Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Friday Night Cowbell | Main | Oh, That Liberal Media »
June 05, 2004

Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States, Dies in California

R.I.P., Dutch.

For my part, all I can say is that I didn't appreciate Reagan when he was President, as I was young, irresponsible, and stupid. In other words, I was a liberal, or at least I thought I was.

But I still remember clearly my Reagan moment, the moment I realized that maybe this guy wasn't so stupid, evil, or crazy as often claimed. A lot of people had had their Reagan moment in November 1980-- that's how he got elected, after all. Mine took a while.

Right after the Libyans had blown up flight 103 (or whatever outrage they'd perpetrated), Reagan, of course, went on TV to announce that we were bombing Tripoli.

I remember listening to a radio station that night, the one I favored at the time, which was a college alternative/punk station. And I thought those DJ's were pretty cool. They played the Flying Lizards and Camper Van Beethoven and, once in a while, just to mix it up, even the Sweet's Barroom Blitz.

Anyway, they were all droning on and on as if it were a funeral for a king, how horrible it was that America was retaliating, how terrible it was that we had a warmonger idiot for President.

And I remember having a frenzy of cognitive dissonance. I wanted to agree with them, I wanted to believe the received wisdom of the hate-America left, I wanted to parrot the sophisticated blather of the intellectual swells. Or even the swells who ran dinky radio stations.

So even as I strained to get as outraged about the attack on Tripoli as they did (and of course I don't even need to mention they weren't outraged at all about the bombing of flight 103; they didn't even mention it between songs), I couldn't help noticing that the things they were saying, while undoubtedly true, were also undoubtedly the worst bullshit I ever heard in my young life.

They blew up an airplane, killing hundreds of Americans-- and the crime here was that we were bombing the bombers?

This is all so very terrible, said the good-boy liberal part of my brain.

Are you out of your fucking mind?! asked a different part of my brain, this part less socially-acceptable but also a great deal more sensible and vital.

Within a couple of hours of going back and forth, I decided the first part of my brain was a fucking hippie fruitcake, and really ought not be consulted on solemn matters of foreign policy.

I think that was the first psychic shock that disturbed me out of my complacent, sheep-like belief in liberalism. There would be more to follow (Michael Dukakis pretty much sealed the deal), but it was Reagan's defiant resolve against terrorism in 1986 that set me on the path to questioning the received wisdom of the left and then finally rejecting it.

Thanks for understanding what so many of your intellectual "superiors" couldn't or wouldn't-- that when bad men attack America, good men attack back. The enemy in war isn't "violence," as the left claims. The enemy in war is the fucking enemy. Period.

Thanks for that airstrike, Dutch.

Update: Stix has a compilation of Reagan quotes, some embarassing and the type offered by liberals as proof of his stupidity, but most of them inspiring or humorous.

John Hawkins of Right Wing News has reaction from the blogosphere, and a reprint of a tribute he wrote on Reagan's 92nd birthday.

I Read the NYT Obituary So That You Don't Have To: This is a Kausfiles schtick, but a good one. Here's a part I liked, regarding Reagan's job as a baseball radio announcer:

His commentary became an exercise of imagination; he never saw any of the games he described so vividly. Instead, he recreated them from telegraphic reports from Chicago. In his 1965 autobiography, Mr. Reagan described what happened the day the wire went dead: "I had a ball on the way to the plate and there was no way to call it back. At the same time, I was convinced that a ball game tied up in the ninth inning was no time to tell my audience we had lost contact with the game." He proceeded to give meticulous descriptions of what may be the longest series of foul balls in baseball history, even describing in detail the redheaded boy who scrambled for a souvenir ball. It was a story he loved to tell.

The rest of the obit is typical liberal crap. They use a very unflattering quote from liberal historian (of course) Lou Cannon to describe his famous, political-star-making speech on behalf of Goldwater:

On Oct. 27, 1964, a washed-up 53-year-old movie actor named Ronald Reagan made a speech on national television on behalf of a Republican presidential candidate who had no chance to be elected. . . . Most of Reagan's address was standard, antigovernment boilerplate larded with emotional denunciations of Communism and a celebration of individual freedom. His statistics were sweeping and in some cases dubious. His best lines were cribbed from Franklin Roosevelt, and he quoted from nearly everybody else as well."

Yes, yes. It was the speech that made him Governor of California two years later, and President of the United States sixteen years later. Obviously, it was pap.

No lines from this historic speech are quoted, of course.

And his years in office? Why, even in an obituary, the liberal take on Reagan is the only take offered:

Washington had not seen a president like Ronald Reagan for a long time. He showed no lust for power. He seemed to have no need to prove that he could work harder, or longer, on less sleep than anybody. Where his predecessor was criticized for involving himself in every detail, Mr. Reagan was a 9-to-5 president, a chairman of the board.

He delegated authority to his staff. Associates said he left details to subordinates and tended to rely on 3-by-5 index cards that they gave him for information he needed at meetings. He paced himself, got a good night's sleep and took afternoon naps when he could.

Ah. A dunce and a slacker who liked to take naps and knock off early.

Don't bother reading this crap.

Oh wait, you weren't going to bother anyway.



posted by Ace at 04:56 PM
Comments



Rest in peace Ronny. I might not be American, but i know greatness when i see it. And you were definately one of the greats.

Posted by: madne0 on June 5, 2004 05:24 PM

Saved the US economy and the West in the Cold War. Revived and emboldened the GOP and Conservatism. Freed 400 million slaves of Communism.

Kept the pundits scratching their pointy heads and outfoxed us all, even at the end.

Quiet, confident, courageous, and an unequaled leader.

RIP, President Reagan.

Posted by: Sharkman on June 5, 2004 05:31 PM

I remember hearing his radio program when I was in college in 1976. In 1981, I was not sure what his conservatism really meant. By 1989, I had grown to love him. God bless Ronald Reagan, his family and his loved ones.

Posted by: Tim Roberts on June 5, 2004 06:02 PM

He has gone to a better place. I once heard someone say that Ronald Reagan was proof that God still loves the USA. He certainly did a lot to make this world a better place, we all owe him.

Posted by: Marty on June 5, 2004 06:07 PM

I am saddened.

Posted by: Beck on June 5, 2004 06:32 PM

Anti-Cowbell news, indeed.

Ronald "Ray-Gun" Reagan, rest in peace. You were a great man.

So, when do we start the great Liberal Purge of 2004?

Posted by: Xoxotl on June 5, 2004 06:37 PM

Is it possible to toll a cowbell? Didn't think so.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on June 5, 2004 06:47 PM

Rest in Peace, Mr. Reagan, and pray for all of us still here facing another evil that threatens our civilization.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix on June 5, 2004 06:48 PM

@ Sharkman...ditto!

Thankyou President Reagan...you left the world a better place. Condolences to the family.

Posted by: terrier on June 5, 2004 07:32 PM

I love ya Ace, and I typed this one out to prove Ronnie was a conservative, but not QUITE a republican! Check out our post and see if there is anything worth listening to. God rest the 'Great Communicator's' soul. www.thefoggiestidea.com

Posted by: stuttgartcad on June 5, 2004 07:57 PM

Rest in peace, Mr. President. You will be missed.

Posted by: Scout on June 5, 2004 09:06 PM

To Teflon Ron, keeper of such faith not even the mighty US media could shake; thank you for the Free World.

Posted by: lauraw on June 5, 2004 10:16 PM

He was the perfect man for the job, and he came along at the perfect time. Look at his life. He was molded by God to be President at a critical time in the country's history.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 5, 2004 10:40 PM

Amen, Ace.

Hopefully, he is allowed to rest in peace. But I'm bracing myself for the inevitable ugliness that rears its head after the mourning period ends.

Let's hope not. But we know better.

Posted by: Sonofnixon on June 5, 2004 10:57 PM

No need to wait for ugliness. The New York Times had a hit piece already written.

For example:

"The former House speaker, Thomas P. O'Neill Jr., Democrat of Massachusetts, said of Mr. Reagan: "Most of the time he was an actor reading lines who
didn't understand his own programs. I hate to say it about such an agreeable man, but it was sinful that Ronald Reagan ever became president."

Also, I read that Reagan's economic boom was the Decade of Greed (Ace had a nice post about this a couple weeks ago).

Mr. O'Neill, who served in much of Mr. Reagan's tenure, said he had "known every president since Harry Truman and there's no question in my mind that Ronald Reagan was the worst." But, he added, "he would have made a hell of a king."

Posted by: Clark on June 5, 2004 11:44 PM

Yeah, we knew it was coming. (the ugliness) Just shows where their hearts are...so much for compassion huh?

If that's how Mr. O'neil wants to remember him, okay. But I know charisma when I see it, and Reagan was the epitome. I'll always remember him saying, "A message to terrorists everywhere: You can run, but you can't hide."

We defended him while Comrade Streisand and Comrade Brolin tried to slander him, and we'll continue to defend him while he's in heaven....

RIP President Reagan. You make me proud to be an American.

Posted by: The Right Wing Conspirator on June 6, 2004 12:33 AM

I don't really have the right words to say what I feel right now. It's kind of odd that only this morning, I made a post here in the comments section about how GWB needed to learn from Reagan how to change the minds of the voters, and indeed, how to change the nature of the national discussion itself. That's what President Reagan did best.

He led the nation by being an educator rather than a commander. He showed people, by tirelessly promoting his viewpoint, which way was the right way. Anyone in a position of leadership can learn from his example.

It amazed me to read the comments from Gorbechev. I truly believe Gorbechev liked Reagan and considered him a friend. Mr. and Mrs. Gorbechev visited the former President and his wife for dinner in May of 1992 in California and were presented with a gift: two white Stetson cowboy hats!

Posted by: Smack on June 6, 2004 01:06 AM

Great posts.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 01:45 AM

Most of the policies he inacted, over time, have proben to do the United States more harm than good, and then there was that business of the Contras, weapons for hostages, oh yeah and lets not forget those 400 plus marines blown up. But he was a charmer and had a great sense of humor.

Posted by: TOBEY MAGUIRE on June 6, 2004 01:46 AM

Most of the policies he inacted, over time, have proben to do the United States more harm than good

Indeed. The proob is in the pubbing.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 01:54 AM

Iguess my Reagan Moment came a little later. It cam abour after starting to listen to Rush Limbaugh. And it definately cam about when the firsr Gulf War happened. I was a freahman in college at the time and all the people were talking about how the war was about oil. But I disagreed. I thought that we should have kicked the hell out of Saddam and get him out of Kuwait. Then after reading about Ronald Reagan and more on conservative thought. I myself became a true conservative. It was a long time vcoming, but I was about 18-19. Ronald Reagan will be thought od as the best president of the 20th century. He made us all proud to be Americans and freed our country of the opposition of communism in the world.


R.I.P Gipper

Posted by: Stix on June 6, 2004 02:04 AM

Ronald Reagan was a good man and a great President. He will be missed. I still remember what it was like in 1980 before he was elected: The USSR seemed to be on a winning streak; high inflation and unemployment; a military still paralyzed by Vietnam; Iran on a rampage; a general lack of confidence in the US on the part of friends and allies (a sitting President who could barely fend off a rabbit by himself!); Communism on the march in the Western Hemisphere in Nicaragua, Grenada, El Salvador etc.

And then we had 8 years of Ronnie:

1. The cold war won; the Warsaw pact disintegrated, the Soviet empire destroyed.

2. Communism stopped in central and latin America, (now if only we could do the same in our universities).

3. Iran played off against Iraq so both lost.

4. Our military restored. (It was largely the Reagan force that performed so well in Gulf one and two).

5. "7 fat years" of economic prosperity, inflation reduced to tolerable levels, unemployment greatly reduced.

6. Above all, he never lost hope and always inspired hope in others.

Goodbye Ronnie. I will miss you.

G-D rest his soul, and bring peace and comfort to his family.

Posted by: Alan M. Ray on June 6, 2004 03:00 AM

Part of the difficulty in appreciating Reagan for someone of my age is that I wasn't follwing politics before Reagan. All I knew about politics was what I saw on Saturday Night Live.

I was also vaguely aware that two comedians I liked, the Smothers Brothers, thought that communism was pretty darn cool.

So really I came of age during the Age of Reagan. I can sort of appreciate what things were like in the 70's, but only in an intellectual way, reading about social currents in the 70's. I didn't live them, in the sense of understanding the times.

The only thing I knew in the 70's was Star Wars. The movie, I mean. Not SDI.

People who are just a few years older understand that, in the 70's, it was just accepted that America was evil, and was furrthermore weak and on the decline and always would be; that communism and terrorism must be appeased, and that a non-peaceful coexistence was the best that could be hoped for; that skyrocketing crime in our cities must be tolerated, for there was no alternative to such toleration, as it was just not socially acceptable to suggest locking criminals up for longer and longer periods of time.

I think Reagan changed all those perceptions.

But I, still a little kid in 1980, wasn't really aware of the tremendous change he engendered. By the time I had a clue what was going on, the Reagan revolution had become the status quo, the new Just the Way Things Are.

I think to really appreciate Reagan you had to be aware of the time before, when it was just accepted that if Iranians kidnapped Americans for 400+ days, we just had to live with that, because to do otherwise would be somehow "wrong."

Reagan offered Americans the possibility they had been longing for-- the idea that things could change. We didn't have to accept decline, weakness, and barbarity in our cities. Millions and millions of Americans knew things were going wrong, but there was no political leader with the wisdom and will to declare such beliefs.

Reagan opened up new possibilities, and soon after, those possibilities became reality.

Someone, like me, growing up in the eighties can never really be aware of how important a figure he was, because for us, the only reality we ever knew was the one that Reagan created.

Posted by: ace on June 6, 2004 03:15 AM

ace, I think the most valuable thing President Reagan gave us was not that "things could change" but that we could change things. His messager to America, over and over again, was that each of us had the power to do great things in small ways that that, together as a nation, we could do anything.

Contrast that with the message you hear from the left and it's prety obvious to me why Reagan's message still resonates right now.

Read some of his speeches (I posted excerpts from a couple, and linked a couple more over on my blog) and you see the power he put into a simple message. That was heady stuff for a 12-year old kid like me in 1980. But it shaped the way I think about the world and our role in it. I still hold those views today because I've never seen a message that was more compelling than his.

Despair? How can we know despair when we wake each morning in the freest nation on Earth? Fear? What is there to fear after we faced the greatest threat the world has ever known in the Soviet Union and beat it? Misery? What financial misery can last in the face of an unfettered American economic machine?

Reagan showed us that it would always be "morning in America" as long as we were determined never to surrender to the dark midnight of self-imposed defeat because surely no external force could defeat a resolute America.

It was a simple message, but it took Reagan to remind us of it.

Posted by: on June 6, 2004 04:50 AM

Tip O'Neill can fry in Hell. Oh, wait... He already is.

Posted by: zetetic on June 6, 2004 10:15 AM

Despair? How can we know despair when we wake each morning in the freest nation on Earth? Fear? What is there to fear after we faced the greatest threat the world has ever known in the Soviet Union and beat it? Misery? What financial Misery can last in the face of an unfettered American economic machine?

Reagan showed us that it would always be "morning in America" as long as we were determined never to surrender to the dark midnight of self-imposed defeat because surely no external force could defeat a resolute America."

Truer words were never spoken (or written) nor do could they be more timely than today.

I wish the Senators from Massachusetts, the Congresswoman from San Francisco, the former Vice-President, Howell Raines, Julian Bond, etc. would once and for all commit this country to finding out why the "terrorists" hate us...

And while they're at it, maybe they can explain to us how come home ownership is at an historic high for the nation, including African-Americans, interest rates have remained for months at an all time low, over one million jobs have been produced in the last four months, wages are rising across the board in the work force, the Taliban were routed in under eight weeks (without the terrible Afghan winter, millions of refugees, tens of thousands dead), Bhagdad falls in three weeks, millions liberated, no refugee crisis, under 1000 American troops killed, Saddam captured, Libya capitulates, the UN oil-for-food scandal exposed...

Instead we get:

Quagmire!

Worst foreign policy debacle in the history of this country!

The economy is in tatters!

Racist!

American Imperialists!

BusHitler!

No Blood for Oil!

Halliburton!

We have lost the French as our allies!

We need the UN!!!!

And what, no Stars and Stripes flying in Paris during GWB's State visit & the 60th anniversary of D-Day?!?!?

The dark midnight of self-imposed defeat, indeed.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 6, 2004 11:00 AM

Reagan was the right man at the right time. I was thinking about him recently, wishing we had a similar leader now.

I think part of my dismay over the GWB presidency is that I thought he could be Reaganesque, especially right after 9/11, but he's fallen so dreadfully short. I think Bush has some Reaganesque impulses, particularly in his clear vision of how we need to overcome terrorism, so much like Reagan's desire to overcome communism. But the slime of Clinton lingers on, and I fear that every president from now on will embrace triangulation and the selling out of his principles.

I took Reagan very much for granted. I was eight years old when he took office, and so I certainly wasn't able to appreciate what a special man he was. I just wish we could have him back.

Posted by: Scout on June 6, 2004 11:43 AM

Ace, I beg to differ with you about a little kid in the 1980s not knowing what great things Reagan was doing. I was born in 1980 and I recall the feelings of nervousness overcome by belief I saw and felt in the adults around me when we were building up our military.

I remember seeing Mr. Reagan's face on TV and hearing his voice after the Challenger blew up. I was too young to understand most of what went on, but I remember the palpable feeling of relief and regirding I sensed in the adults and the older kids and teens around me.

I remember watching the speech Mr. Reagan gave at the Berlin Wall where he said 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' I was six years old. I remember seeing that wall come down not many years later.

Even when I was a little kid, I knew that Reagan was doing something extremely important and that I needed to try to make myself remember it so that later I could tell my friends about it if they forgot.

So, I have to disagree with you. A little kid can remember and can know, even if she didn't completely understand.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix on June 6, 2004 12:56 PM

The speech he gave "A Time for Choosing" was given in March (I think) of 1964 for Barry Goldwater. It is available to read at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1964reagan1.html I was a young mother and had gone to a rally in Denver for Goldwater. I often wonder what would have happened differently if Goldwater had won that election. Dirty political ads, specifically the Daisy ad with the small girl superimposed on a mushroom cloud frightened the voters who still thought it was wrong to use the A-bombs in Japan. I did/do not think we would have had to use it. I further think we would not be in the position we find ourselves in today had the Vietnam war had Barry Goldwater as the Commander in Chief. Lyndon Baines was a traitor as is John F...... Kerry.

Posted by: Sam on June 6, 2004 02:02 PM

We should ask why the left has such an imperative to cast the greatest 20th century president as a lovable dolt and an idiot who got lucky.

Could it be that they don't want to be held accountable to any sort of standards? That they want to live their lives under rotting logs, safe from the light of reason and day?

Their hatred of Ronald Reagan is the left's mantra. Their reasons are suspect, but the voices are so strident you can hear the desperate hope behind them: Don't look too close.

Posted by: Sailor Kenshin on June 6, 2004 03:14 PM

Gorbachev and Reagan did have some kind of cordial relationship;

Of course everyone knows the 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' speech; and there is a chunk of the Berlin Wall at Reagan's presidential library.

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down. Kind of touching.

Posted by: lauraw on June 6, 2004 03:27 PM

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down.

I like that.

Many say he is the greatest president since FDR, but you have to go all the way back to Lincoln to find a president of such character.

And speaking of character, Margaret Thatcher is going to the funeral, Drudge rumors say. She's terribly sick, having suffered several strokes, and many reports said she would not be able to attend.

I knew she would make it. I knew it. There is no way on Earth Thatcher would miss that, even if it's the last thing she does. What a great, gutsy, strong woman, and what a great friend to President Reagan.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 6, 2004 06:56 PM

That piece was a personal gift to Reagan from Gorbachev after the wall was torn down. Kind of touching.

I had heard that he had a piece of the wall but I didn't know the source. You know, after reading the "TOBEY MAGUIRE" comment above, and some more comments from Gorby and other Soviet leaders, I believe that the Soviets were more on Reagan's side than the American left was (and still is)!

Posted by: Smack on June 6, 2004 09:40 PM

Tobey Maguire is very likely a child parroting what some grown-up child told him.

Real communists know they've lost this round.

As with fascism, it will have a new incarnation down the road, and hopefully we will have a stouthearted leader who will help us put it down again.

Posted by: lauraw on June 6, 2004 10:45 PM

From Reagan's speech on Point De Hoc (Normandy) 20 years ago:

" Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.''
Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their valor, and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.

Thank you very much, and God bless you all."

I couldn't add more in tribute to the veterans, the fallen, or the man himself.

Godspeed

Posted by: Joe Mama on June 7, 2004 09:39 AM

If Reagan hadn't turned up the heat, the Evil Empire never would have caved. T.P. O'Neill can take what he said and shove it up his ass. Reagan knew exactly what he was doing and did the best he could with limited help and unlimited harassment from Congress. He had the foresight to see that weapons systems and Contra involvement would push the Soviet bloc over the edge while O'Neill, Kerry and the rest of the liberal Congress hobnobbed with Commandante Ortega. RIP Ronnie!

Posted by: dano on June 7, 2004 02:54 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
CharlieBrown'sDildo: "center-blob. [i] Posted by: Weasel at March 29, ..."

mindful webworker - blows the dog whistle: "NOOD ONT https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419101 ..."

Tonypete: "Good evening good people. ..."

four seasons: " Hello All! ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Evenin' ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "You had to be there. Or were you? ..."

Weasel: "Posted by: Sam Adams at March 29, 2026 09:57 PM (X ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "Terror From The Year 5000! Not 4999. Not 5001. ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Compared to the PPK, the Beretta 80 series guns ho ..."

toby928(c) : "[i]You do you, man. But that sounds like a dangero ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "My vision sucks I probably need the kind of sight ..."

Sam Adams: "Really appreciate the help. If I focus on the sigh ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives