| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Mid-Morning Art Thread
The Morning Report — 5/ 8/26 Daily Tech News 8 May 2026 Thursday Overnight Open Thread - May 7, 2026 [Doof] Thursday Cafe US Assets Counter-Attack Iranian Fast Boats Quick Hits Tennessee Passes New Gerrymandered Map Which Will, Hopefully, Eliminate the Last Democrat-Held Congressional Seat Gavin Newsom Gave $40 Million in California Taxpayer Dollars to an Islamist Hate Group Who Advised Muslims to Call for the Death of Jews Privately, But Avoid Saying So on Public Media As the Likely All-Time Star Wars Box Office Failure Mandalorian and Grogu Is Set to Bomb on May 22, Lunatic Abortion-Thirsty Former Celebrity Mark Hamill Publicly Prays for the Death of the President Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« RNC Video Documents Kerry's Changeable Beliefs About War and Peace |
Main
| Brilliantly Funny Piece at NRO's The Corner »
July 27, 2004
ABC/WashPo Shock Poll: Bush Gaining BigDoes that headline, errrm, overstate the findings of the poll? Well, I'm thinking about applying to the New York Times as a political reporter; I'm emulating Adam Nagourney. I plan to use that headline as one of my "clips." But, in all seriousness, it's the internals that really surprise. Kerry has lost support against Bush in trust to handle five of six issues tested in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, including terrorism, Iraq, taxes and even health care. And Kerry's ratings on personal attributes — honesty, strong leadership, consistency, empathy and others — have softened as well. ... The bottom line has shifted only very subtly. Head-to-head, the Massachuestts senator has slipped from a slight lead in late June to a dead heat today, with 49 percent support for Bush and 48 percent for Kerry among registered voters. Including Ralph Nader, it's 48 percent-46 percent-3 percent. Better but not good. But hang on there. Here's the really stunning part. Asked who the voters trusted to better handle issues... Terrorism B55 v. K37 (was 48 v. 47 -- that's a 17 point swing) Taxes B49 v K43 (was 41 v. 53 -- that's a stunning reversal) Health Care B44 v. K47 (was 38 v. 56 -- from a trouncing to near-parity) Iraq B52 v K40 ( was 49 v 47 -- a nine point swing) Education B44 v K45 (was 43 v 52 -- nine-point deficit to near-parity) Economy B47 v K46 (was 45 v 50 -- five point deficit to near parity, slightly ahead) I don't know if this poll is right or one of the 5% that will just be wrong, but it seems to me that Kerry can't win when he's behind big on the war, slightly behind on the economy, and only slightly ahead on the Mommy issues. An improving economy and the handover of authority in Iraq are among the likely factors influencing these assessments. So, too, is the attention focused on terrorism by the release of the Sept. 11 commission report last week. The nation's response to 9/11 has been Bush's finest hour in public approval; focus on it accrues to his advantage. Probably the single most important advance for Bush on the issues in this poll is his rating for handling terrorism. Fifty-seven percent of Americans now approve, up from 50 percent last month. And registered voters trust Bush over Kerry to handle terrorism by 55 percent to 37 percent, compared with an even split, 48 percent to 47 percent, a month ago. Among specific groups that are key to Kerry's chances, since June he has lost 13 points among women in trust to handle terrorism, 11 points among moderates and eight points among independents. Who do women, moderates, and Independents trust on terrorism? Women B46 v K43 (was 40 v 56 -- nice turnaround) ... On the economy, public perceptions, while hardly enthusiastic, are their best (46 percent positive, 53 percent negative) in ABC/Post polls since July 2001. And Bush's approval rating for handling the economy, while not good, is better — up eight points since March, to 47 percent. Economic sentiment was vastly more sour at this time in 1992, when Bush's father was on his way to losing a second term. This President Bush does remain vulnerable on his economic performance; 41 percent of Americans say most people have gotten worse off financially since he took office, while just 15 percent say most people are better off. That "worse off" number, though, is down from a high of 52 percent last fall — and it was worse still, 61 percent, in summer 1992. Lots of good stuff here. No Matter How Cynical I Try To Be, I Just Can't Keep Up Update: Kerry is Unelectable calls shenanigans on this poll, for an interesting reason: This is meant to give the appearnace of a John Kerry boost after the convention. There will be no real gain for Kerry, the media have recognized that, and now they are doing their damnedest to manufacture one. Kerry has to have some kind of momentum post convention or else everyone will recognize he has no chance of winning and Donks will be discouraged and won't show on Nov.2. This poll is completely false. Hmmmm... I don't know. I guess we'll have some idea in a week. posted by Ace at 03:34 PM
CommentsOh what a great time for a campaign to "go dark." This guy is Karl Rove's dream come true. This guy might remove the term "McGovern-esque loss" from the lexicon. Posted by: Paul C. on July 27, 2004 04:09 PM
This poll is total bullshit. This is meant to give the appearnace of a John Kerry boost after the convention. There will be no real gain for Kerry, the media have recognized that, and now they are doing their damnedest to manufacture one. Kerry has to have some kind of momentum post convention or else everyone will recognize he has no chance of winning and Donks will be discouraged and won't show on Nov.2. This poll is completely false. Posted by: Kerry Is Unelectable on July 27, 2004 04:25 PM
This is good, but I'm waiting for about about Andrew Sullivan and his goddamn donkey. It's so cutesy I want to puke up three feet of small intestine. Posted by: Jeff B. on July 27, 2004 04:41 PM
It was ast month's poll that was completely rigged. Bush was behind even on the tax issue, which would be a first for a Republican. I think this month's is legit. So the "improvements" are bogus. Whether they took a legit poll this time because they were embarrassed last time, or to give Kerry a perceived bounce in next month's poll is up in the air. Just don't get excited by the movement. (Of course it could just be sampling error. I just don't buy it though. A Republican behind on the tax issue would be just about an impossible result to get if the sample was in fact unbiased.) Posted by: Mark on July 27, 2004 04:44 PM
On that Donkey, I think MeTooThen mentioned that earlier. I almost put it into a post, but I'm sure Sullivan would say that the Donkey is just there to signify this is donk convention week, and that there'll be an elephant there at the end of August. I sort of wanted to use it anyway, because he pisses me off so much, but I decided it was just stretching too much to claim that that donkey means what it may easily be taken to mean. Sullivan might mean that. He might be being cute about it. But it's hard to refute his inevitable defense. Posted by: ace on July 27, 2004 04:48 PM
The more of Kerry that people see, the less they like him. He'd do better by hiding in an underground bunker between now and the election and let the 527s do all his campaigning for him. Posted by: Conrad on July 27, 2004 05:44 PM
I just don't trust this poll.It SEEMS wrong.I have never believed short of the world coming to an end that Kerry could win but the rot in the system is a lot deeper than I would have believed,so it will be close. Posted by: dougf on July 27, 2004 06:24 PM
First, it's just one poll. If the poll had shown Kerry heading for a landslide, it would be dismissed as a statistical anomaly. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true…. That said, whatever I think of the reputation of WAPO/ABC, THEY think of themselves as paragons of journalistic virtue. I just don't see them setting up a poll as part of a pro-Kerry conspiracy. I think that they are loathe to admit how poor a snapshot polls give (especially when it is one of their own), so they are essentially reporting this as "news" and not "noise". Finally, so much will change in the wake of the near-inevitable terrorist attack pre-election. Everything that happens between now and such an attack is only relevant in how it sets up public opinion in the wake. Given the inherent unpredictability of such an attack in terms of time, place, scope, and success, I would say that the ability of both sides to position themselves politically post-attack fall somewhere between minimally effective and counter productive. What to do? My recommendation is for Bush partisans and surrogates to do as much as possible to remind the public of what the terrorists would be trying to accomplish with such an attack, change our government. If you have any doubt about who you think should be president, it's a good rule of thumb to find the guy your enemies prefer and vote against him. Posted by: David on July 27, 2004 06:48 PM
Clearly, we have to get rid of Independent women to pull this off. I've alerted the VRWC. Posted by: jeff on July 27, 2004 07:05 PM
Also, remember: "close", i.e., within 1-2 percentage points means "within the margin of error of the poll". Posted by: Nathan on July 27, 2004 07:27 PM
I don't think it's intentionally rigged either. Kerry has been slipping slightly for a while now, and his inability to get a bounce from Edwards or the backspin they've tried to put on the 911 report may be prophetic. If he doesn't get a bounce from the convention he's toast. The networks refusal to televise it is their attempt to keep the people from finding out what an ass he actually is. If they covered the whole thing, ordinary dems would stay away frrom the polls in droves and the "independants" would find themselves in the "decided" column. Posted by: Dacotti on July 27, 2004 08:37 PM
"Close" could very well mean "big GOP lead". Remember how "close" it was just prior to the 1994 elections? Posted by: rdbrewer on July 27, 2004 09:13 PM
Well, it's possible that this poll is the anomaly, or that last month's poll is the anomaly, or that both polls are accurate and that Kerry's numbers really are falling compared to Bush. Does the prior trend for this poll show last month's numbers as being way out of whack? Personally, I think it is entirely possible that Kerry has slipped this much. My recollection is that Kerry's standing rises when he is off the stage and Bush is on (mostly because coverage of Bush is primarily negative in the media). For the past couple of weeks and all of this week, it has been all Kerry, all the time. Kerry isn't the "unnamed Democrat" from 2003 anymore. It's all downhill from here for him. Posted by: Ross on July 27, 2004 11:37 PM
I'm having a little trouble with this myself. Bush practically tied on healthcare? Before they've even begun to carpet-pander with the Medicare handouts? As I see it, the Bushies have been holding their powder on healthcare and education, so there has to be something else at work here. My guess would be the fools and crooks Kerry surrounds himself with are taking their toll, and picking that empty suit for VP hasn't helped. We knew our mediocrity would surround himself with capable and effective henchmen; their mediocrity's been scraping the barrel. If it's even remotely accurate, the poll's just terrible news for Kerry supporters. Posted by: spongeworthy on July 28, 2004 08:57 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Democrat Congresswoman Sara Jacobs cites Me-Again Kelly, Cavernous Nostrils, Alex Jones and Tuq'r Qarlson as proof that concerns about Trump's mental health are "bipartisan"
As Bonchie from Red State says: Know the op when you see it.
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain Recent Comments
NR Pax:
"[i] and advancing "nuclear family" policies rooted ..."
Auspex: " "Trainspotting" is a 30 year old film that showe ..." rickb223 [/b][/s][/u][/i]: "Cohutta Police Department and fired all 10 Less ..." Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]How many are paid off by IRGC? Posted by: runn ..." It's me donna : " How many are paid off by IRGC? Posted by: runne ..." runner: "House Democrats, led by the Congressional Progress ..." TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "335 I'm not familiar with British elections or suc ..." ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "[snip] Lawmakers involved in the war powers eff ..." Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "Karen Bass is a [s]key player[/s] [b]pawn[/b] in t ..." Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]He does not belong in congress. . @RepThomasMa ..." dantesed: "I'm not familiar with British elections or such. B ..." TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "331 Shawn Farash @Shawn_Farash Thomas Massie fe ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|