Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« New York Times Scoop: Families of Iraqi Terrorists are Very, Very Angry That We Fight and Arrest Them | Main | Giving a Shout-Out to Mu-Nu Angels »
June 01, 2004

Rasmussen Poll: 49% Would Consider Voting for Kerry

This poll is very interesting.

For some time everyone's been wondering: Since Bush's poll numbers have slipped so dramatically (and, for him, so dangerously), why isn't Kerry ahead in the polls?

Maybe this answers that question:

June 1, 2004--Fifty-four percent (54%) of American voters say that they would consider voting for George W. Bush under certain circumstances. A Rasmussen Reports survey of 2,000 Likely Voters finds that 39% will not vote for the President under any circumstances.

As for Senator Kerry, 49% say they would consider voting for him while 39% definitely would not.

These results come at a time when the candidates have been locked in a dead heat for months. Ninety-one percent (91%) of those who would consider voting for Kerry already plan to vote for him. Just 3% of those who would consider Kerry are currently planning to vote for Bush.

However, just 81% of those who would consider voting for Bush are planning to vote for him at this time. Another 10% of these potential supporters are currently planning to vote for Kerry.

In other words, the more people who would consider voting for Kerry are already planning on voting for him.

Which is actually good news for Bush. He's got more upside. Kerry's getting 91% of those inclined to vote for him, while Bush is only getting 81% of those inclined to vote for him. Kerry can add another 9% of those inclined to vote for him, Bush double that. And a bigger absolute number of folks could possibly vote for Bush, too.

Plus, there's the obvious: If only 49% say they'd even consider voting for John Kerry, his ceiling can't be much higher than 49%. Yes, things could change, of course; but he'd need them to change. He can't easily win an election when, on his best possible day, he can only garner a minority of the votes. He could win, of course; but it's tricky.

Now here's a real shock that not only throws conventional wisdom out the window, it then jumps out the window as well in order to shout homophobic obsenities at conventional wisdom as it plunges to the street:

However, among those who are currently undecided, 64% would consider voting for Bush and 48% would consider voting for Kerry. These figures challenge the conventional wisdom that undecideds will break for the challenger.

For some time I've thought that Bush's low approval ratings might be indicative of voters' current sentiments -- "You're kinda screwing things up, George" -- but not actually indicative of their voting inclinations. I thought that because Kerry couldn't seem to gain on Bush even at the worst bad-news cycle of his Presidency. These findings would seem to be additional evidence for that.


posted by Ace at 04:24 PM
Comments



Well, it's kind of a goofy question because look at it this way: 49 percent say they would consider voting for Kerry. *But* only 39 percent say they wouldn't. So what about those other goofy 12 percent?

They would not consider it, nor would they *not* not consider it?

The 39 percent is much more telling and the two are tied. That is, if I say I wouldn't vote for somebody under any circumstances, that's a strong statement, much stronger than "I would under (unknown) circumstances."

I do think there's a little good news here in that underlying those numbers is the fact that Bush's last few points of drop have been, from much of the evidence, Republicans. Most of them will come back on election day if he gives them any excuse.

He was polling 90 percent of Republicans, now he's around 80.

Of course the margins are so thin it's hard to say much with certainty. And we've a ways to go.

Posted by: on June 1, 2004 04:45 PM

Bush MUST get the message of the economy and Saddam's al-Qaeda link out. The media will not do it for him. Bush MUST schedule one prime-time press conference a month for the next four months, and read a prepared statement stressing the nation's economic strength and Saddam's al-Qaeda ties.

If he does this effectively, he opens up a big gap over Kerry going into his convention. A good convention and a busy fall with lots of advertising and speeches will seal the deal.

Posted by: Rick on June 1, 2004 05:52 PM

Communication certainly has been the President's vulnerability. Bush needs to realize that the most important part of his job is the articulation of a vision and the education of the electorate on the issues.

Posted by: Smack on June 2, 2004 12:15 AM

Ace,

Statistically, un-decideds tend to make their choice approximatly two to three days before the election, if the vast majority of un-decideds are already leaning for six months prior to the election Bush, you can pretty much reckon on a Bush victory. Q.E.D

Additionally, part of the reason Bush has been silent of getting out "The Message" is this very simple fact, no use blasting your reserve early, we are wating until Mid-October, when it becoms decisive

Posted by: Swiftsure on June 2, 2004 05:11 AM

It's true that the President shouldn't be doing a lot of heavy "campaign ads" right now. But he should be convincing people of his case every day of every year, as Reagan used to do. Bush did an excellent job at the Air Force academy; if he only did that sort of thing every week, he'd be in a much better position right now. People tend to feel unsure of a leader when they don't hear much from him.

Posted by: Smack on June 3, 2004 11:04 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Recent Comments
Tom Servo: "There’s always been areas of weakness with b ..."

Sharpie: " This is a weak attack because most people have t ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: Braenyard - some Absent Friends are mor ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "Religions and churches became a money making indus ..."

polynikes: "We've always made fun of Joel Olsteen that he seem ..."

Emmie, celebrating 250 years of God's grace : "[i]Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 19, 2026 11:48 ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " None of the low Traditional Latin Masses I atten ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks and His All White Jury! [/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "If somebody picks up a guitar, the church service ..."

Ted Torgerson: "Posted by: JackStraw at June 19, 2026 12:02 PM (vi ..."

Sharpie: "This is such a fucking lame criticism of Talarico. ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "A psalm on music in the church Praise ye the Lo ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "The first we toured, the smaller one with the doub ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives