Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Friday Night Cowbell | Main | Oh, That Liberal Media »
June 05, 2004

Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States, Dies in California

R.I.P., Dutch.

For my part, all I can say is that I didn't appreciate Reagan when he was President, as I was young, irresponsible, and stupid. In other words, I was a liberal, or at least I thought I was.

But I still remember clearly my Reagan moment, the moment I realized that maybe this guy wasn't so stupid, evil, or crazy as often claimed. A lot of people had had their Reagan moment in November 1980-- that's how he got elected, after all. Mine took a while.

Right after the Libyans had blown up flight 103 (or whatever outrage they'd perpetrated), Reagan, of course, went on TV to announce that we were bombing Tripoli.

I remember listening to a radio station that night, the one I favored at the time, which was a college alternative/punk station. And I thought those DJ's were pretty cool. They played the Flying Lizards and Camper Van Beethoven and, once in a while, just to mix it up, even the Sweet's Barroom Blitz.

Anyway, they were all droning on and on as if it were a funeral for a king, how horrible it was that America was retaliating, how terrible it was that we had a warmonger idiot for President.

And I remember having a frenzy of cognitive dissonance. I wanted to agree with them, I wanted to believe the received wisdom of the hate-America left, I wanted to parrot the sophisticated blather of the intellectual swells. Or even the swells who ran dinky radio stations.

So even as I strained to get as outraged about the attack on Tripoli as they did (and of course I don't even need to mention they weren't outraged at all about the bombing of flight 103; they didn't even mention it between songs), I couldn't help noticing that the things they were saying, while undoubtedly true, were also undoubtedly the worst bullshit I ever heard in my young life.

They blew up an airplane, killing hundreds of Americans-- and the crime here was that we were bombing the bombers?

This is all so very terrible, said the good-boy liberal part of my brain.

Are you out of your fucking mind?! asked a different part of my brain, this part less socially-acceptable but also a great deal more sensible and vital.

Within a couple of hours of going back and forth, I decided the first part of my brain was a fucking hippie fruitcake, and really ought not be consulted on solemn matters of foreign policy.

I think that was the first psychic shock that disturbed me out of my complacent, sheep-like belief in liberalism. There would be more to follow (Michael Dukakis pretty much sealed the deal), but it was Reagan's defiant resolve against terrorism in 1986 that set me on the path to questioning the received wisdom of the left and then finally rejecting it.

Thanks for understanding what so many of your intellectual "superiors" couldn't or wouldn't-- that when bad men attack America, good men attack back. The enemy in war isn't "violence," as the left claims. The enemy in war is the fucking enemy. Period.

Thanks for that airstrike, Dutch.

Update: Stix has a compilation of Reagan quotes, some embarassing and the type offered by liberals as proof of his stupidity, but most of them inspiring or humorous.

John Hawkins of Right Wing News has reaction from the blogosphere, and a reprint of a tribute he wrote on Reagan's 92nd birthday.

I Read the NYT Obituary So That You Don't Have To: This is a Kausfiles schtick, but a good one. Here's a part I liked, regarding Reagan's job as a baseball radio announcer:

His commentary became an exercise of imagination; he never saw any of the games he described so vividly. Instead, he recreated them from telegraphic reports from Chicago. In his 1965 autobiography, Mr. Reagan described what happened the day the wire went dead: "I had a ball on the way to the plate and there was no way to call it back. At the same time, I was convinced that a ball game tied up in the ninth inning was no time to tell my audience we had lost contact with the game." He proceeded to give meticulous descriptions of what may be the longest series of foul balls in baseball history, even describing in detail the redheaded boy who scrambled for a souvenir ball. It was a story he loved to tell.

The rest of the obit is typical liberal crap. They use a very unflattering quote from liberal historian (of course) Lou Cannon to describe his famous, political-star-making speech on behalf of Goldwater:

On Oct. 27, 1964, a washed-up 53-year-old movie actor named Ronald Reagan made a speech on national television on behalf of a Republican presidential candidate who had no chance to be elected. . . . Most of Reagan's address was standard, antigovernment boilerplate larded with emotional denunciations of Communism and a celebration of individual freedom. His statistics were sweeping and in some cases dubious. His best lines were cribbed from Franklin Roosevelt, and he quoted from nearly everybody else as well."

Yes, yes. It was the speech that made him Governor of California two years later, and President of the United States sixteen years later. Obviously, it was pap.

No lines from this historic speech are quoted, of course.

And his years in office? Why, even in an obituary, the liberal take on Reagan is the only take offered:

Washington had not seen a president like Ronald Reagan for a long time. He showed no lust for power. He seemed to have no need to prove that he could work harder, or longer, on less sleep than anybody. Where his predecessor was criticized for involving himself in every detail, Mr. Reagan was a 9-to-5 president, a chairman of the board.

He delegated authority to his staff. Associates said he left details to subordinates and tended to rely on 3-by-5 index cards that they gave him for information he needed at meetings. He paced himself, got a good night's sleep and took afternoon naps when he could.

Ah. A dunce and a slacker who liked to take naps and knock off early.

Don't bother reading this crap.

Oh wait, you weren't going to bother anyway.



posted by Ace at 04:56 PM
Comments



Rest in peace Ronny. I might not be American, but i know greatness when i see it. And you were definately one of the greats.

Posted by: madne0 on June 5, 2004 05:24 PM

Saved the US economy and the West in the Cold War. Revived and emboldened the GOP and Conservatism. Freed 400 million slaves of Communism.

Kept the pundits scratching their pointy heads and outfoxed us all, even at the end.

Quiet, confident, courageous, and an unequaled leader.

RIP, President Reagan.

Posted by: Sharkman on June 5, 2004 05:31 PM

I remember hearing his radio program when I was in college in 1976. In 1981, I was not sure what his conservatism really meant. By 1989, I had grown to love him. God bless Ronald Reagan, his family and his loved ones.

Posted by: Tim Roberts on June 5, 2004 06:02 PM

He has gone to a better place. I once heard someone say that Ronald Reagan was proof that God still loves the USA. He certainly did a lot to make this world a better place, we all owe him.

Posted by: Marty on June 5, 2004 06:07 PM

I am saddened.

Posted by: Beck on June 5, 2004 06:32 PM

Anti-Cowbell news, indeed.

Ronald "Ray-Gun" Reagan, rest in peace. You were a great man.

So, when do we start the great Liberal Purge of 2004?

Posted by: Xoxotl on June 5, 2004 06:37 PM

Is it possible to toll a cowbell? Didn't think so.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on June 5, 2004 06:47 PM

Rest in Peace, Mr. Reagan, and pray for all of us still here facing another evil that threatens our civilization.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix on June 5, 2004 06:48 PM

@ Sharkman...ditto!

Thankyou President Reagan...you left the world a better place. Condolences to the family.

Posted by: terrier on June 5, 2004 07:32 PM

I love ya Ace, and I typed this one out to prove Ronnie was a conservative, but not QUITE a republican! Check out our post and see if there is anything worth listening to. God rest the 'Great Communicator's' soul. www.thefoggiestidea.com

Posted by: stuttgartcad on June 5, 2004 07:57 PM

Rest in peace, Mr. President. You will be missed.

Posted by: Scout on June 5, 2004 09:06 PM

To Teflon Ron, keeper of such faith not even the mighty US media could shake; thank you for the Free World.

Posted by: lauraw on June 5, 2004 10:16 PM

He was the perfect man for the job, and he came along at the perfect time. Look at his life. He was molded by God to be President at a critical time in the country's history.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 5, 2004 10:40 PM

Amen, Ace.

Hopefully, he is allowed to rest in peace. But I'm bracing myself for the inevitable ugliness that rears its head after the mourning period ends.

Let's hope not. But we know better.

Posted by: Sonofnixon on June 5, 2004 10:57 PM

No need to wait for ugliness. The New York Times had a hit piece already written.

For example:

"The former House speaker, Thomas P. O'Neill Jr., Democrat of Massachusetts, said of Mr. Reagan: "Most of the time he was an actor reading lines who
didn't understand his own programs. I hate to say it about such an agreeable man, but it was sinful that Ronald Reagan ever became president."

Also, I read that Reagan's economic boom was the Decade of Greed (Ace had a nice post about this a couple weeks ago).

Mr. O'Neill, who served in much of Mr. Reagan's tenure, said he had "known every president since Harry Truman and there's no question in my mind that Ronald Reagan was the worst." But, he added, "he would have made a hell of a king."

Posted by: Clark on June 5, 2004 11:44 PM

Yeah, we knew it was coming. (the ugliness) Just shows where their hearts are...so much for compassion huh?

If that's how Mr. O'neil wants to remember him, okay. But I know charisma when I see it, and Reagan was the epitome. I'll always remember him saying, "A message to terrorists everywhere: You can run, but you can't hide."

We defended him while Comrade Streisand and Comrade Brolin tried to slander him, and we'll continue to defend him while he's in heaven....

RIP President Reagan. You make me proud to be an American.

Posted by: The Right Wing Conspirator on June 6, 2004 12:33 AM

I don't really have the right words to say what I feel right now. It's kind of odd that only this morning, I made a post here in the comments section about how GWB needed to learn from Reagan how to change the minds of the voters, and indeed, how to change the nature of the national discussion itself. That's what President Reagan did best.

He led the nation by being an educator rather than a commander. He showed people, by tirelessly promoting his viewpoint, which way was the right way. Anyone in a position of leadership can learn from his example.

It amazed me to read the comments from Gorbechev. I truly believe Gorbechev liked Reagan and considered him a friend. Mr. and Mrs. Gorbechev visited the former President and his wife for dinner in May of 1992 in California and were presented with a gift: two white Stetson cowboy hats!

Posted by: Smack on June 6, 2004 01:06 AM

Great posts.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 01:45 AM

Most of the policies he inacted, over time, have proben to do the United States more harm than good, and then there was that business of the Contras, weapons for hostages, oh yeah and lets not forget those 400 plus marines blown up. But he was a charmer and had a great sense of humor.

Posted by: TOBEY MAGUIRE on June 6, 2004 01:46 AM

Most of the policies he inacted, over time, have proben to do the United States more harm than good

Indeed. The proob is in the pubbing.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 01:54 AM

Iguess my Reagan Moment came a little later. It cam abour after starting to listen to Rush Limbaugh. And it definately cam about when the firsr Gulf War happened. I was a freahman in college at the time and all the people were talking about how the war was about oil. But I disagreed. I thought that we should have kicked the hell out of Saddam and get him out of Kuwait. Then after reading about Ronald Reagan and more on conservative thought. I myself became a true conservative. It was a long time vcoming, but I was about 18-19. Ronald Reagan will be thought od as the best president of the 20th century. He made us all proud to be Americans and freed our country of the opposition of communism in the world.


R.I.P Gipper

Posted by: Stix on June 6, 2004 02:04 AM

Ronald Reagan was a good man and a great President. He will be missed. I still remember what it was like in 1980 before he was elected: The USSR seemed to be on a winning streak; high inflation and unemployment; a military still paralyzed by Vietnam; Iran on a rampage; a general lack of confidence in the US on the part of friends and allies (a sitting President who could barely fend off a rabbit by himself!); Communism on the march in the Western Hemisphere in Nicaragua, Grenada, El Salvador etc.

And then we had 8 years of Ronnie:

1. The cold war won; the Warsaw pact disintegrated, the Soviet empire destroyed.

2. Communism stopped in central and latin America, (now if only we could do the same in our universities).

3. Iran played off against Iraq so both lost.

4. Our military restored. (It was largely the Reagan force that performed so well in Gulf one and two).

5. "7 fat years" of economic prosperity, inflation reduced to tolerable levels, unemployment greatly reduced.

6. Above all, he never lost hope and always inspired hope in others.

Goodbye Ronnie. I will miss you.

G-D rest his soul, and bring peace and comfort to his family.

Posted by: Alan M. Ray on June 6, 2004 03:00 AM

Part of the difficulty in appreciating Reagan for someone of my age is that I wasn't follwing politics before Reagan. All I knew about politics was what I saw on Saturday Night Live.

I was also vaguely aware that two comedians I liked, the Smothers Brothers, thought that communism was pretty darn cool.

So really I came of age during the Age of Reagan. I can sort of appreciate what things were like in the 70's, but only in an intellectual way, reading about social currents in the 70's. I didn't live them, in the sense of understanding the times.

The only thing I knew in the 70's was Star Wars. The movie, I mean. Not SDI.

People who are just a few years older understand that, in the 70's, it was just accepted that America was evil, and was furrthermore weak and on the decline and always would be; that communism and terrorism must be appeased, and that a non-peaceful coexistence was the best that could be hoped for; that skyrocketing crime in our cities must be tolerated, for there was no alternative to such toleration, as it was just not socially acceptable to suggest locking criminals up for longer and longer periods of time.

I think Reagan changed all those perceptions.

But I, still a little kid in 1980, wasn't really aware of the tremendous change he engendered. By the time I had a clue what was going on, the Reagan revolution had become the status quo, the new Just the Way Things Are.

I think to really appreciate Reagan you had to be aware of the time before, when it was just accepted that if Iranians kidnapped Americans for 400+ days, we just had to live with that, because to do otherwise would be somehow "wrong."

Reagan offered Americans the possibility they had been longing for-- the idea that things could change. We didn't have to accept decline, weakness, and barbarity in our cities. Millions and millions of Americans knew things were going wrong, but there was no political leader with the wisdom and will to declare such beliefs.

Reagan opened up new possibilities, and soon after, those possibilities became reality.

Someone, like me, growing up in the eighties can never really be aware of how important a figure he was, because for us, the only reality we ever knew was the one that Reagan created.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 03:15 AM

ace, I think the most valuable thing President Reagan gave us was not that "things could change" but that we could change things. His messager to America, over and over again, was that each of us had the power to do great things in small ways that that, together as a nation, we could do anything.

Contrast that with the message you hear from the left and it's prety obvious to me why Reagan's message still resonates right now.

Read some of his speeches (I posted excerpts from a couple, and linked a couple more over on my blog) and you see the power he put into a simple message. That was heady stuff for a 12-year old kid like me in 1980. But it shaped the way I think about the world and our role in it. I still hold those views today because I've never seen a message that was more compelling than his.

Despair? How can we know despair when we wake each morning in the freest nation on Earth? Fear? What is there to fear after we faced the greatest threat the world has ever known in the Soviet Union and beat it? Misery? What financial misery can last in the face of an unfettered American economic machine?

Reagan showed us that it would always be "morning in America" as long as we were determined never to surrender to the dark midnight of self-imposed defeat because surely no external force could defeat a resolute America.

It was a simple message, but it took Reagan to remind us of it.

Posted by: on June 6, 2004 04:50 AM

Tip O'Neill can fry in Hell. Oh, wait... He already is.

Posted by: zetetic on June 6, 2004 10:15 AM

Despair? How can we know despair when we wake each morning in the freest nation on Earth? Fear? What is there to fear after we faced the greatest threat the world has ever known in the Soviet Union and beat it? Misery? What financial Misery can last in the face of an unfettered American economic machine?

Reagan showed us that it would always be "morning in America" as long as we were determined never to surrender to the dark midnight of self-imposed defeat because surely no external force could defeat a resolute America."

Truer words were never spoken (or written) nor do could they be more timely than today.

I wish the Senators from Massachusetts, the Congresswoman from San Francisco, the former Vice-President, Howell Raines, Julian Bond, etc. would once and for all commit this country to finding out why the "terrorists" hate us...

And while they're at it, maybe they can explain to us how come home ownership is at an historic high for the nation, including African-Americans, interest rates have remained for months at an all time low, over one million jobs have been produced in the last four months, wages are rising across the board in the work force, the Taliban were routed in under eight weeks (without the terrible Afghan winter, millions of refugees, tens of thousands dead), Bhagdad falls in three weeks, millions liberated, no refugee crisis, under 1000 American troops killed, Saddam captured, Libya capitulates, the UN oil-for-food scandal exposed...

Instead we get:

Quagmire!

Worst foreign policy debacle in the history of this country!

The economy is in tatters!

Racist!

American Imperialists!

BusHitler!

No Blood for Oil!

Halliburton!

We have lost the French as our allies!

We need the UN!!!!

And what, no Stars and Stripes flying in Paris during GWB's State visit & the 60th anniversary of D-Day?!?!?

The dark midnight of self-imposed defeat, indeed.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 6, 2004 11:00 AM

Reagan was the right man at the right time. I was thinking about him recently, wishing we had a similar leader now.

I think part of my dismay over the GWB presidency is that I thought he could be Reaganesque, especially right after 9/11, but he's fallen so dreadfully short. I think Bush has some Reaganesque impulses, particularly in his clear vision of how we need to overcome terrorism, so much like Reagan's desire to overcome communism. But the slime of Clinton lingers on, and I fear that every president from now on will embrace triangulation and the selling out of his principles.

I took Reagan very much for granted. I was eight years old when he took office, and so I certainly wasn't able to appreciate what a special man he was. I just wish we could have him back.

Posted by: Scout on June 6, 2004 11:43 AM

Ace, I beg to differ with you about a little kid in the 1980s not knowing what great things Reagan was doing. I was born in 1980 and I recall the feelings of nervousness overcome by belief I saw and felt in the adults around me when we were building up our military.

I remember seeing Mr. Reagan's face on TV and hearing his voice after the Challenger blew up. I was too young to understand most of what went on, but I remember the palpable feeling of relief and regirding I sensed in the adults and the older kids and teens around me.

I remember watching the speech Mr. Reagan gave at the Berlin Wall where he said 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' I was six years old. I remember seeing that wall come down not many years later.

Even when I was a little kid, I knew that Reagan was doing something extremely important and that I needed to try to make myself remember it so that later I could tell my friends about it if they forgot.

So, I have to disagree with you. A little kid can remember and can know, even if she didn't completely understand.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix on June 6, 2004 12:56 PM

The speech he gave "A Time for Choosing" was given in March (I think) of 1964 for Barry Goldwater. It is available to read at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1964reagan1.html I was a young mother and had gone to a rally in Denver for Goldwater. I often wonder what would have happened differently if Goldwater had won that election. Dirty political ads, specifically the Daisy ad with the small girl superimposed on a mushroom cloud frightened the voters who still thought it was wrong to use the A-bombs in Japan. I did/do not think we would have had to use it. I further think we would not be in the position we find ourselves in today had the Vietnam war had Barry Goldwater as the Commander in Chief. Lyndon Baines was a traitor as is John F...... Kerry.

Posted by: Sam on June 6, 2004 02:02 PM

We should ask why the left has such an imperative to cast the greatest 20th century president as a lovable dolt and an idiot who got lucky.

Could it be that they don't want to be held accountable to any sort of standards? That they want to live their lives under rotting logs, safe from the light of reason and day?

Their hatred of Ronald Reagan is the left's mantra. Their reasons are suspect, but the voices are so strident you can hear the desperate hope behind them: Don't look too close.

Posted by: Sailor Kenshin on June 6, 2004 03:14 PM

Gorbachev and Reagan did have some kind of cordial relationship;

Of course everyone knows the 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' speech; and there is a chunk of the Berlin Wall at Reagan's presidential library.

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down. Kind of touching.

Posted by: lauraw on June 6, 2004 03:27 PM

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down.

I like that.

Many say he is the greatest president since FDR, but you have to go all the way back to Lincoln to find a president of such character.

And speaking of character, Margaret Thatcher is going to the funeral, Drudge rumors say. She's terribly sick, having suffered several strokes, and many reports said she would not be able to attend.

I knew she would make it. I knew it. There is no way on Earth Thatcher would miss that, even if it's the last thing she does. What a great, gutsy, strong woman, and what a great friend to President Reagan.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 6, 2004 06:56 PM

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down. Kind of touching.

I had heard that he had a piece of the wall but I didn't know the source. You know, after reading the "TOBEY MAGUIRE" comment above, and some more comments from Gorby and other Soviet leaders, I believe that the Soviets were more on Reagan's side than the American left was (and still is)!

Posted by: Smack on June 6, 2004 09:40 PM

Tobey Maguire is very likely a child parroting what some grown-up child told him.

Real communists know they've lost this round.

As with fascism, it will have a new incarnation down the road, and hopefully we will have a stouthearted leader who will help us put it down again.

Posted by: lauraw on June 6, 2004 10:45 PM

From Reagan's speech on Point De Hoc (Normandy) 20 years ago:

" Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.''
Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their valor, and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.

Thank you very much, and God bless you all."

I couldn't add more in tribute to the veterans, the fallen, or the man himself.

Godspeed

Posted by: Joe Mama on June 7, 2004 09:39 AM

If Reagan hadn't turned up the heat, the Evil Empire never would have caved. T.P. O'Neill can take what he said and shove it up his ass. Reagan knew exactly what he was doing and did the best he could with limited help and unlimited harassment from Congress. He had the foresight to see that weapons systems and Contra involvement would push the Soviet bloc over the edge while O'Neill, Kerry and the rest of the liberal Congress hobnobbed with Commandante Ortega. RIP Ronnie!

Posted by: dano on June 7, 2004 02:54 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Whoops! I posted about Dan Goldman losing the NY congressional primary. He might do that, but it won't be tonight -- the primary isn't held until June 23.
One race to keep an eye on: the Levi's heir nepo baby and egregious "Designated Liar" Dan Goldman -- one of the Democrats from a safe district Democrats send out to spread their most indefensible lies -- may actually lose his lower Manhattan/Brooklyn set due to, get this, antisemitism in the Democrat primary electorate.
Antisemitism? In the anti-Nazi Democrat Party? Sounds crazy, I know, but apparently the anti-Nazi Party wants to eliminate Jews.
Henry Rosoff
@HenryRosoff

🚨EXCLUSIVE POLL:

Brad Lander is 34-pts ahead of Congressman Dan Goldman with #NY10 Democratic Primary voters. @ZohranKMamdani is backing the former Comptroller.

@bradlander: 57%

@danielsgoldman: 23%



Poll by @PIX11News & @EmersonPolling.

MORE: http://pix11.com

Oh my Totenkopf Tattoo, that is a DRUBBING!
I'm usually very anti-antisemitism but if the Communist Antisemite Jihadists can pull this one off, Go Communist Antisemite Jihadists, Go!
Democrat Senator Rueben Gallego, who served his wife with divorce papers when she was nine months pregnant so that he could marry his side-piece, counsels us that we should not judge Graham Platner for his infidelity because these things are personal matters, Racists:

Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., on Platner: "We know that Graham has lived not your typical political experience. He's been very clear and open with his wife, and they worked through whatever they worked through. At the end of the day, this man has had 60 more town halls than Susan Collins has. He's winning the polls, he's willing to accept that he has grown as a person, and I think we should accept that."

Gallego says the drip-drip of revelations won't harm Platner's campaign.

"I think you guys are all in a bubble here right now. The drip, drip that's actually happening is Americans are really, really hurt the fact that gas is still high, food is still high, they can't buy a home, you can't afford rent. They're not going to care about text messages and everything else like that that happened years ago, especially when it was worked out between spouses."

I like that he says that it's okay that Graham Platner sexted 12 different women within months of marrying the woman to sponge off her because he wasn't then "living a political life" -- the clear meaning being, "We all cheat, we just don't cheat when we're running for office, and he didn't know he was running for office when he was sending dicpics to half the women he ran into."
Except he was running: His own wife turned the sexts over to his campaign.
And obviously Reuben Gallego didn't let his "political life" get in the way of his extramarital dating life:
likelytogivebirth.jpg
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD goes solo in a short segment...talking about Iran, the nativist issues surrounding Reform and Restore in the UK, and the delicious pain of an imploding Democrat Party, courtesy of Talerico and Platner!
Recent Comments
NaCly Dog: "Got to go. Tornado warning, and I am in the b ..."

TRex - random interests dino: "190 Many weeks I've opened the hobby thread, read ..."

screaming in digital: "and now I have to go finish mowing, but will come ..."

TRex - club ont DJ dino: "184 Pfft. I can never get past the big dude at the ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Thanks TRex. ..."

polynikes: "Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere ..."

Dash my lace wigs!: "I no longer go to antique stores. The last one wou ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "Time to say thanks before the next act takes the A ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "You're welcome to hang here for a while but don't ..."

TRex - be prepared dino: "Time to say thanks before the next act takes the A ..."

NaCly Dog: "{{{SnailRacer}}} I no longer go to antique stor ..."

screaming in digital: "I hated anything arts & crafts, because I have no ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives