Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
May 06, 2015

Obama Administration: Hey, Since We're Giving Iran the Bomb and All, Maybe We Need a Missile Defense After All, Huh?


Fundamentally transformed.

Meanwhile, Chris "Chaplinsky" Cuomo-- who only got into Fordham Law School despite his dad being, you know, Governor of New York and all -- actually gets spanked by, get this, Vox.

Meanwhile, a would-be asteroid mining company has sent out its first probe, to look for asteroids it can mine gold out of.

Um, this is probably silly, but I don't care. I want escape.

Meanwhile, Jonah Goldberg called it.

Meanwhile, a three year old was traumatized when two black men did a home invasion of his home. In the victim statement part of the sentencing, the parents said the kid was emotionally scarred, to the point where he fears black men. Well, the black judge hearing this case was outraged... at the parents and at the three year old, for being so racist.

Meanwhile, the Political Organization Fox News is trying to get the politics of the Garland attack right -- rather than trying to get the principle right. Most of its hosts, who are largely pretty useless, think it's more important to condemn Pam Geller than to stand up for an American making unpopular -- but legal and politically relevant -- speech.

Martha McCallum counsels that we can only speak about Islam in a "Christian way," which I guess is too bad for Pam Geller, who is Jewish, as well as myself, being an agnostic.

Meanwhile, JWF has rounded up media hatred of free speech, including the useless bobble-head Matha McCallum telling Jews to get right with Jesus.

Meanwhile, Charles C.W. Cooke does something I thought was impossible: He makes me interested in the British elections.

The kink here is that even though Labour would win in any other year -- Labour is going to be wiped out in Scotland, possibly losing every seat they have there, to the Scottish nationalists, and that makes this all an unpredictable thing.

Meanwhile: In the meantime.

Continue reading

Posted by Ace at 07:42 PM Comments

State Department: We Want to Announce "Loud and Clear" That Hillary's Hidden Emails Are "Not Acceptable"


The Hill.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email account run through a private server was "not acceptable" and happened without officials' knowledge, a top State Department record-keeper said on Wednesday.

"I think the message is loud and clear that that is not acceptable," Joyce Barr, the State Department’s assistant secretary for the Bureau of Administration, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"The actions that we’ve taken in the course of recovering these emails has made it very clear what the responsibilities are with regard to record-keeping," she added in remarks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on government transparency....

That's not the only slap-down Hillary has gotten from current Administration officials today on her lawlessness. She announced she would now extend Dreamer status to the parents of Dreamers, using her Powers of the Queen.

She's just going to Decree it in her Queenly Beauty.

As Allah points out, Obama, who is already acting lawlessly in decreeing his own amnesty, flinched from this specific measure, finding it too lawless.

But not the Haggard Queen.

Clinton said she'd differ from Obama by interpreting existing law to permit other groups, including the parents of DREAMers, to apply for protected status under the banner of "sympathetic cases."

Her campaign posted a general explanation of her thinking, but did not respond to emailed questions from RCP....

"We should put in place a simple, straightforward, and accessible way for parents of DREAMers, and others with a history of service and contribution to their communities, to make their case and be eligible for the same deferred action as their children," she continued.

The president last year explained to disappointed immigrant families that he did not extend deportation waivers to all parents of DREAMers because administration legal experts told him he did not have that authority.

Clinton did not explain Tuesday why her legal analysis differs, if indeed it does. “A history of service and contribution to their communities" -- her phrase -- suggested a separate category for protected status.

By "service and contribution to their communities," she means no murders in their records (but manslaughter is fine) and only a couple of rapes.

That's not a joke, by the way. That's Obama's standard. He's "Dreamed" a lot of killers, rapists, molesters, and drug smugglers.

But the White House has just put out the word that they are unable to see any legal means by which The Haggard Queen might accomplish this, as if that's in any way relevant.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday that Obama did as much as he legally could as far as deferring deportations. So he was at a loss as to how a President Clinton could justify doing more, as the candidate promised to do on Tuesday at an event in Las Vegas. Story Continued Below

Asked repeatedly whether additional actions would be illegal, Earnest deferred to Clinton's team.

Posted by Ace at 06:06 PM Comments

ISIS Announces Six Month Terror Campaign; Vows to Murder Pam Geller


Or, as the Washington Post's "Social Change Reporter" calls her: "bait."

'A message to the crusaders' was posted on social media today, supposedly from ISIS terrorist Abu Ibrahim Al Ameriki, naming 5 target states, and saying they have 71 members ready to attack Americans.

Here’s the account that posted it on Twitter:

Message to the crusaders “The New Era”

— Umm Zidane (@locoL1oness_79) May 5, 2015

And here’s the full message:

Bismillah Ar Rahman Ar Raheem

“The New Era”

To our brothers and sisters fighting for the Sake of Allah, we make dua for you and ask Allah to guide your bullets, terrify your enemies, and establish you in the Land. As our noble brother in the Phillipines said in his bayah, "This is the Golden Era, everyone who believes… is running for Shaheed."

The attack by the Islamic State in America is only the beginning of our efforts to establish a wiliyah in the heart of our enemy. Our aim was the khanzeer Pamela Geller and to show her that we don’t care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter. This will heal the hearts of our brothers and disperse the ones behind her. To those who protect her: this will be your only warning of housing this woman and her circus show. Everyone who houses her events, gives her a platform to spill her filth are legitimate targets. We have been watching closely who was present at this event and the shooter of our brothers. We knew that the target was protected. Our intention was to show how easy we give our lives for the Sake of Allah.

We have 71 trained soldiers in 15 different states ready at our word to attack any target we desire. Out of the 71 trained soldiers 23 have signed up for missions like Sunday, We are increasing in number bithnillah. Of the 15 states, 5 we will name.. Virginia, Maryland, Illinois, California, and Michigan. The disbelievers who shot our brothers think that you killed someone untrained, nay, they gave you their bodies in plain view because we were watching.

The next six months will be interesting, To our Amir Al Mu’mineen make dua for us and continue your reign, May Allah enoble your face.

May Allah send His peace and blessings upon our Prophet Muhummad and all those who follow until the last Day.

– Abu Ibrahim Al Ameriki

We simply do not have a country any more, when alleged "Americans" are cheerleading for other Americans' murder, and are applauded for it by hateful know-nothings.

It is time to put an end to this. The American Experiment has failed.

It is time to dissolve the union and create new ones.

Posted by Ace at 04:42 PM Comments

California (Democrat) Secretary of State Kamala Harris' Aides Accused of Running Secret Shadow Police Force...
Which, By the Way, Secret Policemen Claim Dates Further Back Than The Knights Tempar


They say they belong to a secret police force, like Ra's al Ghul's I guess, that is over 3000 years old.

I know what you're thinking -- Whuhh... do I have to do to join the Knights Templar Shadow Police Force?

One of California Attorney General Kamala Harris' (D) staffers was arrested last week and "accused of operating a rogue police force that claimed to exist for more than 3,000 years," The Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.

Brandon Kiel, deputy director of community affairs at the California Department of Justice, and two others -- David Henry and Tonette Hayes -- reportedly face charges for their roles in the Masonic Fraternal Police Department.

"Suspicions about the Masonic Fraternal Police Department — whose members trace their origins to the Knights Templar — were aroused when various police chiefs in Southern California received a letter in late January that announced new leadership for the group," the Times' Matt Hamilton wrote.

"Following an investigation, officials said, sheriff's investigators searched two sites in Santa Clarita and found badges, weapons, uniforms and law enforcement paraphernalia."

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's department said in a statement that the Masonic Fraternal Police Department was not a legitimate police force and that Kiel, Henry, and Hayes were arrested for allegedly impersonating police officers.

You're not going to believe this -- despite not being real, and also being crazy, and also being criminals, and also being Democrats, they have a website.

The Masonic Fraternal Organization is the oldest and most respected organization in the "World."

The "world." Not the world, but the "world."

We're off to a roaring start here, folks. Either they are illiterate, or they are paranoids who aren't sure the "world" is the world.

Grand Masters around the various states are facing serious safety concerns for their Jurisdictions and their family members. The first Police Department was created by the "Knights Templar's" back in 1100 B.C.

The "Knights Templar's." What is that apostrophe doing in there? It's Knights Templar.

And the Knights Templar were created around 1100 A.D., but that's Democrat education for ya.

The Masonic Fraternal Police Department, (M.F.P.D.) is the Knights Templar's!

You, sir, are a Goof.

When asked what is the difference between The Masonic Fraternal Police Department and other Police Departments the answer is simple for us. We were here first! We are born into this Organization our bloodlines go deeper then an application. This is more then a job it is an obligation.

The Masonic Fraternal Police Department (M.F.P.D.) is a Masonic Sovereign Jurisdiction (Municipality) located within the incorporated City of Santa Clarita, California. The Chief of Police is Honorable Grand Master David Henry 33º was elected and is Governed by a Grand Supreme Council, and 33 Masonic Jurisdictions. He currently oversees a 1/2 Million members throughout the United States.

We are not “Sovereign Citizens’ nor do we condone terrorist activity, sovereign citizens or clandestine!

More quote problems. They started with a " and ended with a '.

But punctuation really isn't the Big Story here, is it?

The Masonic Fraternal Police Department (M.F.P.D.) provides services to Masonic Sovereign Grand Masters and their Masonic Jurisdictions, as well as other Fraternities, Sororities and Greek Organizations. Masonic Fraternal Police Department will be located in 33 other states, including Mexico City. We support all law enforcement agencies. Our mission is to preserve the integrity, honor and legacy of our Founding Fathers, Masonic Organizations, all Grand Masters and their Constitution /By Laws. We will uphold our sworn obligation to protect Sovereign Grand Masters and their jurisdictions.

God Bless the United States of America!!!!!

So there you go.

By the way, the Democrat Kamala Harris is running for the Senate seat which will be vacated by Babsy Boxer.

Posted by Ace at 03:31 PM Comments

Life is Beautiful, Part II: Poop, Sweat, and Tears


So here is the "end of the beginning", in all of its visceral detail. My wife would like to thank the morons and ettes, particularly Brent and Carol, who organized an online baby shower for her and Jameson. Your outpouring of support and encouragement has been a blessing during a rewarding, but very trying, pregnancy.

A little over nine months ago, my wife and I did what tens of billions of homo sapiens have done over eleven thousand generations: recombined our DNA; and like 99.99999% of that mass of humanity we certainly weren't thinking about it in that way at the time.

I wrote about the roller coaster that followed right here at Ace's place, and as the months, weeks and days counted down, we felt totally prepared for what would come next.

What follows is a tale of poop, sweat and tears.

Continue reading

Posted by CAC at 02:20 PM Comments

Two Contradictory Claims the Left Urges On Us


1. To speak of Islamist violence, or to suggest there is a problem in Islam, is racist, and hateful, and irrational, and "islamophobic."

2. It is so predictable that Islamists will kill you if you say something "anti-Islamic" that victims of murder attempts can be said to have brought their attacks on themselves.

Two other hard-to-reconcile claims:

1. Islam is compatible with Western values.

2. We're going to have to change some core Western values to avoid violence from our new Muslim friends.

Posted by Ace at 01:11 PM Comments

Mike Huckabee's Big Government Plan for Spiritual Renewal


Jesus Socialism.

Speaking of Jesus, man, this logo for the Year of Mercy (I don't know what that is) is weirdbad.

Posted by Ace at 12:34 PM Comments

If Obama Is a "Bookworm," Why Doesn't He, You Know, Read Books?


Related to the question, of course, "If Obama is an intellectual, why isn't he smart, and why doesn't he enjoy thinking?"

I've been on this for years. Mollie Hemingway dismantles Obama's contrived image as a "reader."

He's not. He's a TV watcher.

Speaking of people who don't read, AllahPundit has followed up and expanded on the story BenK covered, to wit, Chris Cuomo being a proud, loud know-nothing.

Posted by Ace at 11:44 AM Comments

This Is CNN


It's not as though CNN hired him to give legal analysis.

Wait, he's their Chief Justice Correspondent and has a law degree from Fordham?


And he responds.


I would embed it but...Moveable Type 2003.

And he responds again.


Posted by BenK at 10:06 AM Comments

Open Thread


William Stanley Haseltine, "Valle dei Molini – Amalfi" (1871)

Posted by rdbrewer at 09:46 AM Comments

Morning Thread (5-6-2015)


Texas cop with a .45 cal. Glock - 2
Johnny Jihad - 0

Nice overview and short CNN animated reenactment h/t @doreenhdickson

More good work from @Bob_Owens on identifying the bad guys' guns and describing the firefight.

Posted by Andy at 06:14 AM Comments

Potentially Interim ONT - Devil's Own Lasagna edition [krak/t]

—Open Blogger

Toledo is kicking my ass, but I don't see anything else in the offing, and Maet is still living it up in some hot spring with several other sweaty men and possibly a reindeer.

Most people would embrace the modern world and take a bath in a lovely new tub with actual plumbing. I can only guess Maet is trying to ready himself for the coming neo-Luddite utopia being jammed up our collective asses.

Ahhh, the good old days of a life uncluttered and unsoiled by the ravages of Modernity.

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 11:10 PM Comments

It Looks Like Social Justice Warriors Chased the Social Justice Warrior Joss Whedon Off Twitter, And That's Just Terrific


I don't really like Joss Whedon, who's had way too much praise for simply being superficially clever.

And I don't like that this asshole was constantly promoting Social Justice Attacks on other people.

So, if he was indeed chased off of twitter by the constant Social Justice Warrior attacks on him -- ridiculous shit, like that he didn't make Black Widow badass enough or whatever nonsense spoiled and useless Western White Women are throwing their hysterical jags about this week -- then I just have to laugh about it and say "Life is good."

John Sexton shows you some of the abuse he got from the Tumblrinas and assorted other Hate Groups.

No sir, they are not like the Tea Party at all. The Tea Party attempts to enforce their political will on their elected political representatives, which is not only permissible, it is well-nigh necessary, unless Patton Oswald is one of those imbeciles who thinks politicians go to Washington to Do the Right Thing For People and Stuff.

The Social Justice Warriors, on the other hand, are simultaneously more trivial and more profoundly disturbing: They do not attempt to whip-saw the elected members of the political class, but instead pick out random airplane passengers, random computer programmers, random pizzeria owners, and so own to drive them from their jobs and homes for no other reason than to show That The Herd Is Angry At Them.

It is one thing to politicize politics, which is what the Tea Party is accused of doing -- why, those crazies are trying to inject their ideological preferences into government and party platforms! The scandal of it it!

But the SJWs are politicizing everything; everyone is their potential target, for no other reason than that undiagnosed hysterics need someone to SHRIEK at everyday or the snakes inside their heads will eat all their brains.

The Tea Party attempts to purge wayward politicians.

This isn't scary, unless you're a politician, and while that might indeed by scary for a tiny handful of people in the world, it is imperative in a democracy that politicians be afraid of being turned out of office.

The media used to moan about how sick it was that so many politicians had their seats for life, never having to worry about being responsive to the people, until the very moment a committed conservative group started turning some of them out of their Seats For Life, at which point Politicians became a Protected Minority.

Now, while the Tea Party purges politicians , the social justice warriors purge everyday citizens.

Note that we are supposed to have a political vote as to whether Politician X keeps his job. That is the basis of democracy.

But we're not supposed to have a national plebescite over whether Justine Sacco should be fired and driven from society, or whether the family that owns Memories Pizza should be driven into bankruptcy.

In case you wonder why I am as mean as ever to politicians, while being a crusader against political smear campaigns directed at citizens:

Because it's fair and normal and expected to use political campaigning in political campaigns, but it is aberrant, Stalinist, and Salem-like to begin using political campaign tactics -- whipsawing opinion, planting smears, ginning up emotion, calling for people to be un-elected from their jobs -- as to non-political actors.

But to the Social Justice Warriors, for whom the Personal Is Political and so too is the Political the Personal, there is no distinction between the public and private sphere, and all the viral hatred that is common in political campaigns is applied to personalized Coordinated Hate Campaigns against lonely citizens having no means whatsoever of fighting back or of delivering their own counter message out to the world.

American citizens should in fact have a say as to whether Eric Cantor keeps his post as a United States Congressman; they should not have a say as to whether Justine Sacco gets to keep her job in advertising.

The first is a matter of public trust, for which people get to vote.

The latter is not.

But the Social Justice Warriors are, as I say, both so trivial that they will go after Justine Sacco precisely because she is such an unimportant and defenseless target, and thus more easy to remove the scalp from her head; and an absolute menace to peaceful order in society, because society cannot function with roving bands of lunatics attacking average, ordinary citizens virtually at random for sport.

What shocks me is that people do not put two and two together here, and realize how toxic, insane, and full of bad faith and daddy-didn't-love me venom these shrieking harpies are, even when the harpies wrath has been turned against them.

Joss Whedon will continue attacking GamerGaters, and praising Anita Sarkosian, completely forgetting that Sarkosian's fellow travelers made his life hell by making up one preposterously hateful charge after another.

Likewise, a year or so ago, the Social Justice Warriors mobbed up on Seth Rogan, making the silly charge that this Fat Smug Liberal was "anti-woman" because the character he played in Knocked Up started the film as irresponsible as regards women. (They completely miss the point that his dramatic arc has him become responsible at the end.)

Rogen roared back at them, telling them to go fuck themselves.

And yet, six months later, when the same shrieking lunatics were after Adam Baldwin, Seth Rogan actually tweeted to Baldwin that he was an Anti-Woman bigot. His evidence? The shrieking Social Justice Warriors had told him so -- the same people who had lodged absurd charges at he himself just a half year before.

But this is the way liberals work -- tribal loyalty is everything to them, and they assume that every calumny their fellow liberals throw at an outsider must be true. (I think this is due to ego: they think that as they are themselves liberals, and egotistically believe themselves to be honest and just in all things, they extend a weaker form of this egotism to their fellow travelers.)

And so Seth Rogan, onetime target of Social Justice Warrior slander, attacked Adam Baldwin for standing up to the Social Justice Warriors, telling him something like, "Well, if they're all mad at you, you must have done something, so get right with the Leftist Gods and apologize."

It just didn't occur to this fat sack of lipids that they might be making stuff up about Baldwin, too.

Sort of a variant of the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect -- you know reporters are useless when you read an article making an embarrassing hash of everything in your field of expertise, but then you turn the page to read them writing about other fields, and you assume, "These guys probably know what they're talking about here."

And so Joss Whedon, who so gleefully embraces Social Justice Warrior attacks on others, has now himself, perhaps, been purged by the Social Justice Warriors.

And it will make no difference.

Because the next time Anita Sarkesian tells him that Adam Baldwin is a bigot, Joss Whedon will be right there beside his Valkyrie, handing her her next spear.

Posted by Ace at 06:46 PM Comments

Washington Post "Social Change Reporter" On Garland Shooting: "If the event was intended as bait, it worked."


There are only two kinds of political shootings in this country:

1. Shootings of leftwingers by groups associated with the right -- which actually doesn't happen (when was the last one?). The left is very quick to claim every shooter is on the right, though.

2. Shootings of rightwingers by groups associated with the left -- which the media actually suggests are the fault of the right.

Everything's the right's faults-- when they don't shoot people, it's their fault.

When parts of Obama's coalition shoot up rightwingers, that's also the right's fault. They intended themselves to be "bait" to excite leftwingers into murdering people.

Heads must fucking roll.

And what the fuck is a Social Change Reporter anyway?

Are there any women or minorities working at these papers who are capable of doing real reporter work, not in the ghetto of the feminist/minority/gay blogs?

Are they being held out of real reporter jobs -- you know, reporting on real things, not just Social Justice Warrior activism -- by the white males at the papers in question due to the papers' racism, or are they being held out of such positions because they're not interested and/or not qualified?

Here's the headline, which is awful enough:

Event organizer offers no apology after thwarted attack in Texas

I'm sorry, was the intended target of a terrorist attack supposed to apologize?

And to whom? The greater Muslim community which supposedly has nothing to do with the terrorist attack?

But then it gets even worse:

"If the contest was intended as bait, it worked. "

If the contest was intended as bait, it worked?

It's Gellar's fault that terrorists tried to kill her?

Can we use this logic on leftwing "bait"? If someone decides to open fire in a Planned Parenthood rally, can we also agree that the organizers intended themselves to be "bait"?

If someone starts shooting up the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, the gay cross-dressing attack on Christians, will the Washington Post likewise write that those shot down had held themselves out to be "bait"?

If the leftwing is going to be so blatant about their belief that Political violence is justified as regards right wingers, well.

Assumedly, then, the Washington Post and the left generally will not object if the right likewise stops opposing political violence conducted against the left?


Society is a social compact between strangers and often adversaries. But this compact extends two ways, or not at all.

We are in a very careful place now.

By the way: The attack that the Washington Post's Social Change Reporter wants Gellar to apologize for? Claimed by IS, a sworn foreign enemy of the US, as their project.

Posted by Ace at 05:28 PM Comments

Science: Neurochemical Reward From Mastering a Skill or Learning Something New Is Similar to the Release From Taking Opium


And, I think, therefore vice-versa.

So when you learn things, you feel good, and get a chemical rush.

But, on the other hand, if you smoke opium, you get a similar chemical rush, which would, then, displace any natural dataphile urgency you might have.

Kind of interesting, I think: It kind of tells us what we already might have suspected, but couldn't quite say.

Kids doing bad in school? Must be drugs, parents often conclude.

Well, maybe, yeah:

Scientists have long researched the science behind the natural high that comes with mastering a skill, understanding a difficult concept, or solving a challenging problem. Now, neuroscientists have discovered that the “click” of comprehension triggers a biochemical cascade that rewards the brain with a shot of natural opium-like substances.

"The brain's craving for a fix motivates humans to maximize the rate at which they absorb knowledge," he said. "I think we're exquisitely tuned to this as if we’re junkies, second by second."

Apart from porn, I have another addiction: getting lost for hours reading Wikipedia entries. I have thought before it felt like a drug; it was a silly thing, but I had this idea that if I could just Know Everything, well, then that would be awesome.

Maybe it's chemical.

Something else I suspected: You learn better when you take notes by hand, and learn less well when you type into a computer.

And this is something I've been thinking is probably true: If you have something important to your life you want to do, do it first thing in the morning.

Two reasons: 1, you are more creative and fresh in the morning; 2, in the morning, you have not yet been overcome by the demands of the day, which will cause you to not do that very important thing, should you wait to do it.

The article makes a good point: If something's important, you'll only skip it if you have a really good reason for doing so. But guess what? The longer you wait, the more the odds climb that your day will deliver that Really Good Reason not to do it.

Damn, I seriously have to start getting up before 10.

Apologies for these lame posts -- I've been trying to defend my last post against various critics on Twitter. I'll get up something better in a few minutes.

Bonus: Learning Is Racist: Via @lisadep, Rush Limbaugh found someone arguing that reading to your children at night gives them an "unfair advantage," which, I guess, you should stop doing, because Harrison Bergeron wasn't a warning, it was an instruction manual.

The Daily Telegraph frets:

"Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?" asks a story on the ABC’s [Australian Broadcasting Company's] website.

"Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?"

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC's Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

"Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don't -- the difference in their life chances --is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

So humanity is doomed, but you knew that.

Good riddance to bad rubbish I say.

Posted by Ace at 04:12 PM Comments

Megyn Kelly, Shooting Down Bill O'Reilly's Cowardly Stance on the Garland Shooting: "Should We Get Rid of All the Jews, Too?"


O'Reilly is a pretty thoughtless man, given to the sort of rantings of the Lunchbucket Philosopher, basing his philosophy not on Judeo-Christian teachings, as he never tired of cliche-ing, but on his visceral gut reactions.

Do I like this? Do I not like this? Does this bother me in my gut?

I knock Megyn Kelly for being part of the smug Upper Middle Class Consensus, which is essentially a center-left worldview, even among alleged conservatives, but she's also, unlike Bill O'Reilly, a smart and cutting thinker who is more than capable of thinking in terms of abstraction and cool reasoning, and here she takes heated exception to Bill O'Reily's cowardly carping about Ms. Gellar and how he wouldn't have made the point in quite that way.

Oh? We're criticizing Ms. Gellar, a woman who was just the subject of a jihadi assassination attempt and who may well be a marked woman for the rest of her life, on niggling matters of tone and style?

And we need to do this now? We need to trot out the smug and absolutely unexamined, absolutely thoughtless vanities of Upper Middle Class Respectability and attack Ms. Gellar for not doing it in quite the way we would have, even as, in all likelihood, she scrambles to find long-term security to protect her life?

For drawing a cartoon?

This has been stewing in me since yesterday. It's not just that the left is questioning Ms. Gellar in this; that much I expected.

It's that so much of the right is rushing to join them, and thereby Signal that they have Value per the norms established by the leftist politico-media consensus.

I do wish to not overly attack people I like and genuinely respect; but when I read, for example, Jamie Kirchick, a normally dependable guy and someone I've met slightly, and like well enough, spending 700 words of an 800 word column talking up how base he thinks Pam Gellar is in a column allegedly defending her right to free speech, instead of, you know, actually defending her right to free speech, I become despairing, because if this is all the defense the alleged defenders of Free Speech can muster, then we have no right to free speech.

This is about class. This is all about class.

This is about, specifically, the careerist, cowardly, go-along-to-get-along mores of the Upper Middle Class, the class of people whose parents were all college educated, and of course are college educated themselves; the class that dominates our thought-transmitting institutions (because non-college educated people are more of less shut out of this industry).

It is a class which is deathly afraid of social stigma, and lives in class-based fear being grouped with the wrong people, and which is more interested in Career, quite frankly, than in the actual tradecraft of that Career, which is clarity of thought and clarity of expression.

Thus, our institutions of thought propagation are dominated by the very people who can be easily cowed by the Social Justice Warriors, and who will, therefore, adjust their speech in order to not run afoul of the thoughtless -- and frequently lunatic -- thugs of the censorious left.

The very people we need to be most immune to the menaces of stigma, and the blandishments of career advancement, are, due to the absolute primacy of the Upper Middle Class imperative of advancing one's career and avoiding scandal, stigma, and controversy, the very people most sensitive to such distortions.

Here are the simple facts of the matter, with no need of maligning Ms. Gellar:

Ms. Gellar believes, as almost all on the right claim to believe, that free speech should in fact be free, but that speech is not in fact free, due to the intolerable threats of a determined and lunatic religious minority set on imposing their alien laws of blasphemy against us.

Ms. Gellar acts, as almost all on the right claim that we should act, in defiance of benighted, medieval religious zealots who would forbid her from acting by threat of violence.

Ms. Gellar was, along with all her fellow confreres, the target of an actual assassination plot by heavily-armed jihadists determined to murder her and others present for daring to act like Americans while within the borders of the state formerly called America.

These are the facts. We need not add more to these facts simply to Signal our continuing loyalty to the Upper Middle Class consensus that keeps us employed and welcome at DC functions.

But if we were to add something more personal about Ms. Gellar at this moment, this moment when the echoes of the bullets intended to kill her still ring in the air, we could say the following:

Ms. Gellar is fearless.

Ms. Gellar, for whatever reason, is utterly immune to the thuggish enforcements of conformity imposed by the Social Justice Warrior and their publicity department, which we know as the legacy media.

Ms. Gellar chose to remain adamant about beliefs she formed after 9/11 -- beliefs that most of us once had, at least for a time -- even as many of us walked away from such beliefs, whether because we believed our initial reactions to 9/11 were overreactions, or because, as in many of our cases, the social costs of keeping on with a 9/12 mentality proved too high, so it became easier to subsume ourselves into the warm, soporific bath of the leftist-dominated Politico-Media Consensus.

That is to say, when many of us -- and here I include myself -- chose to stop talking so much about the Islamist threat, not because the Islamist threat had receded, but because the social tolerance for talking about the Islamist threat receded into almost nothing, Pam Gellar soldiered on, unbowed.

Now, as a personal matter, I have had sharp differences with Ms. Gellar. We do not get along.

But this is entirely besides the point.

Americans, acting under the influence of America, were fucking shot at by crazed religious cultists seeking to impose a cancerous religious lunacy on America.

One does not "support" someone's right to free speech by name-calling them and advertising how far one believes they fall outside the smug Upper Middle Class (leftist-dominated) Consensus.

One supports free speech by supporting those who speak freely.

I am so disgusted by how so many alleged thinkers seem to care more about social positioning than actual thought.

I should not advertise any hostility I may have towards Ms. Gellar to prove I'm "among the acceptable ones."

Acceptable to whom? Who is making this list?

Perhaps I am like Ms. Gellar in this respect: I have long ago decided that I do not wish to be on the list of the Acceptable Ones, and will take no action whatsoever to secure my place upon it. Maybe I have an advantage here: I do not seek the approval of those who bestow Respectability, as I simply do not respect them.

People who make their trade by writing and, one should hope, thinking about ideas should perhaps follow Ms. Gellar's example, not on the particular positions she stakes out, but her example as to her complete indifference as to how any statement will advance or retard her position in the hierarchy of the stultifying, deliberately-obscuring vagueries of Upper Middle Class Consensus of Respectability.

Are we here to talk about ideas and principles, or are we here to secure position and advantage?

A woman spoke.

Men with guns shot at her for speaking.

Do we really need to take an "on the one hand, on the other hand" approach here.

And we need not talk about "tone" or whether Ms. Gellar speaks for us on all things.

One does not award Style Points on a battlefield.

This is why we have no actual conservative movement worth a damn: Because our political officers and our thought leaders are all drawn from, and aspire to advance in, the same Upper Middle Class Northeast-and-California cultural consensus of "respectability."

Some people are ideologues are are intensely and primarily interested in Ideas.

Most are not.

And thus most people's first loyalty is not to any abstract Idea, but the more tangible Class they come from, and which gives them Identity, which gives them Place in the world, and which is, for far too many thinkers, a major source of pride and, I dare say, egotistical joy.

The current dominant class, the class that controls the political-media establishment, is this Upper Middle Class, leftism-inflected consensus, and until people can begin seeing this and seeing past it, and until they can begin making their first loyalty to Idea and Principle, which are universal and eternal, rather than Class and Cult, which are nothing but happenstance and ego, we will continue having an "opposition" which continues genuflecting to leftist conformity rather than standing up for ideas.

To escape the Matrix, you must first see the Matrix -- something Andrew Breitbart was fond of observing.

To be a traitor to one's Class is to be a patriot towards humanity.

Maybe Marx said that. Maybe I did. I don't know. But I do believe it. I believe that far too many ideas we have are non-ideas, things we've never actually thought through, but are simply Class Assumptions, and that we are all too afraid to go against our herd, our tribe, and start questioning some goddamned Class Assumptions.

Posted by Ace at 02:00 PM Comments

Wayne Allen Root: I Was Politically Targeted for an IRS Audit and I Can Prove It


The Obama critic has posted his account at Fox News.

Root was audited in 2011. He got a call from the IRS, in which the agent told him about his (Root's) political views -- something that's not supposed to happen, obviously.

He spent thousands of dollars on his defense and prevailed in Tax Court in 2012 -- at which time he was informed he was being audited again, something his tax lawyer said he'd never heard of before.

Then he began FOIA'ing the IRS to find out what was going on.

By law, the IRS has 30 days to comply. They stalled and refused for 14 months. The question is why would a government agency disobey the law for 13 months?

Now come the political and criminal revelations. The IRS is supposed to be totally nonpolitical, as it must be in a free and fair democratic society. Do you know what my IRS tax file says?


Do you know the date "SENSITIVE CASE" was written on my tax file? The week Lois Lerner testified in Congress.

The only thing "SENSITIVE" about my case is that I'm a conservative political columnist and commentator often critical of the president. The only context where “sensitive” applies to me is “POLITICALLY SENSITIVE."

Why would a citizen’s tax file be tied to his politics? Why would the IRS know my politics? Why would a normal random audit be classified as "SENSITIVE?"


The reason it may have taken the IRS fourteen months to turn my IRS files over to Judicial Watch is that they state a United States senator from Oregon was involved. At the time both senators from Oregon were Democrats. But only one, Ron Wyden, was chairman of the Senate Finance Committee with oversight over...the IRS. Could Ron Wyden have been the Democrat senator involved in my case?

If so, why was a U.S. senator involved in a "normal random audit?" Why was an Oregon Senator involved in the audit of a Nevada small businessman? Since when do United States Senators get involved in IRS audits?


But wait, we’re not done. On May 23, 2013, my case was officially closed. Recognize that date? It's the exact day that IRS official Lois Lerner was suspended and the day after she testified in front of Congress (and refused to answer questions on the grounds it might incriminate her). Coincidence?

Why was my case closed? The IRS auditor handling my case informed my tax attorney that he had just been called by a top IRS official demanding the case be closed immediately. Why would a top IRS official get involved in my case? Who asked him to make that call? Did he know the politically damaging details of this audit marked “SENSITIVE CASE"? Why did it happen the very day after Lois Lerner's testimony?

There is no debate. I am living proof that there was a widespread political witch hunt and criminal conspiracy within the IRS. It is also proof that this scandal extended beyond the IRS to high-level Democrats -- including a specific Democratic U.S. Senator. It's all in black and white in my personal IRS tax files. These are facts.

People need to go to jail.

Posted by Ace at 11:50 AM Comments

The Idiocy Of "Sure People Have A Right To Speech But....."


There are a lot of examples of the genre in the wake of the Garland, TX terrorist attack but Ken White at Popehat finds a particularly stupid one to gnaw on for awhile. As you might expect, hilarity and carnage ensue.

I can't come close to Ken's take down on the law but there's one sub-genre I'd like to address. It's the, "sure xxxx is a terrible, horrible, no good, piece of human excrement but even someone that loathsome is entitled to speak" club. Spare me the throat clearing. The quality of the person speaking and the content of their speech isn't at issue. In fact they are entirely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. It's the right to speak and our willingness as a society to stand for the principle that matters.

The reality is I'm not standing for or with Pam Geller, the KKK or anyone else I may disagree with. I'm standing for myself. Someday each of us may find ourselves on the "wrong" side of "all right thinking people" and unless we draw a firm and bright line all the time, we should not expect it to protect us when we most need it.

Posted by DrewM. at 11:18 AM Comments

Iran Deal Failure Theater


We got into the Corker-Cardin/Menendez Iran bill a bit on the podcast last week but since Senate action is coming to a head this week, it's worth a fuller look.

As you may recall, Ace is steadfastly opposed to it in its current form. That makes sense because in its current form the bill is a finely crafted instrument designed to allow a majority of Senators to say they did exactly what their votes (on all sides) wanted while not actually doing a damn thing. Corker's inversion of the 2/3rd majority vote to approve a treaty into a 2/3rd majority vote to kill it is a perfect example. Low information voters will think it's being treated just like a treaty when in fact it will the literal opposite of that.

So basically, it's the kind of deal Senators are genetically predisposed to love. If only it included some highway spending in every state it would the Platonic Ideal of Senate bills.

Unfortunately for Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio is running for President. He wants the bill to actually accomplish something. Like serve as a substantive check on Obama and Iran (yeah, they are basically the same at this point). And that's....a problem for the "be seen doing something but not really doing anything" crowd.

Remember when the deal was being negotiated and people said things like, "no deal is better than a bad deal" or "the choice isn't between this deal and a better one but this one and no deal"? Those sentiments apply to this bill.

If any of Rubio's amendments are agreed to (like ensuring the final deal conforms to Obama's "fact sheet") then the Democrats will kill it in the Senate or Obama will veto it and his veto will be sustained.

So either the Senate passes the fig leaf of Corker, which all but ensures that whatever Obama agrees to will survive a Senate vote of "disapproval" (only 37 Democrats will have to stick with Obama) or kill the bill and Obama will simply sign whatever he was going to sign anyway and Congress will never vote on it.

In the end, the outcome is basically the same.

The real question is, what's the best way to hang an Iran nuke around the collective necks of the Democrats? I'd say forgo Corker and make Democrats in the Senate vote on every single damn poison pill out there. Make them either kill a strong bill or make them vote for it, force Obama to veto it and then make Democrats choke on the inevitable outcome of this deal.

We'll have a better sense of this later today or tomorrow when McConnell will announce if Rubio's strong arm tactic to force poison pill votes is what the GOP Senate caucus wants or if they will simply pass Corker as is. read this story to get a sense of how Rubio is jamming McConnell on this. Basically McConnell could have kept Rubio's amendments off the floor and saved Republicans from either having to vote for them and killing the deal or vote against them and look soft on Iran. Rubio however used a parliamentary maneuver that forces McConnell to either let Rubio's poison pills come to a vote, thus forcing GOP Senators into the choice they want to avoid or end debate and kill amendments Republicans wanted to at least vote on to look tough but not so tough as to kill the deal.

But wait! This movie review isn't over....

Continue reading

Posted by DrewM. at 09:59 AM Comments

Morning Thread (5-5-2015)


Happy Cinco de Mayo, which, as we all know, celebrates the date margaritas were invented.

Posted by Andy at 06:07 AM Comments

Overnight Open Thread (5/4/2015) [@CraigR3521]

—Open Blogger

Hi, Morons and Moronettes- I'm tmi3rd, and I'm on the road tonight (sorry about this being late), so I'd like to introduce my friend @CraigR3521 (as you'd find him on Twitter). He winds up being a great source of material for threads such as these, and he's also someone I'm very pleased to call my friend. Enjoy!

Howdy, folks! I’m Craigé, and I’m a long-time Moron, full-time lurker.

I'd planned to write a brilliant and entertaining essay, like the ones that I usually enjoy here, but my ADD had other plans. However, it leads me to a lot of random things that amuse me.

More below the fold...

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 10:59 PM Comments

Bill Clinton: No One Would Give Me Money Just to Influence US Policy



Let me say something obvious: if you're paying $500,000 or $750,000 for Bill Clinton, you're not paying for a canned speech from an old man most of whose vague pronouncements have already been well-documented and are trite to the point of agony.

You're paying for something else.

So: What are people paying for?

When Bill Clinton deliberately committed perjury in the Monica Lewinsky matter, his defense was that while he spoke falsely, he did not knowingly lie.

Well, now he's claiming, with respect to his foundation hiding money, refusing to disclose, and arranging sweet uranium deals for close buddies who just happen to give him $131 million, neither he or his wife did anything knowingly wrong.

Let's talk about this "knowingly" defense. To be found guilty of committing most crimes (all but a precious few which are called "strict liability" crimes, where performing the act itself imposes liability), you must have both committed a blameworthy act (actus reus) while having a blameworthy state of mind (mens rea).

To commit a blameworthy act is not sufficient to impose criminal liability.

If someone sneaks some pot into you luggage without your knowledge of that, you will wind up committing the guilty act of transporting contraband from one country to another, but because (in this hypothethical) you legitimately did not have any guilty culpable state (being completely oblivious to the drugs), you are not guilty of a crime.

That's why they ask you at the airport if you've left your luggage unattended. If you make a false statement here, they can at least try to get you for knowingly making a false statement.

At any rate, it's well-nigh impossible to prove guilty states of mind by direct evidence. We have no brain scans which can tell us if a suspect acted knowingly. The best we can have -- and we only have it in a tiny minority of cases -- is the defendant confessing to someone else, or in a document -- like an email, for example -- what his state of mind at the time of the forbidden action was.

We very rarely have such evidence for state of mind. Usually, all we have is circumtsances that permit an inference as to the actor's state of mind.

In all of the Clintons' lawbreaking, they rely exclusively upon this. State of mind is hard to prove, so they simply deny they had a culpable state of mind, and, crucially, they destroy and hide all documents in which they may have inadvertently given the game away by explaining their level of knowledge or intent.

And, importantly: Because anyone can always say "But you can't prooooove your obvious inference!", they give their partisan dummies a ready argument to be used for all Clinton scandals.

And at this point, after 20 years of this endless lawbreaking, the Clinton partisans pretty much all know the drill.

Sure Clinton spoke falsely when he said he hadn't had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, but you can't prove he was not, as he claims, confused about what constituted sexual relations (giving oral sex to Monica, which he didn't do, or getting oral sex from Monica, which he did).

Sure Hillary spoke falsely when she claimed she hadn't worked on the Whitewater account, and the long-hidden records prove that she did, but you can't prove she knew she was working on Whitewater when she was working on Whitewater -- she says she never heard Whitewater called Whitewater. You can't prove she's lying.

Bill Clinton spoke falsely when he said he was never alone with Monica Lewinsky, but you can't prove that he knew he was along. After all, Clinton later tried to explain: Maybe we were alone, but I never "felt" like we were.

Not even when she was giving him analingus, or he was sticking a cigar inside of her.

So yes, the Clinton partisans know at this point that the Clintons have done every single action they're accused of doing, and that the Eternal Defense of the Scoundrels will be that you can't prove they understood the crimes they were committing when they were committing them.

And it will probably work, yet again.

Posted by Ace at 08:56 PM Comments

Loser in the Mayweather-Pacquiao Fight? The Viewers


Actually, I did not see it, and to be honest I was barely even aware it was going on, but this guy says it was just terrible.

Mayweather vs. Pacquiao: the uber-bout that wasn’t. The so-called fight of the century was pay-per-snooze, a complete waste of everyone’s time and money -- except in a boxing community now rolling in obscene amounts of cash, surely in disbelief they fooled us rubes again.


But we ignored all this because we wanted the fight to be something greater than it was. We attached meaning to it when this was clearly a payout fight, at best. (Floyd even admitted as much.) Oh, they wanted to win, but this hardly evoked the memories of Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Sugar Ray, The Hitman and Hagler fighting brawls that would land them in hospitals for belts that defined them as athletes. This was just glorified sparring....

They thought that the "whoosh" made by Pacquiao’s missed punches and the crowd noise that followed would fool us into thinking this was a real bout, not robbery with the press of a PPV button. They were selling a lie and we were all too happy to buy into it.

Boxing is dead and Mayweather-Pacquiao killed it. Never again will people shell out $100 to watch two old men grab at each other for 36 minutes.

Unless there’s a rematch. Maybe that’s the one that’ll be different.

This guy agrees re: all the terribleness.

Apparently -- I know nothing about any of this, so when I say "apparently," I mean "someone else told me this" -- apparently Mayweather is a great boxer, as in, the actual boxing skill of boxing, which means he wins on points, and not on actually hitting people. Apparently the fight consisted of little more than Mayweather putting up an impregnable defense with his better boxing skills and much longer reach, and then occasionally throwing powder-puff punches just to get the judges to award him points for making contact.

Many people are saying "MMA won the fight," mixed martial arts being the major competitor to boxing -- and the rising competitor to boxing, and, actually, I think, the actually-more-popular-and-has-been-for-years fighting sport competitor to boxing.

When I first heard of this fight a month ago, and heard it would be the most lucrative fight ever, I actually assumed it was a UFC fight. I was surprised to hear it was boxing.

Oh well.

You know who knows how to stage a fight? CNN, that's who. They've had a great run of arranging, promoting, and cashing in on a series of high-profile fights between cops and "protesters."

Posted by Ace at 07:43 PM Comments

Not a Joke: Temple of Satan Fights Abortion Restrictions, Citing Religious Liberty, and Amanda Marcotte Applauds


They're pretty psyched to have Lucifer on their side.

The Prince of Lies is what you call "a really big Get."

Posted by Ace at 05:43 PM Comments

NBC News Head Andrew Lack Instructs Three MSNBC Shows to Put Together "Sizzle Reels" Showing Their Programs At Their Best, Suggesting He May Axe Them


A sizzle reel of Chris Hayes?

The only thing Chris Hayes knows how to sizzle is hotdogs.

But he's been asked to show what his program might look like when, in his estimation, it's not completely unwatchable.

A couple of weeks ago, the executive producers of Now with Alex Wagner, The Ed Show, and All In with Chris Hayes were told to prepare “sizzle reels” of the best their programs have to offer. Theoretically, this exercise will help them identify what works best on their respective shows but, in reality, our sources say, any or all of these shows could soon be on the chopping block. The senior staffs of all three programs, we are told, are now concerned that their days are numbered.

Not on the list of the programs needing of sizzle: Al Sharpton's show, which seems strangely excluded from the list of shows which may be cancelled, especially given, Ed Morrissey writes, the fact that Sharpton seems to be booking labor honchos on the show after they donate to his Clinton-like fake "charity."

Posted by Ace at 04:58 PM Comments

In Baltimore, Reporters Catch "Protesters" Spinning False Testimony About a "Police Shooting" in Real Time


Here is what the situation appeared to be:

A man, standing I think at the front of a block of "protesters," reached into his pants. Police attempted to arrest him.

The man went to the ground.

Pictures of the man on the ground did not show blood.

But the man was carted off to the hospital.

"Protesters" claimed he had been shot without cause. They began spinning claims of police provoking the "protesters" with nightsticks and teargas.

Later, a beat-up old revolver was seen on the ground near where the man had been standing, before he fell.

Another report said this gun was dropped by the man, and discharged when it hit the ground.

FoxNews reporter Mike Tobin, on the scene, however, claimed he heard only one shot, which seemed to dispel that last report -- if the gun discharged when it hit the ground, and if the cops shot the guy, that's at least two shots, if not more.

Police are now saying There was no shooting at all.

Police now say they man was running down the street, and dropped his gun as he did. There the gun discharged. But no police fired their weapons.

What Action News Shep reported breathlessly as a police shooting appears to be nothing more than the police making an arrest without incident of a criminal carrying a revolver.

Shep Smith, who of course hyped the shit out of this because he's a dishonest leftist agitator (remember the Superdome?), is now eating huge piles of shit over this.

This is possibly the most embarrassing false report filed by FoxNews, and it is little surprise to me that Action News Shep is in the center of it.

An enormous embarrassment, for which Fox will be rightly mocked.

But the mockers will not be quick to point out the embarrassment was courtesy of Fox's midday MSNBC host -- for some reason, Fox lets an MSNBC host do their breaking news -- or that his embarrassment was caused by attempting to promote leftist narratives.

Continue reading

Posted by Ace at 03:32 PM Comments

Social Justice Warriorette: Sexual Consent Is Meaningless, Because Sometimes "Yes" Means "No"


Sexual hysteric exhibits hysteria about sex. Film at 11.

K-Timpf reports on a piece written by a Student -- and right there, you know you're in for some Serious Thinking -- in which she complains that she says Yes when she means No and therefore she has actually been "raped" -- while giving actual affirmative consent.

In the piece, Bosiljevac explains that she and her friends even came up with a phrase to describe someone having sex with you who you didn’t want to have sex with even though you told him that you did, which they apparently consider a form of rape: “We coined the term 'raped by rape culture' to describe what it was like to say yes, coerced by the culture that had raised us and the systems of power that worked on us, and to still want 'no,'" she writes in the April 30 article, titled "Why Yes Can Mean No."

Bosiljevac writes that she’s been dealing with the oppression of this culture her whole life -- beginning with having to endure relatives kissing her cheeks "even as I winced and turned away" -- and that it continues to influence her sexual decision-making abilities, almost to the point where she doesn’t seem to think she really has any ability to make those decisions at all.

She then goes on to explain the reasons she feels that consenting to sex is actually rape.

"Sometimes, for me, there was obligation from already having gone back to someone's room, not wanting to ruin a good friendship, loneliness, worry that no one else would ever be interested, a fear that if I did say no, they might not stop, the influence of alcohol, and an understanding that hookups are 'supposed' to be fun," she writes.

Oh, it gets better. For some reason this has something to do with homophobia.

You can read the little idiot's hysterics here.

For me, and many others like me, consent isn't easy. Yes doesn't always mean yes, and we misplaced 'no' several years ago. This experience isn't random, but disproportionately affects oppressed communities. Consent is a privilege, and it was built for wealthy, heterosexual, cis, white, western, able-bodied masculinity. When society has taught some of us to take up as little space as possible, to take all attention as flattery, and to be truly grateful that anyone at all could want our bodies or love, it isn't always our choice to say yes.

Pathetic: She takes attention as flattery, and gives herself to those who pay any attention to her silly ass; and that's your fault, Rapers.

Consent as a privilege doesn't just happen in sex. It happens for those of us who give too much in friendships without knowing how to ask for reciprocation, who let doctors touch us in ways that are triggering because we don't want to make trouble, who dance with handsy strangers because our friends already left the party, who stick around in toxic relationships because we don’t know if we’re allowed to expect better. When you’re poor, disabled, queer, non-white, trans, or feminine, 'no' isn't for you. I don't mean to insist that every person oppressed in these systems of power can’t have empowering consensual experiences, and I know many who do. What I do mean to say is that for me, finding 'no' is a process, consent is elusive, and sometimes, even when people don’t mean to--they hurt me.

So if consent isn't just sexy, quippy slogans on tank tops, or boob-shaped cupcakes, what happens next? First, we have to realize that all oppression is connected, and all rape is racist, classist, ableist, patriarchal, hetero and cissexist. We cannot make consent available to all if we are not simultaneously disrupting these structures. Next, we have to stop trying to squash the variety of experiences of coercion into one "Affirmative Consent" law. We cannot trust the state to defend consent and bodily integrity--not in Baltimore, Ferguson, Los Angeles, or Claremont. In this moment, we have to throw out legislation entirely to realize that justice for our communities wasn't built into those systems anyway.

The state needs to stop taking affirmative consent to signal a non-rape, she means, because to take it that way would be to "squash" all the various ways a woman can be raped into one "narrative."

She's obviously arguing that a woman can and should simply say "I was raped" no matter what the circumstances, no matter how explicit the consent, and that the state should then prosecute her "rapist."

Inspired by the recent performance of The Vagina Monologues at CMC, this piece is part of a series of Forum articles by women at CMC about women and sexuality....

You lost me.

Posted by Ace at 02:50 PM Comments

Conservative Commentator Guy Benson Comes Out As Gay in a Footnote of His New Book


He's written a new book with Mary Katherine Ham called End of Discussion: How the Liberal Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate.

In a chapter on the gay outrage industry, he notes that he himself is gay, literally in a footnote, which is a very neat manner of highlighting that he thinks sexuality should also, metaphorically, but a footnote to someone's political identity.

In an interview with Buzzfeed, Benson denies the idea that being gay automatically should fit one with a "bedazzled ideological straitjacket," and notes this about the punitive social justice warriors of the gay-marriage-uber-alles left.

Many conservatives have argued there must be a legal process for exemption from laws on the basis of religious belief. For his part, Benson argued that exact space between existence and participation is what has helped accelerate acceptance for marriages. The idea that same-sex couples' marriages wouldn't affect straight couples' marriages was "a very effective argument that won over a lot of people," he said.

"I'm for civil marriage, I’m for nondiscrimination laws- but I think there should be broad carve-outs for religious organizations, in particular, and narrow carve-outs for closely-held businesses that serve the wedding industry,"he said.

Yes, the argument was always made: "Why not agree to this, as this will affect your lives not at all?"

But then, the moment the gay left has some momentum, we learn: "Oh yes, we certainly intend that this will affect your lives in all sorts of ways; we in fact demand you rewrite your very religion to re-architect your beliefs to better serve us."

Rod Dreher has written about this fundamental dishonesty and promise-breaking on the part of the cultural left, calling it the Law of Merited Impossibility. As Dreher explains it:

"It's a complete absurdity to believe that Christians will suffer a single thing from the expansion of gay rights, and boy, do they deserve what they're going to get."
Posted by Ace at 02:06 PM Comments

Leftists and the Media, But I Repeat Myself, All But Justifying The Terrorist Attack on Free Speech


Apparently Pamela Gellar is a pungent provocateur, so it's okay to kill her.

See, she was mocking a religion, and therefore, members of that religion can be excused for trying to murder those who mock their god.

So, I guess my question is:

"The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,"
a troupe of anti-clerical gay provocateurs who
cross-dress as bizarre nuns to insult the church and
conventional morality of all sorts,
stage a "Hunky Jesus" competition in San Franscisco

A different "Hunky Jesus" competition, held in Portland, promised a $300 grand prize to the winner; I assume the San Francisco one would promise a bigger take.

So: Should angry Christians start polishing their rifles?

Either we are all allowed to provoke or we are all not so permitted. Either we all have the right to use violence to defend affronts to our god -- even the strange, alien, backwards god of Christianity -- or none of us do.

The left continues to insist that people are allowed to "punch up" -- or shoot guns "up" -- but not down.

Thus pushing the idea that Christians and other allegedly dominant groups are officially second-class citizens, with fewer rights than others (gays, Muslims, especially).

Continue reading

Posted by Ace at 12:31 PM Comments

Area Politician Says: Government Doesn't Work, So Let's Try Government Instead


In the wake of the Baltimore riots and our "everything old is new again" conversation on poverty, Paul Ryan has some startling news...Poverty won The War on Poverty.

"After a 50-year war on poverty and trillions of dollars spent, we still have the same poverty rates – 45 million people in poverty," he said on CBS's "Face the Nation" program. "What we as a country – this isn't a Republican-Democrat thing – it's we as a country need to say, "That's not good enough. … We're not getting the results we need."

Hard to argue with that.

Of course the logical conclusion one would reach from this half-century plus of failure is government is simply incapable of doing anything about fundamental societal problems like multi-generational poverty. Well, it can do somethings, mostly it can make it worse by destroying families. While the left sees that as a rousing success, it's not something conservatives should be shooting for.

So clearly a smart guy like Paul Ryan realizes that government isn't the solution to this particular problem anymore than say a plumber is the right person to call when your car breaks down.

Well, not exactly.

Ryan, the chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee and former vice presidential candidate, said federal programs aimed at alleviating poverty should be scaled back to allow states a great role in the effort.

"What the federal government's good at doing is providing resources. What the federal government is bad at doing is dictating solutions," he said. "What I think the federal government has done is displaced local problem solving with top-down, one-size-fits-all, and it's not working."


Let's get something out of the way up front, "block grants" are a magic incantation conservative reformers like to throw out there to pretend they are "getting Washington out of the way." They aren't.

No one is going to just write billions and billions of checks and not put strings on how they are spent or require oversight and an accounting of results. So the idea that genius state policy makers will just be getting dump truck loads of cash unencumbered by policy makers in DC is a lie.

As far as the idea that the federal government is good at "providing resources" I guess that's true in as much as it can essentially create money out of thin air and "spread it around". I'm not sure that's a talent we should be encouraging though.

As for the idea that state governments are some how bastions of nimble and talented problem solvers I submit three names....California, New York and Massachusetts.

From whence does this mystical faith in state governments to change the hearts and fates of men come? On constitutional grounds states are often the preferable level of government but on a competency grounds? The advantage of state control isn't improved results but rather limited damage. For every damaging policy California implements there are escape destinations. People don't go to Florida or Texas because they are running super smart and innovative state governments, they go there because they are running relatively small and non-invasive ones.

More importantly, can we simply stop accepting the leftist notion that if given enough resources used wisely enough government at any level can change the fortunes of the poor?

If it's simply a question or "providing resources", how much? Tell how much it will take to turn the denizens of the drug infested neighborhoods of Baltimore or predominately white rural areas where meth and Heroin use are skyrocketing, into fine upstanding contributing members of society. Is money the only issues keeping these fine folks from productive careers and the comforts of middle class America? If not, and I don't think anyone thinks it is, whatever is missing is something government simply can not provide.

We should be arguing for alternatives to government that enable people to do the best they can on their own. Only the individual knows what they want and what they are willing to work to achieve. No government bureaucracy will ever be smart, nimble or caring enough to deftly guide an individual through life. State governments are just as a much of a blunt force instrument as the federal government. The only differences are the geographic limits of the damage they can do and the ability of people to move to avoid the worst of it.

Put not your faith in self-dealing bureaucrats at any level.

Until conservative "leaders" accept this, conservative "reformers" will simply be rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking nation.

We spend a lot of time debating how government should do things. What we need is to spend some time thinking about what government really can or should even try to do.

Posted by DrewM. at 10:59 AM Comments

Open Thread


Stanisław Masłowski, "Wschód Księżyca" (Moonrise) (1884)

Posted by rdbrewer at 10:18 AM Comments

Morning Thread (5-4-2015)


Happy Cinco de Cuatro, everyone.

Posted by Andy at 06:02 AM Comments

Overnight Open Thread (5/3/15) [tmi3rd]

—Open Blogger

Good evening once again, Morons and Moronettes. Maetenloch is on assignment for one more week, so you'll get me tonight, and tomorrow night, you'll get @CraigR3521, one of my good friends from Facebook and Twitter, and a guy whose links I routinely borrow from.

I'm a little less lighthearted this evening, but there'll still be some fun with this. This is necessarily going to be long- content rolled in for the 24 hours I was working on this- so be advised ahead of time.

More beneath the fold!

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 11:47 PM Comments

BREAKING NEWS-Possible terrorist attack in Texas [Weirddave]

—Open Blogger

Most of this is coming from Breitbart Texas:

Armed police officers rushed in to the Mohammed Art Exhibit and Contest and quickly removed Pamela Geller and whisked her away to safety after a gunfight erupted outside of the event. A law enforcement officer and two suspects are reportedly down, according to police on the scene. Three Breitbart Texas reporters are locked down inside of the event. The officers on the scene said that possible explosives were found. The extrication of Geller occurred during a live video interview with Breitbart Texas.

Not much beyond that. Geller is safe, Wounded cop is in the hospital and expected to recover, the attackers are still lying where they fell pending clearance by the bomb squad. It's unknown what their religious affiliation is at this point, but I doubt that they were Mormons.

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 08:57 PM Comments

Open Thread - We <3 Obamacare Edition [Weirddave]

—Open Blogger

I dunno how many of y'all saw this, or even realized it's significance if you did, but last week it was announced that Assurant is selling or closing its health insurance business.

With nearly 1 million customers, Assurant Health provides a broad array of insurance coverage to individuals, families and small employers including major medical, short-term and supplemental plans. The company expects Assurant Health to report a net operating loss for the quarter in the range of $80 million to $90 million. Approximately half of the loss is attributable to a reduction in 2014 estimated recoveries from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) risk mitigation programs. The remainder reflects elevated claims on 2015 ACA policies.

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 06:29 PM Comments

Food Thread: Cheese, Butter, Irritating Little Birds....And More! [CBD]

—Open Blogger

Salers, Bleu des Causses, Roquefort and Gaperon

Julie Boulanger cheese.png
From: French Ladies with French Cheeses

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 04:00 PM Comments

Something Uplifting for a Sunday Afternoon... Literally! [Y-not]

—Open Blogger

A couple of weeks ago our fearless leader (no, not Obama... the Head Ewok!) was enjoining us to unplug our televisions. He made some good arguments for what a soul-sucking time-waster TV programming is.

Anyway, not long after that thread the Mister and I went to see one of the touring shows of Cirque du Soleil, "Varekai." This was our third CdS show. Each one has been well worth the price of admission and has left us in awe of what human beings can accomplish. Very uplifting. I hated people a wee bit less after seeing that show.

Varekai's plot was loosely based on the legend of Icarus. There was a happy ending (Icarus recovered from his injuries and found love), but mostly CdS performances are an excuse to showcase some spectacular feats of skill, agility, strength, and bravery.

The most dangerous act in Varekai was the Russian Swings. Here's a clip with abysmal music (not from the show):

Continue reading

Posted by Open Blogger at 01:42 PM Comments

The AoSHQ Amazon Store

Top Headlines
A college English teacher will not grade on grammar.
"correctly written and spoken English is the language of the rich and powerful" [@ComradeArthur]
MyFox: Authorities find fake skeletons in underwater lawn chairs
"A man snorkeling in the Colorado River near the Arizona and California border was terrified...." [rdbrewer]

SciAm: Fixing the Problem of Liberal Bias in Social Psychology
"The topic has exploded out of our conference halls and into major news outlets over the past several years...." [rdbrewer]

Tim Graham: In E-Mail, Ed Schultz Mocked Chris Matthews 'Foaming at the Mouth'
A lawsuit against Schultz turned up nasty emails. F/x, "Do you think it’s a good idea if I spit all over myself like Chris Mathews..." Etc. Must be a great place to work. Via commenter "Jane D'oh." [rdbrewer]
Victor Davis Hanson, How Civilizations Collapse — Is U.S. Next? [Weirddave]

Right, left unite to blast McConnell over Patriot Act move
"The backlash from both sides points to the perilous path for backers of McConnell’s effort, which is likely to engender opposition from liberal and conservative groups alike." It's hard to believe McConnell would stand in the way of the bipartisan consensus the "Patriot" Act needs to be changed. The data collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment right to be secure in our papers and effects is used routinely by other agencies for domestic purposes. It never was just about terrorism. What Republican can tolerate that? [rdbrewer]

CNBC: Hillary is the favorite among millionaire voters
Via Drudge. I guess we can shelve that perception the GOP is the party of the rich, huh Dems? [rdbrewer]

Quinnipiac: Walker Leading in Iowa
By 9 points at 21 percent. Jeb is at 5 percent. Via Drudge. [rdbrewer]

Peter Cook (Slublog): The Left Brings The Culture War To Boxing
"Upon their recent boxing match, the Left proclaimed Floyd Mayweather’s girlfriend-beating equal to Manny Pacquiao’s public speaking. It’s part of a bigger strategy." [rdbrewer]
I'm about to totally mind-screw you and you won't be the same for the rest of the day. Courtesy of Jeff, this entirely new brand of cray-cray. Some people just don't know how to win graciously. - NDH
"Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer: a brief review. Got it today, read it all the way through -- it's a lot worse (for the Clintons) than what you've seen in the media so far. I'd like to think that this would kill Hillary's candidacy, but the Dems have no real alternative and the Clintons (with cause) don't believe normal rules apply to them. [Fritzworth]

Sonny Bunch: Subjecting free speech to the assassin’s veto
"[W]e make the world a more dangerous place each time we cede a sliver of speech to killers." [rdbrewer]

Patrick Pool: EXCLUSIVE: FBI, DHS Assessed Terror Attack Threat to Texas ‘Draw Muhammad’ Contest as ‘UNLIKELY’
Via @EdDriscoll. [rdbrewer]

Fox News: EMP threat to the electrical grid is 'the greatest threat' our nation faces
Not only from a nuclear blast (electromagnetic pulse, "EMP"), but also a large solar flare (coronal mass ejection, "CME"). And the cost of installing surge protectors (resistors) in transformer ground connections is relatively cheap, about two-billion dollars, according to the expert at the link--or it would cost customers about twenty cents per home per month, according to James Woolsey. (I think it would cost less than both figures, FWIW. I mean, resistors, yo.) Imagine having no electricity for a year. More from WSJ. [rdbrewer]

Forgotten 60's mystery click
A nice practical joke dedication for militant feminists. [rdbrewer]

Ashe Schow: Lawsuit spells out 'nightmare' for California man accused without evidence
"Judge Margaret Morrow dismissed his claim based on prosecutors' arguments that they enjoy absolute immunity...." Absolute immunity for prosecutors is something created by judges, not statutory law, and it's obviously a flawed notion. Glenn Reynolds talked about it here. More from Paul Jossey at The Federalist. Some legislatures like this one are looking to limit it. [rdbrewer]

Ken White: Unusually Stupid McClatchy Column Gets Free Speech Wrong
"I expected that in the wake of the attempted terrorist assault on a 'draw Muhammad' event in Texas, people would write dumb things about speech. American journalists have not disappointed me." [rdbrewer]

Jim Geraghty, Morning Jolt: Bill Clinton Stretches His Old Lying Muscles
"Bill Clinton declared, 'There’s one set of rules for us and another set for everybody else' and actually believes he and his wife are held up to harder scrutiny and tougher rules than everyone else." [rdbrewer]

NBC Anchor: Geller Caused Texas Shooting Herself, by Setting Muslim ‘Mousetrap’ [rdbrewer]

Mitchell Blatt: Hamas Can Promote Genocide But Don’t Quote Them
"New York City bus ads quote a Hamas music video that calls killing Jews ‘worship.’ Outrage ensues, but not against Hamas." They've decided not to think about Hamas in a negative way, and they don't like being reminded of facts that challenge their perception. [rdbrewer]

Michael T. Hamilton: How The Iran Bill Weakens Senate Oversight While Trying To Preserve It
"If the Corker-Menendez bill passes as is, the president could execute the same weak Iran agreement that he was going to enter unilaterally—while now claiming legitimacy." [rdbrewer]

Jon Gabriel: Feminists Chase Avengers Director off Twitter
SJW's chased Joss Whedon off twitter. [rdbrewer]
Fox News Alert: Fox News team witnesses "protester" being shot by Baltimore police; he reached into his pants, and there is currently a "beat up old" revolver lying on the street where he had been shot down.
Meanwhile, other "protesters" are claiming this was murder because that's what they do
POLICE: Reports that the man was shot are "not true." This possibly agrees with what were apparently conflicting reports: The police saying the man's gun was dropped and fired when it hit the ground, and a reporter's report that only a single shot rang out... it appears likely that the police did not in fact shoot him.
But we got to see Baltimore "protesters" spin false claims in real time.
Recent Comments
Old Hob: "One way for the regular person or blog owner to pr ..."

Laurie David's Cervix: "To explain the phenomenon, Toronto-based writer Do ..."

OTB: "We will escape. It is called the Rapture. Some w ..."

Bruce J: "Nate Silver predicts the Tories will win tomorrow. ..."

The Great White Snark: "Chuck Berry, John Lennon, and Yoko singing togethe ..."

DangerGirl and her 1.21 gigawatt Sanity Prod (tm): "Meanwhile, why the fuck do Huck and Grimace feel t ..."

Hannity's Broken Record: "*scritch*...*scratch*...*scritch*...*scratch*...*S ..."

DangerGirl and her 1.21 gigawatt Sanity Prod (tm): "[i]Human shitstain should have recused himself. Ho ..."

Cato the Rebel Without a Party: "That judge needs to be removed from the bench. Po ..."

Retard Strength Trumps Smart Power: "I saw Giving Iran The Bomb open for Not Drowning, ..."

Cato the Rebel Without a Party: "I don't think you're being silly at all, Ace. I t ..."

Laurie David's Cervix: "Went unnoticed yesterday, because not a lot of fol ..."

Bloggers in Arms

Alarming News
Ambient Irony
American Digest
The Anchoress
Anticipatory Retalliation
Armies of Liberation
Attu Sees All
Bad Stated of Gruntledness
Bastard Sword
The Baron
The Bastidge
Beautiful Atrocities
A Beleaguered Conservative in Nor Cal
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Between the Coasts
Bill from INDC
The Bitch Girls
Blackfive, Paratrooper of Love
The Black Republican
Tim Blair
Blaster's Blog
Blithering Bunny
Blogs For Bush
Blonde Sagacity
Blue State Conservatives
The Real Boston Irish, Like A Viking
Breakdown Lane
Burn Rate
Cake or Death?
California Conservative
Cartago Delenda Est
Cavalry Charge
A Certain Slant of Light
Charmaine Yoest
Christina in London (Journal)
Chicago Boyz
The Cliffs of Insanity
Classical Values
Cold Fury
The Colossus Blog
The Corndog Blog
College Pundit
Confederate Yankee
The Country Store
Cowboy Blob
Cox & Forkum (cartoons)
Cranial Cavity
Cranky Neocon
Critical Mastiff
Croooow Blog
Cynical Nation
Da Goddess
Daily Lunch
Daily Pundit
The Daily Recycler (Vidblog)*
Daleks Weblog
Daly Thoughts
Ilyka Damen
Damn the Man
Dave Munger
Dave's Not Here
Dawn Eden
Day by Day (Cartoon)
Demure Thoughts
Steven den Beste/USS Clueless
Desert Cat's Paradise
Digger's Realm
Digital Brownshirt
Doc Peabody
Don Luskin/Conspiracy
Don Sequitors (Pop Culture)
The Dorian Davis Republican Spectacular
Drake's Drum
Dr. Sanity
The Edge of England's Sword
Emily Starr (Journal/Web-Design)
Enjoy Every Sandwich
Enter Stage Right
Eternity Road
Ether House
Dean Esmay
Fish or Man
Fatass the Conqueror
The Fat Guy
(Musings of a) Fat Kid
Feisty Republican Whore
File It Under
Fine? Why Fine?
The Flying Space Monkey
Football Fans For Truth and Beyond
The Foggiest Idea
Frinklin Speaks (Baseball)
From Left to Right
Jane Galt/AI
Garfield Ridge
Geek Empire
Geek Soapbox
George Gaskell
The Gleeful Extremist
Ghost of a Flea
GOP Vixen
The Grand Vizier
Greg Gutfeld
Grim's Hall
Hell in a Handbasket
Victor Davis Hanson
Head's Bunker (Guns)
Heard Here
Hugh Hewitt
Andrew Hofer
The Hole Card
Horrors of an Easily Distracted Mind
The House of Payne
The Hundred Percenter
I Love Jet Noise/Joatmoaf
Inoperable Terran
In the Hat
Iraq the Model
Iraq Now
Is This Blog On?
It'z News to Me
JamieR (Classics)
Joust the Facts
Just One Minute
Ken Wheaton/As I Please
Kerry Spot @ NRO
Kesher Talk
Kin's Kouch
Kikuchiryo News
Last Chance Cafe
Least Loved Bedtime Stories
Left and Right
Le Sabot Post-Moderne
Lesbien C'est Moi (reasonable liberal)
Letters From Desolation Row (JackM.) Lifelike Pundits
Lileks/The Bleat
Likeliehood of Confusion Law Blog
The Llama Butchers
Michelle Malkin
Machias Privateer
Marcland (now Hubs and Spokes)
Margi Lowry (was: Miss Apropos)
Matt Howell/Nerf-Coated World
Ryne McClaren McCullough/Stingray
Mean Mr. Mustard
Memento Moron
Memeorandum (Metablog)
Metallicity (Metal)
Miss Apropos Mind of Mog
More Eclipse Ramblings
My Pet Jawa
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
The New Partisan
The New Vintage
Nickie Goomba
No Easy Answers
No Pundit Intended
Not a Shrinking Violet
Note-It Posts
Not So Much People
Terry Notus
Now You Know
Number 2 Pencil
NYC Smurfette (Journal)
Ocean Guy
Of the Mind
Oh, That Liberal Media
Oliver Kamm
Andrew Olmstead
On The Third Hand
One Man's Opinion
Outside the Beltway
Partisan Pundit
Patterico's Pontifications
Patriots for Bush
Peppermint Patty
The Perfect World (Discussion Forum)
The People's Cube
Petitedov (Journal)
Pink Flamingo Bar & Grill
Pirate Pundit
Polar Opposite Politics
The Politburo Diktat
The Political Teen
The Primary Main Objective
Professor Chaos
Protein Wisdom
The Pundit Guy
Q & O
The Questing Cat
Qur'an Project
Rambling's Journal
Random Birkel
Random Numbers
Rather Biased
Rational Explications
Revealed Truth
Riehl Worldview (Carnivorous Conservative)
Right on Red
The Right Place
The Rightwing Conspiracy
The Right Wing Conspirator
Rightwing Sparkle
Rip 'N Read (Podcasting)
Running At the Mouth
The Sandwich Shop
Say Anything Blog
Secure Liberty
Sekimori Liveblog
Seldom Sober
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Seraphic Press
Sharp as a Marble
Simon's New Blog Showcase
Simon World (Asiablog)
Roger L. Simon
Simply Kimberly
Six Meat Buffet
Slithery D
The Smoking Room
Son of Nixon
Sondra K/Knowlege is Power
South Park Pundit
Speed of Thought
The Spoons Experience
International Capitalist/Starbanker
Stop the ACLU
Strange Women Lying in Ponds
Suburban Sundries Shack
Susskins Central Dispatch
Sweet Spirits of Amonia
Sydney T's Weblog
The Tar Pit
Team Hammer
tBlog-- Are You High?
Ten Fingers Six Strings
The Therapist
Thought Mesh
Thoughts On Line
Thunder Monkey
T. Longren
TMan in Tennessee
Total Vocabulary Failure*
Traction Control/US Citizen
Jim "Mother May I Sleep With" Treacher
Truth Laid Bear
Try On the Glasses
Two Crackas in My Soup
Twisted Spinster
Two Braincells
The Unabrewer
An Unamplified Voice (Music/Opera)
The Unpopulist
The Urban Grind
VA. Conservative
Viking Pundit
Villainous Company
Vote for Judges
The Wardrobe Door
The Waterglass
Way Off Bass
Matt Welch
White Pebble (Politics/Poetry)
Whitney Gaskell (Author)
Michael Williams/Master of None
Wing Nut Echo Chamber
Witty Sex Kitten (Journal)
(John from) Wuzzadem
Meryl Yourish

Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)