Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















November 11, 2025

Jimmy Kimmel's Nasty Mentally-Unstable Whore-Wife: I Disassociated From Family Members As if I Were Programmed by a Cult Over Them Refusing to Match My Hysterical Anti-Trump Energy

—Ace

Jimmy Kimel's Whatever-the-Opposite-of-a-Trophy-Wife is does not admit she is mentally unstable, but she makes several key psychiatric admissions that could support a diagnosis of mental illness:

* "When Donald Trump was first elected, I was so upset, I mean, we all were"

* She admits she is "angry all the time" and understands that this "isn't healthy, at all"

* She says she feels "a little bit of sympathy" for people in her family who are conservative, claiming that they are being "deliberately misinformed everyday," while she says she has all the real facts at her fingertips

* She says that family members believing things other than what she does "hurts me so much"

* She further shows a possible Narcissistic Personality Disorder by asserting that everything is about her: When her family members vote for Trump, she claims, they are "voting against" her fat husband and his stupid show (which I believe she produces -- so she's a nepo baby)

* She says this is not about "Democrat versus Republican" but about "family values" as she freely admits -- brags, actually -- about "having lost relationships with members of my family"

* She says she's "immediately mad" at "certain aunts, uncles, cousins" when she reads left-wing media ragebait stories, saying that she gets "really angry" and then she dashes "many emails" collecting the ragebait stories and telling them "here are ten reasons not to vote for Trump." She then says that "ninety percent" of these family members ignore her -- gee, wonder why -- but, worse yet, some of them actually respond with "insane responses." Which, between you and me, are just telling her she's wrong.

* She says "I hate that this has happened," as if her own boxwine-fueld midnight nastygrams to family members have noting to do with her estrangement from family members


* She says she is "in constant conflict" (with family members, I assume" and that "it's really hard"

* Finally, she admits to her cult-mentality by saying "I wish I could deprogram myself in some way, but I get, I get really angry"

These are real quotes. I may have missed a word here or there but this is all real. She is going on podcasts with her Unfunny TV Clown Chubby Hubby and confessing that she is a deeply mentally disturbed woman, and, for some reason, proud of it.

I mean, seriously, there is so much psychiatric cud to chew over in just three minutes that one can only imagine what an entire fifty-minute hour of psychological counseling would stir up.

Kirsten Fleming at the NY Post:

Jimmy Kimmel's wife has a very healthy way of dealing with family members who don't share her political persuasion.

When our president does something she doesn't like, Molly McNearney gets angry at her "aunts, uncles and cousins" who helped put him in office -- and hectors them with anti-Trump emails.

Shockingly, this has led to some "lost relationships."

Speaking on the "We Can Do Hard Things" podcast, Molly McNearney complained about family members who voted for President Trump because it was "them not voting for my husband and me and our family."

But deep down, McNearney, who is also her husband's executive producer for "Jimmy Kimmel Live!," even knows she's the one who has lost the plot.

"I wish I could deprogram myself in some way," she said recently on the "We Can Do Hard Things" podcast.

So why doesn't she go ahead and do it? Reboot the machine and upload a new operating system. Cut back on politics instead of cutting off her right-leaning loved ones.

After all, McNearney's displeasure with her relatives, she insists, is not just politics -- it's about "values."

Yet when she explains the rifts, she reveals that she values politics -- and fealty to her husband -- over blood and free thinking. Hmmmm.


"It hurts me so much ... my husband is out there fighting this man, and to me, them voting for Trump is them not voting for my husband and me and our family," she said.

"And I unfortunately have kind of lost relationships with people in my family because of it."

McNearney has somehow deluded herself into believing that her husband, whose literal job is to be a clown on late-night television and make America laugh at the end of a hard day, is now the unelected leader of the Trump resistance.

This is a serious national health crisis, and no one says anything about it, because almost all of the expErTs we should all TrUsT are all suffering from the same ten-year-nervous breakdown and insisting that it's perfectly normal.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 01:17 PM Comments



After Shutdown Climb-Down, Democrats In Meltdown

—Ace

I don't mean to discombobulate you, but the Party of Reason and Emotional Stabilityis having a, get this, hysterical overreaction to normal, everyday, fairly trivial things that sane and emotionally-temperate people can barely find the energy to care about.

Democrat Party Fanzine The Hill: Democtats Rage as Spending Bill Heads to House.

The Hill's Mike Lillis and Sudiksha Kochi report tensions are boiling over within the Democratic Party, just a week after the party was riding high off its sweeping success in last Tuesday's elections.

"What Senate Dems who voted for this horseshit deal did was f-- over all the hard work people put in to Tuesday's elections," Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), a former head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, posted on the social platform X. "Healthcare matters. Not platitudes."

Fox: Liberal media neurotics, hysterics, and smoothbrains turn on Democrats.

Liberal media figures are calling out the Democratic Party after eight senators voted with the GOP on a plan to reopen the government, accusing the party of caving as they try to end the longest shutdown in history.

Ex-CNN host Don Lemon, "The View" co-hosts Sunny Hostin and Whoopi Goldberg, former CNN journalist Chris Cillizza and more were among members of the media lambasting the Democratic caucus members who voted to advance a plan to re-open the government on Sunday.

...

Lemon posted on TikTok and said the Democrats "caved."

Goldberg said during "The View" on Monday, "eight Senate Democrats threw in the towel by siding with the GOP to advance a vote that could lead to the government reopening."

Others specifically took aim at Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the Senate minority leader.

Hostin said, "Shame on you the first time. You do it twice, three times, four times, shame on me. Shame on the Democrats for even believing that the Republicans will, you know, even vote on it."

"So the bottom line is, the Democrats went into, after a blue wave, the American people saying, 'We do want [an] opposition.' The working people want the Democratic Party to fight for them. And now, they just caved and surrendered. I think Chuck Schumer -- his days are over. And if he cannot keep his caucus together, he needs to go. He needs to be replaced," she added.

...

Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, who founded Zeteo, also called on Schumer to resign in a post on social media.

So let's not bury the lede: Charles Schumer is on the chopping block. Or the slopping block*, because he's a rumpled elderly sow. His bid to appear to be as fighty and zany as Retarded Congresswoman AOC failed completely. No one's buying it.

Some Democratic lawmakers also called for Schumer to step down.

"Senator Schumer is no longer effective and should be replaced. If you can't lead the fight to stop healthcare premiums from skyrocketing for Americans, what will you fight for?" Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif, said in a post on social media on Sunday.

Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., also said in a post that the vote was "another example of why we need new leadership."

The favorite televised doomscrolling feed for bitter femcel women and developmentally-delayed homosexuals who want to sound smart at grown-up parties, CNN, writes:

Schumer didn't vote for bill to reopen the government. He's facing liberal fury anyway.

He's facing liberal furries? Well keep facing them. Don't turn your back on liberal furries. Unless you want to be yiffed in the keister.

No he didn't vote for cloture on the CR, but it is common knowledge (or at least a well-informed common assumption) that he told the "moderate" purple state senators and the retiring Dick Durbin to end the shutdown while he continued playing John Jay Rambo screaming "It's not over, it's never over!" while shooting up generic computer equipment.

...

There is no immediate threat to Schumer's leadership, according to multiple Democratic sources. Not one of the Democrats calling for Schumer to step down as leader is a current member of his caucus. Still, frustrations are mounting privately among Senate Democrats that Schumer and his leadership team lacked a long-term plan to secure real concessions from the GOP in the funding fight-- and that the party ultimately ended up without a tangible legislative win, according to a half-dozen Senate Democratic sources. And there is growing chatter about what it means for his future after the 2026 midterms and if he chooses to run again in 2028.

...


Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona wouldn't directly say whether he had confidence in Schumer. Asked by CNN about the Democratic leader's handling of the shutdown, Kelly pivoted to President Donald Trump, whom he called "an irrational president who doesn't care about the American people."

Pressed again on whether he had confidence in Schumer, Kelly conceded that it had been a "rough" time for Senate Democrats. "I've been here four and a half years now, and [Schumer has] been the leader, and I understand why people look at this and say, well, this was kind of a rough period," he said.

Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, pressed if he had confidence in Schumer, was also mum on the leader's future. "I was glad to see that kind of unity," Van Hollen said. "I'm disappointed in the result, but we will fight on another day."


Alexandria Donkey-Chompers' fellow Skwad member, Hamas Terrorist and Future Muckbang YouTuber Rashida Tlaib also called for the Jew to be thrown under the bus.

But, you know, day that ends in a -y and all that.

Axios, a wannabe Politco only read by groomers when they're shitting out yesterday's deposit of shame, writes:

"Sen. Schumer has failed to meet this moment and is out of touch with the American people," progressive Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Minn.) said in a post on X.

Said Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), a moderate who is running for U.S. Senate, said "if [Schumer] were an effective leader, he would have united his caucus to vote 'No'" on the Senate shutdown deal.

Driving the news: In addition to Moulton and Tlaib, Reps. Mike Levin (D-Calif.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) called for Schumer to step down between Sunday night and Monday afternoon.

"It is time for us to have somebody who can stand up to Trump and someone that is unwavering, somebody who is more strategic, and, frankly, somebody with guts," Thanedar said in a phone interview.

Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) told Axios that Schumer "should not" remain as leader.

Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas) said in a statement to Axios: "If I were a senator, I would be asking Senator Schumer to step down as minority leader. He's simply cannot meet this moment."

Flashback: Only Reps. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) and Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) called for Schumer to step aside when he voted for a Republican spending bill in March.

Ramirez doubled down on Monday, writing on X: "I've said it before, and I will say it again ... Schumer needs to resign."

Zoom out: Other Democrats skirted just up to the line.

"If I had a vote it would be for Patty Murray," Rep. Emily Randall (D-Wash.) told Axios, referring to her home state's senator.

Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.) criticized Schumer both for his handling of the shutdown and his refusal to endorse New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, posting on X, "Profile of scourge? Next."

Profile of scourge? What? Does he think scourge rhymes with courage?

I'm not Joe Dead Poets Society over here but, you know: It does not.

This is a party of retards.

Zoom in: Those lawmakers join a cohort of grassroots groups actively trying to orchestrate Schumer's ouster.

Indivisible is urging Democratic voters to call their senators and tell them "time for Chuck Schumer to step aside" and launching a program to promote candidates in Senate Democratic primaries who are "firmly committed to opposing Schumer" as leader.

Progressive group MoveOn also joined the chorus Monday, telling Axios' Holly Otterbein that around 80% of its members voted in a survey that Schumer should quit his leadership role.

More from Politico 4 Kidz: Reports of extreme snippiness on conference calls!

A private call of House Democrats devolved into a furious vent session Monday afternoon as lawmakers fumed about a group of Senate centrists cutting a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown.

Why it matters: Over a dozen House Democrats spoke on the call, with the vast majority slamming the deal, sources told Axios -- a volume that reflects deep outrage between the two chambers.

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) said the public is incensed at what they see as Democrats caving on the shutdown fight, telling her colleagues, "People are f**king pissed."
Nearly "everyone [was] strongly against" the deal, said one House Democrat who was on the call but spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of a private discussion.

...

Zoom in: Roughly half of those who spoke on Monday's call either directly criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) or did so implicitly by agreeing with previous speakers who tore into him, sources said.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the former chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued that either the Senate leader "can't control his caucus" or he "gave his blessing" to the deal.

Yeah, as I keep saying, this is one of those less-common Democrat performances of Failure Theater.

Chuck Schumer is so angry that exactly eight Democrats -- precisely the number needed, given Rand Paul's never-ending "I'm not like the other grrrls" Goth Tween act -- voted to end the shutdown that he busted out his world-renown Crocodile tears to show his extreme pissiness. Video below the fold.

Democrat House members are demanding their fellow congressmen vote it down:

...

Several hours after the call, House Democratic leadership sent out an email to members' offices instructing them to "VOTE NO" on the shutdown deal.

House members have been on a two month break.

Must be nice.

Must.

Be.

Nice.

Mike Johnson told them to all Get Your Ass to the Choppahs and return to DC for a vote planned for tomorrow. And he did say return ASAP, because, due to the Democrats' shutdown theater, a lot of air traffic controllers are skipping (unpaid) work and there are flight delays and cancellations aplenty.

Happy Tuesday!

And of course:

Happy Veterans Day! I sincerely thank all the veterans who have served and fought to keep this nation safe.

Bonus: Chucky Schumer's Fake Tears make a fresh appearance. This sociopathic nebbish turns on the fake waterworks whenever he's called upon to appear "sincere," despite being a soulless, ruthless, and craven political operator who only exists to manipulate people into ceding power to him.

Enjoy Chuck watering his flabby cheeks with Tactical Eye Piss.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 12:12 PM Comments



The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition

—CBD

minaj2025.png

The conspicuous apathy when it comes to the murder of Christians by Muslims is nowhere more obvious than in Nigeria, where the bloodshed is savage and everywhere, and has been for 15 years. But it is focused on Christians, because that is what Muslims do. They are a bit more than 50% of the population of Nigeria, and their playbook is ancient and clear...convert, pay, or die. And since Nigeria is a poor country, and its Christian population is committed to actual Christianity, rather than the post-modern mess of Christianity in the West, they are killed.

They are killed because they are Christian. They are killed because they are devout. They are killed because the revolutionary political philosophy that is Islam will tolerate no other social construct, especially one that recognizes the individual.

But mostly they are killed because they are poor and black and conservative Christian, and the West simply does not care about the deaths of poor black Christians, because they do not fit into the hierarchy of class and race and colonizer status that elevates an Arab rock-thrower shot by Israeli soldiers to the top of the grievance list.

If Mainstream Christianity wanted to elevate the murders of 100,000 Christians to a prominent place in its discussions of every other social issue, it could. Perhaps it could supplant the pressing issues of giving communion to adulterers, or performing marriages for polygamists, or ordaining two-spirit, non-binary, gay transsexuals.

Look close to home...at the carnage of our inner cities. Blacks murder blacks at an unimaginable rate, and nobody cares. Jews are beaten in the streets of our cities, and nobody cares. Christians are harassed and condemned by Muslims in Dearborn, and nobody cares.

Conservative religion is anathema to the post-modern West; they see it as perhaps the most significant enemy of their overarching goal of the destruction of traditional culture and Judeo-Christian philosophy. And, of course it is! Accepting traditional interpretations of scripture and accepting its authority, personal morality guided by that scripture, traditional views of marriage, abortion, etc! That repulses our elites, and they will not defend it. Add blackness to the mix, and we see the current situation in Nigeria as the culmination of three generations of post-religious thought.

President Trump was absolutely correct in calling out the government of Nigeria. There is a genocide brewing there (and, sadly, in other places), and pushing back against Islam in Nigeria would be a welcome addition to the efforts of Israel in the Middle East.

Because it is a war, and only a few in the West recognize it!

[Crossposted at CutJibNewsletter and X/Twitter]. If you folks who are on X/Twitter would follow us it would be much appreciated!

Posted by CBD at 11:00 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Art Thread

—CBD

Tanner Grateful Poor.jpg

The Grateful Poor
Henry Ossawa Tanner

I posted this a long time ago, but it was cleaned and restored recently, and it is worth another look.

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report — 11/11/25

—J.J. Sefton

VeteransDAY2025.jpg

Good morning kids. First of all and most importantly, today is Veterans Day. And so, for those of you who have worn the uniform and for those who continue to serve, my admiration for you all is beyond measure. Thank you for your service, dedication and sacrifices. God bless you all, and keep you safe.

Now on to the news. So the Schumer Shitshow Shakedown Shutdown is now officially over. I jumped the gun yesterday in declaring it over insofar as the vote that was held was merely the cloture vote to bring the official vote to the full Senate. And so it goes. Given the fact that the midterms are just about a year away, which of course is both an eternity and right around the corner in terms of politics. As I had stated yesterday, both the polling and the improving economy means this will not redound negatively on President Trump and the GOP, despite the full court press propaganda campaign by the media to make it otherwise. What this episode will do is further set the Democrats at each other's throats to see which faction comes out on top. The tyrannical commie criminals who fake being "Moderate" and the in-your-face full-on Communists who perceive that openly espousing the destruction of America as founded and Judeo/Christian Western civilization will attract legions of future voters and lead them from victory to victory. Yes it's a steel cage tag team match to the death between Beelzebub/12th Imam vs. Stalin/Mao Tse-Tung.


The fold likely reinforces the convictions held by many voters on the Left that Washington Democrats are giving them mere lip service and threatens Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) continued hold on his leadership position.

Meh, pass the popcorn and let them tear each other apart. That said, unfortunately for us normal human beings, there will be no Mutually Assured Destruction. Regardless of which faction comes out on top, their common trait of an unslakable thirst for absolute power while defecating on our mass grave, after squeezing every last drop of blood and treasure from our bodies means that the Democrat Left or whatever brand name it might change into will still remain.

So, whether Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk are/were both flashes in the pan, what they both have managed to achieve in a very short time has the potential to blossom into the complete undoing of the Leftist enterprise. Whether that comes about in our lifetimes or if at all remains to be seen.

But that said, the forces of darkness and evil and their instrumentality of destruction with its epicenter in the Democrat Party will not rest and will resort to greater and greater levels of violence to conquer us.

Today, we see familiar signs of foreign wars on our own streets: the normalization of political violence, the collapse of enforcement authority, the ideological capture of civil institutions, and the strategic demoralization of those still willing to stand post. These are no longer foreign indicators, but domestic realities. What we are seeing in the streets of Chicago and New York is not random violence; it is the very thing we swore an oath to protect against. It is insurgent in nature, symbolic in purpose, and deeply strategic in effect. 

When Border Patrol agents are ambushed in an American city, it is not merely a crime; it is an assault on the institution charged with upholding the boundary of American citizenship.

Citizenship is more than paperwork. It is the covenant that binds a people; the shared rights, duties, and the consent to govern ourselves together. Without it, sovereignty is an empty word. . . We’ve reached a point where the narrative surrounding immigration enforcement has been fully inverted. Those upholding the law are portrayed as tyrants, aggressors, and racists, while those obstructing it are framed as defenders of freedom and justice. . .

. . . This Veterans Day, we must say the quiet part out loud: the war we fought abroad has come home. The difference is that we no longer call it war. We call it politics. We call it protest. We call it compassion. But we know the truth. We were trained to recognize insurgency, subversion, and the collapse of legitimate authority. We were trained to defend boundaries, not just lines on a map, but the moral and legal foundations of a free nation. That fight is now ours again. 

At the height of the anti Vietnam War Protests that raged on streets and campuses across the country, culminating in the shooting at Kent State in May of 1970 the rallying cry of the Leftists was "Bring the War Home!" And here we are 55 years later and the war is at home. In many ways it is a civil war and fought not just with bullets, bricks, molotov cocktails and such but with subversion and treachery as was amply demonstrated by Clinton, Comey, Brennan et al who subverted the institutions and agencies that are there to keep us safe and free by turning them into heinous tools of oppression and repression made all the more uglier than the Gestapo, Stasi and KGB by virtue of the fact that they sprang from among us right here in the bastion and stronghold of freedom and liberty or what was supposed to be those. Considering we have not fired a literal volley back at the enemy, and certainly not committed any pre-emotive or unprovoked acts of violence on them, it's not much of a war is it. It's more of a simmering pogrom against us.

Again, happy and blessed Veterans Day to you all, and long live the cause of freedom - OUR CAUSE, Here and now in this hour! And may the terrible swift sword of justice and vengeance smite those who seek our destruction. Amen.


And lastly, a quick shout-out and thank you for your continued support in hitting our tip jar. It truly is appreciated more than you can know

    ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY LINKS

  • The vote ends a disastrous shutdown for Democrats, but the civil war for the soul and direction of the party is just beginning. (Tagteams of Beelzebub/12th Imam vs. Mao/Stalin - jjs)
    Senate Passes Funding Bill to End Schumer Shutdown
  • "Despite the obstacles, a determined Trump administration is restoring the rule of law and equal justice under the law. The day of reckoning for treasonous Deep State plotters is coming.
    The Misrule of Law (Hat tip to Cob and colleague Buck Throckmorton! - jjs)
  • There’s an anti-Left storm brewing among the once conservative/libertarian Generation Z, which follows a predictable and dangerous path that’s left a trail of destruction throughout history.
    There’s an Anti-Left Storm Brewing on the Right, and It’s Ominous (Meh, I'm not seeing it - jjs)

Continue reading


Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:33 AM Comments

Daily Tech News 11 November 2025

—Pixy Misa

Top Story

Continue reading


Posted by Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM Comments

Monday Overnight Open Thread (11/10/25)

—Misanthropic Humanitarian

suburban-men-late-night-randomness-beautiful-women-amazing-photography-20221017-112.jpg

Continue reading


Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 10:00 PM Comments

Scandi Rapid Transit Cafe

—Ace

urquhartcastle.jpg-

Urquhart Castle, Scotland
by Stuart Mckay Photography

I wish I were gay so I could toss off a few lines from Brigadoon.

Early day today. I'm still dragging after a weekend of low sleep and low ambition.

PAWS

Like the Millennium Falcon hiding on the Star Destroyer. It works!

This puppy isn't even trying to be cute, it just happens.

This puppy might be trying a little to be cute, and he's nailing it.

I choose you as my mate. (I posted this before but I didn't note the context of this Gift of Stone. By the way, the guy here sounds like Evil Ed saying "You're so cool Brewster." And yes, I rewatched Fright Night for Halloween. One critique I've always had: I never understand the geography of this town they're in. Supposedly the vampire has a big old mansion standing just yards from normal suburban houses, and then you walk through the suburb and suddenly you're in a dark cramped alleyway.)


Dog gives his O-face.

Many dogs are guardian dogs.

Dog picks out random strangers to play fetch with.

Sometimes cats get pounced, too.

ICYMI: Dealing with an undersized bully.

The kid singing the angelic (ishtari?) chorus for the Lord of the Rings score.

When you're stuck in a pit of ocean water but the tides are kind.

Some Pig!!!


Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 07:03 PM Comments

The Head of the BBC and Its Head of News Both Resign In Wake of Revelations They Deliberately Pushed Fake News About Trump's Role in the (Also Fake) J6 Insurrection

—Ace

The BBC Panorama ran stealth-edited video to make it appear that Trump was urging his followers to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell." The claim being made was that Trump told them to riot.

It was a literal stitch-up -- they framed Trump by stitching together different speeches.

Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin

23h

You don't have to be an uncritical fanboy of President Trump to be horrified at just how much lying the media around the world did about him. They said he was involved in election interference while they were the ones doing it!


Now the head of the BBC and the head of news at the BBC have been forced to resign.

The BBC's boss and its head of news quit on Sunday following accusations of bias at the British broadcaster, including in the way it edited a speech by U.S. President Donald Trump.

The publicly funded BBC had been under mounting pressure after an internal report by a former standards adviser, which cited failings in its coverage of the Israel-Hamas war, transgender issues and a speech made by Trump, was leaked to the Daily Telegraph newspaper.

Terrorist propaganda outlet claims they "quit." In fact, they were forced out, more credible outlets report.

Trump welcomed the departures, criticising the two as "very dishonest people" after the BBC's flagship Panorama programme edited two parts of one of his speeches together so he appeared to be encouraging the Capitol Hill riot of January 2021.

Tim Davie, who has led the British Broadcasting Corporation since 2020, defended the organisation, saying its journalism was seen as the gold standard around the world. But he said mistakes had been made and he had to take ultimate responsibility.

Deborah Turness, the CEO of BBC News, also resigned. In an email to staff she said: "I want to be absolutely clear recent allegations that BBC News is institutionally biased are wrong."

Lie.

Widely respected around the world, the BBC still tops polls in Britain on the most trusted news brand and has huge reach in the country, providing news, entertainment and sport.

But the corporation, which is funded by a licence fee paid by all television-watching households, comes under intense scrutiny from some newspapers and critics on social media, which object to its funding model and perceived liberal stance.

"Perceived." By the way, do you know that "British Men" and "British Teens" keep attacking people with knives?

The Telegraph revealed more left-wing bias, based on leaked memos:

The leaked internal report said BBC Arabic had shown anti-Israel bias in its reporting of the war in Gaza and that an effort to cover a group campaigning for single-sex spaces had been suppressed by a small group of staff who saw it as hostile to the transgender community.

BBC Arabic was anti-Israel? Not the BBC itself?

LOL.

bbcisraelbias.jpg

Also revealed today : some time back the BBC ran a story about a mass grave of Palestinian civilians, secretly buried by the IDF. Internal documents leaked today show that the BBC had hard evidence that the story was a hoax, yet they ran it anyway.

Posted by: Tom Servo


And as for the second item: The story would have been about the need for single-sex spaces to protect women but the transgenders spiked the story.

Per the NYT: Trump is now threatening to sue the BBC for defamation.

To the tune of... one billion dollars.


President Trump on Monday threatened to sue the BBC for $1 billion for a documentary that his lawyer claimed included "malicious, disparaging" edits to a speech Mr. Trump delivered on Jan. 6, 2021.

The legal threat came in a letter from Alejandro Brito, one of Mr. Trump's lawyers, to the BBC that was obtained by The New York Times. The letter demanded a full retraction of the documentary, an apology and what his lawyers said would be payments that "appropriately compensate President Trump for the harm caused."

The letter said that if those demands were not met, "President Trump will be left with no alternative but to enforce his legal and equitable rights, all of which are expressly reserved and are not waived, including by filing legal action for no less than $1,000,000,000 (One Billion Dollars) in damages."

The letter said: "The BBC is on notice" and concluded: "PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY."

Noted scrupulously non-partisan media analyst and Sex Machine Brian Stelter called the double resignation "very notable."

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 05:53 PM Comments

Is This Something?

—Ace

Hunting Season looks a bit like a generic revenge actioner but it's got Mel Gibson and he's really good at revenge actioners. Alas, it's not directed by Mel Gibson, but maybe some of his over-the-top ideas for cinematic violence were used.

The final moment of the clip is good.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 04:35 PM Comments

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Embarasses George Stephanolopous But Stephanopoolous Filibusters and Talks Over Him and Ends the Interview

—Ace

George Stephanolpolous -- or Slopadopolous, as Trump calls him* -- tried to lecture Scott Bessent that Republicans should give in to Democrats shutdown demands.

Bessent reminded the former (and current) Democrat spokesman and spinner that he had previously called Republicans "terrorists" for shutting down the government in 1995.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confronted ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos on Sunday for calling Republicans "terrorists" during the 1995 government shutdown.

Stephanopoulos asked Bessent on Sunday's "This Week" about the Trump administration's plan to end the ongoing government shutdown. Bessent reminded Stephanopoulos about his own experience handling a government shutdown when he served as an advisor to former President Bill Clinton.

"The best way to do it -- and look, you were involved in a lot of these in the '90s," Bessent said. "And, you know, you basically called the Republicans terrorists and, you know, you said that it is not the responsible party that keeps the government closed. And so, what we need is five brave, moderate Democratic senators to cross the aisle, because right now it is 52--3, 52--3. Five Democrats can cross the aisle and reopen the government. That's the best way to do it, George."


"I can disagree with you about the history there, but we don't have a history lesson right now," Stephanopoulos responded.

"No, no, no. George, George, George," Bessent interrupted. "If you want, I've got all your quotes here. I got all your quotes here, George."

Stephanopoulos claimed that Bessent's comments were a "mischaracterization of history" and then repeated his original question.

In a 2000 PBS interview, Stephanopoulos described how there were concerns over whether the Democrats or Republicans would be blamed more for the government shutdown that occurred in late 1995 and early 1996. He said the Democratic Party's strategy relied on accusing Republicans of "blackmailing the country" for shutting down the government.

"Our strategy was very simple. We couldn't buckle, and we had to say that they were blackmailing the country to get their way. In order to get their tax cut, they were willing to shut down the government, throw the country into default for the first time in its history and cut Medicare, Social Security, education and the environment just so they could get their way. And we were trying to say that they were basically terrorists, and it worked," Stephanopoulos said.

Below, you can see Slopadopolous repeatedly talk over Bessent to keep his viewers in the dark about his prior statements.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 03:39 PM Comments

Enough! Sixth Circuit Rules That Schools May Not Punish Students for Referring to Other Students By Their Biologically-Correct, Original, Real Pronouns

—Ace

For at least six years, the trans lobby held everyone in terror. You'd be destroyed, fired, deplatformed, and debanked for ever doubting that a man in a party city wig was not 100% literally a woman, in every sense, in every situation, for every purpose.

To question whether they were "really" women in all situations -- such as in sports, even contact sports -- was to accept exile from the Regime's roster of craven weaklings of the Professional Managerial Class.

The spineless, soft-handed, sloop-shouldered "men" of the Regime and their insane Benzos-and-Boxwine AWFL henchpyrsyns either deferred to the Reign of Trans Terror out of cowardice or else zealously enforced it as a means of revenge on straight white men.

Years into the Reign of Trans Terror, a group of dissidents finally succeeded in putting some backbone into the cowardly Regime Professional Managerial Class, and a few PMC cowards tepidly, slightly began to buck their trans enforcement officers.

And finally now, years into The Terror, we're moving to a near-majority of Regime PMC types who are willing to risk the now much-lower risk of cancellation by the enforcers of The Terror.

The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this past week that an Ohio school district cannot punish students who refer to their transgender peers by biological pronouns.

The Columbus Dispatch reports the court determined by a party-line 10-7 vote in Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education that the defendant "did not demonstrate that the use of the pronouns to refer to transgender and nonbinary students would 'materially and substantially disrupt school activities or infringe on the legal rights of others in the school community.'"

Such is a direct reference to the historic 1969 Tinker decision which dealt with students wearing black arm bands at school to protest the Vietnam War.

The November 6 en banc decision overturns a federal judge's ruling, as well as that of a three-judge 6th Circuit panel.

"Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive -- just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights," the court's majority wrote, authored by Judge Eric Murphy.

"The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view."

The court goes on to say that this doesn't mean a school has to permit actual harassment -- just that it cannot side with a particular faction and dictate to students that they are required to obey this faction, or else be found guilty of "harassment."

On Friday, I think, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration is permitted to just have 'Male" and "Female" passports, exactly the same as every other Administration since 1796 except for Biden's.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently ruled in favor of the government's removal of any genders other than male or female in passport identification. Said decision reverses prior flexibility for transgender and nonbinary passport applicants. The ruling overturns a lower court block against implementing the new limits on passport identification. This action follows the precedent set by a Supreme Court ruling issued in July 2025.

The decision reaffirms an Executive Order, which directed U.S. federal agencies to recognize only male and female genders on all official documents. Additionally, federal identification can only list a person's birth gender. Transgender and non-binary applicants with passports listing their preferred gender identity are rendered invalid.

In its' decision, the Supreme Court ruled such limitations are based on historical and biological fact and therefore don't violate any equal protection principles. Said ruling ties into the larger debate surrounding gender identification. Since the start of 2025, the government policy has been increasingly less flexible regarding individuals who don't identify with their birth gender.

I always love the left's eternal claim that the Constitution changed just last week without anyone bothering to amend it. It just changed on its own. Poof.


Members of the craven, status-seeking Professional Managerial Class, Sports Division, have recognized that, get this, sports leagues created for women only and which exclude men so that women can fairly compete are allowed, nay required, to be for women and exclude men so that women may fairly compete.

Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events

IOC [International Olympic Committee] likely to announce new policy early in new year after findings of a scientific review about the permanent physical advantages of being born male


The International Olympic Committee is set to announce a ban on transgender women in female competition early next year after a science-based review of evidence about permanent physical advantages of being born male.

The IOC's guidance to Olympic sports has until now been that transgender women can compete with reduced testosterone levels but leaves it up to individual sports to decide. That is now set to change under its new president, Kirsty Coventry, who has promised to protect the female category.

The committee's medical and scientific director, Dr Jane Thornton, last week presented to IOC members at a meeting in Lausanne the initial findings of a science-based review into the issues of transgender athletes and athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) competing in female sport.

Sources said the presentation by Thornton, a Canadian former Olympic rower, stated that scientific evidence showed there were physical advantages to being born male that remained with athletes, including those who had taken treatment to reduce testosterone levels.

Really. You don't say.

"It was a very scientific, factual and unemotional presentation which quite clearly laid out the evidence," one source said. Another IOC insider said there had been hugely positive feedback from IOC members about the presentation.

It is understood the IOC is likely to announce its new policy early in the new year, possibly around the IOC session at the Milan-Cortina winter Olympics in early February.

Some work remains to be done to ensure the new policy is legally watertight. Until now the IOC's policy has been based on recommendations and guidance to sports rather than actually being part of its eligibility rules.

Some sports such as athletics and swimming have already brought in a ban on athletes who have been through male puberty taking part in female competition but others, including football, have not.

The new policy is also likely to cover DSD (differences of sex development) athletes -- those who were raised as girls from birth but have male chromosomes and male levels of testosterone.

This is such an obvious realization that it's hard to understand why it even required any realizing. As Douglas Adams said of the speed of light: Light travels so quickly it takes civilizations thousands of years to realize it travels at all.


Good. Let us stop speaking of men's and women's sports. Let's just speak of "sports" and "women's sports," where sports (unmodified by adjective) is for anyone who can actually compete -- an open category, in which men will of course dominate, but if a "transgender" "male" wants to compete, sure, he can go to the trials. Where she'll lose. But she'll be allowed to "compete."

And then we should have a restrictive category called "women's sports," for, get this, women only, as it always has been since the creation of "women's sports."


Meanwhile: other sectors of the Professional Managerial Class continue pledging allegiance to The Terror.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 02:33 PM Comments

More Deets: Conde Nast Fires Four Entitled Wokesters Including a Formerly-Untouchable Transgender

—Ace

This isn't entirely a repeat. On Friday, I posted about this, but only had the video and a quick recap from someone on Twitter.

I also failed to say something very obvious. I know it's obvious and you probably all thought of it yourself, but it feels to me like I left a golf ball right on the edge of the cup and never tapped it in:

Five years ago, all left-wing wokesters, and especially minority wokesters, and especially especially trans wokesters, could hold executives in left-wing media operations hostage and demand firings of executives and other personnel for failing to zealously appease their every demand.

Now, it seems like even the most left of left-wing media corporations have had enough of entitled, barely-working woke political agitators on their payrolls, and are now firing them. They are using the difficult economy and rise of AI content "creation" as an excuse to fire the wokesters, but as Clownfish TV and many other people have observed, they have long wanted to fire these people anyway, but were politically/culturally cowed from doing so. Now they feel they have sufficient justification to fire barely-working workplace political terrorists.

And yes, this even means that the most protected identity of all, "trans," is now eligible for firing as well, and no, the highly-protected, highly-entitled "trans" identity will not give you sanction to harass, blockade, surround, and virgually "kidnap" executives (as they literally do in France) so you can berate them into keeping your non-binary sex-friend on the payroll, as seems to have happened at Conde Nast.

I know that's obvious enough but it's like a scratch I didn't itch on Friday and it's bugged me ever since.

So once again, a repeat from Friday: the video so you know what the hell I'm even babbling about. Conde Nast, mega-corporation with a dozen major media brands under its control, fired and/or reassigned personnel from various media outlets, including "Teen" Vogue, which now specializes in such fare as "The Teen Vogue Guide to Anal Sex," infinite stories on the best prosthetics and "tucking" underwear to simulate either having or not having a penis, and endless agitation for full-on communist revolution. Some of these sexual-extremist and Marxist people were fired, others will reassigned from Teen Vogue to regular Vogue. Conde Nast apparently wants Teen Vogue less about hard-core Marxist politics and LGBT issues and more about, you know, make up and cute outfits.

One of the people fired was a "non-binary journalist," and a group of left-wing activists surrounded and heckled the head of HR -- which I think makes him as senior executive -- and made demands of him even after he repeatedly told them to go back to their actual assigned jobs.

Oh: The other thing they're angry about is the new Conde Nast rule that they have to actually come to the office four (not five) days per week. Prior to that they were allowed to mostly, or entirely, "work" from home.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 01:27 PM Comments

Eight Democrats Vote for Cloture on CR Bill, Securing Only Minor Concessions

—Ace

Eight Democrats gave up the ghost and voted to end the filibuster. In case you're not up to speed on how this works, before a vote on the actual merits of a bill can happen, the Senate must vote for "cloture," for the closing of all debate on the bill. This requires 60, not 50, votes, though the vote on the bill itself requires 51 (or 50 plus a VP tie-breaker vote).

Eight Democrats just voted for cloture so that the entire Senate can now vote on the bill itself. The vote was 60-40, with eight Democrats joining the Republicans to end debate, and grandstanding douchebag Rand Paul of course joining the Democrats to show how pure and virtuous he is.

OSZ @OpenSourceZone

Senate breaks Dem filibuster on to end the government shutdown

8 Dems vote YES
🔵 Durbin
🔵 Kaine
🔵 King
🔵 Shaheen
🔵 Rosen
🔵 Hassan
🔵Fetterman
🔵 Cortez Masto

1 GOP NO
🔴 Rand Paul

Apparently John Cornyn wasn't present for the vote for a while and had to fly to DC to finally cast the 60th vote. Rand Paul of course would not supply that last vote. When the RINO John Cornyn finally made it into work, he voted "Yes" to end debate.

Thune did not "cave," as people had worried, to get the cloture vote. Some concessions were made, which I guess you can object to on principle. But the left is going berserk over how little the Democrats got so I guess by negative inference we can say that Thune "won," mostly.

I don't know if it's true that the "Democrats lost everything in the shutdown" as PJ Media's Matt Margolis says, but it does seem like they got doodly squat and they only got 30% of the doodly they demanded.

This is what capitulation looks like, and the left knows it.

The deal is simple. Schumer's caucus agreed to advance a package of spending bills that will reopen the government and extend funding through January.

That's it.

No sweeping policy concessions, no big wins tucked into the fine print, no "historic framework" or "moral victory." Just a basic continuing resolution, dressed up with some boilerplate back pay for furloughed workers and funding for food assistance through next fall. In other words, exactly what Republicans had put on the table before the Democrats decided to make a scene.

This shutdown began because Schumer thought he could strongarm the GOP into extending Obamacare subsidies that were set to expire and repealing Medicaid reforms that closed a loophole handing out free healthcare to illegal immigrants. President Trump and Republican leaders had already said they planned to address those subsidies separately, aiming to rein them in and curb abuse. But Schumer wanted drama. He shut down the government over it, thinking Republicans would blink.

They didn't.

Although there is nothing being added to the CR itself that can be called a concession to Democrats, Thune and the Republicans did make some minor promises about what they'll grant the Democrats in exchange for a cloture vote:

OSZ @OpenSourceZone

Proposed Government Funding Bill To End The Government Shutdown:

🔴 Fund the government through January 31
🔴 Promise to vote on ACA subsidies in December
🔴 Reverse the mass layoffs of federal workers (RIFs) since Oct. 1
🔴 Provide full-year funding for Veterans Affairs
🔴 Provide full-year funding for SNAP

On the last two, I don't know what's being given up here. This is my guess: Democrats want SNAP and Veterans Affairs funded now for a full year so if they shut the government down again, they will not have to worry about their EBT army shrieking about "starving." As far as Veterans Affairs -- I dunno, Democrats don't really care about veterans.

On YouTube, Dr. Steve Turley says that that guarantee of a restoration of the jobs Trump cut during the shutdown isn't as big a concession as it seems. He says that while Republicans agree to restore those positions...

1, it does not require Trump to re-hire the people fired from those positions. He can hire other people. MAGA people.

2, it doesn't actually even require Trump to hire anyone. The Republicans agree that these positions will be restored, but there's no promise those positions will be filled.

Is that accurate? Not sure. I heard it from a guy on a webcam.

The last concession is that Republicans agree to a vote on the endless "emergency covid" Obamacare subsidies. I think this means they agree they will not demand a 60-vote threshold for cloture, but they guarantee a vote on the merits. Republicans have 53 votes and I'm almost certain that the Democrat in RINO clothing Lisa Murkoswski will vote for these supposedly temporary emergency covid subsidies, and so will the liberal "Republican" Bill Cassidy in Lousiana. I can imagine another couple of votes coming from the likes of Susan Collins and Tom Tillis (who still plagues us as he's not out of the Senate yet).

Democrats would need 51 votes to get these "temporary emergency covid subsidies" extended.

So I do think that's a concession. I do think that is a very real chit we gave the Democrats.

On the other hand, the Democrats were sabotaging the economy to try to win the 2026 midterms and set the stage for a 2028 win so... pick your poison.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 12:15 PM Comments

THE MORNING RANT: Post-Millenials Abandoning Television, and other Random TV Thoughts

—Buck Throckmorton


At my day job, I recently participated in a gathering of 10 employees for the purpose of introducing a new company initiative. As an icebreaker, the moderator asked each person when introducing themselves to name a television series they are currently watching. Four of the ten individuals stated that they don’t watch any TV at all. Of those four, three of them were clearly under-35, possibly in their mid to late 20s (it’s hard for me to guess ages these days) and the other was a lady probably over 55. The moderator gently pressed a little and asked if they watch any shows on their tablets or devices, and all four of them said “no.”

I thought about old memories of how TV was demonized when I was a child in the ‘70s, yet today’s younger generation has somewhat abandoned television.

I also thought about what this portends for Hollywood. I knew that people had generally stopped going to theaters to watch movies like they used to, but I kind of assumed that meant more time was spent in front of the TV, and that there was still strong demand for all the streaming TV shows. Maybe not.

Since I’m talking television today, rather than my normal focus on the climate hoax, woke capital, or burning EVs, here are a few more television-related things that are on my mind…

*****

Missing the Red Netflix Envelope

Netflix Red Envelope.png

Does anyone else miss getting movies and TV shoes on a DVD from Netflix? It was great. I would still prefer to watch a movie or TV series this way, rather than streaming.

For one thing, there was never any question about what to watch. There were always two DVDs to choose from representing shows we had previously made a decision to watch.

More importantly, there were no commercials and no buffering. How did we get to the point that I am paying a premium to stream TV shows and movies, but unlike the HBO of my youth, I’m also still having to sit through commercials?

Back to Netflix, my wife and I were “red envelopers” right until the end. That is how we watched the entire Justified series.

Also, there was an abundance of movie titles that could be rented on DVD that were not available for streaming. I believe this was due to licensing reasons, but since Netflix had actually bought the physical DVDs in my queue, those could then be rented out to me. After we had returned our last red envelopes, my wife found out that Netflix wasn’t even requiring them to be returned, since they were just going to be discarded. Had I known that, I would have made sure my last two disks were something special to me, perhaps Jaws, or Animal House, or Live and Let Die.

++ What would your last two Netflix DVDs be if you knew you didn’t have to return them?

*****

Why I Hated Star Trek and MTV

Captain Kirk and Spock.png

I hate Star Trek. Actually, I don’t have any actual malice toward the TV show, although I never got into it. But I hate how it ruined outdoor fun and play when I was a kid.

Continue reading


Posted by Buck Throckmorton at 11:00 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Art Thread

—CBD

Steen Prayer.jpg

The prayer before the meal
Jan Havickszoon Steen

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report — 11/10/25

—J.J. Sefton

ItsAJive.jpg

Good morning kids. Well, it certainly appears that the Schumer Shakedown Shutdown Shitshow has come to an end, after 40 days. Essentially Schemer and the Dems got nothing in return for passing what amounts to just another continuing resolution and the hardcore Maoists are blowing a gasket. Cue a very loud sad trombone

Whatever one thinks of polling, even before last Tuesday's horrendous election day results, polls had consistently indicated that Americans were blaming the Democrats for the perceived and in maybe a few instances real pain being felt by the government shutting down. So if their calculus was to use this as a weapon to beat up on Trump and the GOP in the run up to next year's midterms, perhaps Schumer felt it wise to just lick his wounds, fold up the tent and as Democrats always do, pray that the economy tanks and Americans suffer so they can ride that to victory next November and again in 2028 while discrediting the America First economic and political agenda.


This is what capitulation looks like, and the left knows it. The deal is simple. Schumer’s caucus agreed to advance a package of spending bills that will reopen the government and extend funding through January.

That’s it.

No sweeping policy concessions, no big wins tucked into the fine print, no “historic framework” or “moral victory.” Just a basic continuing resolution, dressed up with some boilerplate back pay for furloughed workers and funding for food assistance through next fall. In other words, exactly what Republicans had put on the table before the Democrats decided to make a scene.

This shutdown began because Schumer thought he could strongarm the GOP into extending Obamacare subsidies that were set to expire and repealing Medicaid reforms that closed a loophole handing out free healthcare to illegal immigrants. President Trump and Republican leaders had already said they planned to address those subsidies separately, aiming to rein them in and curb abuse. But Schumer wanted drama. He shut down the government over it, thinking Republicans would blink.
They didn’t.

After 40 days of a shutdown over a laundry list of demands, Democrats have nothing to show for it. Their only “win” is a vague promise of a future vote on Obamacare subsidies in December—a meaningless gesture that even they know is dead on arrival.


In the first year of Trump's second term, the economy is indeed improving. The direction upward on many fronts, from inflation to employment and other indices is unmistakeable. But of course as the estimable Victor Davis Hanson reminds us, it takes time for the average American to feel it and that gives the enemy time to lie and propagandize to their black heart's content, which they will do anyway.

The current economic indicators, at least those attributable to the 10-month Trump administration, are strong.

Fourth-quarter GDP is estimated to grow between 2.7 and 4 percent, the robust latter figure according to the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank.

Inflation from June to August ranged from 2.7 to 2.9 percent, significantly lower than the 5 percent annual average during Biden’s 2021-2025 term. . .

. . . the recent off-year elections, albeit in blue states like California, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia, were decided mostly on perceptions of “affordability,” shorthand for the economy.

When independent voters heard little from Republican candidates about the good economic news or of the sharp contrast from the prior Democratic train wreck, they simply bought the left-wing line that the lack of “affordability” was due to the administration in power—that is, Trump.

Third, most of Trump’s key economic initiatives are long-term and will not be fully realized by the end of 2025 or in early to mid-2026.

That right there is key. The timing of when things will be felt is crucial. No doubt local and national Democrat Pols will do all they can to make their own constituents suffer so they can then blame the President and his party. Of course the media as is their wont and raison d'être will be to broadcast that message 25/8/366 all the way through 2026 and beyond.


Switching gears for a moment . . .

[Friday] marked the 108th anniversary since the Bolshevik Revolution, which took place on November 7th, 1917 (October 25th, according to the Julian Calendar). Rarely has a local event produced such a profound global effect as the October Revolution, which ultimately enslaved billions around the world and caused mass murder and famine at an unprecedented rate.. . . Today, over a century later, the results are dismal — over 100 million murdered globally and billions starved and deprived of opportunities for normal lives. What is even more insidious, perhaps, is that the ideology of the October Revolution infected and conquered the education, media, and culture of the self-doubting West.

Also, Yesterday marked the 60th anniversary of the great Northeast blackout that left millions in the region and parts of Canada without power for 13 hours, and which gave rise to the expression, Where Were You When the Lights Went Out?


The irony of the anniversaries of both those events is that they come within days of an election in NYC wherein the residents of NYC have chosen a Communist/Muslim jihadist to be their mayor. More chillingly are the indicators that more and more young people are openly espousing a desire for socialism and a forcible if not violent rejection of free-market capitalism and all of the social and human advancement that were engendered by it and could only have come about because of it.

The lament of then British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Gray at the outset of the First World War comes to mind: "The lamps are going out all over Europe; We shall not see them lit again in our lifetime."

It remains to be seen if the miraculous victories of Donald Trump as well as the all too brief life and influence of the late Charlie Kirk are blips on an inevitable trajectory to decline and fall, or are harbingers of a great reawakening of American, Western and Judeo/Christian culture and the advancement of civilization and humanity.

    ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY LINKS

  • Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s first-year economy is surging, but the race ahead hinges on perception, messaging, and whether voters see the boom before the 2026 midterms.
    The Race for the Trump Economy

Continue reading


Posted by J.J. Sefton at 06:55 AM Comments

Daily Tech News 10 November 2025

—Pixy Misa

Top Story



Continue reading


Posted by Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM Comments

Sunday Overnight Open Thread - November 9, 2025 [Doof]

—Open Blogger

doof-sunset-road.jpg

Welcome to the Sunday night ONT. There might be some content. It's definitely an open thread, as always. The gray boxes await you!

Continue reading


Posted by Open Blogger at 10:00 PM Comments

Gun Thread: Second November Edition!

—Weasel

110925 Calendar scaled.jpg

Howdy, Y'all! Welcome to the wondrously fabulous Gun Thread! As always, I want to thank all of our regulars for being here week in and week out, and also offer a bigly Gun Thread welcome to any newcomers who may be joining us tonight. Howdy and thank you for stopping by! I hope you find our wacky conversation on the subject of guns 'n shooting both enjoyable and informative. You are always welcome to lurk in the shadows of shame, but I'd like to invite you to jump into the conversation, say howdy, and tell us what kind of shooting you like to do!

Holy Shitballs! How in the ever-loving Hell did it get to be the Second November Edition? The time, she's flying!

With that, step into the dojo and let's get to the gun stuff below, shall we?

Continue reading


Posted by Weasel at 07:00 PM Comments






Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Buck Throckmorton joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the cultural and business shift away from the insanity of EVs and Climate Religion, his calm perspective on last week's election, Tucker is a toad, and more!
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Recent Comments
I used to have a different nic[/s][/b][/i][/u]: "[i]OT: the Taliban attacked Islamabad, so now Paki ..."

Bulg: "OT: the Taliban attacked Islamabad, so now Pakista ..."

Seems Legit: ""Poll after poll found Americans on both sides of ..."

mrp: "OT: the Taliban attacked Islamabad, so now Pakista ..."

Somewhere South of I-80: "There is way too much mutual dick-sucking going on ..."

Marcus T: "Democrats have NGO’s in at least 50 states t ..."

Huck Follywood: "Sen. Schumer has failed to meet this moment and is ..."

illiniwek: "It might bring costs down if the patient had to pa ..."

18-1: "[i]The government is shutdown? Did no one tell ..."

redridinghood: "Sunny Hostin attacks Fetterman over his vote to en ..."

Emmie -- be strong and courageous!: "I'm in Samaritan Ministries health cost sharing or ..."

Ian S.: "[i]I think Chuck is staying put. He is the firewal ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives