Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« 1) Find Expired Horse. 2) Pummel. 3) Repeat. | Main | Iran Captures Three British Boats »
June 21, 2004

What If?

In 1942, we began a preemtive war against Nazi Germany, a nation that had not yet attacked us.

But what if we had not? What if we had allowed the Nazi regime to consolidate its gains in Europe, and allowed its scientists to continue developing horrifically advanced machines of war?

I have seen a glimpse of our alternative future-past, and it's not pretty.

EasternFront.jpg

Thanks to Dave, who tipped me to a Star Wars toy enthusiast who clearly has too much time on his hands.


posted by Ace at 02:36 PM
Comments



"Ace. I am your father."

Posted by: Darth Vader on June 21, 2004 02:53 PM

Glad I could help Ace!

Dave
Arlington, Virginia

Posted by: Dave on June 21, 2004 02:57 PM

I have some teddy bears that would have joined a teddy bear army and whipped those Germans in the alternative future past.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 21, 2004 03:03 PM

Looks like someone gave in to the dork side of the farce.

Thank you! Got a million of 'em, all bad! Next show's at 9:00!

Posted by: ccwbass on June 21, 2004 03:37 PM

Wow, how cool would that have been?!?

Posted by: Deguoren on June 21, 2004 03:44 PM

Dang it, we weren't supposed to defeat the Nazis until AFTER we captured their ATAT technology!

Posted by: Aaron on June 21, 2004 03:50 PM

Aaron,

Who says we didn't capture the AT-AT technology?

Now who's being naive.

Posted by: ace on June 21, 2004 03:51 PM

I hope I'm just being naive. But if we did get the technology, my next concern is that we get cool helmets like the AT-AT drivers had. Of course, the TIE fighter pilot helmets were the same shape, but done in black, and I thought that was overall more effective in the whole bad-assery category.

Posted by: Aaron on June 21, 2004 04:19 PM

"Now who's being naive."

Next thing you'll tell me is that the late Warren Burger wasn't a stripper.

Posted by: Aaron on June 21, 2004 04:22 PM

Actually, the single stupidest mistake of the entire war was Germany's declaration of war against the US in support of its ally Japan on 08 Dec 1941.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega on June 21, 2004 04:24 PM

As Raoul points out, the US did not declare premptive war on Nazi Germany, quite the contrary.

Posted by: Dave Pasquino on June 21, 2004 04:52 PM

Oh, please. Yes, I know that.

This is a post about Nazi AT-AT's on the Eastern front, for crying out loud. I'd say I'm taking more liberties with history than fudging the chronology of our declaration of war against Hitler.

Besides, whether they "declared" war or not, they hadn't attacked us yet. Saddam effectively had declared war on us, but hadn't attacked us yet.

I changed "declared war" to "began a war" to avoid the argument.

Posted by: ace on June 21, 2004 04:58 PM

"I changed 'declared war' to 'began a war' to avoid the argument."

REVISIONIST HISTORIAN! HOW DARE YOU ATTACK MICAH SANCHES ETRUSCAN WRIGHT (or whatever his name is) FOR DOING THE EXACT SAME THING YOU JUST DID!!!

/liberal shriek

Posted by: Aaron on June 21, 2004 05:20 PM

I demand an apology from Ace!

Posted by: on June 21, 2004 05:31 PM

Dave,

It really was cool. Star Wars technology has always had a WWII flyboy feel, and putting the AT-AT's in control of Hitler's Reich just seems to work.

Posted by: ace on June 21, 2004 06:41 PM

Does this mean the stormtroopers would really look like stormtroopers? And more importantly, would they finally be able to HIT WHAT THEY AIM AT!

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids on June 22, 2004 01:34 AM

Hmmm...I thought they had attacked us. Didn't they torpedo a handful of our merchant ships and maybe even a convoy escort destroyer in the Atlantic?

Not like I can remember what I did last week, so how can I expect to remember stuff about WWII?

Posted by: rudejelly on June 22, 2004 08:31 AM

USS Ruben James was sunk approximately 0525 on 31 October 1941 off Iceland. Woody Guthrie wrote a song about it. An article on Ruben James, the ships named after him, and the words to the song can be found behind my nom du blog.

Posted by: fox2! on June 23, 2004 06:10 PM

Hmmm, what good is "walker" technology when a couple of Ewoks with a strong rope can make it trip?

Posted by: The Wandering Mind on April 7, 2005 09:38 AM

Those were the small scout walkers (AT-ST?) that were tripped by the Ewoks. The AT-ATs, as pictured, would have no problems crushing Ewok villages, although they would have difficulty navigating in a dense forrest.

Posted by: Keyser on April 7, 2005 07:53 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Damn, RMBS. Here, but serving grilled London b ..."

RI Red : "5 GTs in a month. Thanks, Weasel! ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: ">>> As of Friday, I am armed with the first firear ..."

Ed L: "Hello, Weasel! ..."

Pug Mahon, Trumpy can do magic: "Grass fed is different. I like both corn finished ..."

RI Red : "Damn, RMBS. Here, but serving grilled London bro ..."

Skip: "Good evening everyone ..."

Jackson K.: "98 >>"...certain PA Dutch processed meats..." S ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Gub nood. ..."

RI Red : "Here! ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Evenin', Weasel. ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "st! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives