Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« ISM Jobs Report: *tuk tuk tuk tuk* | Main | Report: Hussein Used Same Money-Launderers as Osama Bin Ladin »
June 03, 2004

Tenet's Out; Rudy Can't Fail?

Conservatives have been calling for his head for years.

I've never been on that bandwagon, for several reasons. For one, I doubt that simply sacking the boss will actually change the nature of a huge institution. And the CIA's failures, while of course partly due to Tenet, are mainly due to institutional problems and, frankly, everyone working there. When an NFL team performs poorly, sure, the coach gets sacked more often than not; but let's face it, the coach may be important, but player performance has something to do with losing too.

Another reason I was never super big on firing Tenet: I assumed Bush had reasons for keeping him on. Obviously, Bush no longer has the same level of trust in Tenet now (hence the sacking), so I guess I'm happy to see him go.

I'm curious as to the reasons for this. Not as curious as the lefty bloggers like Joshua Micah Marshall, who are undoubtedly writing novel-length conspiracy theories linking the sacking to Valerie Plame.

Tenet was, I think, a weak director. I think the CIA is a very politicized institution, and I think Tenet wasn't strong enough to push back against the Clintonistas who, for example, claim with an evangelist's passion that there was "no connection" between Saddam and Al Qaeda, despite the mountain of evidence proving beyond any doubt that there was, at the very least, some "connection."

So I'm looking for a strong director, one with credibility with the public, one with popularity with the public, a man with the balls to reform the Agency, a man who's tough enough to tell the Clintonistas that we're going to have a dispassionate analysis about The Connection whether they like it or not.

In other words, I'm looking for Rudy Guiliani.

I don't think this is necessarily a pipe dream. While Rudy has been upfront about his desire to make a pile of money, he undoubtedly also wants to serve America in the fight against terrorism. And DCI isn't some minor posting. He could walk in and take command of an incredibly important institution and change it for the better.

It would be like being Mayor of a Shadow City. And we know Rudy likes being Mayor.

And we all know Rudy wants to be President. And we all know his liberal social positions are a near bar to his getting the nomination from the Republican Party.

He needs to do something big -- something even bigger than his steadfast performance on 9-11 -- to overcome the conservative hesitancy about him.

Becoming a major player in the war on terror and reforming yet another unreformable, sprawling mess could certainly be that "something big."


posted by Ace at 03:32 PM
Comments



Yeah, the libs are all donning their tinfoil hats on this one. Here's a comment from another website I look at:

"I was wondering the same thing...my husband and I were discussing this, and I really don't think that Bush would have chosen for Tenet to leave, and especially not now. Perhaps Tenet has just had a snootful of being the fall guy, and he's tired of Bush's "I-Can-Do-No-Wrong-Because-I-Can-Blame-Everything-On-Someone-Else-Philosophy"?!?! I hope and pray that Tenet has a tell-all book already written that can hit the stands right about the middle of October... **rubbing hands gleefully** If anyone knows where the bodies are buried, it's Tenet!"

Rudy would be an interesting choice. For some reason, I'm picturing Mr. Burns rubbing his hands together, saying, "Excellent."

Posted by: Scout on June 3, 2004 04:02 PM

Just to clarify that wasn't MY nutty comment I was quoting. It was made by a far-far-FAR-leftist.

Posted by: Scout on June 3, 2004 04:03 PM

Rudy certainly seems to be the most popular candidate in the blogosphere for what Cori Dauber calls "body's not cold award", and, being a New Yorker, he's got my vote. And those who like the idea of Rudy as DCI do so for the same reason you do Ace: Balls. Big ones.

As far as who will become the permanent DCI, I guess it all comes down to the outsider/insider issue and George Bush winning the election. I can't see the Bush Administration seeking confirmation this close to the election.

Unless, of course, the the President's choice for DCI is a slam-dunk.

Posted by: Robert on June 3, 2004 04:15 PM

But I think Rudy would be a slam-dunk. How many Democrats would have the cojones to vote against him?

They'd risk tipping off the public that they are nothing but partisans whose chief interest is not in protecting America but rather in weakening Bush.

If a highly-competent, popular, credible man agrees to take such a difficult job, you say Thank You. You don't attempt to derail his appointment.

Unless you're not particularly interested in having a highly-competent, popular, and credible man in the post.

Posted by: ace on June 3, 2004 04:38 PM

Ace, great call on Rudy. He would be a total ball-buster choice.

Posted by: David on June 3, 2004 04:58 PM

Who'd risk tipping off the public, ace? It's been my experience that the fringe -- on EITHER side of the political spectrum -- are the most vocal. I can't *envision* it, but I guess there *might* be a semi-conservative Democrat who might have some Maalox moments when thinking about this issue, but the radical lefties that I see around here don't give a rat's ass about what my conservative honkiness thinks.

BTW, I'm going to be sorely disappointed if Rudy's not nominated, now. I think he'd be perfect.

Posted by: Emma on June 3, 2004 05:35 PM

I've always thought the main problem with getting Rudy into politics again was the lack of an appropriate venue for him. He is a large fish. He requires a large fishbowl.

I always sort of doubted that he'd run for Senator, because being a Senator is a big step down from being the executive of the largest metropolis in America.

Vice President is bullshit, too. Cheney's made the post a powerful one, but there's no guarantee that another Bush VP would have the same power. It would be pretty unlikely.

So I've always thought that the only real possibilities for Guiliani in bigger politics were 1) President 2) Governor of New York 3) Head of the FBI 4) Attorney General or 5) Head of the CIA. I guess now that DHS is a cabinet-level position that would be big enough for him, too, but I don't know about that job. It seems sort of ill-defined and ungainly.

Obviously, there aren't openings for most of those jobs at the moment. (And I think AG might even be beneath him.)

DCI seems perfect for him. It's a huge job. It's not the sort of one that would diminish him.

Posted by: ace on June 3, 2004 05:58 PM

I think Tom Ridge's stature has been diminished by the bureaucratic DHS job.

I can't see that happening with Rudy as DCI.

For one thing, there's the mystery of it. There are liberals who are still shrieking about the fact that George Bush the elder was DCI in the seventies.

Posted by: ace on June 3, 2004 06:01 PM

Beat ya to the punch on this scoop, Ace.

I love the idea. Anyone who can clean house in NYC can handle the CIA. "If you can make it there, you'll make it a-nee-where..."

Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog on June 4, 2004 02:48 AM

Unless, of course, the the President's choice for DCI is a slam-dunk.

I'm with you 100% on this one ace.

I was taking a jab at Tenet by saying Rudy's confirmation would be a slam dunk.

Sarcasm doesn't always work on comment boards.

Posted by: robert on June 4, 2004 02:54 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Recent Comments
NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i] Are the UK rape gangs nearing Red Army levels ..."

Duncanthrax: "[i]Men are complex about things women would find r ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: " I don't think much about the Roman Empire beyond ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Men are more complex than we let on. ________ ..."

L - No nic, another fine day: "One a nurse practitioner. Another - gender unclea ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "Marius. Was he Consul six times or seven? Posted ..."

Oldcat: "I don't think much about the Roman Empire beyond A ..."

Intercepted Reddit Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison: "150 Chance they find 12 members of jury to convic ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: " Velcro is good, buckles limit adjust ability and ..."

Duncanthrax: "Hannibal's army used proper Loxodonts, not those U ..."

Chairborne!...Desk From Above!: "[i]So, it's true, isn't it? Men ARE always thinkin ..."

Chairman LMAO: "Daily Mail click-bait headline: "Scientists calcul ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives