Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















December 03, 2025

Republican Matt Van Epps Holds On to Win the Tennessee 7 Special Election, But It's A Much Closer Race Than We'd've Hoped

—Ace

Trump won the district by 22 points in 2024.

Van Epps won by about nine points.

The Democrats are hysterical and frantic and absolutely energized to kill us at the polls -- and maybe in real life too.

And too many Republicans, and especially too many Trump supporters, are content with the 2024 win and don't really care about the Democrats winning Congress back and impeaching Trump in the first month of 2026.

Republicans won Tuesday's special election in Tennessee. But instead of celebrating, many are dreading what it means about the midterms.

Republican Rep.-elect Matt Van Epps' roughly nine point win marks a massive shift toward Democrats from 2024, when President Donald Trump carried the district by 22 points. That double digit swing -- on the heels of crushing losses in off-year elections in November -- could be a harbinger of what House Republicans will face in the midterms next year, members and strategists warned, as they seek to hold on to their narrow control of the chamber.

"Tonight is a sign that 2026 is going to be a bitch of an election cycle," said one House Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly. "Republicans can survive if we play team and the Trump administration officials play smart. Neither is certain."

Democrat Aftyn Behn's overperformance in the Tennessee special election -- which attracted millions of dollars in spending and national attention in its final days -- continues a trend of concerning electoral results for the GOP. Earlier this year, Democrats saw big overperformances in losses in other special elections in deep-red seats, and last month they swept a slate of critical off-year elections, including gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey.

In the wake of those victories, some Republicans urged the White House to retool its political message to better engage moderate voters and independents who broke for Trump in the presidential election.

"I'm glad we won. But the GOP should not ignore the Virginia, New Jersey and Tennessee elections," Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), who is retiring from his swingy Omaha-based district, said. "We must reach swing voters. America wants some normalcy."

Gerrymandering is becoming a very tricky thing for us. When you gerrymander to increase the number of seats you could win, you necessarily increase the number of seats you can lose. There's no way around that. Gerrymandering for numbers involves drawing districts which have scant majorities of your voters. You spread your voters around so that you can win with thin margins in as many districts as possible.

But doing this means that in a bad year, you lose many of those districts you've drawn to have thin margins. Your deliberately-thin margin of victory turns into a loss.

Does that mean we shouldn't redistrict? No, because control of the House is a very binary thing. It kind of doesn't matter if you lose the House by ten seats or thirty seats. Either way, you have lost the power to bring bills in for a vote, or block them from a vote, and of course Democrats are intensely partisan hive-mind bug people who will all vote in lockstep so even a majority of two seats for the Democrats is a guaranteed majority in every important vote. There are effectively no more swing districts or moderate Congressmen... except on the GOP side.

But given our performance so far, I think it's now guaranteed that we will lose the House by thirty seats, unless something changes bigly, and I don't know what that could be.

Trump has attracted new voters, yes, but these voters... don't really vote.

Meanwhile, a new poll released by the Democrats shows that Ken Paxton is leading shameless RINO traitor John Cornyn.

InteractivePolls @IAPolls2022


TEXAS SENATE GOP PRIMARY POLL

Ken Paxton - 32%
Wesley Hunt - 22%
John Cornyn - 22%
Not sure - 24%
----
Paxton vs Cornyn
Paxton - 44%
Cornyn - 34%
Not sure - 22%
--
Hunt vs Cornyn
Hunt - 45%
Cornyn - 28%
Not sure - 27%
----
Fav-unfav
Hunt: 34-14 (+20)
Paxton: 48-35 (+13)
Cornyn: 29-44 (-15)
----
• PPP for Senate Majority PAC (Dem)
• 12/1-2 | 527 LV

Why did the Democrats release this poll? PPP is a bad polling outfit that pumps out crap polls, so we shouldn't put much stock in this poll either way; but why are the Democrats releasing it? Presumably they want to make trouble and influence the primary vote, but influence it how?

Are they trying to gin up support for Cornyn, the liberal? Or are they trying to depress his voters in the belief that Ken Paxton, the actual conservative, would be easier for Jasmine Ratchet to defeat in the general election?

I don't know. Neither seem like very compelling ops to me.

But Cornyn is claiming the poll is rigged by Democrats to hurt him.

Cornyn has led several recent polls; his campaign adviser Matt Mackowiak said the incumbent senator will win and that "Democrats are desperate to run against fatally flawed homewrecker Ken Paxton and cost the GOP a critically valuable Senate seat and as much as $200M in the general election."

Lauren French, a Senate Majority PAC spokeswoman, called that response "weak, half-hearted spin."

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 12:23 PM Comments



Wednesday Morning Rant

—Joe Mannix

mannixape2.jpg

Cynical Empathy

For a little while now, there has been a new term that keeps cropping up on the internet. That term, which was apparently popularized by Gad Saad, is "suicidal empathy." I think "pathological empathy" is a bit more accurate, but it's more or less the same thing. The "suicidal empathy" concept is that the desire of some - usually leftists, and usually AWFLs - to be "caring" or "compassionate" has become destructive to themselves and the culture.

Cases of rape victims who refuse to describe their attackers when the attacker is a minority because they don't want to accuse a minority of a crime and "contribute to the problem of racism" or somesuch are often pointed out as micro-level examples of "suicidal empathy," as are cases of the parents of children murdered by illegal aliens publicly emphasizing how much they support unchecked migration and the dissolution of borders. At the macro level, examples are usually things like open borders or elimination of prisons. At some point, the desire to "do good" or be one of the "good people" (and not ever a garbage person like those MAGA people!) becomes so destructive as to be fatal. There is some truth to that, at least among individuals.

Continue reading


Posted by Joe Mannix at 11:00 AM Comments



Mid-Morning Art Thread

—CBD

Garofalo Cupid1.jpg

Two Couples with Cupid
Benvenuto Tisi (Garofalo)

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report — 12/3/25

—J.J. Sefton

Good morning kids. Starting off on a positive note, congratulations to Matt Van Epps for winning the TN special election for the state's 7th District, and to the voters who prevented a truly twisted hardcore Leftist, this Aftyn Behn maniac from heading to Congress. Considering the redistricting meshugas in California, we can ill afford to lose any seats that might hand the House back to the Dems as we head towards the midterms, and the second half of Trump 2.0, and of course nationally in 2028.

Moving on, in yesterday's editorial, I questioned why President Trump from time to time throws all kinds of red meat with the blood still dripping from it out there. In that instance it was his contention that the truly horrid Ilhan "BRO-FO" Omar should be stripped of her citizenship and repatriated back to the gaping bedsore of a nation known as Somalia from whence she oozed. No need to rehash my thoughts on this, as I agree with him on this for sure. (reminder not to comment on old threads to avoid accidental banning) And once again, he threw something out there that definitely caused a reaction, intentional on his part or not:

Somali migrants should go home to fix up their own country, President Donald Trump told his cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “They come from hell and they complain and do nothing but bitch” about Americans and America, he said, adding:  “We don’t want them in our country. Let them go back to where they came from and fix it.”

. . .“I don’t want them in our country,” Trump told his cabinet meeting, adding: Their country is no good for a reason. Their country stinks … I can say it about other countries too. We got to, we have to rebuild our country … [Rep.] Ilhan Omar [D-MN] is garbage. She’s garbage. Her friends are garbage. These aren’t people that work. These aren’t people that say, “Let’s go, come on, let’s make this place [Somalia] great.” These are people that do nothing but complain.

Again, I cannot disagree with what the President is saying. But the issue he is skirting around is WHY? What is the reason Somalia stinks? ISLAM, and its Dark Age culture of death and subjugation of those who refuse to submit (which is what Islam mans in English FYI) to it. Mr. President, Bro-Fo Omar did not come here to escape Hell, she and her ilk came here to unleash it on us and transform America and everywhere else they emigrate into Hell.

If you want to throw out red meat, well what I just said is an abattoir primed and ready for you to go to town. Could you not see the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center from the top of Trump Tower? Did you not watch in abject horror what happened at the Munich Olympics in 1972, the Marine Barracks in Beirut 11 years later, and on and on and on.

But that said, there are indeed good and decent people who are desperate to escape the hell of places like Somalia. The estimable and noble Ayaan Hirsi Ali to name but one. The issue was and always has been the proper vetting of people who seek American citizenship and once here the monitoring of them to ensure they become assimilated to the fullest extent possible so as whatever cultural proclivities from their societies of origin cannot ever pose any kind of threat to American society.

Good luck with that, considering there is a very large segment of our own native born citizenry that views this nation as founded as racist and illegitimate in the first place and have been feverishly working to destroy it and seize absolute power to remake it into some other nightmarish hellscape of their own liking. The importation of anti-American, anti-Western ideologies and those who mean us harm in the acquisition of absolute power and control was and is a major weapon in the Leftist arsenal.

As for Islam, all you have to do is peruse the links I have aggregated today alone in that section, not to mention every weekday for nine years now. Be that as it may, arguably the greater threat to the American experiment and our society as we approach our 250th birthday are the native born miscreants and power-mad narcissists with delusions of "Ubermenscheit" who continue to rot at the vitals of our nation.

It's one thing to give Bro-Fo the boot, but how do we neutralize the Newsoms, Pelosis, Randi Weingartens, Ibram X. Krements, Al Sharptons, and all the others like them in our midst?

Okay, I'm done.

Have a good day.

And lastly, a quick shout-out and thank you for your continued support in hitting our tip jar. It truly is appreciated more than you can know.

Continue reading


Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:37 AM Comments

Daily Tech News 3 December 2025

—Pixy Misa

Top Story



Continue reading


Posted by Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM Comments

Tuesday Overnight Open Thread - December 2, 2025 [Doof]

—Open Blogger

doof-alberta-sunset.jpg
Photo credit - Howard in Alberta

Howdy Hordelings! Tuesday night ONT time. Thanks for joining us. What's on your mind tonight?

Continue reading


Posted by Open Blogger at 10:03 PM Comments

Rainy Day Cafe

—Ace

magicalsunset.jpg
Kristen Mae Photography

The Christmas Guardian will save the tree.

Re-post: Baby elephant wants cuddles, does not realize he weighs 300 pounds.

Elephant visits hospital to say goodbye to his dying caregiver.

Puggle cuddle.

CONTENT WARNING (for Duncanthrax): Baby penguin still has his baby feather-fur on his head.

We strike at dawn.

Copykiitten.

Cat capsule hotel.

Man vs. Tiger tug of war.

It's breakfast time, I have commanded.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 07:30 PM Comments

Quick Hits

—Ace

happyholidayssydneysweeney.jpg

@C_3 C_3

20h

There are 42,861 NGOs handling $120 billion in Minnesota per year.

Imagine the fraud.

We're just scratching the surface.


Madonna's got AIDS
on her mind.

madonnaaids.jpg

The criminal dementia patient Joe Biden will be rewarded for advancing the Sexual Left's radical agenda with some kind of Gay Award.

Former President Biden will receive the Chris Abele Impact Award at the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute's Leaders Conference in Washington, D.C., on Friday, and deliver a rare post-presidency speech.

The award for Biden follows "what LGBTQ+ advocates widely view as the most inclusive administration in U.S. history," as the former president had appointed the most LGBTQ+ officials, restored transgender military service, and reinstated and expanded federal protections, The Advocate reported.

It is "rare" for Biden to give a post-presidential speech for the same reason it was rare for him to appear publicly as president: Because he's demented and dying.

But release Trump's MRI, right?

Jim Jordan and congressional Republicans are probing Jack Smith and other government-weaponizers who spied on them.

House and Senate Republicans targeted by former Special Counsel Jack Smith's subpoenas were gearing up for significant oversight of both the Justice Department and the FBI when their phone records were seized.

This raises questions about whether the subpoenas served a dual purpose--to investigate Jan. 6, as Smith was appointed to do, and to keep tabs on the oversight probes into agency conduct, one former representative whose phone records were seized by Smith suggested.

"They were trying to spy on us to see what we were doing," former Rep. Louie Gohmert told the John Solomon Reports podcast. "And also, I think they were looking for anything that they could use to come after us, or hold over our heads, because, you know, you can intimidate the people that are coming after you."

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 06:30 PM Comments

Fascist Government Shows Its Authoritarianism By Responding to Voters' Wishes

—Ace

Kristi Noem says "We don't want them [third world criminal immigrants]."

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Monday delivered one of the strongest border-security demands yet of the Trump administration's second term, urging President Trump to enact a sweeping travel ban on "every damn country" sending violent offenders into the United States. Noem revealed the recommendation in a blistering post on X shortly after meeting with the president, saying the nation can no longer accept foreign nationals who, in her words, are "flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies."

Noem framed the proposal as a necessary break from the failed leniency of the Biden years. "Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat, and the unyielding love of freedom -- not for foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS," she wrote, adding a final line aimed squarely at the countries she argues are exploiting U.S. generosity: "WE DON'T WANT THEM. NOT ONE."

A DHS spokesperson told the New York Post that the department will soon publish the list of countries facing new restrictions.

...

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the State Department halted visa processing for Afghan passport holders, a move intended to prevent additional entry from the same channels that admitted the alleged gunman.

It's not just the terrorists, and it's not just the Somali pirates stealing a billion dollars from us and sending it back home to fund Al-Shaabab terrorism against us.

And it's not just Democrat politicians enabling that massive theft and funding of terrorism for Somali pirate votes.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said Monday that Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz allowed the state's massive COVID-era fraud scandal to fester because he sought political favor from the state's large Somali community.

Walz defended his administration Sunday by claiming Minnesota "attracts criminals" and telling the public not to "demonize" the Somali community, even as he faced questions over more than $1 billion in welfare fraud tied to Somali-linked schemes. Appearing on "The Evening Edit," Jarrett said the question many Minnesotans want answered is simple: Why would Walz allow a massive fraud scheme to flourish?

"So if all of this is true, and I suspect it is, the question is, why would he do it? Well, the answer is he was currying favor with the large Somali community where the fraud was largely happening. He was turning a blind eye for political gain," Jarrett told host Elizabeth MacDonald.

Jarrett said state employees allege more than just simple administrative failure.


It's also incompetent third-world drivers paying for fraudulent commercial drivers licenses to kill us on the highways:

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 05:30 PM Comments

As the Media Insists That It's Illegal To Shoot Missiles at Foreign Terrorist Drug Boats, They Also Claim That It's Okay to Shoot National Guardsmen If You Object to Their Presence

—Ace

At some point, the left will have the shooting war they crave.

Charles C.W. Cooke:

Responding to the news that a crazed asylee from Afghanistan had shot two National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., the New Yorker's Jane Mayer concluded that the attack was "so tragic" and "so unnecessary," before proceeding to identify the real culprit of the abomination: President Donald J. Trump. "These poor guardsmen," wrote Mayer, "should never have been deployed."

In this ugly asseveration, Mayer was swiftly joined by a bunch of other political commentators, each more desperate than the last to train their fire on the current occupant of the White House. In The Atlantic, Juliette Kayyem wrote that "there are costs to performatively deploying members of the military, one of which is the risk of endangering them." On Twitter, the author John Pavlovitz explicitly proposed that "Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are culpable for endangering the National Guard by putting them in harm's way." Not to be outdone, MS NOW's Ken Dilanian followed this path to its revolting terminus by suggesting that the guardsmen were "walking around with uniforms in an American city," that "there are some Americans that might object to that," and "so, apparently, this shooting has happened."

As with Charlie Kirk: The victims brought their murders at the hands of leftists upon themselves.

I'm sorry . . . what? In what possible universe could that be an appropriate response? Washington, D.C., is a federal city over which the federal government has plenary control. If, as has been the case this year, the federal government decides that it is necessary to deploy federal agents to enforce the law, it is permitted to do so without the expectation that those agents will be murdered. Certainly, the American social contract has become more complicated over time than it was back in 1787, but at no point has it come to tolerate the proposition that officials who have been sent to keep the peace should expect to be gunned down by assassins if their deployment is disapproved of by the progressive intellectual class. Politically, one can believe that Donald Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard was a good one, a bad one, or a middling one and that postulate will not change one whit. Whether they are there to pick up trash, fight an alien invasion, or solely to smile for foreign tourists, there is no circumstance in which killing them is appropriate.

Meanwhile, ABC "News" under George Sloppadopoulos and the Gay Model says that the Motive May Never Be Known, but right now we can confidently say that he shot those National Guardsmen not because he is a foreign Islamic terrorist and not becuase he was programmed to kill by a traitor media that justifies the murders of its opponents, but because... of Trump's economy.

He was feeling financial stress you guys.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 04:30 PM Comments

A Week of Ops: Traitor Media That Insisted Biden Was a Cognitively-Gifted "Super-Ager" Continues Pushing the Op That Trump Is Too Old to Serve and Must be Removed by the 25th Amendment

—Ace

Shipwreckedcrew @shipwreckedcrew

Nov 29

Wayyy too much coordination on the new manufactured narrative about Trump showing signs of aging.

Wayyy to much coordination on WaPo story about strike on drug boat.

Does no one remember 2017-2018??

This is a redo -- facts don't matter to media, only narrative matters.

Facts that don't fit the narrative don't get published.

The NYT admitted it as an EXPRESS policy. There was no "neutrality" -- Trump was such a threat to how they wanted the Govt to work that driving him from office what the overriding consideration.

The media and Dems were back on their heels for 9 months.

Now that his approval numbers have been talked down, they think he's vulnerable enough to go after him with falsified reports to drive a narrative.

I've seen this movie -- and I paid attention when the credits ran.

Experts say!

Brian Stelter @brianstelter

The NYT produced a seemingly undeniable report on Trump showing signs of aging. The story was data-driven, almost clinical, proving that Americans see Trump "less than they used to" and that "his battery shows signs of wear."

Trump is trying to deny it anyway.

The data is that Trump usually scheduled his first event of the day at 10:30 am in his first term, but now the average first event starts at 12:08 pm.

Obviously then, based on this seemingly undeniable data-driven almost-clinical evidence, Trump is unfit to serve.

You'll notice that that's Noted Truth Merchant Brian Stelter saying that.

Who claimed Biden was fit as a fiddle and video showing him stumbling and bumbling and wandering and fondling were all "cheap fakes."

The seriously retarded fraud co-conspirator Tim Walz claimed Biden was "fit for office," but now gurgles that Trump must be removed from office due to health.

"Release the MRI," he says.

I'd like to see this fat retard's medical records. He looks pretty unhealthy to me, and his brains are rotten garbage.

So... is any of this true? Is it true that the guy who seems to always be doing something, speaking to reporters, negotiating peace deals, etc., is really running out of energy?

Well no, of course not, it's another fucking traitor media lie.


President Trump has been clocking 12-hour days this month, according to internal White House documents shared exclusively with the New York Post, an unusual disclosure meant to swat down a New York Times storyline that the 79-year-old president is showing "signs of fatigue." The unpublished logs, spanning 10 weekdays between Nov. 12 and Nov. 25, show Trump working roughly 50-hour weeks -- not counting weekend duties, pre-dawn phone calls, or the after-midnight bursts of activity his staff has come to expect. Far from slowing, the records depict a president driving hard on trade and immigration reforms, pushing for an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, and overseeing the most extensive White House construction effort in decades.

The schedule stands in stark contrast to the Biden era that Americans still remember vividly, when the previous president's staff routinely called early-afternoon "lids" and shielded him from public view on days when he appeared visibly drained. Biden, who left office at age 82, was widely understood to be fading cognitively long before he stepped aside -- a reality even many Democrats eventually acknowledged. Trump, by comparison, is presenting a workload more reminiscent of his first year in office, with the private logs showing a relentless pace from morning into late night.

On Wednesday, November 12 -- the day Congress ended the 43-day government shutdown -- aides documented 32 meetings and calls. Trump began with a 10:30 a.m. staff session in the Roosevelt Room and moved straight into a gauntlet of calls with Vice President JD Vance, Staff Secretary Will Scharf, lawmakers, judicial nominees, and business leaders. He ended with a 7:45 p.m. dinner with Wall Street executives, a bill-signing event after 10 p.m., and a late-night meeting with a corporate executive at 10:40 p.m. Notably, none of this includes the off-schedule calls he is known for taking at dawn and well past midnight.

The next day brought another 17 meetings and calls over eight-and-a-half hours. He met with Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Counsel David Warrington at 10:39 a.m., conferred with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, reviewed intelligence, sat for a "pre-brief" with speechwriters, signed an executive order alongside Melania Trump, granted a media interview, spoke with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and joined a 6 p.m. tele-rally for Tennessee congressional candidate Matt Van Epps.

The old op was this: Trump's boundless energy was not a sign of good health, but proof that this famous teetotaler was an amphetamine addict.

I actually was open to the idea he was popping uppers. How else to explain the constant energy? (It also made me feel better about being Low Energy Ace.)

Now that op's usefulness is expired, so the new op: Trump is so tired you guys, seriously you guys, he may work 12-hour days but you can see that sometimes he gets fatigued.

You don't say. You don't say.

Karoline Leavitt is not having it:

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 03:30 PM Comments

Indiana Republicans Unveil New Restricting Map That Could Result in Two More GOP House Members, But It's Unclear if Indiana RINOs Will Pass It

—Ace

RINOs are balking about redistricting because... I don't know why. Because Democrats will be mad at them.

But other Republicans have unveiled their redistricting plan to spit Democrats up so that Indiana's 7 to 2 delegation can become a clean sweep of nine Republicans to zero Democrats.

(If things work out -- there are no guarantees.)

The move comes as President Donald Trump pressures Republicans across the country to redistrict in order to bolster the GOP's chances of holding the House in 2026.

Indiana currently has 7 Republicans and 2 Democrats in Congress. The proposed map would split the current Democratic-leaning districts into the other GOP-leaning districts and divide the blue-leaning urban areas, Politico reported.

It remains unclear whether the legislature will pass the plan, though Trump has urged them to do so.

Ron "The Meatball" DeSantis says he'll call a special legislative session early next year in order to pass a redistricting map for Florida.

"Yeah, so we're going to redistrict," DeSantis told The Floridian on Monday, according to NOTUS.

The governor said that the timing of redrawing the state's congressional map will depend on the results of a voting rights case before the Supreme Court.

The case is regarding the legality of Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which has been interpreted as the enforcement mechanism for the 15th Amendment. The statute allows judicial relief for a voter if they believe their right to vote is being infringed upon on the basis of race.

"The argument in October about Section 2 of the VRA, that impacts Florida's maps, so we're going to do it next spring," DeSantis said. "I am going to talk to [state Senate Majority Leader Ben Albritton] about when it makes sense to do it, but that will be done. I think we are going to be required to do it because of this court decision."

Florida GOP Chairman Evan Power said last month that he expects Republicans to gain three to five House seats under the new redistricting proposal.

Note that DeSantis seems to be saying he must redistrict if the Supreme Court overturns the unconstitional judge-made rule that districts must be drawn on racial grounds. But I don't know if he's saying that if the Supreme Court punts on this issue, he'll redistrict anyway.

In the meantime, we're waiting for results from the special election in Tennessee 7, a +10 Trump district in which an absolute maniac even further to the left than AOC is actually within two points of winning the seat and narrowing the deadly-thin GOP majority still further.

If you're in the district, you must vote. It's critical.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 02:30 PM Comments

New Deep State Op Drops: Pete Heseth Said "Kill Them All" Just Like Colonel Kurtz, and US Planes Fired on Drug Boat Survivors Clinging to the Wreckage Like Heroes

—Ace

I missed this story, but someone I knew who spent the holidays with her liberal family said that CNN is pushing this latest op non-stop.

It has to do with the latest drug boat interdiction-by-missile.

There are two main hoaxes in this latest op. The first is that Pete Hegseth showed that he is a psychopathic dry-drunk unfit to serve by demanding that the military "kill everybody."

The second, pushed by deranged insurrectionist and future court-martial convict Mark Kelly, is that there is video of the survivors of the first missile strike clinging to the wreckage of the drug boat, but then the second missile ordered by Jack T. Ripper, I mean Pete Hegseth, murders them.

Here's the Washington Post -- not edited enough by centrist liberal Bari Weiss -- pushing the hoax, based on highly credible Unnamed Sources.

The Washington Post @washingtonpost

Exclusive: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave an order to "kill everybody" in the first strike on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean. After two men survived, the mission commander ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth's instructions, according to two sources.

Here's the Washington Post op:

Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all As two men clung to a stricken, burning ship targeted by SEAL Team 6, the Joint Special Operations commander followed the defense secretary's order to leave no survivors.

The longer the U.S. surveillance aircraft followed the boat, the more confident intelligence analysts watching from command centers became that the 11 people on board were ferrying drugs.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation. "The order was to kill everybody," one of them said.

A missile screamed off the Trinidad coast, striking the vessel and igniting a blaze from bow to stern. For minutes, commanders watched the boat burning on a live drone feed. As the smoke cleared, they got a jolt: Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck.

The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack -- the opening salvo in the Trump administration's war on suspected drug traffickers in the Western Hemisphere -- ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth's instructions, two people familiar with the matter said. The two men were blown apart in the water.

The article strains to insinuate that the "Kill everyone" order came after the first strike, with the express intent to kill the two alleged survivors clinging to the wreck, while soft-pedaling the actual claims made in this op, that the order came before any missile strikes at all.

There's also no context for the "kill everyone" order, if it was made at all. Here's some context I can imagine: Given resistance leftists and their determination to refuse to carry out "illegal orders" -- that is itself an op -- I can see leftist personnel objecting to the strikes entirely, saying "we should just stop the boats and arrest them" and an annoyed Secretary of War saying, "We have declared war on the narcoterrorists, and we kill people in war. You have your orders, kill everyone attempting to smuggle drugs into the US."

Or something like that.

The fact that this article provides no context for the alleged order strongly suggests that the context, were it supplied, would undermine the narrative being pushed. Propagandists don't leave out context which supports their propaganda messaging, after all.

Hegseth's order, which has not been previously reported, adds another dimension to the campaign against suspected drug traffickers. Some current and former U.S. officials and law-of-war experts have said that the Pentagon's lethal campaign -- which has killed more than 80 people to date -- is unlawful and may expose those most directly involved to future prosecution.

Which is the point of the Democrats' "Refuse to obey the chain of command" op.

And that's further context for the alleged order: Resistance leftists might say "But I am exposing myself to prosecution by AOC and Mark Kelly" and Hegseth might have responded, "You have your orders, you cannot be prosecuted for following a lawful order, I am ordering you to kill everyone on those boats. You have no legal liability."

The alleged traffickers pose no imminent threat of attack against the United States and are not, as the Trump administration has tried to argue, in an "armed conflict" with the U.S., these officials and experts say.

Well, if experts say....

Amazingly, even the New York Times points out that critical context for this alleged order is entirely absent from the hit piece. Even they seem to realize that this is likely yet another op.

The Times also points out that while the Post strains to link the order to the second strike -- they want to claim the second strike was an attempt to fulfill Hegseth's alleged order -- in fact there is no actual connection between the order and the second strike.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 01:15 PM Comments

Surgeons Removed His Cancers and Saved His Life.
He, a "Transgender," Is Now Suing the Doctors for Having Questions About His Fake Gender.

—Ace

The transgender decided to make trouble by secretly recording the medical staff during his surgery so he could hear if the surgeons Failed to Correctly Gender Him when they were saving his life.

They did correctly gender him -- they called him a man, which he was and is and always will be. And at least part of this discussion was medically necessary, because his patient file stated, falsely, that he was a woman, whereas the correct designation was "transgender female." It actually matters whether you're a man or woman for diagnosis and treatment -- for example, if you're a man, you don't need a pregnancy test and the doctors can rule out lots of things that only affect women, or they can deprioritize testing for diseases and syndromes that affect women much more frequently than they do men.

The Times will eventually acknowledge that -- after first ginning up sympathy for this malignant ingrate.

The transgender found that the surgeons and nurses discussing his actual biological sex as they were operating on him and saving his life intolerable, and is now suing because he says that pretending to be a woman makes him feel "pretty" and helps his psychological health, and surgeons and nurses discussing his actual sex made him feel un-pretty.

No, this is serious, this is actually happening.

The trans-crazy NYT gives this attention-seeking mentally-ill narcissist a very, very sympathetic hearing.

As usual, substitute "he" for "she" in this article, and read "woman" as "fake woman."

Jennifer Capasso, a 42-year-old transgender woman, figured there was a good chance she would be dead within 18 months. Since her diagnosis of metastatic rectal cancer, her life had become a succession of treatments and surgeries as more tumors were found. On her liver, and her lungs, and her large intestine, and again on her lungs.

At her apartment in Long Island City, Queens, she read cancer research papers and estimated her chances of survival, updating the odds after each scan, each tumor, each treatment. She tried to remember exactly what her doctors had said, and the tone they had used.

It frustrated her that she was unconscious at the most crucial moments -- as the surgeon removed each cancerous mass. What if the surgeon said something important, a stray comment that no one bothered to tell her about after the anesthesia wore off? She decided to record her next surgery, on March 7, 2022, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the renowned Manhattan hospital.

"I wanted to know what's going on," she recounted. She turned on the audio recorder on her phone before the anesthesia hit. "Knowledge is power."

"I wanted to record TikTok 'misgendering crime' content during my lifesaving surgery so that I could shame and cancel the people who saved my life."

In case you live such a happy and non-mentally-ill life that you didn't know this, transgenders love staging confrontations with normal people they interact with and recording them misgendering them -- "correctly gendering," in reality -- for clout and to cancel the poor normies who struggle to deal with these lunatics.



The surgeon removed part of her lung. She did not get around to playing the recording until a few weeks later. Though the audio was muffled, she could follow some of what the surgical team was saying before the procedure began. Someone was going out for coffee -- did anyone want something from Starbucks? The conversation then shifted.

" -- still has man parts."

It seemed to Ms. Capasso that they were talking about her genitalia.

Actually they were talking about all of the parts of his body, because they're all man parts.

But yes, they were also noting that despite claiming to be a woman and wasting medical resources by demanding a pre-surgery pregnancy test, he still had his dick and balls. He wants the world to make maximum effort to pretend he's a woman while he himself takes minimum effort to actually appear to be a woman.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 12:13 PM Comments

The Morning Rant: Immigration? No Thanks

—CBD

punk-monkey.jpg

At what population density do immigrants retain their original culture, and have the ability to reject the culture of their "adopted" country?

If a small number of immigrants show up in a typical American city, they will be swamped by the tremendous cultural pressure of America. Some of their neighbors might be immigrants, but not from their home country. Their employers might be Americans, their children's teachers will probably be Americans, the advertisements they see, the music they hear, the food they see in most markets, all will be of their new country, or of immigrants from different countries and possibly radically different cultures.

But at some speed and density, the new immigrants will be able to recreate some of the conditions from their origin. If there are 50 people from country X, no ethnic food store will emerge to satisfy their demand for fried crickets or sheep's eyeballs or goat brains or.... But if 10,000 of them descend onto a neighborhood, then the demand can and will be satisfied. And not just food. Clothing, education, music, advertisements, religion, and on and on. Density and speed of the immigration will overwhelm even the power of American culture to assimilate.

And that is what happens when we prioritize a particular people for immigration to America. Somalia on the Mississippi exists because the desire to create a monolithic sub-culture that is insulated from the now defunct "Melting Pot," and can be manipulated for political ends, was far more important than the idyllic vision of vibrant immigrants enriching America while embracing our culture and political philosophy. Dearborn and Paterson exist because we have allowed our political class to create the conditions necessary for a permanent alien presence in America that conveniently votes for them!

That we have allowed these cultures to bring with them savagery, and even worse, an unadulterated contempt for everything that America and American Exceptionalism stands for is trivial to our political elites in comparison to winning the next election.

One of the most important structural changes that made these huge concentrations possible was the creation of the welfare state by the Democrats in the 1960s, ably and vilely led by the execrable Lyndon Baines Johnson. No longer did economics drive the desire to leave the inner city ghettos where most immigrants began their lives in America. Uncle Sugar made sure that they could remain with their fellow immigrants...forever! Section 8 housing, government housing, generous welfare payments, and other massive redistributionist policies allowed oceans of American tax dollars to flow into these areas, so that the voting blocs grew, but their morphing into Americans never happened.

[Crossposted at CutJibNewsletter and X/Twitter]. If you folks who are on X/Twitter would follow us it would be much appreciated!

Posted by CBD at 11:00 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Art Thread

—CBD

Melendez Walnuts1.jpg


Still Life with Oranges and Walnuts

Luis Meléndez

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report — 12/2/25

—J.J. Sefton

WalzWOLTZ.jpg

Good morning kids. As per yesterday's post about President Trump calling for Bro-Fo Omar to be stripped of citizenship and deported, despite being absolutely justified is likely a non-starter for a number of reasons. But that said, one has to ask why President Trump is wont to make these sort of statements. Does he do it just to stir things up, knowing that nothing will ever come of them? It does shine a very bright light on a do-nothing Congress, even if it is controlled by the GOP (I didn't use the term "his party" as it really isn't), and a bureaucracy and judiciary that is controlled by his bitterest enemies. The salient point is that by his making these kind of statements, he puts the issues and the bigger picture out into the broader public discourse and that to me is something that very few if any politicians on our side have ever done. Trump doesn't give a damn about how it looks, so long as he gets a broader point across and that ultimately in the long term if not short term I think will have a salutary effect on our government and society at large.

Just to underscore it, in the words of our friend and friend of the blog the estimable Robert Spencer:

President Donald Trump recently offered yet another devastating characterization of one of the Democrats’ legion of America-Last, far-left politicians. All of Trump’s rhetorical cylinders were firing as he gave us this: The worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc.” The “swaddling hijab” business is a nice little nod to the Christmas season, and while this is Trump at his most acidic, there is no denying any of it. In fact, Ilhan Omar herself has made it clear more than once that she has little but contempt for the land that welcomed her and her family and gave them refuge from her violent, anarchic, war-torn homeland.

And so it goes. Obviously the leftist propaganda press as is their wont and mission will do everything to shield the President's targets and in turn attack him, his allies and agenda. While we must do all we can to be on guard from the foreign born invaders hell bent on taking us down, what in Heaven's name can we do to eradicate the equally lethal, if not more deadly threat, from the enemies within who are not foreign born but whose mindset, beliefs and goals are as devastating as Afghani gunmen or Saudi/Eguptian airplane hijackers. Back to you, Mr. President:


Referring to Holder by the nickname “FAST AND FURIOUS,” invoking the Obama-era gun-running scandal, Trump warned that Holder “emphatically stated, above all else, that Democrats will PACK the Supreme Court of the United States if they get the chance.” According to Trump, Holder supports not just a minor expansion, but an increase to “21 Radical Left Activist Judges,” up from “the heretofore 15 that they were seeking.”

For those who are unaware, and if you've been coming to the Ace of Spades HQ for any length of time, you certainly know what the President is referring to. but for the sake of clarity, "Fast and Furious" was a highly illegal and horrendously evil scheme cooked up by Obama and Holder to run guns into Mexico so that the criminal element there would cause such bloodshed and havoc that Obama and Holder would use the carnage to attempt to whip up public outrage here on this side of the border, and create a groundswell of public opinion to abolish entirely or render ineffective our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

In the event all it did was turn Mexico into a narco-terrorist state and whip up public sentiment in that country against its own eternally corrupt government to do something to try and smash the drug cartels. Just a week or so ago there was a massive protest against the corrupt Claudia Scheinbaum regime in that nation's capital:


TPUSA Frontlines reporter Julio Rojas covered a protest in Mexico City on Thursday in which Mexican citizens denounced the presence of the cartel in their country and the failures of President Claudia Scheinbaum’s administration in sufficiently addressing it.

The protests took place at the Angel of Independence Monument in the Zocalo in the Historic Downtown Neighborhood. According to the US Embassy in Mexico, the march coincided “with the Mexican Revolution Commemorative Military Parade, which begins at 10:00 am at the Zocalo and ends at the Revolution Monument.”

Other actions from the Mexican government are also being criticized in protests that have been ongoing throughout the past week; several of these protests are being attended by younger citizens, rallying against corruption and other “injustices” from the government, leading news outlets to call it a “Gen Z Uprising.”

Elsewhere, and on a more upbeat note:

The most extraordinary thing about the confrontation that wrongly sent Ian Cranston, an unassuming young man in glasses, to prison for a decade, is that there was very little argument over the facts because they’re amply documented and were caught on video.

The prosecution admitted that Cranston was assaulted by Barry Washington Jr: a violent criminal who had been harassing his fiancée. The assault by Washington was severe enough that Cranston looks battered in his booking photo, suffered a brain injury, and had to be taken to the hospital for evaluation.

Before Ian Cranston shot Washington in self-defense, the drunken violent criminal had not only attacked him, but also his fiancée, and had punched another of Cranston’s friends in the nose.

The only reason a case that normally should never have even come to trial not only did, but led to an innocent man being locked up for ten years was due to the deadliest three letter acronym.

BLM.

BLM and Antifa of course are the unofficial/official brownshirt/black mob stormtroopers of the Democrat Left. And considering this case is unfolding in Oregon, which is and has always been a safe haven and a home base for the most violent of Antifa Leftist political terrorists. It is essentially Gaza on the Willamette, If Cranston is exonerated it will be nothing short of a miracle. In any case, this is how vigilante death squads and Star Chambers are born. Add to this the case of Daniel Penny and what was done to him and the families of victims of illegal aliens who went unpunished as well as what’s happening in Britain with the Islamic rape gangs that will one day perhaps soon be coming here . . . and voila, the USA goes third world.

And speaking of all that, across the pond the sun is at long last setting not just on Great Britain but on Civilization itself as this troubling story portends:

The Free Speech Union warns the United Kingdom risks losing “a check on governmental power and arbitrary justice” in “the biggest assault on our liberties in 800 years” if the government is able to push ahead this week with plans said to be looking at abolishing the right to a trial by jury in all but the most serious cases, such as murder, rape, terrorism, and others. For many other criminal cases where defendants face considerable jail time, the chance to have their guilt assessed by their peers hangs in the balance as Justice Secretary David Lammy looks for a cut-cost way to clear a backlog in cases, and the Union warns freedom of expression cases are particularly threatened.

So much for packing the Court, eh Holder? Hell, just do away with trials altogether!!! And as far as all but the most serious cases, they mean the ability to go after the political enemies of the Left and ultimately Islam. Oh there will be courts and trials, all done according to SHARIA law.

And as Bro-Fo, Mamdani and the Afghan assassin in DC show, it's coming here . . FAST and FURIOUS, so to speak.

Have a good day.

And lastly, a quick shout-out and thank you for your continued support in hitting our tip jar. It truly is appreciated more than you can know.

    ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY LINKS

  • Glenn H. Reynolds: Tuesday is a big day for Tennessee, and for the closely divided US House of Representatives.  Democrats have been vowing to turn red states blue, and last month’s elections gave them some hopeful signs, thanks largely to revved-up urban voters. This week a special election in Tennessee’s 7th District, pitting GOP military veteran Matt Van Epps against far-left candidate Aftyn Behn, will show them just how far their base can take them.  Going by conventional wisdom, this should be a walkover for Van Epps: The district leans Republican by 10 percentage points, and Van Epps’ policy positions echo those of the previous incumbent, former Rep. Mark Green, who resigned in July to launch a new business.
    Too-close Tennessee election warns GOP: Damning the left isn’t enough

  • Freedom of speech will be under even greater threat if the British government is able to do away with jury trials for almost all cases because legal studies show a judge sitting alone is far more likely to convict defendants in free speech than juries, the Free Speech Union warns.
    ‘Biggest Assault On Our Liberties in 800 Years’: UK Abolishing Trial by Jury Threatens Freedom of Speech
  • Justice comes for a wrongly convicted victim of BLM and Antifa.
    He Went to Jail for Defending Himself. Now Ian Cranston May Get a Second Chance.

Continue reading


Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:10 AM Comments

Daily Tech News 2 December 2025

—Pixy Misa

Top Story



Continue reading


Posted by Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM Comments

Overnight Open Thread [12/01/2025]

—CBD

MTLafayette25.jpg
[Mount Gilbert du Motier]

That mountain is 5,249 feet high, and it is so short in comparison to the mountains of the western United States that I can't even find it on a ranking list! It's a great hike during the summer, but since it is in the White Mountains, which is smack dab in the middle of weather that originates in Northern Canada, it can be miserable and dangerous any other time of the year.

Interestingly, the top of the mountain is in an Alpine Zone, which means the weather is so crappy that only small plants grow. No trees!

And for you layabouts and slugabeds, unlike Mount Washington, there is no road, so you will have to get off the couch and walk! But it is worth it...the views are wonderful, especially if you like fog and low clouds. Yeah; I would wait for good weather before climbing it.

Continue reading


Posted by CBD at 10:31 PM Comments

Tis the Season Cafe

—Ace

coveredbridgeinautumn.jpg

Dog and deer play together.

Canine Kuato.

As I tell strange women I accost on the street: A goose means love.

Cat realizes there's an additional course available for dinner.

Mama dog just gave birth and she is beaming.

Dog sled.

Adorably incompetent stealth.

Happy horse loves the snow.

Dog plays fetch with himself by a bridge over a stream.

Big dog gets adopted. St. Bernard? Not sure.

Continue reading


Posted by Ace at 07:30 PM Comments






Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton is back with CBD to discuss killing narco-terrorists (we are both for it!), the TN special election, Trump's communication skills, and more!
Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey vows to Somali criminals that he will not cooperate with ICE, then begins speaking in Somali
Gee I wonder why Walz allowed Somali pirates to steal 1 billion in American dollars... could it possibly be that criminal illegal aliens are voting in elections and the Democrats know it and play to that illegal constituency?
Incumbent Senator John Cornyn (RINO - TX) betrayed his party and his country by voting in favor Biden's Afghan resettlement bill in 2021. Cornyn voted to bring in the Afghan who shot two National Guard soldiers on US soil. A vote for Cornyn is an endorsement of importing unvetted, radicalized murderers. [Buck]
Escaped "SlenderMan Stabber" picked up with her "transgender" friend
We're increasingly loose with the word "transgender" aren't we?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland Institute joins CBD for a discussion of their recent polling that shows a majority of 18-39s want socialism, the Epstein files, what will Mamdani do, and more!
Live voting in the House to end the shutdown.
I don't know if this is a preliminary procedural vote or what.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Buck Throckmorton joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the cultural and business shift away from the insanity of EVs and Climate Religion, his calm perspective on last week's election, Tucker is a toad, and more!
Our Favorite British Couple Exploring True America Experiences Flora-Bama And Sees A Side Of The Deep South Rarely Seen. [dri]
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Recent Comments
Archimedes: "Willowed: [i]364 REAL MEN DON'T EAT QUICHE A ..."

Thanatopsis: "Hola ..."

He learned almost too late, that Moron is a feeling creature: "I think the suicidal empathy is more a thing with ..."

Guy Mohawk: "Something bothering me today in the news headlines ..."

ShainS -- The Neo-Jacobins: Anarcho-Terrorism & Assassination Culture Since 1789 [/b][/i][/s][/u]: " "BREAKING: The House Judiciary Committee has subp ..."

Martini Farmer: "Yo ..."

Aetius451AD: "Coryn is getting beat by 'not sure'. That seems li ..."

TheJamesMadison, seeing life through the shadows with Otto Preminger: "362 * Charlie Kirk had literally entered the chats ..."

IllTemperedCur: " Yeah, they all started out in the CCM ghetto as ..."

Doof: "Nood duties performed ..."

Don in SoCo: "Quiche? Yeah, whatever the wife calls it, I don't ..."

Archimedes: "[i]REAL MEN DON'T EAT QUICHE[/i] And yet, real ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives