that multiple people have abruptly resigned from Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign: "Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell's top liaison to organized labor groups."

So the campaign is collapsing due to the truth of the sexual harassment allegations.
That hissing sound you hear is the air going out of the Swalwell campaign. UPDATE: No it wasn't, it was just Swalwell one-cheek-sneaking out a fart on camera
Eric Swalwell more like Eric Farewell amirite
thanks to weft-cut loop.
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
Recent Comments
Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "5th! ..."

mindful webworker - the wait is over: "“We never live; we are always in the expecta ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "1 ..."

COMountainMarie : "Yay! ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "229 223 So whom does God root for in the Super Bow ..."

...: "So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? Po ..."

four seasons: " Bulg, I believe God doesn't root for anyone ..."

mikeski: "[i]So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? P ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Those ships would be good for repatriating Somalia ..."

Bulg: "223 So whom does God root for in the Super Bowl? ..."

And?: "What if you wasted the gifts you were given becaus ..."

mikeski: "[i]I just don’t think that God cares about t ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives